Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 minor 56 references

Slowly modulated aperiodic crystals admit localized approximate eigenfunctions whose energies are set by effective Landau or oscillator operators (with an extra energy shift).

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-10 09:26 UTC pith:BIBPRKXU

load-bearing objection Solid, self-contained construction of L^{2} approximate eigenfunctions for two-scale aperiodic Hamiltonians that recovers Simon, Landau levels (with Zeeman shift), honeycomb Dirac, and almost-flat bands under explicit spectral assumptions.

arxiv 2607.08320 v1 pith:BIBPRKXU submitted 2026-07-09 math-ph cond-mat.mes-hallmath.FAmath.MPmath.SPquant-ph

Approximate eigenfunctions for some aperiodic crystals

Long Meng This is my paper
classification math-ph cond-mat.mes-hallmath.FAmath.MPmath.SPquant-ph MSC 81Q2035P2081Q1047A55
keywords aperiodic crystalsapproximate eigenfunctionsBloch transformeffective HamiltonianLandau levelsquantum Hall effectvan Hove singularitywave packets
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper studies Schrödinger or Dirac Hamiltonians for crystals whose potentials are periodic in the fast variable but slowly modulated in a second slow scale εx. When the underlying family of periodic Bloch operators has a multiple eigenvalue of multiplicity J at energy e0 whose local expansion is homogeneous of degree m=1 or 2, the author constructs explicit wave-packet trial functions that are approximate eigenfunctions of the full aperiodic operator. The residual is of order ε to the power m/2 plus 1/4, while the functions remain normalized up to an O(√ε) error. The same construction recovers quantum-harmonic-oscillator spectra, Landau levels (with a Zeeman-type shift that the author traces to a second-order commutator), relativistic Landau levels for honeycomb Dirac cones, almost-flat bands for rational supercells, and two-particle Laughlin-type trial states for fractional quantum-Hall models. The result therefore supplies a single semiclassical recipe that turns local band geometry into concrete approximate eigenvalues and eigenfunctions for a wide class of aperiodic crystals.

Core claim

Under a local spectral-gap and homogeneous-degree-m expansion assumption on the Bloch family h(k,X) about a point (k0,X0), the aperiodic Hamiltonian H_ε admits localized approximate eigenfunctions Φ_ε whose energies are e0 plus ε^{m/2} times an eigenvalue of an effective matrix operator built from the leading homogeneous symbol (plus an explicit constant matrix correction when m=2). The residual is O(ε^{m/2+1/4}) and the L2-norm of Φ_ε equals the reciprocal square-root of the cell volume plus O(√ε).

What carries the argument

The reduction identity that replaces H_ε acting on a Bloch wave packet by an effective two-scale operator heff_ε (split into a band-edge part heff_1,ε and a non-uniform-density correction heff_2,ε), followed by a WKB construction of approximate eigenpairs of heff_ε that are then lifted back to the original space.

Load-bearing premise

The Bloch eigenvalues and eigenfunctions must admit a homogeneous polynomial expansion of exact degree one or two (with a spectral gap) in a shrinking neighborhood of the special point; any higher-order or non-homogeneous remainder would destroy the claimed residual size.

