Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 minor 10 cited by

This review argues that strongly dipolar molecular Bose-Einstein condensates will reach interaction strengths where the standard mean-field description of quantum gases breaks down, and it identifies the shielding limits and many-body phase

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-03 16:01 UTC pith:BHG573VI

load-bearing objection A useful, honest roadmap for molecular BECs: the central claims are hedged where needed, and the paper deserves a serious referee despite being mostly synthesis.

arxiv 2512.14511 v3 pith:BHG573VI submitted 2025-12-16 cond-mat.quant-gas physics.atom-phquant-ph

Strongly dipolar molecular Bose-Einstein condensates: From few- to many-body physics

Andreas Schindewolf , Jens Hertkorn , Ian Stevenson , Matteo Ciardi , Phillip Gross , Dajun Wang , Tijs Karman , Goulven Quemener
show 3 more authors
Sebastian Will Thomas Pohl Tim Langen
This is my paper
classification cond-mat.quant-gas physics.atom-phquant-ph
keywords strongly dipolar Bose-Einstein condensatesmicrowave shieldingfield-linked statesthree-body recombinationbeyond mean-field theoryquantum dropletssupersolidspath integral Monte Carlo
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper argues that the first molecular Bose-Einstein condensates are entering a regime of dipolar interaction strength where the standard mean-field description — the extended Gross-Pitaevskii equation with leading-order quantum fluctuations — stops being reliable. At the large values of εdd accessible to strongly dipolar molecules, the fluctuation correction gains a significant imaginary part, meaning the theory becomes internally inconsistent and needs a self-consistent, beyond-LHY treatment. On the experimental side, the paper maps which molecular species and shielding schemes can produce stable condensates, concluding that double microwave shielding is essential and that the practical limit on the effective dipole moment of bosonic molecules is about 1 Debye before field-linked states cause three-body losses. It also collects recent Quantum Monte Carlo predictions that strongly dipolar molecular layers should form self-bound droplets, transform into superfluid membranes, and eventually crystallize, offering a path toward states of matter that atomic dipolar gases cannot reach.

Core claim

Molecular condensates with stronger dipole-dipole interactions reach larger values of εdd for which the imaginary part of the quantum-fluctuation coefficient γqf becomes significant and even comparable to its real part. Resolving this requires an improved theoretical framework for dilute but highly dipolar condensates, with self-consistent inclusion of quantum fluctuations beyond leading-order LHY corrections. On the collisional side, the paper establishes that double microwave shielding suppresses both two-body inelastic collisions and three-body recombination, enabling stable BECs, and that the absence of field-linked bound states sets a practical ceiling of roughly 1 D for the effective d

What carries the argument

The central object is the relative dipolar strength εdd = add/as, the ratio of the dipolar length to the s-wave scattering length. The paper analyzes the extended Gross-Pitaevskii equation with the Lee-Huang-Yang quantum-fluctuation term γqf|ψ|^3 and shows when the imaginary part of γqf becomes significant. On the collisional side, the key machinery is the effective interaction potential for double microwave shielding, written as a sum of C6/r6 and C3/r3 terms, and the concept of field-linked bound states that define stability windows. Quantum Monte Carlo path-integral simulations using the full interaction potentials provide benchmark phase boundaries and predict exotic equilibrium phases.

Load-bearing premise

The roadmap assumes that in the double-microwave-shielded 'stable window' where field-linked states are absent, three-body recombination remains negligible and two-body inelastic processes dominate; the paper explicitly leaves the role of three-body collisions without field-linked states open.

What would settle it

Measure the three-body loss coefficient of a double-MW-shielded bosonic molecule such as NaCs across its predicted stable window; if loss scales with density cubed or remains substantial when field-linked states are absent, the assumption of two-body-dominated loss fails. Alternatively, compute the droplet phase boundary at large εdd with a self-consistent beyond-LHY theory and compare with the Quantum Monte Carlo boundary: if the imaginary part of γqf does not materially change the predictions, the claimed breakdown of mean-field theory is not confirmed.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • At large εdd, the extended Gross-Pitaevskii equation with leading-order LHY corrections cannot be trusted, so future theory must include self-consistent quantum fluctuations, changing predicted droplet and supersolid phase diagrams.
  • Double microwave shielding, which cancels the long-range dipolar tail while retaining a repulsive barrier, is the enabling technique for stable molecular BECs and provides wide tunability of interactions, including zero crossings of the scattering length.
  • The roughly 1 D effective-dipole ceiling means that molecules with larger permanent dipoles require double MW shielding or alternative schemes to avoid field-linked-state losses in three dimensions.
  • Quantum Monte Carlo simulations predict a sequence of self-bound droplets, superfluid membranes, and self-bound monolayer crystals for anti-dipolar dressed molecules, giving concrete experimental targets.
  • Stronger dipolar interactions lower the particle number needed to observe structural transitions in supersolids, so small molecular BECs of a few hundred to a few thousand molecules can explore physics that atomic dipolar gases require about 10^5 particles to reach.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the 1 D shielding limit is robust, the most polar candidate species with permanent dipole moments around 8–10 D will not reach their full dipolar strength in a stable 3D BEC; their exotic phases may only be accessible in reduced dimensions or with new shielding concepts.
  • The quantitative spread among recent droplet phase-boundary calculations suggests that droplet formation measurements can serve as a discriminating testbed among beyond-mean-field theories.
  • The predicted superfluid-membrane-to-crystal transition could be probed by measuring the superfluid fraction or excitation spectrum of a confined molecular layer across increasing interaction strength.
  • If three-body losses are truly negligible without field-linked states, evaporative cooling efficiency becomes the main bottleneck, implying that molecular BECs above 10^4 molecules are within reach by improving evaporation to atomic-level efficiencies.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a forward-looking review and roadmap for strongly dipolar molecular Bose–Einstein condensates. It covers few-body physics (long-range interactions, static-field and microwave shielding, double-MW shielding, field-linked resonances, three-body collisions), then many-body theory (effective two-body interactions, eGPE, LHY quantum fluctuations, mean-field stability, droplets/supersolids, and recent QMC results), and finally the experimental path to molecular BECs, including shielding implementation, probing, and routes to larger condensates. The central claims are that molecular BECs can reach dipole strengths at which the leading-order LHY/eGPE framework fails (Sec. III.E), that a practical effective-dipole ceiling near 1 D exists for stable bosonic shielding (Sec. II.E, Table I), and that strongly dipolar molecular systems may realize phases such as the QMC-predicted droplet → superfluid-membrane → monolayer-crystal sequence (Sec. III.F, Fig. 7).

