Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

AutoAdvExBench: Benchmarking autonomous exploitation of adversarial example defenses

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2503.01811 v1 pith:CDSFOEFS submitted 2025-03-03 cs.CR cs.AIcs.LG

AutoAdvExBench: Benchmarking autonomous exploitation of adversarial example defenses

classification cs.CR cs.AIcs.LG
keywords defensesadversarialautoadvexbenchbenchmarkctf-likeagentbenchcode
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

We introduce AutoAdvExBench, a benchmark to evaluate if large language models (LLMs) can autonomously exploit defenses to adversarial examples. Unlike existing security benchmarks that often serve as proxies for real-world tasks, bench directly measures LLMs' success on tasks regularly performed by machine learning security experts. This approach offers a significant advantage: if a LLM could solve the challenges presented in bench, it would immediately present practical utility for adversarial machine learning researchers. We then design a strong agent that is capable of breaking 75% of CTF-like ("homework exercise") adversarial example defenses. However, we show that this agent is only able to succeed on 13% of the real-world defenses in our benchmark, indicating the large gap between difficulty in attacking "real" code, and CTF-like code. In contrast, a stronger LLM that can attack 21% of real defenses only succeeds on 54% of CTF-like defenses. We make this benchmark available at https://github.com/ethz-spylab/AutoAdvExBench.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Engineering Trustworthy Agentic AI for Critical Systems

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0

    A survey claiming that agentic AI trustworthiness is a single cross-domain problem and outlining a framework for graded, certifiable assurance.

  2. Auto-ART: Structured Literature Synthesis and Automated Adversarial Robustness Testing

    cs.CR 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Auto-ART delivers the first structured synthesis of adversarial robustness consensus plus an executable multi-norm testing framework that flags gradient masking in 92% of cases on RobustBench and reveals a 23.5 pp rob...