Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Supersymmetry and Nonreciprocity

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-02 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that every nonreciprocal stochastic system with additive Gaussian white noise can be mapped to a supersymmetric quantum field theory with a single, generically non-Hermitian supercharge.

desk verdict A genuinely new explicit N=1 superspace action for nonreciprocal stochastic systems, with the equivalence to the original process clean only modulo boundary terms. read the letter →

arxiv 2602.16824 v2 pith:DM6KU4V7 submitted 2026-02-18 hep-th cond-mat.softcond-mat.stat-mechmath-phmath.MP

Savdeep Sethi , Gabriel Artur Weiderpass This is my paper
classification hep-thcond-mat.softcond-mat.stat-mechmath-phmath.MP
keywords supersymmetrynonreciprocalinteractionsLangevinequationsstochasticpathintegralsnon-Hermitianquantummechanicsactivematterpartialdifferentialexactsymmetries
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper aims to prove that stochastic dynamical systems with nonreciprocal interactions — forces that do not come from a potential — can be recast as quantum field theories with a manifest supersymmetry generated by a single supercharge. The resulting actions are generically non-Hermitian, which is what allows the enlarged symmetry to exist. The construction generalizes the known reciprocal case, where two supercharges appear, and supplies an explicit superspace action whose supercharge squares to the Hamiltonian. If correct, it gives a quantum-mechanical description of a wide class of nonequilibrium systems — active matter, nonreciprocal Ising models, self-sustaining waves — and opens them to supersymmetric tools.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the one-supercharge superspace action S = ∫dt dθ (½ Λ_i D_χ Λ_i − Λ_i E_i(φ)), with D_χ = −∂_θ − θ∂_t and E_i = ∂_t ϕ_i − f_i. Under the Q_χ transformations, δφ = −ϵχ, δψ = −ϵF, δχ = −ϵ ∂_t φ, δF = −ϵ ∂_t ψ, the action is invariant and Q_χ² = −∂_t, so the supercharge squares to the Hamiltonian. A second essential ingredient is the finite- and infinite-dimensional Pfaffian identity Pf[(M E), (−Eᵀ 0)] = det(E), which rewrites the functional determinant as a fermion integral with a skew-symmetric block M; this freedom in representing the determinant is what makes the new supersymmetry possible. The nonreciprocal part of the force, A_i, couples to the bosons as an imag

What would settle it

For a simple linear nonreciprocal system, e.g., two variables with f_x = −k_x x + a y and f_y = b x − k_y y with a ≠ b, discretize the new fermionic action on a finite time grid and compare the resulting fermion determinant with det(∂_t δ − ∂f) from the standard response-field path integral. Any mismatch for finite N, or in the continuum limit, would show the supersymmetric action describes a different stochastic process. A second check is to compute the two-point functions from both formulations in this linear model and compare them directly.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Every Langevin equation and stochastic PDE with additive Gaussian white noise has a local equivalent action with one real supersymmetry, even when the drift force is nonreciprocal. The superspace action S = ∫dt dθ (½ Λ_i D_χ Λ_i − Λ_i E_i(φ)) is invariant under a supercharge Q_χ that squares to the Hamiltonian. A Pfaffian identity rewrites the functional determinant of the Langevin equation as a new fermion bilinear, and this rewriting is what allows the extra supersymmetry. Nonreciprocity appears as a vector coupling like a magnetic field with imaginary charge; the supercharge is the standard nilpotent charge plus half of a second broken charge. In the reciprocal limit the action reduces to

