Holographic analysis of near-conformal dynamics and light dilaton

Deog Ki Hong; Jes\'us Cruz Rojas; Matti J\"arvinen; Sang Hui Im

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 2 cited by

Holographic analysis of near-conformal dynamics and light dilaton

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A near-conformal gauge theory has a parametrically light dilaton only when its deep infrared is almost Neumann, and this paper derives the mass formula.

desk verdict A careful, largely self-consistent holographic analysis showing a parametrically light dilaton requires an almost Neumann IR boundary; worth refereeing, but the 'generic IR' claim is stronger than Appendix G proves. read the letter →

arxiv 2504.18623 v2 pith:A7SVIQJE submitted 2025-04-25 hep-ph hep-th

Jesús Cruz Rojas , Deog Ki Hong , Sang Hui Im , Matti Järvinen This is my paper · ORCID

classification hep-phhep-th

keywords near-conformalgaugetheorieslightdilatonpseudo-Nambu-GoldstonebosonholographicQCDwalkingregimeMiranskyscalingEfimovspiralGell-Mann-Oakes-Rennerrelation

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks when a gauge theory sitting just outside the conformal window can produce a parametrically light scalar—the pseudo-Nambu-Goldstone boson of broken scale invariance, called the dilaton—and answers the question in a generic holographic setup. The model contains a scalar field dual to the quark bilinear in a nearly AdS$_5$ geometry, with a small violation of the Breitenlohner–Freedman bound measured by $\nu$, plus a dilaton dual to the gluon operator. The paper's main result is that a light mode exists exactly when the infrared is summarized by an almost-Neumann linear boundary condition, and its mass is $\omega\sim \sqrt{\nu}/r_{\rm IR}$ up to order-one factors. This is shown analytically in a solvable toy model and argued to persist in a more complete model with a running dilaton, with consistency checks from the dilatation Ward identity and the Gell-Mann-Oakes-Renner relation. If correct, the result explains why earlier holographic models disagreed about whether a light dilaton exists.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the linear IR boundary condition $A\xi(r_{\rm IR})+B r_{\rm IR}\xi'(r_{\rm IR})=0$ on the gauge-invariant flavor fluctuation, together with the walking-region solution in terms of Bessel functions, $\xi(r)\propto r^2[\operatorname{Re}J_{i\nu}(\omega r)+c\,\operatorname{Re}Y_{i\nu}(\omega r)]$. Matching this solution to the UV-normalizable mode at $r_{\rm UV}$ and to the IR boundary condition at $r_{\rm IR}$ produces the characteristic equation for $\omega^2 r_{\rm IR}^2$. Its small-$\omega$ form shows that the coefficient of the would-be mass term vanishes only when $A=0$ or $A/B\ll1$, and the resulting formula $\omega^2 r_{\rm IR}^2 = 2\nu\sin\alpha/[\sin(\beta-\alpha)\sin\beta]+O(\nu^2)$ is the quantitative core of the argument. The same boundary condition also organizes the scale hierarchy: $r_{\rm IR}/r_{\rm UV}=e^{(\pi-\beta)/\nu}$, with Miransky scaling $\beta\to0$ for generic parameters and non-Miransky but still exponential scaling in special corners such as $A+2B\simeq0$.

What would settle it

Take one of the explicit, fully backreacted IR-complete actions cited in the paper, compute the scalar two-point function with a nearly Neumann boundary condition at the point where walking stops, and look for a pole with $\omega^2 r_{\rm IR}^2\propto\nu$. Finding no such light pole, or finding an equally light pole with genuinely non-Neumann boundary data, would disprove the central claim; a lattice or functional calculation of a near-conformal gauge theory that sees a light scalar while its infrared data are not of this special type would also do so.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim, stated on the paper's own terms, is that the spectrum of a near-conformal vector-like gauge theory has a parametrically light PNGB dilaton precisely when the IR boundary condition on the gauge-invariant flavor fluctuation $\xi$ is Neumann, $A=0$, or nearly so, $A/B\ll1$. Imposing $A\xi(r_{\rm IR})+B r_{\rm IR}\xi'(r_{\rm IR})=0$ on the walking-region solution and matching to a UV-normalizable mode gives the mass formula $\omega^2 r_{\rm IR}^2 = 2\nu\sin\alpha/[\sin(\beta-\alpha)\sin\beta]+O(\nu^2)$, where $\nu$ measures the small violation of the BF bound, $\alpha$ is the phase of the background flavor field, and $\beta$ encodes the scale separation through $r_{\rm IR}/r_{\rm UV}=e^{(\pi-\beta)/\nu}$. Hence for $\beta=O(1)$ the dilaton mass is $\sim\sqrt{\nu}/r_{\rm IR}$, parametrically below the hadronic scale as $\nu\to0$. The light state is mostly the fluctuation of the quark-bilinear field, not a glueball, and it saturates the anomalous Ward identity of scale symmetry; the pions, meanwhile, satisfy the Gell-Mann-Oakes-Renner relation. The same structure is found in a toy model with analytic solutions and in a more general model with a running dilaton potential, including the Efimov-spiral pattern of the quark mass-condensate plane.

