pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.20804 · v1 · pith:A4GZCOXDnew · submitted 2026-06-18 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA

LEGGOS II: A Strong Lens Model and Source-Plane Projection of the Clumpy Star-Forming Galaxy SGASJ111020.0+645950.8 at z=2.48

Pedram Abedi , Keren Sharon , Taylor A. Hutchison , Matthew B. Bayliss , Michael Florian , Gourav Khullar , Michael D. Gladders , Dylan Berry
show 13 more authors
Catherine Cerny H{\aa}kon Dahle Aleena Ebey Juliana S.M. Karp Keunho Kim James W. Kulp Guillaume Mahler Jane R. Rigby T. Emil Rivera-Thorsen Amritaansh Srivastava Brian Welch Alex Ross Julissa Sarmiento
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 16:22 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA
keywords strong gravitational lensinggalaxy clustersstar-forming galaxiesJWST imaginggravitational magnificationclumpy galaxiescosmic noonlens modeling
0
0 comments X

The pith

A strong lens model for cluster SDSSJ1110+6459 delivers 2-8 times tighter magnification precision for a clumpy galaxy at z=2.48 by using JWST-resolved clumps as constraints.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper builds a strong gravitational lens model for the cluster that magnifies the galaxy SGASJ111020.0+645950.8 into a giant arc. JWST NIRCam imaging resolves over 20 luminous clumps across the multiple images of the arc, and spectroscopy confirms they lie at the same source redshift of 2.481. These clump positions supply dense constraints on the lensing potential even with only four distinct background sources. The resulting model reports a projected mass, Einstein radius, and total magnification for the arc together with per-clump magnification factors that carry fractional uncertainties between 3 and 9 percent.

Core claim

The lens model yields a projected lens mass of M(<250 kpc) = 1.21^{+0.09}_{-0.04} × 10^{14} M_⊙, an Einstein radius of θ_E = 10.8^{+0.3}_{-0.4} arcsec, and a total effective magnification of μ_tot = 24.2^{+3.4}_{-1.2} for the giant arc. Individual clumps show magnifications spanning 4 to 19 with fractional uncertainties σ_μ / |μ_best| of 0.03-0.09, representing a 2-8 times improvement over earlier models.

What carries the argument

Strong gravitational lens model constrained by the positions of four multiply-imaged systems and the high-density set of JWST-resolved clumps within the giant arc.

If this is right

  • The arc receives a total magnification of 24.2 with asymmetric uncertainties of +3.4 and -1.2.
  • Clump magnifications range from 4 to 19 with per-clump fractional uncertainties of 3-9 percent.
  • The model supplies the foundation for source-plane reconstruction of star-forming structures at 10-100 pc scales.
  • Ongoing LEGGOS analyses can now measure galaxy growth and feedback at cosmic noon using these magnification values.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Source-plane sizes and luminosities of the clumps can be recovered with reduced systematic error from uncertain lensing.
  • The same clump-density approach may produce high-precision models for other systems that lack many distinct multiply-imaged sources.
  • Consistent application across the LEGGOS sample would enable direct comparison of intrinsic clump properties at similar redshifts.

Load-bearing premise

The many JWST clumps can be treated as independent constraints on the lensing potential despite originating from only four distinct sources all placed at one source-plane redshift.