What would settle it

Take a concrete one-dimensional Schrödinger operator whose band edge is quadratic, compute the exact density of states or the lowest eigenvalues of a large supercell for several small ε, and check whether the predicted oscillator eigenvalues (including the constant energy shift) reproduce the observed peaks within the stated O(ε^{5/4}) tolerance.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Near van-Hove points or Dirac cones the spectrum of H_ε contains discrete approximate eigenvalues given by Landau or harmonic-oscillator levels (plus an explicit constant shift when m=2).
  • For rational ε=p/q the same construction produces an almost-flat band of width O(ε^{m/2+1/4}) in the Bloch decomposition over the supercell Brillouin zone.
  • Two-particle systems with weak interaction inherit approximate eigenfunctions whose energies are those of the corresponding two-particle Landau/Dirac operator plus the interaction potential.
  • The same wave-packet recipe applies verbatim to any dimension and to both Schrödinger and Dirac kinetic terms once the local band geometry is known.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The constant matrix correction that appears for m=2 is the continuum analogue of a Zeeman term; its presence suggests that any higher-order effective Hamiltonian will systematically generate magnetic-moment corrections from the same commutator structure.
  • Because the construction only needs local information about the Bloch family, it can be turned into a practical numerical scheme that extracts approximate eigenfunctions of large aperiodic systems from a single small-cell band-structure calculation.
  • If the homogeneous expansion can be pushed to higher order, the residual can be improved beyond O(ε^{m/2+1/4}), opening a route to sharper almost-flat-band estimates for incommensurate moiré materials.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper constructs localized approximate eigenfunctions for two-scale aperiodic Hamiltonians H_ε = T(-i∇_x + A(x,εx)) + V(x,εx) (Schrödinger or Dirac) when the Bloch family h(k,X) admits a multiplicity-J spectral gap and a homogeneous degree-m (m=1 or 2) expansion of eigenvalues and eigenfunctions about a point (k0,X0) (Assumption 3.1). Theorems 3.3 and 3.5 produce wave-packet states Φ_ε built from the Bloch modes and the eigenfunctions of an effective operator (Landau–Dirac, Landau–Schrödinger, or quantum harmonic oscillator, possibly with a constant energy shift ĂM) such that ||(H_ε - e0 - ε^{m/2} μ) Φ_ε|| = O(ε^{m/2 + 1/4}) with ||Φ_ε|| = |Ω|^{-1/2} + O(√ε). The proofs proceed by a reduction of H_ε to an effective Hamiltonian h_eff_ε (Theorem 9.2) followed by a WKB construction; applications recover quantum-oscillator approximations, integer and fractional quantum Hall effects (including honeycomb Dirac cones), and almost-flat bands for rational supercells.

Significance. The work supplies a unified, rigorous semiclassical framework that produces quantum (rather than purely classical) effective Hamiltonians for aperiodic crystals and recovers several physically important models as special cases. The energy-shift term ĂM for m=2 is new and is shown to arise from a Zeeman-type contribution; it improves the density-of-states approximation of Cancès–Massatt–Meng–Polack–Quan. The reduction Theorem 9.2 and the explicit residual O(ε^{m/2+1/4}) are clean and track all cut-off and Taylor remainders. The almost-flat-band statement for rational ε and the two-particle fractional-Hall constructions further enlarge the range of applications. The paper therefore constitutes a solid contribution to mathematical physics of aperiodic media.

minor comments (5)
  1. The cut-off exponents s1, s2 defined in Assumption 3.1 appear repeatedly; a short remark explaining why the particular combination 1/(2nd(m+1)) is chosen would help the reader follow the error bookkeeping in Section 10.
  2. In the abstract and Introduction the residual is written O(ε^{m/2 + 1/4}); the same exponent appears in Theorems 3.3 and 3.5. A parenthetical note that the 1/4 is an artifact of the L2-norm of the cut-off remainder (and could be improved under stronger decay) would clarify optimality.
  3. Figure 1 is referenced as improving the DoS approximation of [9], but the caption does not state the precise value of the shift ĂM used for the green curve; adding that number would make the figure self-contained.
  4. A few typographical inconsistencies remain (e.g., “Trepresents”, “xÞÑ”, missing spaces around operators). A careful copy-edit pass would remove them.
  5. Assumption 11.1 for the two-particle problem is left unverified; while the Laughlin wave-functions are known to satisfy the required decay, a one-sentence reference or remark would close the logical gap.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: approximate eigenfunctions and residuals are derived from Assumption 3.1 via explicit Bloch/Weyl reduction and WKB, with no fitted parameters or self-referential definitions.

