Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

UniBench: Visual Reasoning Requires Rethinking Vision-Language Beyond Scaling

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2408.04810 v1 pith:BZAJDH2G submitted 2024-08-09 cs.CV cs.AIcs.LG

UniBench: Visual Reasoning Requires Rethinking Vision-Language Beyond Scaling

classification cs.CV cs.AIcs.LG
keywords benchmarksunibenchvision-languagemodelprogressscalingcapabilitiescounting
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Significant research efforts have been made to scale and improve vision-language model (VLM) training approaches. Yet, with an ever-growing number of benchmarks, researchers are tasked with the heavy burden of implementing each protocol, bearing a non-trivial computational cost, and making sense of how all these benchmarks translate into meaningful axes of progress. To facilitate a systematic evaluation of VLM progress, we introduce UniBench: a unified implementation of 50+ VLM benchmarks spanning a comprehensive range of carefully categorized capabilities from object recognition to spatial awareness, counting, and much more. We showcase the utility of UniBench for measuring progress by evaluating nearly 60 publicly available vision-language models, trained on scales of up to 12.8B samples. We find that while scaling training data or model size can boost many vision-language model capabilities, scaling offers little benefit for reasoning or relations. Surprisingly, we also discover today's best VLMs struggle on simple digit recognition and counting tasks, e.g. MNIST, which much simpler networks can solve. Where scale falls short, we find that more precise interventions, such as data quality or tailored-learning objectives offer more promise. For practitioners, we also offer guidance on selecting a suitable VLM for a given application. Finally, we release an easy-to-run UniBench code-base with the full set of 50+ benchmarks and comparisons across 59 models as well as a distilled, representative set of benchmarks that runs in 5 minutes on a single GPU.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. FeynmanBench: Benchmarking Multimodal LLMs on Diagrammatic Physics Reasoning

    cs.AI 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    FeynmanBench is the first benchmark for evaluating multimodal LLMs on diagrammatic reasoning with Feynman diagrams, revealing systematic failures in enforcing physical constraints and global topology.

  2. FeynmanBench: Benchmarking Multimodal LLMs on Diagrammatic Physics Reasoning

    cs.AI 2026-04 conditional novelty 7.0

    Across 19 multimodal LLMs, local Feynman-diagram recognition stays high while topological reconstruction and full amplitude derivation collapse.

  3. How Well Does GPT-4o Understand Vision? Evaluating Multimodal Foundation Models on Standard Computer Vision Tasks

    cs.CV 2025-07 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Multimodal foundation models achieve respectable but sub-specialist performance on semantic vision tasks and weaker results on geometric tasks when evaluated through prompt chaining on established benchmarks.