Load-bearing premise

The new non-Hermitian path integral must compute exactly the same correlation functions as the original stochastic process; everything rests on the Gaussian fermion integral reproducing the Langevin functional determinant under the paper's discretization, and on the non-Hermitian quantum theory having a well-defined state space — both of which the paper leaves at the level of an asserted identity.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Any nonreciprocal Langevin or SPDE system with additive Gaussian white noise can be studied with supersymmetric field theory methods, including indices and localization, despite being far from equilibrium.
  • The non-Hermitian Hamiltonians that arise naturally support exceptional points, and the algebra Q_χ² = H ties spectral degeneracies to supersymmetry-breaking.
  • The reciprocal limit reproduces the known two-supercharge theory, so the construction is a genuine extension rather than a separate formalism.
  • Concrete nonreciprocal models — coupled heat equations with self-sustaining waves, a nonreciprocal O(2) model, and two coupled kinetic Ising models — acquire explicit N=1 supersymmetric actions that were previously missing.
  • Because the vector A_i behaves like a magnetic field, intuition about particles in magnetic fields and Berry connections transfers to nonreciprocal dynamics.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the determinant identity holds beyond perturbation theory, the long-time or steady-state properties of nonreciprocal systems may be governed by ground states of these non-Hermitian supersymmetric Hamiltonians, suggesting a generalized index that counts stationary states.
  • A direct test is to compare the new action's predictions on a finite lattice with the original stochastic process; the paper's discretization is the spot where the equivalence either holds or breaks.
  • The construction is stated for additive Gaussian white noise; extending it to multiplicative noise or non-Gaussian noise would require a similar determinant identity for the modified noise kernel, which the paper does not provide.
  • The imaginary-charge gauge coupling hints at an underlying geometric or topological structure in nonreciprocity, possibly connecting to supersymmetric descriptions already observed in topological mechanical systems.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper claims that any stochastic ODE/SPDE system with additive Gaussian white noise, including nonreciprocal (non-potential) forces, can be mapped to a quantum field theory with an explicit N=1 supersymmetry generated by a single (generically non-Hermitian) supercharge. The construction is a superspace action (2.40) whose component form is (2.41); after integrating out the auxiliary field and redefining fermions, the paper argues the action is equivalent to the standard Martin–Siggia–Rose (MSR) action. The paper also proves a finite-dimensional Pfaffian identity (Appendix B.2), uses it to rewrite the MSR Jacobian, and gives several examples, including nonreciprocal coupled heat equations and nonreciprocal kinetic Ising models.

Significance. If the claimed equivalence is correct, this is a substantial generalization of the Parisi–Sourlas construction to nonreciprocal systems, potentially giving a new toolset for active matter, non-Hermitian physics, and stochastic quantization. The paper is explicit and self-contained in its formal manipulations: the superspace action is manifestly invariant, the Pfaffian identity is proved in finite dimensions, and the discretization logic in Appendix B.3 is spelled out. These strengths are real. However, the central claim — that the new supersymmetric action computes the same stochastic observables as the original Langevin process — is not fully established because the derivation drops a boundary term and contains a sign inconsistency in the key rewriting (2.71). The paper itself flags the unresolved Hilbert-space/stochastic-state question in §1.