full rationale

The central claims (Theorems 3.3 and 3.5) take as input the local spectral gap and homogeneous degree-m expansions of eigenvalues/eigenfunctions of the family h(k,X) stated in Assumption 3.1. From these the paper constructs the effective operators h_eff_ε (eqs. 8.1–8.3, 8.10–8.11) by Taylor expansion of the projected symbol (3.12), reduces H_ε Φ_ε to Φ_ε h_eff_ε by Bloch transform + Weyl quantization + cut-off estimates (Theorem 9.2 and Lemmas 10.2–10.7), and obtains the residual O(ε^{m/2+1/4}) by a finite-order WKB ansatz on the effective problem (Corollary 9.4). All steps are self-contained calculations; the energy-shift matrix ĂM (3.23) arises algebraically from the same expansion and is not presupposed. Applications (Sections 4–7, 11) simply verify Assumption 3.1 by standard perturbation theory for concrete models and recover known special cases (Simon, Landau levels, Dirac cones) as corollaries. Self-citations appear only for technical lemmas or numerical illustrations and are not load-bearing for the residual bounds. No parameter is fitted to data and then re-used as a prediction, and no uniqueness or ansatz is imported by self-citation. The derivation is therefore non-circular.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 3 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper is a pure-mathematics derivation. All free parameters are absent; the only inputs are standard smoothness/periodicity of the potentials and the local spectral Assumption 3.1. No new physical entities are postulated.

axioms (3)
  • domain assumption Potentials A(x,X), V(x,X) are C^∞ and L-periodic in x (and, for the flat-band section, also in X).
    Stated at the beginning of §1 and used for the Bloch transform and all Taylor expansions.
  • domain assumption Assumption 3.1: local multiplicity-J gap and homogeneous degree-m expansion of Bloch eigenvalues/eigenfunctions about (k0,X0).
    Load-bearing hypothesis of Theorems 3.3 and 3.5; verified by perturbation theory in each application section.
  • standard math Standard functional-analytic facts (self-adjointness of magnetic Schrödinger/Dirac operators, Weyl quantization calculus, Poisson summation for Bloch transform).
    Used throughout §§2,8–10 without further proof.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 64435 in / 2273 out tokens · 27610 ms · 2026-07-10T09:26:50.322702+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

In this paper, we consider Hamiltonians for aperiodic crystals of the form \begin{align*} H_\varepsilon:=T(-i\nabla_x+{\mathbf A}(x,\varepsilon x))+V(x,\varepsilon x),\qquad x\in {\mathbb R}^d \end{align*} where $T$ represents either a Dirac operators or a Schr\"odinger operator, and $x\mapsto {\mathbf A}(x,X)$ and $x\mapsto V(x,X)$ are $\mathbb L$-periodic with respect to some lattice $\mathbb L\subset{\mathbb R}^d$. Let \begin{align*} (k,X)\ni {\mathbb R}^d\times {\mathbb R}^d\mapsto h(k,X):=T(-i\nabla_x+k+{\mathbf A}(x,X))+V(x,X) \end{align*} be a family of operators acting on $L^2_{\rm per}(\mathbb{R}^d/\mathbb{L})$ with periodic boundary conditions. We show that, under some suitable assumptions on the family of operators $ (h(k,X))_{k,X}$ around an energy level $e_0\in {\mathbb R}$ and some points $(k_0,X_0)\in {\mathbb R}^d\times {\mathbb R}^d$, one can construct localized approximate eigenfunctions $\Phi_\varepsilon\in L^2({\mathbb R}^d)$ of the operator $H_\varepsilon$ such that for $\varepsilon$ small enough and for some $m\in \{1,2\}$ and $\mu\in {\mathbb R}$, \begin{align}\label{eq:abstract} \|(H_\varepsilon-e_0-\varepsilon^{\frac{m}{2}}\mu)\Phi_\varepsilon\|_{L^2({\mathbb R}^d)}={\mathcal O}(\varepsilon^{\frac{m}{2}+\frac{1}{4}}). \end{align} with \begin{align*} \|\Phi_\varepsilon\|_{L^2({\mathbb R}^d)}=\frac{1}{|{\mathbb R}^d/\mathbb L|^{1/2}}+{\mathcal O}(\sqrt{\varepsilon}). \end{align*}

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.08320 by Long Meng.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Approximations of oscillation of DoS. As shown in [ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_1.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

56 extracted references · 56 canonical work pages · 3 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Continuum honeycomb Schr\"odinger operators with incommensurate line defects

    Pierre Amenoagbadji and Michael I Weinstein. “Continuum honeycomb Schrödinger operators with incommensurate line defects”. In:arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.16712(2026)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  2. [2]

