REVIEW 1 cited by
Action Dynamics Task Graphs for Learning Plannable Representations of Procedural Tasks
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Action Dynamics Task Graphs for Learning Plannable Representations of Procedural Tasks
read the original abstract
Given video demonstrations and paired narrations of an at-home procedural task such as changing a tire, we present an approach to extract the underlying task structure -- relevant actions and their temporal dependencies -- via action-centric task graphs. Learnt structured representations from our method, Action Dynamics Task Graphs (ADTG), can then be used for understanding such tasks in unseen videos of humans performing them. Furthermore, ADTG can enable providing user-centric guidance to humans in these tasks, either for performing them better or for learning new tasks. Specifically, we show how ADTG can be used for: (1) tracking an ongoing task, (2) recommending next actions, and (3) planning a sequence of actions to accomplish a procedural task. We compare against state-of-the-art Neural Task Graph method and demonstrate substantial gains on 18 procedural tasks from the CrossTask dataset, including 30.1% improvement in task tracking accuracy and 20.3% accuracy gain in next action prediction.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
The N-Body Problem: Parallel Execution from Single-Person Egocentric Video
Structured prompting for a VLM, fed with ground-truth spatial zone schedules, can generate more feasible multi-agent parallel executions from single-person egocentric videos.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.