What would settle it

Spectroscopy that places any of the edge clumps at a redshift different from 2.481, or new high-resolution imaging that shows predicted multiple-image positions offset from the observed locations by more than the reported uncertainties.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.20804 by Aleena Ebey, Alex Ross, Amritaansh Srivastava, Brian Welch, Catherine Cerny, Dylan Berry, Gourav Khullar, Guillaume Mahler, H{\aa}kon Dahle, James W. Kulp, Jane R. Rigby, Juliana S.M. Karp, Julissa Sarmiento, Keren Sharon, Keunho Kim, Matthew B. Bayliss, Michael D. Gladders, Michael Florian, Pedram Abedi, Taylor A. Hutchison, T. Emil Rivera-Thorsen.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: (Top left) JWST NIRCam color image of SDSS J1110 constructed from F480M (red), F182M (green), and F150W (blue). The critical curve for a source at z = 2.481 is shown in red. Multiply imaged systems used in the lens model are labeled. (Top right) Close-up view of the three images of the primary arc, shown using a color composite of F200W (red), F182M (green), and F115W (blue). The central image (1.1) exhibi… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: JWST/NIRSpec spectroscopy of representative clumps associated with the edge structure, system 1a. (Left) One￾dimensional spectra of five clumps extracted from NIRSpec data. Prominent emission lines are detected at a consistent redshift of z = 2.481, matching the primary arc. (Right) NIRSpec continuum map of the arc with the locations of the extracted clumps overlaid. The consistent redshift across these di… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Red-sequence selection of SDSS J1110 cluster members. Blue stars are spectroscopically confirmed cluster members used to inform the red-sequence fit. The bluer con￾firmed member is suspected to be a jellyfish galaxy falling into the cluster. Cluster members are selected out to 3.5σ in red. etry for this step consistency with previous work (John￾son et al. 2017a; Sharon et al. 2023). Spectroscopically-confi… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Magnification and fractional magnification uncertainty across the image-plane for the best-fit lens model. The background color map shows the fractional uncertainty in magnification, computed from the standard deviation of magnification values across 300 lens models randomly drawn from the posterior distribution and normalized by the magnification of the best-fit model. The color scale is truncated at 0.5 … view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Source-plane projections of SGAS J1110 obtained by ray-tracing each multiply imaged arc through the best-fit lens model. From left to right, the panels show the reconstructions derived from arcs 1.3, 1.1, and 1.2, respectively. Each reconstruction represents an independent mapping of the same background galaxy to the source-plane at z = 2.481. The images are shown as RGB composites constructed from the F20… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Strong gravitational lensing by galaxy clusters combined with the resolution of JWST enables studies of star formation on ~10-100 pc scales in galaxies at z~2-4. As part of the LEnsing and Galaxy Growth: Observing Substructures survey (LEGGOS), we present an updated strong lensing model of the galaxy cluster SDSSJ1110+6459 (z=0.659), which lenses the clumpy star-forming galaxy SGASJ111020.0+645950.8 at z=2.481 into a highly magnified giant arc. Using JWST NIRCam imaging, NIRSpec spectroscopy, and archival HST data, we confirm and refine the identification of four multiply imaged background sources, including one newly identified system, and map over 20 luminous regions between each image of the primary arc. Spectroscopy confirms that several previously ambiguous edge "clumps" belong to the main arc at z=2.481. Despite the limited number of strongly lensed sources in the field, the resulting lens model has high precision, owing to the high density of JWST-resolved clump constraints that tightly probe the lensing potential near the giant arc. The model yields a projected lens mass of $M(<250~\mathrm{kpc}) = 1.21^{+0.09}_{-0.04} \times 10^{14}~M_\odot$, an Einstein radius of $\theta_\mathrm{E} = 10.8^{+0.3}_{-0.4}~\mathrm{arcsec}$, and a total effective magnification of $\mu_\mathrm{tot}=24.2^{+3.4}_{-1.2}$ for the giant arc. Across the arc, individual clump magnifications span $\mu_\mathrm{clump}\sim4-19$, with fractional magnification uncertainties of $\sigma_\mu/|\mu_{\rm best}|\sim0.03-0.09$. We report a $\sim2-8\times$ improvement in magnification precision over previous models. Ongoing and future analyses of this arc will enable robust measurements of star-forming structure, building on the lensing foundation established here for LEGGOS studies of galaxy growth and feedback during cosmic noon.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper presents an updated strong-lensing model of the galaxy cluster SDSS J1110+6459 (z=0.659) that lenses the clumpy galaxy SGAS J111020.0+645950.8 (z=2.481) into a giant arc. Using JWST NIRCam imaging, NIRSpec spectroscopy, and archival HST data, the authors identify four multiply-imaged background sources (one new) and map >20 luminous clumps across the primary arc images. They derive a projected lens mass M(<250 kpc) = 1.21^{+0.09}_{-0.04} × 10^{14} M_⊙, Einstein radius θ_E = 10.8^{+0.3}_{-0.4} arcsec, and total effective magnification μ_tot = 24.2^{+3.4}_{-1.2} for the arc, with individual clump magnifications spanning ~4–19 and fractional uncertainties 0.03–0.09, claiming a 2–8× improvement over prior models due to the high density of JWST-resolved clump constraints.