major comments (4)
  1. [§2.3, Eqs. (2.41), (2.51), and (2.16)] The step from (2.41) to (2.51) drops the total derivative ∫dt φ̇_i ∂_i V = V(φ(T)) − V(φ(0)). With f_i = −∂_i V − A_i, the MSR bosonic action (2.19) is 1/2(φ̇−f)^2, while (2.51) is equal to this up to the same endpoint term. Consequently the finite-time transition amplitude differs from the MSR one by e^{V(φ_T)−V(φ_0)}. Unless boundary terms are restored or initial/final state weights are prescribed, ratios of finite-time correlation functions are not preserved. This issue is acknowledged as open in §1 ('Which states in the quantum Hilbert space admit a stochastic interpretation?'), but it is load-bearing for the paper's central equivalence claim.
  2. [§2.3, Eq. (2.71)] The action (2.71) is advertised as the supersymmetric action expressed in MSR fermions, but it is not equivalent to (2.51) with the stated substitution χ_i = ψ̃_i − ψ_i/2 and f_i = −∂_i V − A_i. The bosonic term in (2.71), 1/2(φ̇+f)^2 = 1/2(φ̇−∂V−A)^2, differs from the bosonic term in (2.51), 1/2 φ̇^2 + φ̇A + 1/2(∂V+A)^2, by a non-total-derivative piece containing ∫ φ̇A. The fermionic kinetic term also appears to change sign relative to (2.19) under the substitution. This is a concrete sign/consistency error in the key rewriting that is supposed to identify the new action with the MSR action; it needs to be corrected or explained before the central claim can be accepted.
  3. [§3.2, Eqs. (3.27) and (3.36)] The same boundary-term issue occurs in the field-theory generalization. Starting from E_i = ∂_t φ_i + δ_i S + A_i, integrating out F gives 1/2 E_i^2 = 1/2(∂_t φ_i)^2 + ∂_t φ_i δ_i S + ∂_t φ_i A_i + 1/2(δ_i S + A_i)^2. The action (3.27) drops ∫ ∂_t φ_i δ_i S = S[φ(T)] − S[φ(0)], so the SPDE examples (3.38) and (3.41) are at best equivalent to the stochastic processes up to this boundary contribution. Since the paper presents these as dual QFTs for the SPDEs, the finite-time generating functional must be re-examined.
  4. [§2.4, Eqs. (2.55)–(2.56)] The operator formalism for the non-Hermitian Hamiltonian H in (2.56) requires a choice of inner product, state space, and integration contour for the bosonic momentum variables after the magnetic-type shift (p_i−iA_i)^2. The paper notes in §1 that the physical content of the enlarged Hilbert space is open. This is not merely a philosophical caveat: without a specified inner product and boundary conditions, the path integral (2.55) itself is only formal, and the connection between its correlation functions and those of the original stochastic process is not defined. The equivalence claim therefore requires either a rigorous construction or an explicit restriction to boundary conditions under which the dropped boundary term vanishes.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Throughout] Several typos: 'supersymetric' after (3.27), 'Parisi-Soulars' in (3.12) and nearby text, 'Weiner process' in Appendix A.1, 'sympletic quantization' in Appendix C, and 'notion' should be 'notation' after (2.36).
  2. [Appendix A.3, Eq. (A.42)] The matrix displayed after (A.42) is lower bidiagonal, not upper triangular; the determinant conclusion (product of diagonal entries) is unaffected.
  3. [Eq. (3.38)] The K^2 term appears to be missing a factor of 1/2 relative to the general form (3.27); please check the coefficient.
  4. [References] Reference [61] cites a preprint from the same month as this paper; if this is not a published work, it may be worth clarifying its status or replacing with a stable reference.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the supersymmetric action is constructed from the MSR benchmark via an independently proved Pfaffian identity, and the only self-citation is incidental.