Significance. If the roadmap is realized, this is a significant contribution to dipolar quantum gases: it connects recent experimental breakthroughs—NaCs and NaRb molecular BECs—with quantitative species comparisons, stability windows, and beyond-mean-field theory, and it identifies concrete open problems. The paper's honesty is a genuine strength: the imaginary-γqf issue, the factor-of-2 spread among PIGS/PIMC/eGPE/variational phase boundaries (Fig. 7d), the omission of Floquet photon-exchange couplings (Sec. II.C.d), and the open three-body question (Sec. II.E) are all stated explicitly rather than glossed over. The skeptic's concern about three-body losses is real, but it does not land as a fatal objection because the manuscript itself frames the high-εdd regime as conditional on the absence of field-linked states and on further three-body studies. The paper is best read as a carefully hedged roadmap, not as a claim of certainty; in that role it is timely and useful.

minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. II.E and Sec. IV.D] The wording in Sec. IV.D that double-MW shielding gives three-body recombination rates 'consistent with zero' is stronger than the open-question statement in Sec. II.E. Please reconcile the two, and specify whether 'consistent with zero' refers to an experimental upper bound, at what density, and over what observation time.
  2. [Table I and Sec. II.E] The '≈1 D effective dipole ceiling' is a central quantitative statement, but Table I lists dipolar lengths and detuning windows rather than effective dipoles, and no conversion is shown. A one-sentence derivation or a reference to the Karman et al. calculation would make the claim easier to assess, especially given the fixed Ωσ = Ωπ = 10×2π MHz operating point.
  3. [Sec. IV.D] The hydrodynamic-regime criterion is written as 'σel, n0 > ¯ω', which is dimensionally inconsistent. It should presumably involve a velocity scale, e.g., n0 σel v ≳ ¯ω, as in the cited collision-rate arguments. Please correct.
  4. [Eq. (1)] The notation is inconsistent: the equation writes f(θ, φ) but the text calls it fn(θ, φ). Define the subscript or drop it. Also, 'Sect.' and 'Sec.' are used interchangeably; unify.
  5. [Fig. 7(d)] The axes are labeled 'scaled interaction strength' and 'particle number', but the text discusses the parameters C and N. Add these symbols to the axes or caption. A sentence on likely sources of the PIGS/PIMC factor-of-2 difference (system size, trial action, metastability) would also strengthen the discussion beyond 'further work needed'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the paper’s claims are supported by standard formulas, explicit calculations, and cross-benchmarked external/prior computational results, with caveats stated openly.

full rationale

The paper is a perspective/review rather than a new derivation. Its central statements about the failure of mean-field theory follow directly from the standard LHY expression: for εdd > 1 the Bogoliubov modes soften and γqf acquires an imaginary part (Eqs. 17–18). The claim that molecular BECs can reach regimes where Im γqf is comparable to Re γqf is a parameter estimate, not a fitted prediction. The stability windows in Table I and the ≈1 D effective-dipole limit are obtained by evaluating the effective two-body potentials of Eqs. (9)–(12), and the paper explicitly acknowledges missing Floquet photon-exchange couplings (Sec. II.C.d) and the open question of three-body collisions in the absence of field-linked states (Sec. II.E). The QMC phase boundaries in Fig. 7 are cross-benchmarked among eGPE, variational, PIGS, and PIMC results, and the paper states that further experimental comparison is needed. Although some of the cited prior work shares authors with the present paper (Langen et al. 2025, Ciardi et al. 2025, Karman et al. 2025), those results are independent computational/experimental studies with stated assumptions, not definitions of the conclusions. No equation is shown to reduce to its own input by construction, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. The main caveats are flagged as open questions rather than hidden assumptions, so no circularity is present.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 7 axioms · 0 invented entities

The review's central claims rest on the effective-potential and universal-scaling framework (Eqs. 8–12, 16), whose validity regimes are stated but whose neglected terms (Floquet couplings, polarization imperfections, hyperfine effects, three-body channels) carry no quantified uncertainty. Molecular constants come from external spectroscopy. The QMC results that benchmark the theory are the authors' own. No new physical entities are postulated: field-linked states and tetramers are prior, experimentally observed entities from the cited literature.

free parameters (3)
  • MW operating point Ωσ = Ωπ = 10×2π MHz, Δσ = 0 = Ω/(2π) = 10 MHz, Δσ = 0
    Hand-chosen operating conditions defining the Table I stability windows; the tabulated a_dd values and Δπ boundaries depend on this choice and are not invariant across species.
  • Collision energy 100 nK for Fig. 5(b) scattering lengths = 100 nK
    Operating point for the NaCs scattering-length calculation; results are energy-dependent, so the zero crossings and window positions are specific to this temperature.
  • Infrared cutoff / discarding of imaginary part of γqf in eGPE = not specified
    The cited eGPE framework (Eq. 17) keeps the LHY correction real via small-momentum cutoffs or by dropping the imaginary part (Sec. III.B/E); the paper itself flags this as questionable for molecules. A hand-chosen regulator in the framework whose breakdown is part of the central claim.
axioms (7)
  • domain assumption The effective pseudopotential V(r) = (4πℏ²a_s/M)δ(r) + V_3(r) (Eq. 15) accurately captures binary collisions in the dilute limit
    Invoked in Sec. III.A to justify the eGPE for molecules; the paper states it breaks down when the shielding core (∼10³ a0) approaches interparticle spacing (Sec. III.A, III.F).
  • domain assumption Universality of MW-shielded scattering under scaling by E3 = ẽₑ and R3 = ẽₐᵈ (Dutta et al. 2025)
    Basis for transferring single-MW results across species and for the Table I survey; stated valid for Ω, Δ ≪ B_rot/ℏ (Sec. II.C).
  • domain assumption Adiabatic (Born–Oppenheimer-like) dressed-state potentials (Eqs. 8–12) describe the collision channels
    Used throughout Sec. II.C for shielding barriers; neglects Floquet photon-exchange couplings “which can play a significant role” (Sec. II.C.d) and assumes ideal σ/π polarization.
  • domain assumption Three-body loss is negligible in the window without field-linked states
    Load-bearing for long-lived BECs; explicitly flagged as open in Sec. II.E: “the role of three-body collisions remains an open question, warranting further study.”
  • domain assumption The Lima–Pelster LHY correction γqf|ψ|³ is the leading beyond-mean-field term, with its real part retained
    Core of the eGPE (Eq. 17); the imaginary-part problem for εdd > 1 is flagged as the key limitation in Sec. III.E.
  • standard math PIMC/PIGS with worm algorithms and pair-product approximations is numerically exact for the model potentials
    Sec. III.F relies on PIMC and PIGS results (Ciardi et al. 2025; Langen et al. 2025) for the droplet/membrane/crystal boundaries in Fig. 7.
  • domain assumption Molecular constants d0 and B_rot in App. A (from cited spectroscopy) are accurate inputs
    Table I values derive from these; some are estimates (LiCs d0 in the second excited vibrational state; Ag-containing species at equilibrium bond length; isotopologue scaling — footnotes b–d of Tab. II).