    The Ten Martini Problem

    Artur Avila and Svetlana Jitomirskaya. “The Ten Martini Problem”. In:Ann. of Math. (2)170.1 (2009), pp. 303–342

    work page 2009

  3. [3]

    Mathematics of magic angles in a model of twisted bilayer graphene

    S. Becker, M. Embree, J. Wittsten, and M. Zworski. “Mathematics of magic angles in a model of twisted bilayer graphene”. In:Probab. Math. Phys.3.1 (2022), pp. 69–103

    work page 2022

  4. [4]

    Semiclassical quantization conditions in strained moiré lat- tices

    Simon Becker and Jens Wittsten. “Semiclassical quantization conditions in strained moiré lat- tices”. In:Comm. Math. Phys.405.9 (2024), Paper No. 218, 48

    work page 2024

  5. [5]

    The noncommutative geometry of the quantum Hall effect

    Jean Bellissard, Andreas van Elst, and Hermann Schulz-Baldes. “The noncommutative geometry of the quantum Hall effect”. In:Journal of Mathematical Physics35.10 (1994), pp. 5373–5451

    work page 1994

  6. [6]

    Moiré bands in twisted double-layer graphene

    Rafi Bistritzer and Allan H. MacDonald. “Moiré bands in twisted double-layer graphene”. In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences108.30 (2011), pp. 12233–12237

    work page 2011

  7. [7]

    Anderson localization for Schrödinger operators onZ 2 with quasi-periodic potential

    Jean Bourgain, Michael Goldstein, and Wilhelm Schlag. “Anderson localization for Schrödinger operators onZ 2 with quasi-periodic potential”. In:Acta Math.188.1 (2002), pp. 41–86

    work page 2002

  8. [8]

    Simple derivation of moiré-scale continuous models for twisted bilayer graphene

    Eric Cancès, Louis Garrigue, and David Gontier. “Simple derivation of moiré-scale continuous models for twisted bilayer graphene”. In:Phys. Rev. B107 (15 2023), p. 155403

    work page 2023

  9. [9]

    Numerical compu- tation of the density of states of aperiodic multiscale Schrödinger operators

    Eric Cancès, Daniel Massatt, Long Meng, Étienne Polack, and Xue Quan. “Numerical compu- tation of the density of states of aperiodic multiscale Schrödinger operators”. In:to appear in SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing(2026)

    work page 2026

  10. [10]

    Semiclassical analysis of two-scale electronic Hamiltonians for twisted bilayer graphene

    Eric Cancès and Long Meng. “Semiclassical analysis of two-scale electronic Hamiltonians for twisted bilayer graphene”. In:arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.14011(2023)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  11. [11]

    Duality between atomic configurations and Bloch states in twistronic materials

    Stephen Carr, Daniel Massatt, Mitchell Luskin, and Efthimios Kaxiras. “Duality between atomic configurations and Bloch states in twistronic materials”. In:Phys. Rev. Res.2 (3 2020), p. 033162

    work page 2020

  12. [12]

    Effective mass theorems with Bloch modes crossings

    Victor Chabu, Clotilde Fermanian Kammerer, and Fabricio Macià. “Effective mass theorems with Bloch modes crossings”. In:Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal.245.3 (2022), pp. 1339–1400

    work page 2022

  13. [13]

    Derivation of Kubo’s formula for disordered systems at zero temperature

    Wojciech De Roeck, Alexander Elgart, and Martin Fraas. “Derivation of Kubo’s formula for disordered systems at zero temperature”. In:Invent. Math.235.2 (2024), pp. 489–568

    work page 2024

  14. [14]

    Pseudospectra of semiclassical (pseudo-) differential operators

    Nils Dencker, Johannes Sjöstrand, and Maciej Zworski. “Pseudospectra of semiclassical (pseudo-) differential operators”. In:Comm. Pure Appl. Math.57.3 (2004), pp. 384–415

    work page 2004

  15. [15]

    Développementsasymptotiquesdesperturbationslentesdel’opérateurdeSchrödinger périodique