full rationale

The central derivation is self-contained rather than circular. The superspace action (2.40) is manifestly invariant under the supercharge Qχ defined in (2.43)/(2.52), and the equivalence to the stochastic system is demonstrated by proving that the fermionic part of the action reproduces the MSR functional determinant: the finite-dimensional Pfaffian identity (B.16) is proved in Appendix B.2, and the continuum extension in Appendix B.3 uses an explicit discretization (B.25) whose off-diagonal blocks are negative transposes by construction, so the determinant representation is not assumed but derived. No parameters are fitted to data, no external benchmark is used in place of derivation, and no uniqueness theorem is imported. The only self-citation, [29] on ways to couple kinetic Ising models, is an illustrative example and carries no logical weight in the manuscript's argument. The paper itself flags an open issue in §1 — "Which states in the quantum Hilbert space admit a stochastic interpretation?" — and the action (2.51) is obtained from (2.41) after dropping a total derivative, so the finite-time equivalence to the stochastic process has a boundary-condition subtlety that is not fully resolved. That is a correctness or regularization gap, not circularity, because the map is constructed from the MSR path integral rather than defined to reproduce the conclusion. The finding is therefore no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No parameters are fitted to data; the central claim is an algebraic identity (Pfaffian re-representation) plus a continuum limit of standard MSR type. The suspended assumptions are the MSR/Faddeev–Popov dictionary, flat target and additive noise, and the continuum functional-determinant identity whose discretized proof needs audit. No new physical entities are introduced: the χ fermion is a linear recombination of the MSR fermions (2.64), and the 'imaginary electric charge e=i' is an interpretive analogy, not a new force or particle.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The MSR/Faddeev–Popov mapping (2.6)–(2.9) exactly represents correlation functions of the Langevin equation (2.2) as a path integral, with the path integral taken to define the regularized stochastic system.
    Invoked throughout §2.1. The paper states this as its philosophy: 'We will take the philosophy that the map into a path-integral description, given below, defines the regularized stochastic system.'
  • domain assumption Flat Euclidean target space and additive Gaussian white noise (σ set to 1 without loss of generality); multiplicative noise and curved targets are deferred to Appendix A and not used in the main claims.
    §2 opening: 'it will be simpler and sufficient for our discussion to consider a flat target manifold' with Gaussian white noise (2.3)–(2.4).
  • domain assumption Functional determinants on [0,T] are positive, regularization-dependent as det'(δE/δφ) = exp(−α∫∂_i f^i), and zero modes are removed by the 'prime' prescription; the continuum Pfaffian identity (2.50)/(B.27) follows from the discretization of Appendix B.3.
    Used in (2.12) and in the load-bearing step (2.50). The discretized proof in B.3 is the item whose transcription needs audit (see red flags).
  • domain assumption The Fokker–Planck equation (2.11) is independent of the regularization parameter α for additive Gaussian white noise, so the determinant factors and the (φ̇−f)² expansion combine consistently.
    Appendix A.2, eq. (A.30)–(A.31). Underlies the claim that the path-integral description is well-defined.
  • standard math Standard Grassmann/Pfaffian calculus, including Pf([[M,E],[−Eᵀ,0]]) ∝ det(E) for skew M and invertible E.
    Proved for finite dimension in B.2; consistent with elementary linear algebra (verified for n=1,2).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Supersymmetry and Nonreciprocity." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/DM6KU4V7

@misc{pith2026260216824,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Supersymmetry and Nonreciprocity},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/DM6KU4V7}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2602.16824}
}
read the original abstract

Nonreciprocal theories are used to model a broad array of non-equilibrium phenomena found in nature ranging from biological systems like networks of neurons to the behavior of overflowing water fountains. This includes systems broadly classified as active matter systems. We show that the stochastic theories which describe nonreciprocal interactions can be mapped into quantum field theories described by a supersymmetric action with a single supercharge. The theories are generically non-Hermitian. This generalizes the past work of Parisi and Sourlas on reciprocal theories, which model systems with interactions derived from potentials.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Disorder induced time crystal in athermal random field Ising model with non-reciprocal interactions

    cond-mat.stat-mech 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    In an athermal random-field Ising model with non-reciprocal couplings, a spontaneous time-oscillatory (time-crystal) phase exists for intermediate disorder strength on complete graphs and in 3D, but not in 2D.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

101 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [74]

    Introduction to Supersymmetric Theory of Stochastics,

    I. V. Ovchinnikov, “Introduction to Supersymmetric Theory of Stochastics,” Entropy18(2016) 108,1511.03393

    arXiv 2016

  2. [82]

    Supersymmetries in nonequilibrium Langevin dynamics,

    B. Marguet, E. Agoritsas, L. Canet, and V. Lecomte, “Supersymmetries in nonequilibrium Langevin dynamics,”Physical Review E104(Oct., 2021) 044120. Publisher: American Physical Society

    2021

  3. [1]

    A unifying framework for mean-field theories of asymmetric kinetic Ising systems,

    M. Aguilera, S. A. Moosavi, and H. Shimazaki, “A unifying framework for mean-field theories of asymmetric kinetic Ising systems,”Nat. Commun.12(2021) 1197

    2021

  4. [2]

    Statistical Mechanics where Newton’s Third Law is Broken,

    A. Ivlev, J. Bartnick, M. Heinen, C.-R. Du, V. Nosenko, and H. L¨ owen, “Statistical Mechanics where Newton’s Third Law is Broken,”Phys. Rev. X5(2015) 011035

    2015

  5. [3]