Load-bearing premise

The whole light-dilaton result rests on the assumption that every possible deep-infrared dynamics can be summarized by one linear condition on the quark-bilinear field at a cutoff, with two constant numbers $A$ and $B$; the paper calls this a gross simplification and does not exhibit a concrete infrared model that produces the required almost-Neumann condition.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

A near-conformal theory whose IR dynamics is effectively Neumann has a scalar meson of mass $\sim\sqrt{\nu}/r_{\rm IR}$, parametrically below the dynamical scale when $\beta$ is of order one.
Generic Dirichlet or mixed IR boundary conditions give no parametrically light dilaton, so the presence or absence of the mode is a property of the deep infrared, not of the walking region alone.
In the walking regime the light mode is mainly a quark-bilinear meson, with glueball mixing suppressed, which singles out the flavor sector as the source of the light scalar.
The setup reproduces Miransky scaling $r_{\rm IR}\sim r_{\rm UV}e^{\pi/\nu}$ for typical boundary conditions but also admits exponentially separated scales with different exponents when the boundary parameter is tuned near $A/B=-2$.
With small quark masses the pion sector satisfies $m_\pi^2 f_\pi^2\simeq -2m_q\langle\bar q q\rangle$ independently of the IR boundary conditions, so the chiral and dilatonic sectors decouple in this limit.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The result implies that a generic random scan over IR completions will almost never produce a light dilaton: the Neumann corner is a codimension-one slice of boundary-condition space, so the mode is selected by dynamics, not by proximity to the conformal edge alone.
If the mass formula is taken literally, the dependence $\omega^2\sim\nu/r_{\rm IR}^2$ gives a sharp signature for non-holographic studies: a near-conformal theory tuned toward $\nu\to0$ should show the scalar mass squared vanishing linearly with the BF-bound violation, not quadratically.
One could test the framework by computing, in an explicit fully backreacted IR model cited by the paper, the scalar spectrum as a function of the effective boundary parameter $A/B$; the prediction is that the light pole appears only in the Neumann corner and disappears or turns tachyonic elsewhere.
The Efimov-spiral structure connects the present analysis to discrete self-similarity; if real near-conformal theories share this feature, the quark-mass dependence of the condensate could show oscillatory small-scale structure rather than monotone Miransky behavior.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Two things to know about this paper. First, it is a serious, largely self-consistent bottom-up holographic study of near-conformal dynamics, and it does settle a tension in the literature in a precise way: the existence of a parametrically light dilaton depends on the IR boundary condition, specifically on A/B being small (almost Neumann) in the linear condition A X + B r X' = 0. Second, that conclusion is conditional, and the paper mostly says so, but the introduction's talk of 'model-independent' IR coverage is overstated. The load-bearing step—the assumption that generic IR completions reduce to linear, nearly Neumann boundary conditions for light fluctuations—is argued in Appendix G, not proven.

Where credit is due: the paper goes well beyond the authors' earlier work [11]. It includes a UV RG flow, a toy model with analytic control, a nonzero quark mass with the Efimov spiral, free energy comparison to pick stable vacuum, and Ward identity checks (GMOR, PCDC). The derivations in Sections 2 and 3 hang together; the consistency checks are real evidence, not decoration. The observation that a constant xi = zeta solution gives a zero mode at omega -> 0 and selects the Neumann condition (Sec. 4.3.3) is a nice physical argument that the corner is not empty, though it does not prove natural completions land there.

The soft spots, in proportion. The main concern is not internal inconsistency—I found none in the advertised walking-regime derivation. It is that the walking-region Bessel solution (4.43) is extended to r = r_IR, where walking stops and nonlinearities/backreaction become important, and the boundary condition is imposed there. The stress-test note is right that this can create or remove a small eigenvalue without describing an actual IR model. Appendix G maps a given regular nonlinear background to a linear condition via (G.4), and for fluctuations it asserts—but does not prove—that A/B can be treated as fixed for light modes. So the parametric lightness is proven conditionally, not unconditionally. The paper's own Conclusion asks for an explicit IR completion; that is the honest summary.