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 53463 in / 19123 out tokens · 176255 ms · 2026-08-03T16:01:01.643381+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Recent advances in molecular cooling have enabled the realization of strongly dipolar Bose--Einstein condensates (BECs) of molecules, and BECs of many different molecular species may become experimentally accessible in the near future. Here, we explore the unique properties of such BECs and the new insights they may offer into dipolar quantum fluids and many-body physics. We explore which parameter regimes can realistically be achieved using currently available experimental techniques, discuss how to implement these techniques, and outline which molecular species are particularly well suited to explore exotic new states of matter. We further determine how state-of-the-art beyond mean-field theories, originally developed for weakly dipolar magnetic gases, can be pushed to their limits and beyond, and what other long-standing questions in the field of dipolar physics may realistically come within reach using molecular systems.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 10 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Tunable state-dependent interactions in collisionally stable mixtures of polar molecules

    cond-mat.quant-gas 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0

    Vibrational states v=0 and v=1 of microwave-shielded polar molecules form a collisionally stable pseudo-spin with tunable dipolar Ising, density-density, and spin-density interactions.

  2. Ro-vibrational van der Waals interaction between ultracold polar molecules

    cond-mat.quant-gas 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0

    Molecules in (v,j)=(0,1) and (1,0) feel a strong ro-vibrational van der Waals repulsion, C6=d_e^4/(9α_e), that can cut collisional loss by orders of magnitude.

  3. Ro-vibrational van der Waals interaction between ultracold polar molecules

    cond-mat.quant-gas 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0

    Molecules in a (v=0,j=1)+(v=1,j=0) pair feel a giant, repulsive van der Waals interaction that strongly suppresses collisional loss.

  4. Machine Learning Phase Field Reconstruction in a Bose-Einstein Condensate

    cond-mat.quant-gas 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A U-Net-based ML pipeline reconstructs the complete phase field and quantized vortex charges in 2D Bose-Einstein condensates from density snapshots alone, using synthetic training data from projected Gross-Pitaevskii ...

  5. Tunable state-dependent interactions in collisionally stable mixtures of polar molecules

    cond-mat.quant-gas 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    Microwave-shielded polar molecules in vibrational states v=0 and v=1 realize tunable Ising, density-density, and spin-density dipolar interactions with suppressed two-body losses.

  6. Self-Bound Droplets of Ultracold Dipolar Molecules under Tunable Double Microwave Shielding

    cond-mat.quant-gas 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    Ground-state path integral Monte Carlo simulations of NaCs polar molecules with double microwave shielding show self-bound droplets forming above an ellipticity threshold of ~3 degrees, with an estimated superfluid fr...

  7. Tuning interactions between static-field-shielded polar molecules with microwaves

    cond-mat.quant-gas 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0

    Adding a microwave field to static-field-shielded CaF molecules allows the s-wave scattering length and dipole length to be tuned over wide ranges while keeping collisional losses low.

  8. Bilayer crystals in a polar-molecules system

    cond-mat.quant-gas 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Simulations of confined polar molecules reveal a bilayer crystal phase stabilized by increasing confinement and evidence of layered superfluid states with inter-layer coherence.

  9. Bilayer crystals in a polar-molecules system

    cond-mat.quant-gas 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Quantum Monte Carlo simulations of polar molecules in quasi-2D harmonic confinement identify a bilayer crystal phase stabilized by increasing confinement strength at fixed interaction, along with temperature-induced c...

  10. Microwave shielding of ultracold polar molecules on the transition $\boldsymbol{n=1 \rightarrow 2}$

    physics.atom-ph 2026-07 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Microwave shielding on the n=1→2 transition prevents collisions between ultracold polar molecules without producing bound states that would enhance three-body recombination.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

99 extracted references · 6 linked inside Pith · cited by 7 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Anisotropic Relaxation Dynamics in a Dipolar Fermi Gas Driven Out of Equilibrium,

    Aikawa, K., A. Frisch, M. Mark, S. Baier, R. Grimm, J. L. Bohn, D. S. Jin, G. M. Bruun, and F. Ferlaino (2014), “Anisotropic Relaxation Dynamics in a Dipolar Fermi Gas Driven Out of Equilibrium,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 (26), 263201. Aikawa, K., A. Frisch, M. Mark, S. Baier, A. Rietzler, R. Grimm, and F. Ferlaino (2012), “Bose-Einstein Con- densation of Erbi...

    2014

  2. [7]

    Elec- tric dipole moment of SrF X 2Σ+ from high-precision Stark effect measurements,

    Ernst, W., J. K¨ andler, S. Kindt, and T. T¨ orring (1985), “Elec- tric dipole moment of SrF X 2Σ+ from high-precision Stark effect measurements,” Chem. Phys. Lett. 113 (4),

    1985

  3. [33]

    Topological Quan- tum Critical Points in the Extended Bose-Hubbard Model,

    Fraxanet, J., D. Gonz´ alez-Cuadra, T. Pfau, M. Lewenstein, T. Langen, and L. Barbiero (2022), “Topological Quan- tum Critical Points in the Extended Bose-Hubbard Model,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 043402. Frisch, A., M. Mark, K. Aikawa, S. Baier, R. Grimm, A. Petrov, S. Kotochigova, G. Qu´ em´ ener, M. Lepers, O. Dulieu, and F. Ferlaino (2015), “Ultracold Dip...

    2022

  4. [41]

    Ul- tracold LiCr: A New Pathway to Quantum Gases of Para- magnetic Polar Molecules,

    Finelli, S., A. Ciamei, B. Restivo, M. Schemmer, A. Cosco, M. Inguscio, A. Trenkwalder, K. Zaremba-Kopczyk, M. Gronowski, M. Tomza, and M. Zaccanti (2024), “Ul- tracold LiCr: A New Pathway to Quantum Gases of Para- magnetic Polar Molecules,” PRX Quantum 5 (2), 020358. Fitch, N., and M. Tarbutt (2021), “Laser-cooled molecules,” in Advances in Atomic, Molec...

    2024

  5. [50]

    Two-photon- assisted collisions in ultracold gases of polar molecules,

    Karam, C. (2024), Optical shielding of collisions between ultracold polar molecules , Ph.D. thesis (Universit´ e Paris- Saclay, Orsay). Karam, C., G. Hovhannesyan, R. Vexiau, M. Lepers, N. Bouloufa-Maafa, and O. Dulieu (2025), “Two-photon- assisted collisions in ultracold gases of polar molecules,” Phys. Rev. A 112, 043317. Karam, C., R. Vexiau, N. Boulou...

