The Illusion-Illusion: Vision Language Models See Illusions Where There are None
read the original abstract
Illusions are entertaining, but they are also a useful diagnostic tool in cognitive science, philosophy, and neuroscience. A typical illusion shows a gap between how something "really is" and how something "appears to be", and this gap helps us understand the mental processing that lead to how something appears to be. Illusions are also useful for investigating artificial systems, and much research has examined whether computational models of perceptions fall prey to the same illusions as people. Here, I invert the standard use of perceptual illusions to examine basic processing errors in current vision language models. I present these models with illusory-illusions, neighbors of common illusions that should not elicit processing errors. These include such things as perfectly reasonable ducks, crooked lines that truly are crooked, circles that seem to have different sizes because they are, in fact, of different sizes, and so on. I show that many current vision language systems mistakenly see these illusion-illusions as illusions. I suggest that such failures are part of broader failures already discussed in the literature.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
The Riddle Riddle: Testing Flexible Reasoning in Large Language Models and Humans
LLMs score 84.9% on genuine riddles but 50.7% on riddle riddles requiring literal answers, opposite to humans (50.5% vs 80.5%), indicating memory retrieval over flexible strategy selection.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.