Who is this for? Anyone working on holographic near-conformal models, composite Higgs, or dilaton dark matter. A serious referee should get this; I would recommend accept with the expectation that the authors temper the 'generic IR' phrasing and add an explicit check in a concrete IR model (e.g., V-QCD or a tachyon DBI model) that the Neumann corner is actually populated. Even if that check fails for known models, the paper is valuable for having isolated the exact condition.

My verdict: worth refereeing, conditionally; cite it if you work in the area.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. Rojas et al. study holographic models of near-conformal gauge theories slightly outside the conformal window. The bulk contains gravity plus a dilaton field realizing the RG flow and a scalar X dual to \bar q q; the walking regime is characterized by a small imaginary dimension \nu of the quark bilinear. The paper derives the mass of the light scalar fluctuation in Sec. 2.2, obtaining Eq. (2.21): a parametrically light PNGB dilaton appears when the IR boundary condition is almost Neumann (A/B<<1) and the phase \beta is O(1). A fully analytic toy model (Sec. 3) and a UV-completed model with a flowing dilaton (Sec. 4) are presented, with the Efimov spiral, the Wronskian constraint, the GMOR relation, the PCDC relation, and trace-anomaly Ward identities used as checks. The authors conclude that near-conformal models produce a light dilaton only for a special corner of IR boundary conditions, which they argue resolves the tension between earlier holographic results.

Significance. The paper is a carefully executed contribution with several nontrivial analytic consistency checks: the GMOR relation (2.34), the PCDC relation (3.38), the Wronskian constraint (4.29), and the Ward identity (4.69). The toy model is completely solvable, which makes the main assumptions transparent, and the UV-completed model is substantially more general than earlier studies in this class. If the central claim survives scrutiny, it sharpens the condition for a light dilaton to an almost Neumann IR boundary condition and explains why some holographic models do not find one. The principal weakness is that the advertised model independence is stronger than the evidence: the light mode exists only for a corner of the parameterized IR boundary conditions, and the paper does not exhibit an explicit IR completion realizing that corner.

major comments (3)

[§4.3.2 and Appendix G] The light-dilaton result rests on the assumption that generic IR dynamics is captured by the linear boundary condition (4.55) with A/B<<1. The Bessel solution (4.43) is valid only in the walking region r_UV<<r<<r_IR, but it is imposed at r=r_IR, the very scale where walking stops and nonlinearities and backreaction become important; this can create or remove an O(\nu) eigenvalue without describing a concrete IR model. Appendix G maps a regular background to the linear condition via Eq. (G.4), but for fluctuations it only asserts that A and B are fixed numbers for light modes; it does not prove that a natural IR completion yields A/B tending to zero as \nu tends to zero. If A/B is O(1), Eq. (2.20) gives \omega^2 r_IR^2 of order one and the parametric lightness disappears. The paper explicitly acknowledges this gap in the Conclusion, but the introduction's model-independence claim is not supported. This issue should be addressed, for example by explicit IR completions or by a sharper argument bounding A/B.
[§2.2, Eqs. (2.16)–(2.21)] The central formula (2.21) assumes c_UV\simeq 0 in addition to A=0. From the definition (2.19), c_UV is proportional to \xi_UV/[C_2 Re[J_{i\nu}(\omega r_UV)]], and no independent estimate of this ratio is given because the normalization of C_2 is not fixed. Since c_UV enters the numerator of the general expression (2.20), an O(1) value of c_UV would shift the would-be light mass by O(1/r_IR), so the light-mode condition is not yet shown to be robust. A bound such as c_UV=O(\nu), or a direct calculation of c_UV in the toy-model gluing procedure, is needed to make the derivation of Eq. (2.21) airtight.
[§4.2.3, Eqs. (4.32)–(4.34)] In the UV-completed model, the transition between the UV basis (4.15) and the walking basis (4.16) is encoded in the phases \rho_i and coefficients C_i^{(X)}. The light-mode expressions (4.58)–(4.60) and the scaling law (4.23) depend on \rho_2, but the behavior \rho_i\sim\nu is obtained only from the toy model and from an expectation about generic potentials; the text acknowledges that alternatives such as (4.34) are not excluded by the Wronskian identity (4.29). For the claim that the general model reproduces the toy-model light dilaton, this scaling must be derived or explicitly assumed, with the resulting loss of generality stated.

minor comments (6)