Significance. If the reported magnification uncertainties are robust, the model supplies a high-precision lensing foundation for resolved studies of star-forming substructure on 10–100 pc scales at z~2.5, directly supporting the LEGGOS survey goals of measuring galaxy growth and feedback during cosmic noon.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract and lens-modeling description] Abstract and lens-modeling description: The headline precision (σ_μ/|μ_best| ~0.03–0.09 and 2–8× improvement) is attributed to treating >20 JWST-resolved clump positions as independent constraints on the lensing potential. With only four distinct multiply-imaged systems, these clumps lie in a single source plane at z=2.481 and share the same deflection field; without explicit modeling of source-plane spatial correlations or a full pixelized source reconstruction, the reported uncertainties on M(<250 kpc), θ_E, and μ_clump risk being artificially tight.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and for identifying this important methodological point regarding the treatment of clump constraints. We respond to the major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and lens-modeling description] Abstract and lens-modeling description: The headline precision (σ_μ/|μ_best| ~0.03–0.09 and 2–8× improvement) is attributed to treating >20 JWST-resolved clump positions as independent constraints on the lensing potential. With only four distinct multiply-imaged systems, these clumps lie in a single source plane at z=2.481 and share the same deflection field; without explicit modeling of source-plane spatial correlations or a full pixelized source reconstruction, the reported uncertainties on M(<250 kpc), θ_E, and μ_clump risk being artificially tight.

    Authors: We thank the referee for raising this subtlety. The four multiply-imaged systems include the primary arc (SGAS J111020.0+645950.8), which we model using >20 distinct luminous clumps whose image-plane positions were independently measured from JWST NIRCam data. These clumps are assigned the same source redshift and share a single lens potential; each clump is treated as a separate point source whose multiple images must map back to a common source-plane location under that potential. The lens-model parameters (including the reported M(<250 kpc), θ_E, and μ values) are sampled via MCMC, with the posterior reflecting the joint constraints from all image positions. While we did not impose explicit source-plane spatial correlations between clumps or perform a pixelized source reconstruction, the position-only approach with multiple knots is standard for cluster-scale models and directly constrains the local deflection field near the arc. The resulting fractional uncertainties (0.03–0.09) are therefore driven by the high density of independent positional measurements rather than by over-counting. We will revise the abstract and Section 3 to clarify the constraint implementation and to note the absence of a full source-plane correlation model. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Standard lens modeling pipeline with no circular derivation steps

full rationale

The paper derives the lens mass M(<250 kpc), Einstein radius θ_E, and magnifications μ from a standard strong-lensing fit to observed image positions and spectroscopic redshifts of four multiply-imaged systems plus >20 clumps. These quantities are direct outputs of the deflection field solved from the constraints; they are not redefined in terms of themselves or obtained by renaming a fitted parameter as a prediction. No self-citation chain, uniqueness theorem, or ansatz is invoked to justify the central results. The high density of clump positions is presented as an empirical advantage of the data, not as a mathematical identity that forces the reported precision. The derivation is therefore self-contained against external image-position benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The lens model rests on standard parametric or free-form assumptions about the cluster mass distribution and the assumption that all identified clumps lie at the same source redshift. No new particles or forces are introduced. Free parameters are the usual lens-model parameters (e.g., halo masses, ellipticities, external shear) fitted to the image positions.

free parameters (1)
  • lens model parameters (halo masses, ellipticities, shear)
    Standard parameters in strong-lensing models that are adjusted to reproduce the observed image positions and redshifts.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption All identified clumps and image systems lie at the same source redshift z=2.481
    Invoked when treating the dense set of clump positions as constraints on a single source plane.
  • standard math Standard thin-lens approximation and parametric or grid-based mass model for the cluster
    Background assumption of all strong-lensing analyses; not derived in the paper.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 6067 in / 1930 out tokens · 47581 ms · 2026-06-26T16:22:58.917862+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

38 extracted references · 35 canonical work pages · 3 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    and Tollerud, Erik J

    Anand, G. S., Mack, J., Avila, R. J., et al. 2025, in The DrizzlePac Handbook, 3 Astropy Collaboration, Robitaille, T. P., Tollerud, E. J., et al. 2013, A&A, 558, A33, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 Astropy Collaboration, Price-Whelan, A. M., Sip˝ ocz, B. M., et al. 2018, AJ, 156, 123, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f Astropy Collaboration, Price-Whelan, A...

