Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Delve into Visual Contrastive Decoding for Hallucination Mitigation of Large Vision-Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2412.06775 v1 pith:DGQCGN3Q submitted 2024-12-09 cs.CV cs.AIcs.CL

Delve into Visual Contrastive Decoding for Hallucination Mitigation of Large Vision-Language Models

classification cs.CV cs.AIcs.CL
keywords contrastivevisualdecodingsamplescontentsacrossbenchmarksdifferent
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

While large vision-language models (LVLMs) have shown impressive capabilities in generating plausible responses correlated with input visual contents, they still suffer from hallucinations, where the generated text inaccurately reflects visual contents. To address this, recent approaches apply contrastive decoding to calibrate the model's response via contrasting output distributions with original and visually distorted samples, demonstrating promising hallucination mitigation in a training-free manner. However, the potential of changing information in visual inputs is not well-explored, so a deeper investigation into the behaviors of visual contrastive decoding is of great interest. In this paper, we first explore various methods for contrastive decoding to change visual contents, including image downsampling and editing. Downsampling images reduces the detailed textual information while editing yields new contents in images, providing new aspects as visual contrastive samples. To further study benefits by using different contrastive samples, we analyze probability-level metrics, including entropy and distribution distance. Interestingly, the effect of these samples in mitigating hallucinations varies a lot across LVLMs and benchmarks. Based on our analysis, we propose a simple yet effective method to combine contrastive samples, offering a practical solution for applying contrastive decoding across various scenarios. Extensive experiments are conducted to validate the proposed fusion method among different benchmarks.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. HIVE: Understanding Post-Hallucination Reasoning in Vision Language Models

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0

    Hallucinated captions systematically improve VLM accuracy on vision-language tasks across nine models and nine datasets, with gains linked to broadened semantic coverage and modulated reasoning entropy.

  2. HTDC: Hesitation-Triggered Differential Calibration for Mitigating Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Models

    cs.CV 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    HTDC mitigates hallucinations in LVLMs by triggering calibration only at hesitation-prone decoding steps via contrasts with visual-nullification and semantic-nullification probes.

  3. Mitigating Manifold Departure: Uncertainty-Aware Subspace Rectification for Trustworthy MLLM Decoding

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    MGAP constructs a language-prior subspace from blind hidden states via SVD and applies a consistency-aware gate to attenuate only the projected prior component in multimodal hidden states during decoding.