Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Lessons for Editors of AI Incidents from the AI Incident Database

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2409.16425 v1 pith:CM465HF5 submitted 2024-09-24 cs.CY cs.AIcs.LG

Lessons for Editors of AI Incidents from the AI Incident Database

classification cs.CY cs.AIcs.LG
keywords incidentsincidentaiidanalyzingdatabaseharmimplicatedincreasingly
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

As artificial intelligence (AI) systems become increasingly deployed across the world, they are also increasingly implicated in AI incidents - harm events to individuals and society. As a result, industry, civil society, and governments worldwide are developing best practices and regulations for monitoring and analyzing AI incidents. The AI Incident Database (AIID) is a project that catalogs AI incidents and supports further research by providing a platform to classify incidents for different operational and research-oriented goals. This study reviews the AIID's dataset of 750+ AI incidents and two independent taxonomies applied to these incidents to identify common challenges to indexing and analyzing AI incidents. We find that certain patterns of AI incidents present structural ambiguities that challenge incident databasing and explore how epistemic uncertainty in AI incident reporting is unavoidable. We therefore report mitigations to make incident processes more robust to uncertainty related to cause, extent of harm, severity, or technical details of implicated systems. With these findings, we discuss how to develop future AI incident reporting practices.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. RiskNet: A large-scale dataset of AI risk incidents from news with alignment and multi-dimensional annotations

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    RiskNet releases a large-scale dataset of aligned and annotated AI risk incidents extracted from news via a structured processing pipeline, along with benchmark subsets and an online exploration platform.