[§3.2] The word 'Neunmann' should be 'Neumann' in the two occurrences before Eqs. (3.25) and (3.26).
[§4.4] 'Wroskian' in the paragraph after Eq. (4.69) should be 'Wronskian'.
[Eq. (4.20)] 'tank IR' should read 'tan k_IR' (or the subscript should be attached to the tangent argument).
[§1] In the bulleted list, 'This approximations mean' should be 'These approximations mean'.
[Figure 2 caption] 'expect that for clarity' should be 'except that for clarity'.
[§4.3, below Eq. (4.39)] The redefinition of \hat\xi in terms of \xi, A', and X' is introduced in prose; displaying it as a numbered equation would improve readability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the light-dilaton mass formula is a conditional derivation from the stated walking-regime boundary conditions, not a refitting of the conclusion.

full rationale

The paper's central result, Eq. (2.21), is obtained by solving the linearized fluctuation equation in the walking regime with the explicitly stated IR boundary condition (2.13) and then taking the Neumann limit A=0. This is a genuine conditional derivation: the parametric lightness omega ~ sqrt(nu)/r_IR follows from the equations once A=0 is imposed, and A/B is not fitted to any observable nor is it renamed as a prediction. The paper also explicitly identifies A=0 as a necessary condition for a light mode, so the result is transparently an input-condition statement rather than a hidden restatement of the output. The UV completion is modeled separately, and the IR dynamics is parameterized by boundary conditions with the caveat, acknowledged in the Conclusion and Appendix G, that generic IR completions are expected but not proven to realize nearly Neumann conditions; this is a robustness limitation, not a circular step. Self-citations, including the authors' previous work [11], are used for context and motivation, but the key formulas for the dilaton mass, correlators, Ward identities, and GOR relation are re-derived within this paper. No fitted parameter is relabeled as a prediction, no uniqueness theorem is imported as an external fact to force the choice, and no known result is merely renamed. Therefore the derivation chain is self-contained and no significant circularity is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new particles, forces, or extra dimensions are introduced; the dilaton and pions are standard composite states. The model is defined by an action plus an unspecified IR boundary whose parameters A and B are free. The central light-dilaton result is conditional on the Neumann limit of these boundary parameters, and that limit is not derived from an explicit IR model. No parameters are fitted to external data.

free parameters (4)

IR boundary condition ratio A/B = not fixed; light mode requires A/B << 1 (A=0)
The central result is controlled by this ratio: the PNGB dilaton is parametrically light only for nearly Neumann conditions. The paper treats A/B as a generic input rather than fitting it to data.
nu (imaginary part of IR dimension of quark bilinear) = small (nu << 1)
This parameter controls the walking regime and the scale separation. It is chosen small to realize the near-conformal picture, and it enters the light-dilaton mass formula (2.21) as O(nu) or O(nu^2).
Delta_g (dimension of Tr G^2 at the UV fixed point) = kept in the range 2 < Delta_g < 4
A free parameter in the UV dilaton potential (4.9). The authors claim the main results do not depend on its precise value, so it remains an undetermined model input.
k_IR (IR phase of the flavor field) = typically O(nu), but can be O(1) in special models
In Eq. (4.18) the IR behavior is parameterized through the amplitude X_IR and phase k_IR. These are not determined without a concrete IR model, and their size controls whether Miransky scaling or non-standard scaling is obtained.

assumptions (5)

domain assumption Gauge-gravity duality for a bottom-up Einstein-dilaton plus flavor scalar model
The entire analysis assumes the 5D action (2.1)-(2.2) is a valid holographic dual of a vector-like near-conformal gauge theory. The dictionary is constructed in Appendix A.
domain assumption The walking regime is characterized by Delta_IR = 2 + i nu with nu small
This is the standard Dyson-Schwinger expectation for theories just below the conformal window, stated in Sec. 2.1 and used in Eq. (2.6) and throughout.
ad hoc to paper The IR dynamics can be replaced by a linear boundary condition A X + B r X' = 0 at r_IR
Footnote 3 calls this a gross simplification. Appendix G argues that generic IR completions reduce to such conditions, but no explicit IR model is constructed, and the light-mode result requires the special limit A=0.
ad hoc to paper The walking-region fluctuation solution (4.43) remains valid at r_IR
Sec. 4.3.2 states this is outside the region of validity of the analytic solution and relies on Appendix G to justify extending it to the IR boundary.
standard math Standard asymptotic analysis of Bessel functions and small-nu expansions
The mass formulas and correlators use small-omega and small-nu expansions of Bessel functions, which are standard mathematical tools.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Holographic analysis of near-conformal dynamics and light dilaton." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/A7SVIQJE