    2024

  6. [54]

    En- tanglement and iSW AP gate between molecular qubits,

    Picard, L. R. B., A. J. Park, G. E. Patenotte, S. Gebretsad- kan, D. Wellnitz, A. M. Rey, and K.-K. Ni (2025), “En- tanglement and iSW AP gate between molecular qubits,” Nature 637 (8047),

    2025

  7. [57]

    Tetratomic states of microwave dressed and associated ultracold 23Na40K molecules,

    Gu, Z., X. Zhou, W. Chen, W. Han, F. Deng, T. Shi, P. Wang, and J. Zhang (2025), “Tetratomic states of microwave dressed and associated ultracold 23Na40K molecules,” arXiv:2509.23634. Guo, M., F. B¨ ottcher, J. Hertkorn, J.-N. Schmidt, M. Wenzel, H. P. B¨ uchler, T. Langen, and T. Pfau (2019), “The low- energy Goldstone mode in a trapped dipolar supersoli...

    arXiv 2025

  8. [59]

    Speculations on Bose-Einstein Con- densation and Quantum Crystals,

    Chester, G. V. (1970), “Speculations on Bose-Einstein Con- densation and Quantum Crystals,” Phys. Rev. A 2,

    1970

  9. [64]

    Six-dimensional potential energy surface for NaK–NaK collisions: Gaussian process representation with correct asymptotic form,

    Christianen, A., T. Karman, R. A. Vargas-Hern´ andez, G. C. Groenenboom, and R. V. Krems (2019a), “Six-dimensional potential energy surface for NaK–NaK collisions: Gaussian process representation with correct asymptotic form,” J. Chem. Phys. 150 (6), 064106. Christianen, A., M. W. Zwierlein, G. C. Groenenboom, and T. Karman (2019b), “Photoinduced Two-Body...

    2025

  10. [73]

    Quantum Depletion of a Homoge- neous Bose-Einstein Condensate,

    Lopes, R., C. Eigen, N. Navon, D. Cl´ ement, R. P. Smith, and Z. Hadzibabic (2017), “Quantum Depletion of a Homoge- neous Bose-Einstein Condensate,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 190404. Lozovik, Yu. E., S. Yu. Volkov, and M. Willander (2004), “Structural Properties of the Condensate in Two- Dimensional Mesoscopic Systems of Strongly Correlated Excitons,” Zh. Eks...

    2017

  11. [76]

    Can Angular Oscillations Probe Superfluidity in Dipolar Super- solids?

    Nightingale, M. P., and C. J. Umrigar (1998), Quantum Monte Carlo methods in physics and chemistry , Nato Sci- ence Series C, Vol. 525 (Springer, Dordrecht). Norcia, M. A., E. Poli, C. Politi, L. Klaus, T. Bland, M. J. Mark, L. Santos, R. N. Bisset, and F. Ferlaino (2022), “Can Angular Oscillations Probe Superfluidity in Dipolar Super- solids?” Phys. Rev....

    1998

  12. [78]

    A Feshbach resonance in collisions be- tween triplet ground-state molecules,

    Park, J. J., Y.-K. Lu, A. O. Jamison, T. V. Tscherbul, and W. Ketterle (2023), “A Feshbach resonance in collisions be- tween triplet ground-state molecules,” Nature 614 (7946),

    2023

  13. [84]

    Long-lived entanglement of molecules in magic-wavelength optical tweezers,

    Ruttley, D. K., T. R. Hepworth, A. Guttridge, and S. L. Cornish (2025), “Long-lived entanglement of molecules in magic-wavelength optical tweezers,” Nature 637 (8047),

    2025

  14. [91]

    Incorporating exact two-body propagators for zero-range interactions into N -body Monte Carlo simulations,

    Yan, Y., and D. Blume (2015), “Incorporating exact two-body propagators for zero-range interactions into N -body Monte Carlo simulations,” Phys. Rev. A 91, 043607. Yan, Y., and D. Blume (2017), “Path integral Monte Carlo ground state approach: formalism, implementation, and applications,” J. Phys. B 50 (22), 223001. Yang, A., S. Botsi, S. Kumar, S. B. Pal...

    2015

  15. [97]

    High Phase-Space Density of Laser-Cooled Molecules in an Optical Lattice,

    Wu, Y., J. J. Burau, K. Mehling, J. Ye, and S. Ding (2021), “High Phase-Space Density of Laser-Cooled Molecules in an Optical Lattice,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 263201. Xie, T., M. Lepers, R. Vexiau, A. Orb´ an, O. Dulieu, and N. Bouloufa-Maafa (2020), “Optical Shielding of Destruc- tive Chemical Reactions between Ultracold Ground-State NaRb Molecules,” Phys...

    2021

  16. [158]

    Stable Topological Superfluid Phase of Ultracold Polar Fermionic Molecules,

    Cooper, N. R., and G. V. Shlyapnikov (2009), “Stable Topological Superfluid Phase of Ultracold Polar Fermionic Molecules,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 103 (15), 155302. Covey, J. P. (2017), Enhanced Optical and Electric Manipu- lation of a Quantum Gas of KRb Molecules , Ph.D. thesis (University of Colorado, Boulder). Dagdigian, P. J., and L. Wharton (1972), “Molecul...

    2009

  17. [176]

    Dipolar spin-exchange and en- tanglement between molecules in an optical tweezer array,

    Bao, Y., S. S. Yu, L. Anderegg, E. Chae, W. Ketterle, K.-K. Ni, and J. M. Doyle (2023), “Dipolar spin-exchange and en- tanglement between molecules in an optical tweezer array,” Science 382 (6675),

    2023

  18. [201]

    Rotational tuning of the dipole-dipole interaction in a Bose gas of magnetic atoms,

    Baillie, D., and P. B. Blakie (2020), “Rotational tuning of the dipole-dipole interaction in a Bose gas of magnetic atoms,” Phys. Rev. A 101 (4), 043606. Baillie, D., R. M. Wilson, R. N. Bisset, and P. B. Blakie (2016), “Self-bound dipolar droplet: A localized matter wave in free space,” Phys. Rev. A 94, 021602(R). Balibar, S. (2010), “The enigma of super...

    2020

  19. [205]

    Transition from a polaronic condensate to a degenerate Fermi gas of heteronuclear molecules,

    Duda, M., X.-Y. Chen, A. Schindewolf, R. Bause, J. von Milczewski, R. Schmidt, I. Bloch, and X.-Y. Luo (2023), “Transition from a polaronic condensate to a degenerate Fermi gas of heteronuclear molecules,” Nat. Phys. 19 (5),

    2023

  20. [218]

    Three-Body Problem in a Dilute Bose- Einstein Condensate,

    K¨ ohler, T. (2002), “Three-Body Problem in a Dilute Bose- Einstein Condensate,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 210404. K¨ ohler, T., K. G´ oral, and P. Julienne (2006), “Production of cold molecules via magnetically tunable Feshbach reso- nances,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 78 (4),

    2002

  21. [221]

    Dipolar quantum solids emerging in a Hubbard quantum simulator,

    Su, L., A. Douglas, M. Szurek, R. Groth, S. F. Ozturk, A. Krahn, A. H. H´ ebert, G. A. Phelps, S. Ebadi, S. Dick- erson, F. Ferlaino, O. Markovi´ c, and M. Greiner (2023), “Dipolar quantum solids emerging in a Hubbard quantum simulator,” Nature 622 (7984),

    2023

  22. [231]