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 2025

  2. [2]

    , keywords =

    Bertin, E., & Arnouts, S. 1996, A&AS, 117, 393, doi: 10.1051/aas:1996164

    work page doi:10.1051/aas:1996164 1996

  3. [3]

    Strong LensIng and Cluster Evolution (SLICE) with JWST: Early Results, Lens Models, and High-Redshift Detections

    Cerny, C., Mahler, G., Sharon, K., et al. 2025, Strong LensIng and Cluster Evolution (SLICE) with JWST: Early Results, Lens Models, and High-Redshift Detections. https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.17498 Di Valentino, E., Mena, O., Pan, S., et al. 2021, Classical and Quantum Gravity, 38, 153001, doi: 10.1088/1361-6382/ac086d

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ac086d 2025

  4. [4]

    N., & Edge, A

    Ebeling, H., Stephenson, L. N., & Edge, A. C. 2014, ApJL, 781, L40, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/781/2/L40

    work page doi:10.1088/2041-8205/781/2/l40 2014

  5. [5]

    D., & Yee, H

    Gladders, M. D., & Yee, H. K. C. 2000, AJ, 120, 2148, doi: 10.1086/301557

    work page doi:10.1086/301557 2000

  6. [6]

    A., Koester, B

    Hao, J., McKay, T. A., Koester, B. P., et al. 2010, ApJS, 191, 254, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/191/2/254

    work page doi:10.1088/0067-0049/191/2/254 2010

  7. [7]

    Harris and K

    Harris, C. R., Millman, K. J., van der Walt, S. J., et al. 2020, Nature, 585, 357, doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 2020

  8. [8]

    Hunter, J. D. 2007, Computing in Science & Engineering, 9, 90, doi: 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55

    work page doi:10.1109/mcse.2007.55 2007

  9. [9]

    2025, in American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts, Vol

    Hutchison, T., Khullar, G., Welch, B., et al. 2025, in American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts, Vol. 245, American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts #245, 170.05

    2025

  10. [10]

    A., Welch, B

    Hutchison, T. A., Welch, B. D., Rigby, J. R., et al. 2024, PASP, 136, 044503, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/ad34fd Inc., T. M. 2025, MATLAB version (R2025a), Natick,

    work page doi:10.1088/1538-3873/ad34fd 2024

  11. [11]

    D., Leja, J., Conroy, C., & Speagle, J

    Johnson, B. D., Leja, J., Conroy, C., & Speagle, J. S. 2021, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 254, 22, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/abef67

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.3847/1538-4365/abef67 2021

  12. [12]

    L., Sharon, K., Gladders, M

    Johnson, T. L., Sharon, K., Gladders, M. D., et al. 2017a, The Astrophysical Journal, 843, 78, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa7756

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa7756

  13. [13]

    L., Rigby, J

    Johnson, T. L., Rigby, J. R., Sharon, K., et al. 2017b, ApJL, 843, L21, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aa7516

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aa7516 2041

  14. [14]

    , keywords =

    Jullo, E., & Kneib, J.-P. 2009, MNRAS, 395, 1319, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14654.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14654.x 2009

  15. [15]

    2007, New Journal of Physics, 9, 447, doi: 10.1088/1367-2630/9/12/447

    Jullo, E., Kneib, J.-P., Limousin, M., et al. 2007, New Journal of Physics, 9, 447, doi: 10.1088/1367-2630/9/12/447

    work page doi:10.1088/1367-2630/9/12/447 2007

  16. [16]

    Kamionkowski, M., & Riess, A. G. 2023, Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science, 73, 153, doi: 10.1146/annurev-nucl-111422-024107

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-nucl-111422-024107 2023

  17. [17]

    , keywords =

    Limousin, M., Kneib, J.-P., & Natarajan, P. 2005, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 356, 309, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08449.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08449.x 2005

  18. [18]

    SLICE -- Combining Strong Lensing and X-ray in AC 114. Further Insights into the Merger Scenario

    Limousin, M., Beauchesne, B., Sharon, K., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2512.09512, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2512.09512

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2512.09512 2025

  19. [19]

    R., Ciardi, D

    Livermore, R. C., Jones, T., Richard, J., et al. 2012, MNRAS, 427, 688, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21900.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21900.x 2012

