Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Privacy Policy Analysis through Prompt Engineering for LLMs

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2409.14879 v1 pith:BAYQLJSE submitted 2024-09-23 cs.CL cs.CYcs.SE

Privacy Policy Analysis through Prompt Engineering for LLMs

classification cs.CL cs.CYcs.SE
keywords privacyanalysisllmspapelpoliciesmodelspromptannotation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Privacy policies are often obfuscated by their complexity, which impedes transparency and informed consent. Conventional machine learning approaches for automatically analyzing these policies demand significant resources and substantial domain-specific training, causing adaptability issues. Moreover, they depend on extensive datasets that may require regular maintenance due to changing privacy concerns. In this paper, we propose, apply, and assess PAPEL (Privacy Policy Analysis through Prompt Engineering for LLMs), a framework harnessing the power of Large Language Models (LLMs) through prompt engineering to automate the analysis of privacy policies. PAPEL aims to streamline the extraction, annotation, and summarization of information from these policies, enhancing their accessibility and comprehensibility without requiring additional model training. By integrating zero-shot, one-shot, and few-shot learning approaches and the chain-of-thought prompting in creating predefined prompts and prompt templates, PAPEL guides LLMs to efficiently dissect, interpret, and synthesize the critical aspects of privacy policies into user-friendly summaries. We demonstrate the effectiveness of PAPEL with two applications: (i) annotation and (ii) contradiction analysis. We assess the ability of several LLaMa and GPT models to identify and articulate data handling practices, offering insights comparable to existing automated analysis approaches while reducing training efforts and increasing the adaptability to new analytical needs. The experiments demonstrate that the LLMs PAPEL utilizes (LLaMA and Chat GPT models) achieve robust performance in privacy policy annotation, with F1 scores reaching 0.8 and above (using the OPP-115 gold standard), underscoring the effectiveness of simpler prompts across various advanced language models.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Disclosure Divergence: Measuring Privacy Policy and Data Safety Misalignment at Scale

    cs.CR 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    Privacy policies and Google Play Data Safety labels disagree for about one in three data-category disclosures across 6,051 apps, with sharing and sensitive categories the most affected.

  2. Overcoming Language Barriers: Multilingual Analysis of the 2023 Swiss Privacy Law's Impact

    cs.CL 2025-10 conditional novelty 6.0

    Switzerland's 2023 GDPR-style privacy law revision is associated with higher disclosure rates in Swiss privacy policies, and automated policy generators are associated with up to 15 p.p. more disclosures.