Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2304.14415 v1 pith:D3RLNJ5V submitted 2023-04-21 cs.HC cs.AIcs.CLcs.CY

Generative AI Perceptions: A Survey to Measure the Perceptions of Faculty, Staff, and Students on Generative AI Tools in Academia

classification cs.HC cs.AIcs.CLcs.CY
keywords chatgptsurveyfacultymeasurestaffstudentstooleffects
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

ChatGPT is a natural language processing tool that can engage in human-like conversations and generate coherent and contextually relevant responses to various prompts. ChatGPT is capable of understanding natural text that is input by a user and generating appropriate responses in various forms. This tool represents a major step in how humans are interacting with technology. This paper specifically focuses on how ChatGPT is revolutionizing the realm of engineering education and the relationship between technology, students, and faculty and staff. Because this tool is quickly changing and improving with the potential for even greater future capability, it is a critical time to collect pertinent data. A survey was created to measure the effects of ChatGPT on students, faculty, and staff. This survey is shared as a Texas A&M University technical report to allow other universities and entities to use this survey and measure the effects elsewhere.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. AI-Assisted Help-Seeking Trajectories in Programming Education from an SRL-Informed Perspective

    cs.AI 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Empirical analysis of AI help-seeking trajectories in programming courses finds reactive troubleshooting dominates and links to higher submission counts without score differences.