  20. [20]

    2019, Behavior Research Methods, 51, 440, doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-1188-3

    Lorah, J., & Womack, A. 2019, Behavior Research Methods, 51, 440, doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-1188-3

    work page doi:10.3758/s13428-018-1188-3 2019

  21. [21]

    2018, MNRAS, 473, 663, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx1971

    Mahler, G., Richard, J., Cl´ ement, B., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 473, 663, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx1971

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx1971 2018

  22. [22]

    2023, ApJ, 945, 49, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acaea9

    Mahler, G., Jauzac, M., Richard, J., et al. 2023, ApJ, 945, 49, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acaea9

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acaea9 2023

  23. [23]

    2017, MNRAS, 472, 3177, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx2064 21

    Meneghetti, M., Natarajan, P., Coe, D., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 472, 3177, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx2064 21

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx2064 2017

  24. [24]

    Ofek, E. O. 2014, MAAT: MATLAB Astronomy and Astrophysics Toolbox, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1407.005. http://ascl.net/1407.005

    2014

  25. [25]

    2011, MNRAS, 416, 2193, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19197.x

    Oguri, M., Bayliss, M. B., Dahle, H., et al. 2012, MNRAS, 420, 3213, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.20248.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.20248.x 2012

  26. [26]

    Rauscher, B. J. 2024, PASP, 136, 015001, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/ad1b36 Remolina Gonz´ alez, J. D., Sharon, K., Li, N., et al. 2021, ApJ, 910, 146, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abe62a

    work page doi:10.1088/1538-3873/ad1b36 2024

  27. [27]

    R., Johnson, T

    Rigby, J. R., Johnson, T. L., Sharon, K., et al. 2017, ApJ, 843, 79, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa775e

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa775e 2017

  28. [28]

    Detection of Wolf-Rayet stars injecting nitrogen into a low-metallicity, z = 2.37 proto-globular cluster leaking ionizing photons

    Rivera-Thorsen, T. E., Chisholm, J., Welch, B., et al. 2024, Astronomy &; Astrophysics, 690, A269, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202450359

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202450359 2024

  29. [29]

    1985, A&A, 143, 413

    Schneider, P. 1985, A&A, 143, 413

    1985

  30. [30]

    The Annals of Statistics , author =

    Schwarz, G. 1978, The Annals of Statistics, 6, 461 , doi: 10.1214/aos/1176344136

    work page doi:10.1214/aos/1176344136 1978

  31. [31]

    C., Mahler, G., Coe, D., & RELICS: Reionization Lensing Cluster Survey

    Sharon, K., Chen, M. C., Mahler, G., Coe, D., & RELICS: Reionization Lensing Cluster Survey. 2023, ApJS, 264, 15, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/aca7c3

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/aca7c3 2023

  32. [32]

    B., Dahle, H., et al

    Sharon, K., Bayliss, M. B., Dahle, H., et al. 2020, ApJS, 247, 12, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ab5f13

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ab5f13 2020

  33. [33]

    E., et al

    Sharon, K., Mahler, G., Rivera-Thorsen, T. E., et al. 2022, ApJ, 941, 203, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac927a Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory. 2000, SAOImage DS9: A utility for displaying astronomical images in the X11 window environment, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:0003.002. http://ascl.net/0003.002

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac927a 2022

  34. [34]

    Tully, R. B. 2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2305.11950, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2305.11950

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2305.11950 2023

  35. [35]

    and Loiacono, F

    Vanzella, E., Loiacono, F., Bergamini, P., et al. 2023, A&A, 678, A173, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202346981

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202346981 2023

  36. [36]

    Nature Methods 17:261--272, ://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2

    Virtanen, P., Gommers, R., Oliphant, T. E., et al. 2020, Nature Methods, 17, 261, doi: 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2

    work page doi:10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2 2020

  37. [37]

    2022, ApJL, 940, L1, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac9d39

    Welch, B., Coe, D., Zackrisson, E., et al. 2022, ApJL, 940, L1, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac9d39

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac9d39 2022

  38. [38]

    2015, ApJ, 801, 44, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/801/1/44

    Zitrin, A., Fabris, A., Merten, J., et al. 2015, ApJ, 801, 44, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/801/1/44

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/801/1/44 2015