Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

AI Generated Text Detection Using Instruction Fine-tuned Large Language and Transformer-Based Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2507.05157 v1 pith:BDB3XOQM submitted 2025-07-07 cs.CL cs.AI

AI Generated Text Detection Using Instruction Fine-tuned Large Language and Transformer-Based Models

classification cs.CL cs.AI
keywords textmodelcontentgeneratedlanguagelargeattemptsbeen
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) possess an extraordinary capability to produce text that is not only coherent and contextually relevant but also strikingly similar to human writing. They adapt to various styles and genres, producing content that is both grammatically correct and semantically meaningful. Recently, LLMs have been misused to create highly realistic phishing emails, spread fake news, generate code to automate cyber crime, and write fraudulent scientific articles. Additionally, in many real-world applications, the generated content including style and topic and the generator model are not known beforehand. The increasing prevalence and sophistication of artificial intelligence (AI)-generated texts have made their detection progressively more challenging. Various attempts have been made to distinguish machine-generated text from human-authored content using linguistic, statistical, machine learning, and ensemble-based approaches. This work focuses on two primary objectives Task-A, which involves distinguishing human-written text from machine-generated text, and Task-B, which attempts to identify the specific LLM model responsible for the generation. Both of these tasks are based on fine tuning of Generative Pre-trained Transformer (GPT_4o-mini), Large Language Model Meta AI (LLaMA) 3 8B, and Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT). The fine-tuned version of GPT_4o-mini and the BERT model has achieved accuracies of 0.9547 for Task-A and 0.4698 for Task-B.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Black-Box Forensics for Conversational LLM Agents

    cs.CR 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Empirical study reporting 98% base-model attribution accuracy and cross-encoder fingerprinting of unseen system prompts (AUC 0.768 single-conversation, 0.943 with 50 conversations) in black-box LLM agents.

  2. Findings of the Counter Turing Test: AI-Generated Text Detection

    cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    Shared task findings show F1=1.0000 for binary AI text detection and 0.9531 for model attribution using fine-tuned DeBERTa and BART transformers with ensembles.

  3. Findings of the Counter Turing Test: AI-Generated Text Detection

    cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    Shared task findings show near-perfect binary detection of AI-generated text but greater difficulty in attributing outputs to particular language models.