REVIEW 2 cited by
Can Multimodal Large Language Models Truly Perform Multimodal In-Context Learning?
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Can Multimodal Large Language Models Truly Perform Multimodal In-Context Learning?
read the original abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) with in-context learning (ICL) ability can quickly adapt to a specific context given a few demonstrations (demos). Recently, Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) built upon LLMs have also shown multimodal ICL ability, i.e., responding to queries given a few multimodal demos, including images, queries, and answers. While ICL has been extensively studied on LLMs, its research on MLLMs remains limited. One essential question is whether these MLLMs can truly conduct multimodal ICL, or if only the textual modality is necessary. We investigate this question by examining two primary factors that influence ICL: 1) Demo content, i.e., understanding the influences of demo content in different modalities. 2) Demo selection strategy, i.e., how to select better multimodal demos for improved performance. Experiments revealed that multimodal ICL is predominantly driven by the textual content whereas the visual information in the demos has little influence. Interestingly, visual content is still necessary and useful for selecting demos to increase performance. Motivated by our analysis, we propose a simple yet effective approach, termed Mixed Modality In-Context Example Selection (MMICES), which considers both visual and language modalities when selecting demos. Extensive experiments are conducted to support our findings and verify the improvement brought by our method. Code is available at \url{https://chenxshuo.github.io/m-icl/}.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Why Multimodal In-Context Learning Lags Behind? Unveiling the Inner Mechanisms and Bottlenecks
Multimodal ICL lags text-only ICL in few-shot settings due to weak cross-modal reasoning alignment and unreliable task mapping transfer, with an inference-stage method proposed to strengthen transfer.
-
Online In-Context Distillation for Low-Resource Vision Language Models
Online In-Context Distillation lets small VLMs gain up to 33% performance with as little as 4% teacher annotations by distilling knowledge through dynamic in-context demonstrations at inference.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.