    Dipolar collisions of polar molecules in the quantum regime,

    Ni, K.-K., S. Ospelkaus, D. Wang, G. Qu´ em´ ener, B. Neyen- huis, M. H. G. de Miranda, J. L. Bohn, D. S. Jin, and J. Ye (2010), “Dipolar collisions of polar molecules in the quantum regime,” Nature 464,

    2010

  23. [239]

    Stimulated Raman adiabatic pas- sage in physics, chemistry, and beyond,

    Vitanov, N. V., A. A. Rangelov, B. W. Shore, and K. Bergmann (2017), “Stimulated Raman adiabatic pas- sage in physics, chemistry, and beyond,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 89 (1), 015006. W¨ achtler, F., and L. Santos (2016a), “Ground-state prop- erties and elementary excitations of quantum droplets in dipolar Bose-Einstein condensates,” Phys. Rev. A 94, 043618. W¨ ac...

    arXiv 2017

  24. [256]

    Obser- vation of Collisions between Two Ultracold Ground-State CaF Molecules,

    Cheuk, L. W., L. Anderegg, Y. Bao, S. Burchesky, S. S. Yu, W. Ketterle, K.-K. Ni, and J. M. Doyle (2020), “Obser- vation of Collisions between Two Ultracold Ground-State CaF Molecules,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 (4), 43401. Childs, W. J., L. S. Goodman, U. Nielsen, and V. Pfeufer (1984), “Electric-dipole moment of CaF (X 2Σ+) by molec- ular beam, laser-rf, dou...

    2020

  25. [259]

    Mean-Field Expansion in Bose–Einstein Conden- sates with Finite-Range Interactions,

    Sch¨ utzhold, R., M. Uhlmann, Y. Xu, and U. R. Fischer (2006), “Mean-Field Expansion in Bose–Einstein Conden- sates with Finite-Range Interactions,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 20 (24),

    2006

  26. [263]

    Quantum-mechanical theory of atom-molecule and molecular collisions in a mag- netic field: Spin depolarization,

    Krems, R. V., and A. Dalgarno (2004), “Quantum-mechanical theory of atom-molecule and molecular collisions in a mag- netic field: Spin depolarization,” J. Chem. Phys. 120 (5),

    2004

  27. [279]

    Quantum-enhanced sensing using non-classical spin states of a highly magnetic atom,

    Chalopin, T., C. Bouazza, A. Evrard, V. Makhalov, D. Dreon, J. Dalibard, L. A. Sidorenkov, and S. Nascimbene (2018), “Quantum-enhanced sensing using non-classical spin states of a highly magnetic atom,” Nat. Commun. 9 (1),

    2018

  28. [283]

    Field-linked resonances of polar molecules,

    Chen, X.-Y., A. Schindewolf, S. Eppelt, R. Bause, M. Duda, S. Biswas, T. Karman, T. Hilker, I. Bloch, and X.-Y. Luo (2023), “Field-linked resonances of polar molecules,” Na- ture 614 (7946),

    2023

  29. [289]

    Ground-state phase diagram of a dipolar conden- sate with quantum fluctuations,

    Bisset, R. N., R. M. Wilson, D. Baillie, and P. B. Blakie (2016), “Ground-state phase diagram of a dipolar conden- sate with quantum fluctuations,” Phys. Rev. A 94, 033619. Biswas, S., S. Eppelt, C. Buchberger, X.-Y. Chen, A. Schin- dewolf, M. Hani, E. Biebl, I. Bloch, and X.-Y. Luo (2025), “Generation of strong ultralow-phase-noise mi- crowave fields wit...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  30. [332]

    Controlling the quantum stereodynamics of ultracold bimolecular reactions,

    de Miranda, M. H. G., A. Chotia, B. Neyenhuis, D. Wang, G. Qu´ em´ ener, S. Ospelkaus, J. L. Bohn, J. Ye, and D. S. Jin (2011), “Controlling the quantum stereodynamics of ultracold bimolecular reactions,” Nat. Phys. 7 (6),

    2011

  31. [337]

    The Helical Antenna,

    Kraus, J. (1949), “The Helical Antenna,” Proc. IRE 37 (3),

    1949

  32. [351]

    Hyperfine structure and electric dipole moment of BaF X 2Σ+,

    Ernst, W. E., J. K¨ andler, and T. T¨ orring (1986), “Hyperfine structure and electric dipole moment of BaF X 2Σ+,” J. Chem. Phys. 84 (9),

    1986

  33. [356]

    Dipolar Droplets of Strongly Interacting Molecules,

    Langen, T., J. Boronat, J. S´ anchez-Baena, R. Bomb ´ ın, T. Karman, and F. Mazzanti (2025), “Dipolar Droplets of Strongly Interacting Molecules,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 053001. Langen, T., G. Valtolina, D. Wang, and J. Ye (2024), “Quantum state manipulation and cooling of ultracold molecules,” Nat. Phys. 20 (5),

    2025

  34. [357]

    Properties of strongly dipolar Bose gases beyond the Born approxima- tion,

    O ldziejewski, R., and K. Jachymski (2016), “Properties of strongly dipolar Bose gases beyond the Born approxima- tion,” Phys. Rev. A 94, 063638. Olson, A. J., R. J. Niffenegger, and Y. P. Chen (2013), “Opti- mizing the efficiency of evaporative cooling in optical dipole traps,” Phys. Rev. A 87 (5), 053613. Ospelkaus, S., K.-K. Ni, G. Qu´ em´ ener, B. Ney...

    2016

  35. [367]

    On- demand entanglement of molecules in a reconfigurable op- tical tweezer array,

    Holland, C. M., Y. Lu, and L. W. Cheuk (2023), “On- demand entanglement of molecules in a reconfigurable op- tical tweezer array,” Science 382 (6675),

    2023

  36. [382]

    Two-dimensional dipolar scattering,

    Ticknor, C. (2009), “Two-dimensional dipolar scattering,” Phys. Rev. A 80 (5), 052702. Ticknor, C. (2010), “Quasi-two-dimensional dipolar scatter- ing,” Phys. Rev. A 81 (4), 042708. Tomza, M. (2021), “Interaction potentials, electric moments, polarizabilities, and chemical reactions of YbCu, YbAg, and YbAu molecules,” New J. Phys. 23 (8), 085003. Toprakci...

    2009

  37. [386]

    High-resolution internal state control of ultracold 25 23Na87Rb molecules,

    Guo, M., X. Ye, J. He, G. Qu´ em´ ener, and D. Wang (2018), “High-resolution internal state control of ultracold 25 23Na87Rb molecules,” Phys. Rev. A 97 (2), 020501. Guo, M., B. Zhu, B. Lu, X. Ye, F. Wang, R. Vexiau, N. Bouloufa-Maafa, G. Qu´ em´ ener, O. Dulieu, and D. Wang (2016), “Creation of an Ultracold Gas of Ground-State Dipolar 23Na87Rb Molecules,...