    MouezDimassi.“Développementsasymptotiquesdesperturbationslentesdel’opérateurdeSchrödinger périodique”. In:Comm. Partial Differential Equations18.5-6 (1993), pp. 771–803

    work page 1993

  16. [16]

    Adiabatic charge transport and the Kubo formula for Landau-type Hamiltonians

    Alexander Elgart and Benjamin Schlein. “Adiabatic charge transport and the Kubo formula for Landau-type Hamiltonians”. In:Comm. Pure Appl. Math.57.5 (2004), pp. 590–615

    work page 2004

  17. [17]

    Zyun Francis Ezawa.Quantum Hall Effects. 3rd. World Ssientific, 2013

    work page 2013

  18. [18]

    Honeycomb Schrödinger operators in the strong binding regime

    Charles L. Fefferman, James P. Lee-Thorp, and Michael I. Weinstein. “Honeycomb Schrödinger operators in the strong binding regime”. In:Comm. Pure Appl. Math.71.6 (2018), pp. 1178–1270

    work page 2018

  19. [19]

    Honeycomb lattice potentials and Dirac points

    Charles L. Fefferman and Michael I. Weinstein. “Honeycomb lattice potentials and Dirac points”. In:J. Amer. Math. Soc.25.4 (2012), pp. 1169–1220

    work page 2012

  20. [20]

    Wave packets in honeycomb structures and two-dimensional Dirac equations

    Charles L. Fefferman and Michael I. Weinstein. “Wave packets in honeycomb structures and two-dimensional Dirac equations”. In:Comm. Math. Phys.326.1 (2014), pp. 251–286

    work page 2014

  21. [21]

    Sharp regularity results for Coulombic many-electron wave functions

    Søren Fournais, Maria Hoffmann-Ostenhof, Thomas Hoffmann-Ostenhof, and Thomas Øster- gaard Sørensen. “Sharp regularity results for Coulombic many-electron wave functions”. In: Comm. Math. Phys.255.1 (2005), pp. 183–227

    work page 2005

  22. [22]

    A mathematical approach to the effective Hamiltonian in perturbed periodic problems

    C. Gérard, A. Martinez, and J. Sjöstrand. “A mathematical approach to the effective Hamiltonian in perturbed periodic problems”. In:Comm. Math. Phys.142.2 (1991), pp. 217–244

    work page 1991

  23. [23]

    Homogenization limits and Wigner transforms

    PatrickGérard,PeterA.Markowich,NorbertJ.Mauser,andFrédéricPoupaud.“Homogenization limits and Wigner transforms”. In:Comm. Pure Appl. Math.50.4 (1997), pp. 323–379. 60

    work page 1997

  24. [24]

    Dynamical delocalization in random Landau Hamiltonians

    François Germinet, Abel Klein, and Jeffrey H. Schenker. “Dynamical delocalization in random Landau Hamiltonians”. In:Ann. of Math. (2)166.1 (2007), pp. 215–244

    work page 2007

  25. [25]

    Universality of the Hall conduc- tivity in interacting electron systems

    Alessandro Giuliani, Vieri Mastropietro, and Marcello Porta. “Universality of the Hall conduc- tivity in interacting electron systems”. In:Comm. Math. Phys.349.3 (2017), pp. 1107–1161

    work page 2017

  26. [26]

    Hölder continuity of the integrated density of states for quasi-periodic Schrödinger equations and averages of shifts of subharmonic functions

    Michael Goldstein and Wilhelm Schlag. “Hölder continuity of the integrated density of states for quasi-periodic Schrödinger equations and averages of shifts of subharmonic functions”. In:Ann. of Math. (2)154.1 (2001), pp. 155–203

    work page 2001

  27. [27]

    Puits de potentiel généralisés et asymptotique semi-classique

    B. Helffer and D. Robert. “Puits de potentiel généralisés et asymptotique semi-classique”. In: vol. 41. 3. 1984, pp. 291–331

    work page 1984

  28. [28]

    Analyse semi-classique pour l’équation de Harper (avec application à l’équation de Schrödinger avec champ magnétique)

    B. Helffer and J. Sjöstrand. “Analyse semi-classique pour l’équation de Harper (avec application à l’équation de Schrödinger avec champ magnétique)”. In:Mém. Soc. Math. France (N.S.)34 (1988), p. 113

    work page 1988

  29. [29]

