Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Understanding the LLM-ification of CHI: Unpacking the Impact of LLMs at CHI through a Systematic Literature Review

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2501.12557 v1 pith:CBGQIHSP submitted 2025-01-22 cs.HC cs.AIcs.CLcs.CY

classification cs.HCcs.AIcs.CLcs.CY
keywords llmsresearchauthorsbeendomainsliteraturemodelsreview
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large language models (LLMs) have been positioned to revolutionize HCI, by reshaping not only the interfaces, design patterns, and sociotechnical systems that we study, but also the research practices we use. To-date, however, there has been little understanding of LLMs' uptake in HCI. We address this gap via a systematic literature review of 153 CHI papers from 2020-24 that engage with LLMs. We taxonomize: (1) domains where LLMs are applied; (2) roles of LLMs in HCI projects; (3) contribution types; and (4) acknowledged limitations and risks. We find LLM work in 10 diverse domains, primarily via empirical and artifact contributions. Authors use LLMs in five distinct roles, including as research tools or simulated users. Still, authors often raise validity and reproducibility concerns, and overwhelmingly study closed models. We outline opportunities to improve HCI research with and on LLMs, and provide guiding questions for researchers to consider the validity and appropriateness of LLM-related work.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. "I Just Don't Want My Work Being Fed Into The AI Blender": Queer Artists on Refusing and Resisting Generative AI

    cs.HC 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Queer artists largely refuse and resist generative AI, seeing it as anti-relational and disruptive to the community-oriented, identity-forming nature of their art practices, with only limited acceptance for surreal im...

  2. Exploring MLLMs Perception of Network Visualization Principles

    cs.HC 2025-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    MLLMs given the same instructions as human participants achieve expert-level performance on perceiving stress in network visualizations and rely on similar visual proxies.

Pith tools