    Nonreciprocity as a generic route to traveling states,

    Z. You, A. Baskaran, and M. C. Marchetti, “Nonreciprocity as a generic route to traveling states,”Proc. Natl. Acad. of Sc.117(2020). USA19767

    2020

  6. [4]

    Nonreciprocal Pattern Formation of Conserved Fields,

    F. Brauns and M. C. Marchetti, “Nonreciprocal Pattern Formation of Conserved Fields,”Phys. Rev. X14(2024) 021014

    2024

  7. [5]

    Nonreciprocal Cahn-Hilliard Model Emerges as a Universal Amplitude Equation,

    T. Frohoff-H¨ ulsmann and U. Thiele, “Nonreciprocal Cahn-Hilliard Model Emerges as a Universal Amplitude Equation,”Phys. Rev. Lett.131(2023) 107201

    2023

  8. [6]

    Scalar Active Mixtures: The Nonreciprocal Cahn-Hilliard Model,

    S. Saha, J. Agudo-Canalejo, and R. Golestanian, “Scalar Active Mixtures: The Nonreciprocal Cahn-Hilliard Model,”Phys. Rev. X10(2020) 041009

    2020

Show all 101 references
  1. [7]

    Non-reciprocal Phase Separations with Non-conserved Order Parameters,

    M. Liu, Z. Hou, H. Kitahata, L. He, and S. Komura, “Non-reciprocal Phase Separations with Non-conserved Order Parameters,”J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.92(2023) 093001

    2023

  2. [8]

    Critical fluctuations at a many-body exceptional point,

    R. Hanai and P. B. Littlewood, “Critical fluctuations at a many-body exceptional point,”Phys. Rev. Res.2(2020) 033018

    2020

  3. [9]

    Nonreciprocal Ising Model,

    Y. Avni, M. Fruchart, D. Martin, D. Seara, and V. Vitelli, “Nonreciprocal Ising Model,”Phys. Rev. Lett.134(Mar, 2025) 117103

    2025

  4. [10]

    Dynamical phase transitions in the nonreciprocal Ising model,

    Y. Avni, M. Fruchart, D. Martin, D. Seara, and V. Vitelli, “Dynamical phase transitions in the nonreciprocal Ising model,”Phys. Rev. E111(Mar, 2025) 034124

    2025

  5. [11]

    Universal scaling in one-dimensional non-reciprocal matter,

    S. Liu, R. Hanai, and P. B. Littlewood, “Universal scaling in one-dimensional non-reciprocal matter,” 2025

    2025

  6. [12]

    Universal phenomenology at critical exceptional points of nonequilibrium O (N) models,

    C. P. Zelle, R. Daviet, A. Rosch, and S. Diehl, “Universal phenomenology at critical exceptional points of nonequilibrium O (N) models,”Physical Review X14(2024), no. 2, 021052. 44

    2024

  7. [13]

    Nonequilibrium fixed points of coupled Ising models,

    J. T. Young, A. V. Gorshkov, M. Foss-Feig, and M. F. Maghrebi, “Nonequilibrium fixed points of coupled Ising models,”Physical Review X10(2020), no. 1, 011039

    2020

  8. [14]

    Irreversibility, heat and information flows induced by non-reciprocal interactions,

    S. A. M. Loos and S. H. L. Klapp, “Irreversibility, heat and information flows induced by non-reciprocal interactions,”New J. Phys.22(2020) 123051

    2020

  9. [15]

    Hidden nonreciprocity as a stabilizing effective potential in active matter

    M. Du and S. Vaikuntanathan, “Hidden nonreciprocity as a stabilizing effective potential in active matter.” [cond-mat], April, 2024

    2024

  10. [16]

    Hydrodynamics of soft active matter,

    M. C. Marchetti, J. F. Joanny, S. Ramaswamy, T. B. Liverpool, J. Prost, M. Rao, and R. A. Simha, “Hydrodynamics of soft active matter,”Rev. Mod. Phys.85 (2013) 1143

    2013

  11. [17]