    Semiclassical analysis for Harper’s equation. III. Cantor structure of the spectrum

    B. Helffer and J. Sjöstrand. “Semiclassical analysis for Harper’s equation. III. Cantor structure of the spectrum”. In:Mém. Soc. Math. France (N.S.)39 (1989), pp. 1–124

    work page 1989

  30. [30]

    Analyse semi-classique pour l’équation de Harper. II. Comportement semi-classique près d’un rationnel

    B. Helffer and J. Sjöstrand. “Analyse semi-classique pour l’équation de Harper. II. Comportement semi-classique près d’un rationnel”. In:Mém. Soc. Math. France (N.S.)40 (1990), p. 139

    work page 1990

  31. [31]

    P. D. Hislop and I. M. Sigal.Introduction to spectral theory. Vol. 113. Applied Mathematical Sci- ences. With applications to Schrödinger operators. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1996, pp. x+337. isbn: 0-387-94501-6

    work page 1996

  32. [32]

    Projection method for quasiperiodic elliptic equations and application to quasiperiodic homogenization

    Kai Jiang, Meng Li, Juan Zhang, and Lei Zhang. “Projection method for quasiperiodic elliptic equations and application to quasiperiodic homogenization”. In:SIAM J. Numer. Anal.63.5 (2025), pp. 1962–1985

    work page 2025

  33. [33]

    Universal hierarchical structure of quasiperiodic eigen- functions

    Svetlana Jitomirskaya and Wencai Liu. “Universal hierarchical structure of quasiperiodic eigen- functions”. In:Ann. of Math. (2)187.3 (2018), pp. 721–776

    work page 2018

  34. [34]

    Metal-insulator transition for the almost Mathieu operator

    Svetlana Ya. Jitomirskaya. “Metal-insulator transition for the almost Mathieu operator”. In:Ann. of Math. (2)150.3 (1999), pp. 1159–1175

    work page 1999

  35. [35]

    Flat band in twisted bilayer Bravais lattices

    Toshikaze Kariyado and Ashvin Vishwanath. “Flat band in twisted bilayer Bravais lattices”. In: Phys. Rev. Res.1 (3 2019), p. 033076

    work page 2019

  36. [36]

    On Mott’s formula for the ac-conductivity in the Anderson model

    Abel Klein, Olivier Lenoble, and Peter Müller. “On Mott’s formula for the ac-conductivity in the Anderson model”. In:Ann. of Math. (2)166.2 (2007), pp. 549–577

    work page 2007

  37. [37]

    Anomalous Quantum Hall Effect: An Incompressible Quantum Fluid with Frac- tionally Charged Excitations

    R. B. Laughlin. “Anomalous Quantum Hall Effect: An Incompressible Quantum Fluid with Frac- tionally Charged Excitations”. In:Phys. Rev. Lett.50 (18 1983), pp. 1395–1398

    work page 1983

  38. [38]

    On the mixed regularity ofN-body Coulombic wavefunctions

    Long Meng. “On the mixed regularity ofN-body Coulombic wavefunctions”. In:ESAIM Math. Model. Numer. Anal.57.4 (2023), pp. 2257–2282

    work page 2023

  39. [39]

    A rigorous justification of the Mittleman’s approach to the Dirac-Fock model

    Long Meng. “A rigorous justification of the Mittleman’s approach to the Dirac-Fock model”. In: Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations63.2 (2024), Paper No. 39, 29

    work page 2024

  40. [40]

    Ultraflatbands and Shear Solitons in Moiré Patterns of Twisted Bilayer Transition Metal Dichalcogenides

    Mit H. Naik and Manish Jain. “Ultraflatbands and Shear Solitons in Moiré Patterns of Twisted Bilayer Transition Metal Dichalcogenides”. In:Phys. Rev. Lett.121 (26 2018), p. 266401

    work page 2018

  41. [41]

    Low energy bands do not contribute to quantum Hall effect

    S. Nakamura and J. Bellissard. “Low energy bands do not contribute to quantum Hall effect”. In:Comm. Math. Phys.131.2 (1990), pp. 283–305

    work page 1990

  42. [42]

