A Survey of Test-Time Compute: From Intuitive Inference to Deliberate Reasoning
read the original abstract
The remarkable performance of the o1 model in complex reasoning demonstrates that test-time compute scaling can further unlock the model's potential, enabling powerful System-2 thinking. However, there is still a lack of comprehensive surveys for test-time compute scaling. We trace the concept of test-time compute back to System-1 models. In System-1 models, test-time compute addresses distribution shifts and improves robustness and generalization through parameter updating, input modification, representation editing, and output calibration. In System-2 models, it enhances the model's reasoning ability to solve complex problems through repeated sampling, self-correction, and tree search. We organize this survey according to the trend of System-1 to System-2 thinking, highlighting the key role of test-time compute in the transition from System-1 models to weak System-2 models, and then to strong System-2 models. We also point out advanced topics and future directions.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 10 Pith papers
-
Evo-Memory: Benchmarking LLM Agent Test-time Learning with Self-Evolving Memory
Evo-Memory is a new benchmark for self-evolving memory in LLM agents across task streams, with baseline ExpRAG and proposed ReMem method that integrates reasoning, actions, and memory updates for continual improvement.
-
Latent Reward Steering: An Adaptive Inference-Time Framework that Implicitly Promotes Cognitive Behaviors in Reasoning LLMs
LRS trains a latent reward model on final-answer correctness to steer SAE states during inference, improving reasoning performance and implicitly encouraging better cognitive behaviors.
-
When to Vote, When to Rewrite: Disagreement-Guided Strategy Routing for Test-Time Scaling
A disagreement-guided routing framework dynamically selects among resolution, voting, and rewriting strategies for test-time scaling, delivering 3-7% accuracy gains with lower sampling cost on mathematical benchmarks.
-
When to Trust Tools? Adaptive Tool Trust Calibration For Tool-Integrated Math Reasoning
ATTC reduces 'Tool Ignored' errors in tool-integrated reasoning by adaptively trusting tool results according to generated code confidence, yielding 4.1-7.5% gains across models and datasets.
-
Evo-Memory: Benchmarking LLM Agent Test-time Learning with Self-Evolving Memory
Evo-Memory is a new streaming benchmark and evaluation framework for self-evolving memory in LLM agents, unifying over ten memory modules and introducing the ReMem pipeline for continual improvement on multi-turn and ...
-
Test-Time Scaling in Multimodal Foundation Models: A Comprehensive Survey of Generation and Reasoning
A survey of test-time scaling for multimodal foundation models that introduces a three-way taxonomy of sampling, feedback, and search approaches along with applications and benchmarks.
-
Mapping Whisper Representations to Human ECoG Responses with Interpretable Time-Resolved Neural Encoding
The paper introduces a time-resolved neural encoder combining Whisper embeddings with recurrent temporal modeling and soft attention to predict ECoG responses, finding strongest alignment in intermediate layers and an...
-
Explicit Reasoning Makes Better Judges: A Systematic Study on Accuracy, Efficiency, and Robustness
Thinking LLMs achieve ~10 percentage points higher accuracy than non-thinking ones on RewardBench with under 2x compute overhead, outperforming augmentation strategies that cost over 8x more while also showing better ...
-
MODE-RAG: Manifold Outlier Diagnosis and Energy-based Retrieval-Augmented Generation Evaluation
MODE-RAG introduces a VFE-driven multi-agent pipeline with MCTS and logit perturbations to lower hallucination and sycophancy rates in multimodal RAG, tested on the new ModeVent subset of MultiVent.
-
From System 1 to System 2: A Survey of Reasoning Large Language Models
The survey organizes the shift of LLMs toward deliberate System 2 reasoning, covering model construction techniques, performance on math and coding benchmarks, and future research directions.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.