Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

ControlAgent: Automating Control System Design via Novel Integration of LLM Agents and Domain Expertise

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.19811 v1 pith:A4JC7UNV submitted 2024-10-17 eess.SY cs.AIcs.CLcs.LGcs.SYmath.OC

classification eess.SYcs.AIcs.CLcs.LGcs.SYmath.OC
keywords designcontrolcontrolagentagentssystemcontrollerhumanrequirements
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Control system design is a crucial aspect of modern engineering with far-reaching applications across diverse sectors including aerospace, automotive systems, power grids, and robotics. Despite advances made by Large Language Models (LLMs) in various domains, their application in control system design remains limited due to the complexity and specificity of control theory. To bridge this gap, we introduce ControlAgent, a new paradigm that automates control system design via novel integration of LLM agents and control-oriented domain expertise. ControlAgent encodes expert control knowledge and emulates human iterative design processes by gradually tuning controller parameters to meet user-specified requirements for stability, performance, and robustness. ControlAgent integrates multiple collaborative LLM agents, including a central agent responsible for task distribution and task-specific agents dedicated to detailed controller design for various types of systems and requirements. ControlAgent also employs a Python computation agent that performs complex calculations and controller evaluations based on standard design information provided by task-specified LLM agents. Combined with a history and feedback module, the task-specific LLM agents iteratively refine controller parameters based on real-time feedback from prior designs. Overall, ControlAgent mimics the design processes used by (human) practicing engineers, but removes all the human efforts and can be run in a fully automated way to give end-to-end solutions for control system design with user-specified requirements. To validate ControlAgent's effectiveness, we develop ControlEval, an evaluation dataset that comprises 500 control tasks with various specific design goals. The effectiveness of ControlAgent is demonstrated via extensive comparative evaluations between LLM-based and traditional human-involved toolbox-based baselines.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Safety-Gated Agentic Supervisory Control on a Coupled Distillation Benchmark: Regime Map, Auditable Gate, and Co-Design Findings

    eess.SY 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    On a simulated distillation column, an ungated LLM supervisor beats linear MPC at off-nominal target re-planning but is ~10–16x worse at disturbance rejection; a forked-twin safety gate contains failures, yet 534 of 5...

  2. Closed-Loop Control with Rule-Aligned Small Language Models and Multi-Agent Self-Correction

    cs.AI 2026-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A GRPO-aligned Qwen2.5-1.5B multi-agent loop reaches 91.5% expert-action agreement and 95% in-range thermal regulation in randomized first-order simulations at 3.84 s mean latency.

Pith tools