    2018

  38. [413]

    Superfluid Filaments of Dipolar Bosons in Free Space,

    Cinti, F., A. Cappellaro, L. Salasnich, and T. Macr ` ı (2017), “Superfluid Filaments of Dipolar Bosons in Free Space,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 215302. Cinti, F., T. Macr ` ı, W. Lechner, G. Pupillo, and T. Pohl (2014), “Defect-induced supersolidity with soft- core bosons,” Nat. Commun. 5 (1),

    2017

  39. [435]

    Measurement of the superfluid fraction of a supersolid by Josephson effect,

    Biagioni, G., N. Antolini, B. Donelli, L. Pezz` e, A. Smerzi, M. Fattori, A. Fioretti, C. Gabbanini, M. Inguscio, L. Tanzi, and G. Modugno (2024), “Measurement of the superfluid fraction of a supersolid by Josephson effect,” Na- ture 629 (8013),

    2024

  40. [442]

    Dipolar physics: a review of experiments with magnetic quantum gases,

    Chomaz, L., I. Ferrier-Barbut, F. Ferlaino, B. Laburthe-Tolra, B. L. Lev, and T. Pfau (2022), “Dipolar physics: a review of experiments with magnetic quantum gases,” Rep. Prog. Phys. 86 (2), 026401. Chomaz, L., D. Petter, P. Ilzh¨ ofer, G. Natale, A. Traut- mann, C. Politi, G. Durastante, R. M. W. van Bijnen, A. Patscheider, M. Sohmen, M. J. Mark, and F. ...

    2022

  41. [463]

    Quantum Gas of Deeply Bound Ground State Molecules,

    Danzl, J. G., E. Haller, M. Gustavsson, M. J. Mark, R. Hart, N. Bouloufa, O. Dulieu, H. Ritsch, and H.-C. N¨ agerl (2008), “Quantum Gas of Deeply Bound Ground State Molecules,” Science 321 (5892),

    2008

  42. [502]

    Bose-Einstein Condensation of Eu- ropium,

    Miyazawa, Y., R. Inoue, H. Matsui, G. Nomura, and M. Kozuma (2022), “Bose-Einstein Condensation of Eu- ropium,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 223401. Moerdijk, A. J., H. M. J. M. Boesten, and B. J. Verhaar (1996), “Decay of trapped ultracold alkali atoms by recom- bination,” Phys. Rev. A 53,

    2022

  43. [677]

    Roton Excitations in an Oblate Dipolar Quantum Gas,

    Schmidt, J.-N., J. Hertkorn, M. Guo, F. B¨ ottcher, M. Schmidt, K. S. H. Ng, S. D. Graham, T. Langen, M. Zwierlein, and T. Pfau (2021), “Roton Excitations in an Oblate Dipolar Quantum Gas,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 193002. Schmidt, M., L. Lassabli` ere, G. Qu´ em´ ener, and T. Lan- gen (2022), “Self-bound dipolar droplets and supersolids in molecular Bose-Ei...

    2021

  44. [702]

    Controlling the Scattering Length of Ultracold Dipolar Molecules,

    Lassabli` ere, L. (2021), Collisions of ultracold dipolar molecules controlled by electric and electromagnetic fields , Ph.D. thesis (Universit´ e Paris-Saclay, Orsay). Lassabli` ere, L., and G. Qu´ em´ ener (2018), “Controlling the Scattering Length of Ultracold Dipolar Molecules,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 163402. Lassabli` ere, L., and G. Qu´ em´ ener (202...

    2021

  45. [710]

    Controlling the rotational and hyperfine state of ultracold 87Rb133Cs molecules,

    Gregory, P. D., J. Aldegunde, J. M. Hutson, and S. L. Cor- nish (2016), “Controlling the rotational and hyperfine state of ultracold 87Rb133Cs molecules,” Phys. Rev. A 94 (4), 041403. Gregory, P. D., J. A. Blackmore, S. L. Bromley, and S. L. Cornish (2020), “Loss of Ultracold 87Rb133Cs Molecules via Optical Excitation of Long-Lived Two-Body Collision Comp...

    2016

  46. [720]

    A high qual- ity, efficiently coupled microwave cavity for trapping cold molecules,

    Dunseith, D. P., S. Truppe, R. J. Hendricks, B. E. Sauer, E. A. Hinds, and M. R. Tarbutt (2015), “A high qual- ity, efficiently coupled microwave cavity for trapping cold molecules,” J. Phys. B 48 (4), 045001. Dutta, J., B. Mukherjee, and J. M. Hutson (2025), “Universal- ity in the microwave shielding of ultracold polar molecules,” Phys. Rev. Res. 7, 0231...

    2015

  47. [722]

    Resonant and first-order dipolar interactions between ultracold 1Σ molecules in static and microwave electric fields,

    Karman, T., Z. Z. Yan, and M. Zwierlein (2022), “Resonant and first-order dipolar interactions between ultracold 1Σ molecules in static and microwave electric fields,” Phys. Rev. A 105 (1), 013321. Ketterle, W., D. S. Durfee, and D. M. Stamper-Kurn (1999), “Making, probing and understanding Bose-Einstein condensates,” in Bose-Einstein Condensation in Atom...

    2022

  48. [724]

    Pulsed-nozzle Fourier-transform microwave spec- troscopy of laser-vaporized metal oxides: Rotational spec- tra and electric dipole moments of YO, LaO, ZrO, and HfO,

    Suenram, R. D., F. J. Lovas, G. T. Fraser, and K. Matsumura (1990), “Pulsed-nozzle Fourier-transform microwave spec- troscopy of laser-vaporized metal oxides: Rotational spec- tra and electric dipole moments of YO, LaO, ZrO, and HfO,” J. Chem. Phys. 92 (8),

    1990

  49. [729]

    Collisions of ultracold molecules in bright and dark optical dipole traps,

    Bause, R., A. Schindewolf, R. Tao, M. Duda, X.-Y. Chen, G. Qu´ em´ ener, T. Karman, A. Christianen, I. Bloch, and X.- Y. Luo (2021), “Collisions of ultracold molecules in bright and dark optical dipole traps,” Phys. Rev. Res. 3 (3), 033013. Becca, F., and S. Sorella (2017), Quantum Monte Carlo ap- proaches for correlated systems (Cambridge University). Be...

    2021

  50. [735]

    Quantum Engineering of a Low- Entropy Gas of Heteronuclear Bosonic Molecules in an Op- tical Lattice,

    Reichs¨ ollner, L., A. Schindewolf, T. Takekoshi, R. Grimm, and H.-C. N¨ agerl (2017), “Quantum Engineering of a Low- Entropy Gas of Heteronuclear Bosonic Molecules in an Op- tical Lattice,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 (7), 073201. Rem, B. S., A. T. Grier, I. Ferrier-Barbut, U. Eismann, T. Langen, N. Navon, L. Khaykovich, F. Werner, D. S. Petrov, F. Chevy, and C...

