Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Towards Explainability in Monocular Depth Estimation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2310.16457 v1 pith:B7NT2LOA submitted 2023-10-25 cs.CV cs.AIcs.LG

Towards Explainability in Monocular Depth Estimation

classification cs.CV cs.AIcs.LG
keywords depthmethodsestimationexplainabilitymonocularaccuracybeencues
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

The estimation of depth in two-dimensional images has long been a challenging and extensively studied subject in computer vision. Recently, significant progress has been made with the emergence of Deep Learning-based approaches, which have proven highly successful. This paper focuses on the explainability in monocular depth estimation methods, in terms of how humans perceive depth. This preliminary study emphasizes on one of the most significant visual cues, the relative size, which is prominent in almost all viewed images. We designed a specific experiment to mimic the experiments in humans and have tested state-of-the-art methods to indirectly assess the explainability in the context defined. In addition, we observed that measuring the accuracy required further attention and a particular approach is proposed to this end. The results show that a mean accuracy of around 77% across methods is achieved, with some of the methods performing markedly better, thus, indirectly revealing their corresponding potential to uncover monocular depth cues, like relative size.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.