    Non-Hermitian Phase Transition from a Polariton Bose-Einstein Condensate to a Photon Laser,

    R. Hanai, A. Edelman, Y. Ohashi, and P. B. Littlewood, “Non-Hermitian Phase Transition from a Polariton Bose-Einstein Condensate to a Photon Laser,”Phys. Rev. Lett.122(2019) 185301

    2019

  12. [18]

    Ising model with non-reciprocal interactions

    A. K. Rajeev and A. V. A. Kumar, “Ising model with non-reciprocal interactions.” [cond-mat, physics:physics], March, 2024

    2024

  13. [19]

    Non-reciprocal interactions spatially propagate fluctuations in a 2D Ising model,

    D. S. Seara, A. Piya, and A. P. Tabatabai, “Non-reciprocal interactions spatially propagate fluctuations in a 2D Ising model,”Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment2023(April, 2023) 043209

    2023

  14. [20]

    Nonreciprocal Frustration: Time Crystalline Order-by-Disorder Phenomenon and a Spin-Glass-like State,

    R. Hanai, “Nonreciprocal Frustration: Time Crystalline Order-by-Disorder Phenomenon and a Spin-Glass-like State,”Physical Review X14(February, 2024) 011029

    2024

  15. [21]

    Coupled parametric oscillators: From disorder-induced current to asymmetric Ising model,

    C. Han, M. Wang, B. Zhang, M. I. Dykman, and H. B. Chan, “Coupled parametric oscillators: From disorder-induced current to asymmetric Ising model,”Physical Review Research6(May, 2024) 023162

    2024

  16. [22]

    Nonequilibrium stationary states and phase transitions in directed Ising models,

    C. Godr` eche and A. J. Bray, “Nonequilibrium stationary states and phase transitions in directed Ising models,”Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment2009(December, 2009) 12016

    2009

  17. [23]

    Dynamics of the directed Ising chain,

    C. Godr` eche, “Dynamics of the directed Ising chain,”Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment2011(April, 2011) 04005. 45

    2011

  18. [24]

    Rates for irreversible Gibbsian Ising models,

    C. Godr` eche, “Rates for irreversible Gibbsian Ising models,”Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment2013(May, 2013) 05011

    2013

  19. [25]

    Dynamics of the two-dimensional directed Ising model in the paramagnetic phase,

    C. Godr` eche and M. Pleimling, “Dynamics of the two-dimensional directed Ising model in the paramagnetic phase,”Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment2014(May, 2014) 05005

    2014

  20. [26]

    Dynamics of the two-dimensional directed Ising model: zero-temperature coarsening,

    C. Godr` eche and M. Pleimling, “Dynamics of the two-dimensional directed Ising model: zero-temperature coarsening,”Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment2015(July, 2015) 07023

    2015

  21. [27]

    Generic phase coexistence in the totally asymmetric kinetic Ising model,

    C. Godr` eche and J.-M. Luck, “Generic phase coexistence in the totally asymmetric kinetic Ising model,”Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment 2017(July, 2017) 073208

    2017

  22. [28]

    Freezing in stripe states for kinetic Ising models: a comparative study of three dynamics,

    C. Godr` eche and M. Pleimling, “Freezing in stripe states for kinetic Ising models: a comparative study of three dynamics,”Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment2018(April, 2018) 043209

    2018

  23. [29]

    Solving the kinetic Ising model with nonreciprocity,

    G. A. Weiderpass, M. Sharma, and S. Sethi, “Solving the kinetic Ising model with nonreciprocity,”Phys. Rev. E111(Feb, 2025) 024107

    2025

  24. [30]

    Exceptional points in nonlinear and stochastic dynamics,

    C. Weis, M. Fruchart, R. Hanai, K. Kawagoe, P. B. Littlewood, and V. Vitelli, “Exceptional points in nonlinear and stochastic dynamics,” 2023

    2023

  25. [31]

    Generalized non-reciprocal phase transitions in multipopulation systems,

    C. Weis and R. Hanai, “Generalized non-reciprocal phase transitions in multipopulation systems,” 2025

    2025

  26. [32]