    2017

  51. [759]

    New states of matter with fine-tuned interactions: quantum droplets and dipolar supersolids,

    B¨ ottcher, F., J.-N. Schmidt, J. Hertkorn, K. S. H. Ng, S. D. Graham, M. Guo, T. Langen, and T. Pfau (2021), “New states of matter with fine-tuned interactions: quantum droplets and dipolar supersolids,” Rep. Prog. Phys. 84 (1), 012403. B¨ ottcher, F., J.-N. Schmidt, M. Wenzel, J. Hertkorn, M. Guo, T. Langen, and T. Pfau (2019a), “Transient Supersolid Pr...

    2021

  52. [773]

    Collisionally stable gas of bosonic dipolar ground-state molecules,

    Bigagli, N., C. Warner, W. Yuan, S. Zhang, I. Stevenson, T. Karman, and S. Will (2023), “Collisionally stable gas of bosonic dipolar ground-state molecules,” Nat. Phys. 19 (11),

    2023

  53. [779]

    An optical tweezer array of ultracold molecules,

    Anderegg, L., L. W. Cheuk, Y. Bao, S. Burchesky, W. Ket- terle, K.-K. Ni, and J. M. Doyle (2019), “An optical tweezer array of ultracold molecules,” Science 365 (6458),

    2019

  54. [821]

    Ex- citations of a two-dimensional supersolid,

    Poli, E., D. Baillie, F. Ferlaino, and P. B. Blakie (2024), “Ex- citations of a two-dimensional supersolid,” Phys. Rev. A 110, 053301. Poli, E., T. Bland, C. Politi, L. Klaus, M. A. Norcia, F. Fer- laino, R. N. Bisset, and L. Santos (2021), “Maintaining supersolidity in one and two dimensions,” Phys. Rev. A 104, 063307. Pollock, E. L., and D. M. Ceperley ...

    2024

  55. [827]

    Path-Integral Monte Carlo Study on a Droplet of a Dipolar Bose–Einstein Condensate Stabilized by Quantum Fluctuation,

    Saito, H. (2016), “Path-Integral Monte Carlo Study on a Droplet of a Dipolar Bose–Einstein Condensate Stabilized by Quantum Fluctuation,” J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 85 (5), 053001. Sakkos, K., J. Casulleras, and J. Boronat (2009), “High order Chin actions in path integral Monte Carlo,” J. Chem. Phys. 130 (20), 204109. S´ anchez-Baena, J., G. Pascual, R. Bomb ´ ın...

    2016

  56. [853]

    Permanent dipole moment of LiCs in the ground state,

    Deiglmayr, J., A. Grochola, M. Repp, O. Dulieu, R. Wester, and M. Weidem¨ uller (2010), “Permanent dipole moment of LiCs in the ground state,” Phys. Rev. A 82 (3), 032503. Deng, F., X.-Y. Chen, X.-Y. Luo, W. Zhang, S. Yi, and T. Shi (2023), “Effective Potential and Superfluidity of Microwave-Shielded Polar Molecules,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 130 (18), 183001. De...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  57. [890]

    Observation of microwave shielding of ultracold molecules,

    Anderegg, L., S. Burchesky, Y. Bao, S. S. Yu, T. Kar- man, E. Chae, K.-K. Ni, W. Ketterle, and J. M. Doyle (2021), “Observation of microwave shielding of ultracold molecules,” Science 373 (6556),

    2021

  58. [916]

    Creation of Ultracold 87Rb133Cs Molecules in the Rovibrational Ground State,

    Molony, P. K., P. D. Gregory, Z. Ji, B. Lu, M. P. K¨ oppinger, C. R. Le Sueur, C. L. Blackley, J. M. Hutson, and S. L. Cor- nish (2014), “Creation of Ultracold 87Rb133Cs Molecules in the Rovibrational Ground State,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 (25), 255301. Mora, C., O. Parcollet, and X. Waintal (2007), “Quantum melting of a crystal of dipolar bosons,” Phys. Rev...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  59. [1002]

    Dipolar Bose Supersolid Stripes,

    Bomb ´ ın, R., J. Boronat, and F. Mazzanti (2017), “Dipolar Bose Supersolid Stripes,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 250402. Bomb ´ ın, R., F. Mazzanti, and J. Boronat (2019), “Berezinskii-Kosterlitz-Thouless transition in two- dimensional dipolar stripes,” Phys. Rev. A 100, 063614. Bomb ´ ın, R., F. Mazzanti, and J. Boronat (2024), “Off- diagonal long-range order...

    2017

  60. [1062]

    A degenerate Fermi gas of polar 24 molecules,

    De Marco, L., G. Valtolina, K. Matsuda, W. G. Tobias, J. P. Covey, and J. Ye (2019), “A degenerate Fermi gas of polar 24 molecules,” Science 363 (6429),

    2019

  61. [1111]

    Field-induced long- lived supermolecules,

    Huang, S.-J., Y.-T. Hsu, H. Lee, Y.-C. Chen, A. G. Volosniev, N. T. Zinner, and D.-W. Wang (2012), “Field-induced long- lived supermolecules,” Phys. Rev. A 85 (5), 055601. Ilg, T., and H. P. B¨ uchler (2023), “Ground-state stability and excitation spectrum of a one-dimensional dipolar su- persolid,” Phys. Rev. A 107, 013314. Jain, P., F. Cinti, and M. Bon...

    2012

  62. [1119]

    Can a Solid Be

    Leggett, A. J. (1970), “Can a Solid Be ”Superfluid”?” Phys. Rev. Lett. 25,

    1970

  63. [1132]

    Bimolecular Chemistry in the Ultracold Regime,

    Liu, Y., and K.-K. Ni (2022), “Bimolecular Chemistry in the Ultracold Regime,” Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 73 (1),

    2022

  64. [1135]

    Many-Body Problem in Quantum Mechanics and Quantum Statistical Mechanics,

    Lee, T. D., and C. N. Yang (1957), “Many-Body Problem in Quantum Mechanics and Quantum Statistical Mechanics,” Phys. Rev. 105,

    1957

  65. [1138]

    Condensed Matter Theory of Dipolar Quantum Gases,

    Baranov, M. A., M. Dalmonte, G. Pupillo, and P. Zoller (2012), “Condensed Matter Theory of Dipolar Quantum Gases,” Chem. Rev. 112 (9),

    2012

  66. [1143]

    Direct observation of bimolecular reactions of ultracold KRb molecules,

    Hu, M.-G., Y. Liu, D. D. Grimes, Y.-W. Lin, A. H. Gheorghe, R. Vexiau, N. Bouloufa-Maafa, O. Dulieu, T. Rosenband, and K.-K. Ni (2019), “Direct observation of bimolecular reactions of ultracold KRb molecules,” Science 366 (6469),

    2019

  67. [1144]

    Quantum fluctuations in dipolar Bose gases,

    Lima, A. R. P., and A. Pelster (2011), “Quantum fluctuations in dipolar Bose gases,” Phys. Rev. A 84, 041604. Lima, A. R. P., and A. Pelster (2012), “Beyond mean-field low-lying excitations of dipolar Bose gases,” Phys. Rev. A 86 (6), 063609. Lin, J., G. Chen, M. Jin, Z. Shi, F. Deng, W. Zhang, G. Qu´ em´ ener, T. Shi, S. Yi, and D. Wang (2023), “Mi- crow...