    Effective dynamics for Bloch electrons: Peierls substitution and beyond

    Gianluca Panati, Herbert Spohn, and Stefan Teufel. “Effective dynamics for Bloch electrons: Peierls substitution and beyond”. In:Comm. Math. Phys.242.3 (2003), pp. 547–578

    work page 2003

  43. [43]

    These pictures are calculated by Xue Quan

    Xue Quan. These pictures are calculated by Xue Quan

    work page

  44. [44]

    Michael Reed and Barry Simon.Methods of modern mathematical physics. IV. Analysis of operators. Academic Press [Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Publishers], New York-London, 1978, pp. xv+396.isbn: 0-12-585004-2

    work page 1978

  45. [45]

    Emergent quantum Hall effects below 50 mT in a two-dimensional topo- logical insulator

    Saquib Shamim et al. “Emergent quantum Hall effects below 50 mT in a two-dimensional topo- logical insulator”. In:Science Advances6.26 (2020), eaba4625

    work page 2020

  46. [46]

    Tight-binding reduction and topological equivalence in strong magnetic fields

    Jacob Shapiro and Michael I. Weinstein. “Tight-binding reduction and topological equivalence in strong magnetic fields”. In:Adv. Math.403 (2022), Paper No. 108343, 70. 61

    work page 2022

  47. [47]

    Almost periodic Schrödinger operators: a review

    Barry Simon. “Almost periodic Schrödinger operators: a review”. In:Adv. in Appl. Math.3.4 (1982), pp. 463–490

    work page 1982

  48. [48]

    Semiclassical analysis of low lying eigenvalues. I. Nondegenerate minima: asymp- totic expansions

    Barry Simon. “Semiclassical analysis of low lying eigenvalues. I. Nondegenerate minima: asymp- totic expansions”. In:Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré Sect. A (N.S.)38.3 (1983), pp. 295–308

    work page 1983

  49. [49]

    Semiclassical analysis of low lying eigenvalues. II. Tunneling

    Barry Simon. “Semiclassical analysis of low lying eigenvalues. II. Tunneling”. In:Ann. of Math. (2)120.1 (1984), pp. 89–118

    work page 1984

  50. [50]

    Strain-induced quasi-1D channels in twisted Moiré lattices

    Andreas Sinner, Pierre A. Pantaleón, and Francisco Guinea. “Strain-induced quasi-1D channels in twisted Moiré lattices”. In:Phys. Rev. Lett.131.16 (2023), Paper No. 166402, 7

    work page 2023

  51. [51]

    Semiclassical approximations for Hamiltonians with operator-valued symbols

    Hans-Michael Stiepan and Stefan Teufel. “Semiclassical approximations for Hamiltonians with operator-valued symbols”. In:Communications in Mathematical Physics320.3 (2013), pp. 821– 849

    work page 2013

  52. [52]

    Stefan Teufel.Adiabatic perturbation theory in quantum dynamics. Vol. 1821. Lecture Notes in Mathematics. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2003, pp. vi+236.isbn: 3-540-40723-5

    work page 2003

  53. [53]

    Texts and Monographs in Physics

    Bernd Thaller.The Dirac equation. Texts and Monographs in Physics. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1992, pp. xviii+357.isbn: 3-540-54883-1

    work page 1992

  54. [54]

    Time dependent approach to scattering from impurities in a crystal

    Lawrence E. Thomas. “Time dependent approach to scattering from impurities in a crystal”. In: Comm. Math. Phys.33 (1973), pp. 335–343

    work page 1973

  55. [55]

    Lectures on the Quantum Hall Effect

    David Tong. “Lectures on the quantum Hall effect”. In:arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.06687(2016)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  56. [56]

    Convergence of the planewave approximations for quantum incommensurate systems

    Ting Wang, Huajie Chen, Aihui Zhou, Yuzhi Zhou, and Daniel Massatt. “Convergence of the planewave approximations for quantum incommensurate systems”. In:Multiscale Model. Simul. 23.1 (2025), pp. 545–576. 62

    work page 2025