The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 1509.07816 · v3 · pith:7PJA2K5B · submitted 2015-09-25 · astro-ph.CO · gr-qc· hep-ph· hep-th

Constraints on deviations from {Λ}CDM within Horndeski gravity

Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:7PJA2K5Brecord.jsonopen to challenge →

classification astro-ph.CO gr-qchep-phhep-th
keywords lambdagravitycosmologicalhorndeskimodelsconstraintsdeviationsgeneral
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Recent anomalies found in cosmological datasets such as the low multipoles of the Cosmic Microwave Background or the low redshift amplitude and growth of clustering measured by e.g., abundance of galaxy clusters and redshift space distortions in galaxy surveys, have motivated explorations of models beyond standard $\Lambda$CDM. Of particular interest are models where general relativity (GR) is modified on large cosmological scales. Here we consider deviations from $\Lambda$CDM+GR within the context of Horndeski gravity, which is the most general theory of gravity with second derivatives in the equations of motion. We adopt a parametrization in which the four additional Horndeski functions of time $\alpha_i(t)$ are proportional to the cosmological density of dark energy $\Omega_{DE}(t)$. Constraints on this extended parameter space using a suite of state-of-the art cosmological observations are presented for the first time. Although the theory is able to accommodate the low multipoles of the Cosmic Microwave Background and the low amplitude of fluctuations from redshift space distortions, we find no significant tension with $\Lambda$CDM+GR when performing a global fit to recent cosmological data and thus there is no evidence against $\Lambda$CDM+GR from an analysis of the value of the Bayesian evidence ratio of the modified gravity models with respect to $\Lambda$CDM, despite introducing extra parameters. The posterior distribution of these extra parameters that we derive return strong constraints on any possible deviations from $\Lambda$CDM+GR in the context of Horndeski gravity. We illustrate how our results can be applied to a more general frameworks of modified gravity models.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Rotating Black Holes with Primary Scalar Hair: Shadow Signatures in Beyond Horndeski Gravity

    gr-qc 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Rotating black holes with primary scalar hair in beyond Horndeski gravity produce shadows whose diameter increases for negative Q and whose distortion increases for positive Q, with EHT bounds on M87* restricting but ...

  2. How deep can a cosmic void be? Voids-informed theoretical bounds in Galileon gravity

    astro-ph.CO 2026-01 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Galileon models must obey a void-depth limit tied to expansion history to avoid force breakdowns, excluding ~60% of a linear parameterization's space by z less than or equal to 10.

  3. AI--Assisted Exploration: DHOST Theories without Quantum Ghosts

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    In DHOST theories with Gauss-Bonnet and Weyl operators, gauge symmetry invariance conditions are identical to Hamiltonian constraints eliminating ghosts.

  4. Modeling Uncertainties in Modified Gravity Predictions for the Stochastic Gravitational-Wave Background

    astro-ph.CO 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0

    Third-generation gravitational-wave detectors can constrain frequency-dependent beyond-GR waveform modifications in the stochastic background, but modified propagation effects remain degenerate with astrophysical popu...

  5. Constraining dark energy with complementary probes of large-scale structure

    astro-ph.CO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Adding DESI DR1 RSD, DES Y3 3x2pt, and ISW cross-correlations to CMB+BAO+SNe improves FoM for EFTofDE parameters {cB, cM} by 2.69x and for {mu(z), Sigma(z)} by 3.37x, with 2.9 sigma deviation from LambdaCDM similar to...