    2011

  68. [1156]

    Quantum theory of defects in crystals,

    Andreev, A. F., and I. M. Lifshits (1969), “Quantum theory of defects in crystals,” Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 56 (6), 2057, [Sov. Phys. JETP 29, 1107 (1969)]. Anich, G., N. H¨ ollrigl, M. Kreyer, R. Grimm, and E. Kirilov (2024), “Comprehensive characterization of an apparatus for cold electromagnetic dysprosium dipoles,” Phys. Rev. A 110, 023311. Astrakharchik...

    1969

  69. [1191]

    Exci- tation Spectrum of a Trapped Dipolar Supersolid and Its Experimental Evidence,

    Natale, G., R. M. W. van Bijnen, A. Patscheider, D. Petter, M. J. Mark, L. Chomaz, and F. Ferlaino (2019), “Exci- tation Spectrum of a Trapped Dipolar Supersolid and Its Experimental Evidence,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 050402. Navon, N., R. P. Smith, and Z. Hadzibabic (2021), “Quantum gases in optical boxes,” Nat. Phys. 17 (12),

    2019

  70. [1225]

    Quantum-Stabilized States in Magnetic Dipolar Quantum Gases,

    Chomaz, L. (2026), “Quantum-Stabilized States in Magnetic Dipolar Quantum Gases,” Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 17, . Chomaz, L., S. Baier, D. Petter, M. J. Mark, F. W¨ achtler, L. Santos, and F. Ferlaino (2016), “Quantum-Fluctuation- Driven Crossover from a Dilute Bose-Einstein Condensate to a Macrodroplet in a Dipolar Quantum Fluid,” Phys. Rev. X 6, ...

    2026

  71. [1311]

    Patterned Supersolids in Dipolar Bose Systems,

    Kora, Y., and M. Boninsegni (2019), “Patterned Supersolids in Dipolar Bose Systems,” J. Low Temp. Phys. 197 (5),

    2019

  72. [1324]

    Scattering of ultracold molecules in the highly resonant regime,

    Mayle, M., G. Qu´ em´ ener, B. P. Ruzic, and J. L. Bohn (2013), “Scattering of ultracold molecules in the highly resonant regime,” Phys. Rev. A 87 (1), 012709. Micheli, A., Z. Idziaszek, G. Pupillo, M. A. Baranov, P. Zoller, and P. S. Julienne (2010), “Universal Rates for Reactive Ultracold Polar Molecules in Reduced Dimensions,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 (7),...

    2013

  73. [1334]

    Bose-Einstein condensa- tion of trapped atoms with dipole interactions,

    Nho, K., and D. P. Landau (2005), “Bose-Einstein condensa- tion of trapped atoms with dipole interactions,” Phys. Rev. A 72, 023615. Ni, K.-K. (2009), A Quantum Gas of Polar Molecules , Ph.D. thesis (University of Colorado, Boulder). Ni, K.-K., S. Ospelkaus, M. H. G. de Miranda, A. Pe’er, B. Neyenhuis, J. J. Zirbel, S. Kotochigova, P. S. Julienne, D. S. J...

    2005

  74. [1446]

    Nonequilibrium dy- namics of an ultracold dipolar gas,

    Sykes, A. G., and J. L. Bohn (2015), “Nonequilibrium dy- namics of an ultracold dipolar gas,” Phys. Rev. A 91 (1), 013625. Tang, Y., W. Kao, K.-Y. Li, and B. L. Lev (2018a), “Tuning the Dipole-Dipole Interaction in a Quantum Gas with a Rotating Magnetic Field,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 230401. Tang, Y., W. Kao, K.-Y. Li, S. Seo, K. Mallayya, M. Rigol, S. Gop...

    2015

  75. [1487]

    Theory of Bose-Einstein condensation in trapped gases,

    Dalfovo, F., S. Giorgini, L. P. Pitaevskii, and S. Stringari (1999), “Theory of Bose-Einstein condensation in trapped gases,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 71,

    1999

  76. [1543]

    Long-range Interactions Between Ultracold Atoms and Molecules,

    Lepers, M., and O. Dulieu (2017), “Long-range Interactions Between Ultracold Atoms and Molecules,” in Cold Chem- istry: Molecular Scattering and Reactivity Near Absolute Zero, Theoretical and Computational Chemistry Series, edited by O. Dulieu and A. Osterwalder, Chap. 4 (The Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge) pp. 150–202. Lepers, M., R. Vexiau, M. Ay...

    2017

  77. [1579]

    Observation of Bose–Einstein condensation of dipolar molecules,

    Bigagli, N., W. Yuan, S. Zhang, B. Bulatovic, T. Kar- man, I. Stevenson, and S. Will (2024), “Observation of Bose–Einstein condensation of dipolar molecules,” Nature 631 (8020),

    2024

  78. [1714]

    Tunable Field- Linked s-wave Interactions in Dipolar Fermi Mixtures,

    Li, J.-L., G. M. Koutentakis, M. Hrast, M. Lemeshko, A. Schindewolf, and R. Alhyder (2025), “Tunable Field- Linked s-wave Interactions in Dipolar Fermi Mixtures,” arXiv:2506.23318. Li, J.-R., W. G. Tobias, K. Matsuda, C. Miller, G. Valtolina, L. De Marco, R. R. W. Wang, L. Lassabli` ere, G. Qu´ em´ ener, J. L. Bohn, and J. Ye (2021), “Tuning of dipolar in...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  79. [1868]

    Roton-Maxon Spectrum and Stability of Trapped Dipolar Bose-Einstein Condensates,

    Santos, L., G. V. Shlyapnikov, and M. Lewenstein (2003), “Roton-Maxon Spectrum and Stability of Trapped Dipolar Bose-Einstein Condensates,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 250403. Sardar, D., A. Christianen, H. Li, and J. L. Bohn (2023), “Four-body singlet potential-energy surface for reactions of calcium monofluoride,” Phys. Rev. A 107 (3), 032822. Sauer, B. E., J....

    2003

  80. [2016]

    Supersolidity in an elongated dipolar condensate,

    23Na133Cs 4.55(3) 1.735 616 Dagdigian and Wharton (1972); Docenko et al. (2004); and Stevenson et al. (2023)a 41K87Rb 0.574(17) 1.095 362(5) c Ni (2009) and Ospelkaus et al. (2010a) 39K133Cs 1.86 0.912 68(18) Ladjimi and Tomza (2024) and Zamarski et al. (2025) 87Rb133Cs 1.225(3)(8) 0.490 173 994(45) Gregory et al. (2016) and Molony et al. (2014) 39K107Ag ...

    1972

Showing first 80 references.