@misc{pith2026250418623,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Holographic analysis of near-conformal dynamics and light dilaton},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/A7SVIQJE}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.18623}
}

read the original abstract

We carry out a detailed analysis of the region slightly outside the conformal window of a non-trivial infrared fixed point in a generic bottom-up holographic setup. We focus on models, which study the dynamics of a scalar field, dual to quark degrees of freedom, in a (nearly) AdS geometry. Such models realize the picture expected for vector-like near-conformal theories from Dyson-Schwinger analysis. The analysis covers a toy model, which allows for analytic solutions, and a more general setup as well, which encompass a complete model for the ultraviolet physics. We analyze the conditions for the appearance of a parametrically light scalar state in the spectrum, which can act as a candidate for the Pseudo-Nambu-Goldstone boson arising from breaking of the approximate conformal symmetry. We also present detailed results for the vacuum structure, correlators, and Ward identities in the near-conformal regime.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Light dilaton from top-down holographic confinement with magnetic fluxes
hep-th 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

In a two-flux family of top-down holographic confining theories, the lightest scalar is an approximate dilaton with mass about one tenth of the lightest spin-2 confinement scale, over a wide, untuned region of paramet...
Dilatonic states, phase transitions, and criticality in holography
hep-th 2026-07 accept novelty 3.0 of 10

A review of holographic examples indicating that a light dilaton appears near critical endpoints of first-order zero-temperature phase transitions, with explicit but lower-dimensional demonstrations.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references · 12 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

[11]

Holographic light dilaton at the conformal edge,

J. Cruz Rojas, D. K. Hong, S. H. Im, and M. J¨ arvinen, “Holographic light dilaton at the conformal edge,”JHEP05(2023) 204,arXiv:2302.08112 [hep-ph]

arXiv 2023
[3]

Analysis of techni-dilaton as a dark matter candidate

K.-Y. Choi, D. K. Hong, and S. Matsuzaki, “Analysis of techni-dilaton as a dark matter candidate,”JHEP12(2012) 059,arXiv:1201.4988 [hep-ph]

work page Pith review arXiv 2012
[4]

Very light dilaton and naturally light Higgs boson

D. K. Hong, “Very light dilaton and naturally light Higgs boson,”JHEP02(2018) 102, arXiv:1703.05081 [hep-ph]. 1Note that in the absence of backreaction, the background stays at the IR fixed point for allr≫r UV. – 53 –

work page Pith review arXiv 2018
[5]

Holographic techni-dilaton at 125 GeV,

S. Matsuzaki and K. Yamawaki, “Holographic techni-dilaton at 125 GeV,”Phys. Rev. D86 (2012) 115004,arXiv:1209.2017 [hep-ph]

arXiv 2012
[6]

V-QCD: Spectra, the dilaton and the S-parameter

D. Arean, I. Iatrakis, M. J¨ arvinen, and E. Kiritsis, “V-QCD: Spectra, the dilaton and the S-parameter,”Phys. Lett. B720(2013) 219–223,arXiv:1211.6125 [hep-ph]

work page Pith review arXiv 2013
[7]

Holographic modelling of a light technidilaton,

N. Evans and K. Tuominen, “Holographic modelling of a light technidilaton,”Phys. Rev. D 87no. 8, (2013) 086003,arXiv:1302.4553 [hep-ph]

arXiv 2013
[8]

Gauge/gravity dynamics for composite Higgs models and the top mass,

J. Erdmenger, N. Evans, W. Porod, and K. S. Rigatos, “Gauge/gravity dynamics for composite Higgs models and the top mass,”Phys. Rev. Lett.126no. 7, (2021) 071602, arXiv:2009.10737 [hep-ph]

arXiv 2021
[9]

Gauge/gravity dual dynamics for the strongly coupled sector of composite Higgs models,

J. Erdmenger, N. Evans, W. Porod, and K. S. Rigatos, “Gauge/gravity dual dynamics for the strongly coupled sector of composite Higgs models,”JHEP02(2021) 058, arXiv:2010.10279 [hep-ph]

arXiv 2021

Show all 48 references

[10]

Holographic conformal transition and light scalars,

A. Pomarol, O. Pujolas, and L. Salas, “Holographic conformal transition and light scalars,” JHEP10(2019) 202,arXiv:1905.02653 [hep-th]

2019 arXiv
[12]

Conformality Lost,

D. B. Kaplan, J.-W. Lee, D. T. Son, and M. A. Stephanov, “Conformality Lost,”Phys. Rev. D80(2009) 125005,arXiv:0905.4752 [hep-th]

