Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Identifying and Compensating for Feature Deviation in Imbalanced Deep Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2001.01385 v4 pith:CGZRRLHE submitted 2020-01-06 cs.LG cs.CVstat.ML

Identifying and Compensating for Feature Deviation in Imbalanced Deep Learning

classification cs.LG cs.CVstat.ML
keywords dataconvnetdeviationfeatureclasseslearningminortest
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Classifiers trained with class-imbalanced data are known to perform poorly on test data of the "minor" classes, of which we have insufficient training data. In this paper, we investigate learning a ConvNet classifier under such a scenario. We found that a ConvNet significantly over-fits the minor classes, which is quite opposite to traditional machine learning algorithms that often under-fit minor classes. We conducted a series of analysis and discovered the feature deviation phenomenon -- the learned ConvNet generates deviated features between the training and test data of minor classes -- which explains how over-fitting happens. To compensate for the effect of feature deviation which pushes test data toward low decision value regions, we propose to incorporate class-dependent temperatures (CDT) in training a ConvNet. CDT simulates feature deviation in the training phase, forcing the ConvNet to enlarge the decision values for minor-class data so that it can overcome real feature deviation in the test phase. We validate our approach on benchmark datasets and achieve promising performance. We hope that our insights can inspire new ways of thinking in resolving class-imbalanced deep learning.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Why Not Hyperparameter-Friendly Optimisation? A Monotonic Adaptive Norm Rescaling Approach For Long-Tailed Recognition

    cs.CV 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    SAMN applies the Pool Adjacent Violators Algorithm to directly enforce monotonicity on per-class weight norms during classifier retraining, eliminating hyperparameters while integrating with other long-tailed methods.

  2. Measuring Weak-to-Strong Legibility of Reasoning Models

    cs.MA 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Strong reasoning models need traces weaker models can digest; current efficiency metrics miss thoroughness and understate this weak-to-strong legibility requirement.

  3. On the Impact of Class Imbalance on the Learning Dynamics of Deep Neural Networks:An Intuitive Insight

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    Class imbalance causes DNNs to underfit minority classes early in training and produce non-generalizable minority representations later by overfitting to minimize overall loss.