2009 arXiv
[13]

Walking Dynamics from String Duals,

C. Nunez, I. Papadimitriou, and M. Piai, “Walking Dynamics from String Duals,”Int. J. Mod. Phys. A25(2010) 2837–2865,arXiv:0812.3655 [hep-th]

2010 arXiv
[14]

Light scalars from a compact fifth dimension,

D. Elander and M. Piai, “Light scalars from a compact fifth dimension,”JHEP01(2011) 026,arXiv:1010.1964 [hep-th]

2011 arXiv
[15]

Conformal Phase Transitions at Weak and Strong Coupling,

D. Kutasov, J. Lin, and A. Parnachev, “Conformal Phase Transitions at Weak and Strong Coupling,”Nucl. Phys. B858(2012) 155–195,arXiv:1107.2324 [hep-th]

2012 arXiv
[16]

Glueball Spectrum in a Gauge Theory with Two Dynamical Scales,

L. Anguelova, P. Suranyi, and L. C. R. Wijewardhana, “Glueball Spectrum in a Gauge Theory with Two Dynamical Scales,”JHEP05(2013) 003,arXiv:1212.1176 [hep-th]

2013 arXiv
[17]

Naturally light dilatons from nearly marginal deformations,

E. Megias and O. Pujolas, “Naturally light dilatons from nearly marginal deformations,” JHEP08(2014) 081,arXiv:1401.4998 [hep-th]

2014 arXiv
[18]

A Soft-Wall Dilaton,

P. Cox and T. Gherghetta, “A Soft-Wall Dilaton,”JHEP02(2015) 006,arXiv:1411.1732 [hep-th]

2015 arXiv
[19]

Exploring the conformal transition from above and below,

A. Pomarol and L. Salas, “Exploring the conformal transition from above and below,”JHEP 08(2024) 149,arXiv:2312.08332 [hep-ph]

2024 arXiv
[20]

Calculable mass hierarchies and a light dilaton from gravity duals,

D. Elander and M. Piai, “Calculable mass hierarchies and a light dilaton from gravity duals,”Phys. Lett. B772(2017) 110–114,arXiv:1703.09205 [hep-th]

2017 arXiv
[21]

Glueballs on the Baryonic Branch of Klebanov-Strassler: dimensional deconstruction and a light scalar particle,

D. Elander and M. Piai, “Glueballs on the Baryonic Branch of Klebanov-Strassler: dimensional deconstruction and a light scalar particle,”JHEP06(2017) 003, arXiv:1703.10158 [hep-th]

2017 arXiv
[22]

Coulomb branch of N=4 SYM and dilatonic scions in supergravity,

D. Elander, M. Piai, and J. Roughley, “Coulomb branch of N=4 SYM and dilatonic scions in supergravity,”Phys. Rev. D104no. 4, (2021) 046003,arXiv:2103.06721 [hep-th]

2021 arXiv
[23]

Light dilaton near critical points in top-down holography,

D. Elander, A. F. Faedo, M. Piai, R. Rodgers, and J. G. Subils, “Light dilaton near critical points in top-down holography,”arXiv:2502.19226 [hep-th]. – 54 –
[24]

Conformal phase transition in gauge theories,

V. A. Miransky and K. Yamawaki, “Conformal phase transition in gauge theories,”Phys. Rev. D55(1997) 5051–5066,arXiv:hep-th/9611142. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 56, 3768 (1997)]

1997 arXiv
[25]

Holographic Conformal Window - A Bottom Up Approach,

M. Jarvinen and F. Sannino, “Holographic Conformal Window - A Bottom Up Approach,” JHEP05(2010) 041,arXiv:0911.2462 [hep-ph]

2010 arXiv
[26]

Holographic Models for QCD in the Veneziano Limit,

M. Jarvinen and E. Kiritsis, “Holographic Models for QCD in the Veneziano Limit,”JHEP 03(2012) 002,arXiv:1112.1261 [hep-ph]

2012 arXiv
[27]

Holography of the Conformal Window,

R. Alvares, N. Evans, and K.-Y. Kim, “Holography of the Conformal Window,”Phys. Rev. D86(2012) 026008,arXiv:1204.2474 [hep-ph]

2012 arXiv
[28]

The discontinuities of conformal transitions and mass spectra of V-QCD,

D. Are´ an, I. Iatrakis, M. J¨ arvinen, and E. Kiritsis, “The discontinuities of conformal transitions and mass spectra of V-QCD,”JHEP11(2013) 068,arXiv:1309.2286 [hep-ph]

2013 arXiv
[29]

Composite Higgs model at a conformal fixed point,

R. C. Brower, A. Hasenfratz, C. Rebbi, E. Weinberg, and O. Witzel, “Composite Higgs model at a conformal fixed point,”Phys. Rev. D93no. 7, (2016) 075028,arXiv:1512.02576 [hep-ph]. [30]LatKMICollaboration, Y. Aokiet al., “Light flavor-singlet scalars and walking signals in Nf =...

2016 arXiv
[32]

Chiral dynamics from AdS space,

N. J. Evans and J. P. Shock, “Chiral dynamics from AdS space,”Phys. Rev. D70(2004) 046002,arXiv:hep-th/0403279

2004 arXiv
[33]

Low energy hadron physics in holographic QCD,

T. Sakai and S. Sugimoto, “Low energy hadron physics in holographic QCD,”Prog. Theor. Phys.113(2005) 843–882,arXiv:hep-th/0412141

2005 arXiv
[34]

Quark mass and condensate in HQCD,

O. Bergman, S. Seki, and J. Sonnenschein, “Quark mass and condensate in HQCD,”JHEP 12(2007) 037,arXiv:0708.2839 [hep-th]

2007 arXiv
[35]

QCD and a holographic model of hadrons,

J. Erlich, E. Katz, D. T. Son, and M. A. Stephanov, “QCD and a holographic model of hadrons,”Phys. Rev. Lett.95(2005) 261602,arXiv:hep-ph/0501128

2005 arXiv
[36]

Massive holographic QCD in the Veneziano limit,

M. Jarvinen, “Massive holographic QCD in the Veneziano limit,”JHEP07(2015) 033, arXiv:1501.07272 [hep-ph]

2015 arXiv
[37]

Semi-local quantum liquids,

N. Iqbal, H. Liu, and M. Mezei, “Semi-local quantum liquids,”JHEP04(2012) 086, arXiv:1105.4621 [hep-th]

2012 arXiv
[38]

Energy levels arising form the resonant two-body forces in a three-body system,

V. Efimov, “Energy levels arising form the resonant two-body forces in a three-body system,”Phys. Lett. B33(1970) 563–564

1970
[39]

Quantum phase transitions in semilocal quantum liquids,

N. Iqbal, H. Liu, and M. Mezei, “Quantum phase transitions in semilocal quantum liquids,” Phys. Rev. D91no. 2, (2015) 025024,arXiv:1108.0425 [hep-th]

2015 arXiv
[40]

CP-odd sector andθdynamics in holographic QCD,

D. Arean, I. Iatrakis, M. Jarvinen, and E. Kiritsis, “CP-odd sector andθdynamics in holographic QCD,”Phys. Rev. D96no. 2, (2017) 026001,arXiv:1609.08922 [hep-ph]

2017 arXiv
[41]

Holographic Gauged NJL Model: the Conformal Window and Ideal Walking,

K. Bitaghsir Fadafan, W. Clemens, and N. Evans, “Holographic Gauged NJL Model: the Conformal Window and Ideal Walking,”Phys. Rev. D98no. 6, (2018) 066015, arXiv:1807.04548 [hep-ph]. – 55 –

2018 arXiv
[42]

Dynamic scale anomalous transport in QCD with electromagnetic background,

M. Kawaguchi, S. Matsuzaki, and X.-G. Huang, “Dynamic scale anomalous transport in QCD with electromagnetic background,”JHEP10(2020) 017,arXiv:2007.00915 [hep-ph]

2020 arXiv
[43]

Chiral Symmetry Breaking and Nonperturbative Scale Anomaly in Gauge Field Theories,

V. A. Miransky and V. P. Gusynin, “Chiral Symmetry Breaking and Nonperturbative Scale Anomaly in Gauge Field Theories,”Prog. Theor. Phys.81(1989) 426–450

1989
[44]

Exploring improved holographic theories for QCD: Part I,

U. Gursoy and E. Kiritsis, “Exploring improved holographic theories for QCD: Part I,” JHEP02(2008) 032,arXiv:0707.1324 [hep-th]

2008 arXiv
[45]

Exploring improved holographic theories for QCD: Part II,

U. Gursoy, E. Kiritsis, and F. Nitti, “Exploring improved holographic theories for QCD: Part II,”JHEP02(2008) 019,arXiv:0707.1349 [hep-th]

2008 arXiv
[46]

Mimicking the QCD equation of state with a dual black hole,

S. S. Gubser and A. Nellore, “Mimicking the QCD equation of state with a dual black hole,” Phys. Rev. D78(2008) 086007,arXiv:0804.0434 [hep-th]

2008 arXiv
[47]

On massless 4D gravitons from asymptotically AdS(5) space-times,

E. Kiritsis and F. Nitti, “On massless 4D gravitons from asymptotically AdS(5) space-times,”Nucl. Phys. B772(2007) 67–102,arXiv:hep-th/0611344

2007 arXiv
[48]

Mass spectrum of gapped, non-confining theories with multi-scale dynamics,

D. Elander, A. F. Faedo, D. Mateos, D. Pravos, and J. G. Subils, “Mass spectrum of gapped, non-confining theories with multi-scale dynamics,”JHEP05(2019) 175,arXiv:1810.04656 [hep-th]

2019 arXiv
[49]

Holographic Walking from Tachyon DBI,

D. Kutasov, J. Lin, and A. Parnachev, “Holographic Walking from Tachyon DBI,”Nucl. Phys. B863(2012) 361–397,arXiv:1201.4123 [hep-th]

2012 arXiv
[50]

Exact identification of the radion and its coupling to the observable sector,

L. Kofman, J. Martin, and M. Peloso, “Exact identification of the radion and its coupling to the observable sector,”Phys. Rev. D70(2004) 085015,arXiv:hep-ph/0401189

2004 arXiv
[51]

AdS / CFT correspondence and geometry,

I. Papadimitriou and K. Skenderis, “AdS / CFT correspondence and geometry,”IRMA Lect. Math. Theor. Phys.8(2005) 73–101,arXiv:hep-th/0404176

2005 arXiv
[52]

Holographic Renormalization of general dilaton-axion gravity,

I. Papadimitriou, “Holographic Renormalization of general dilaton-axion gravity,”JHEP08 (2011) 119,arXiv:1106.4826 [hep-th]. – 56 –

2011 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [11]

Holographic light dilaton at the conformal edge,

J. Cruz Rojas, D. K. Hong, S. H. Im, and M. J¨ arvinen, “Holographic light dilaton at the conformal edge,”JHEP05(2023) 204,arXiv:2302.08112 [hep-ph]

arXiv 2023

[2] [3]

Analysis of techni-dilaton as a dark matter candidate

K.-Y. Choi, D. K. Hong, and S. Matsuzaki, “Analysis of techni-dilaton as a dark matter candidate,”JHEP12(2012) 059,arXiv:1201.4988 [hep-ph]

work page Pith review arXiv 2012

[3] [4]

Very light dilaton and naturally light Higgs boson

D. K. Hong, “Very light dilaton and naturally light Higgs boson,”JHEP02(2018) 102, arXiv:1703.05081 [hep-ph]. 1Note that in the absence of backreaction, the background stays at the IR fixed point for allr≫r UV. – 53 –

work page Pith review arXiv 2018

[4] [5]

Holographic techni-dilaton at 125 GeV,

S. Matsuzaki and K. Yamawaki, “Holographic techni-dilaton at 125 GeV,”Phys. Rev. D86 (2012) 115004,arXiv:1209.2017 [hep-ph]

arXiv 2012

[5] [6]

V-QCD: Spectra, the dilaton and the S-parameter

D. Arean, I. Iatrakis, M. J¨ arvinen, and E. Kiritsis, “V-QCD: Spectra, the dilaton and the S-parameter,”Phys. Lett. B720(2013) 219–223,arXiv:1211.6125 [hep-ph]

work page Pith review arXiv 2013

[6] [7]

Holographic modelling of a light technidilaton,

N. Evans and K. Tuominen, “Holographic modelling of a light technidilaton,”Phys. Rev. D 87no. 8, (2013) 086003,arXiv:1302.4553 [hep-ph]

arXiv 2013

[7] [8]

Gauge/gravity dynamics for composite Higgs models and the top mass,

J. Erdmenger, N. Evans, W. Porod, and K. S. Rigatos, “Gauge/gravity dynamics for composite Higgs models and the top mass,”Phys. Rev. Lett.126no. 7, (2021) 071602, arXiv:2009.10737 [hep-ph]

arXiv 2021

[8] [9]

Gauge/gravity dual dynamics for the strongly coupled sector of composite Higgs models,

J. Erdmenger, N. Evans, W. Porod, and K. S. Rigatos, “Gauge/gravity dual dynamics for the strongly coupled sector of composite Higgs models,”JHEP02(2021) 058, arXiv:2010.10279 [hep-ph]

arXiv 2021