    Non-Hermitian physics,

    Y. Ashida, Z. Gong, and M. Ueda, “Non-Hermitian physics,”Advances in Physics 69(July, 2020) 249–435

    2020

  27. [33]

    Non-reciprocal robotic metamaterials,

    M. Brandenbourger, X. Locsin, E. Lerner, and C. Coulais, “Non-reciprocal robotic metamaterials,”Nature Communications10(October, 2019) 4608

    2019

  28. [34]

    Non-reciprocal topological solitons in active metamaterials,

    J. Veenstra, O. Gamayun, X. Guo, A. Sarvi, C. V. Meinersen, and C. Coulais, “Non-reciprocal topological solitons in active metamaterials,”Nature627(March,

  29. [35]

    Non-reciprocal breathing solitons

    M. Brandenbourger, O. Gamayun, J. Veenstra, F. van Gorp, H. Terwisscha-Dekker, J.-S. Caux, and C. Coulais, “Non-reciprocal breathing solitons.” [cond-mat, physics:nlin], May, 2024

    2024

  30. [36]

    Observation of non-Hermitian topology and its bulk–edge correspondence in an active mechanical metamaterial,

    A. Ghatak, M. Brandenbourger, J. van Wezel, and C. Coulais, “Observation of non-Hermitian topology and its bulk–edge correspondence in an active mechanical metamaterial,”Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences117(November,

  31. [37]

    Generalized bulk–boundary correspondence in non-Hermitian topolectrical circuits,

    T. Helbig, T. Hofmann, S. Imhof, M. Abdelghany, T. Kiessling, L. W. Molenkamp, C. H. Lee, A. Szameit, M. Greiter, and R. Thomale, “Generalized bulk–boundary correspondence in non-Hermitian topolectrical circuits,”Nature Physics16(July,

  32. [38]

    Active topolectrical circuits,

    T. Kotwal, F. Moseley, A. Stegmaier, S. Imhof, H. Brand, T. Kie ling, R. Thomale, H. Ronellenfitsch, and J. Dunkel, “Active topolectrical circuits,”Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences118(August, 2021)1903.10130. e2106411118. [cond-mat, physics:nlin, physics:physics

    2021 arXiv

  33. [39]

    Chiral Voltage Propagation and Calibration in a Topolectrical Chern Circuit,

    T. Hofmann, T. Helbig, C. H. Lee, M. Greiter, and R. Thomale, “Chiral Voltage Propagation and Calibration in a Topolectrical Chern Circuit,”Physical Review Letters122(June, 2019) 247702

    2019

  34. [40]

    Active nonreciprocal attraction between motile particles in an elastic medium,

    R. K. Gupta, R. Kant, H. Soni, A. K. Sood, and S. Ramaswamy, “Active nonreciprocal attraction between motile particles in an elastic medium,”Physical Review E105(June, 2022) 064602

    2022

  35. [41]

    Odd dynamics of living chiral crystals,

    T. H. Tan, A. Mietke, J. Li, Y. Chen, H. Higinbotham, P. J. Foster, S. Gokhale, J. Dunkel, and N. Fakhri, “Odd dynamics of living chiral crystals,”Nature607 (July, 2022) 287–293

    2022

  36. [42]

    Topological active matter,

    S. Shankar, A. Souslov, M. J. Bowick, M. C. Marchetti, and V. Vitelli, “Topological active matter,”Nature Reviews Physics4(June, 2022) 380–398

    2022

  37. [43]

    Odd Viscosity and Odd Elasticity,

    M. Fruchart, C. Scheibner, and V. Vitelli, “Odd Viscosity and Odd Elasticity,” Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics14(March, 2023) 471–510. 47

    2023

  38. [44]

    Interpreting neural operators: how nonlinear waves propagate in non-reciprocal solids

    J. Colen, A. Poncet, D. Bartolo, and V. Vitelli, “Interpreting neural operators: how nonlinear waves propagate in non-reciprocal solids.” [cond-mat, physics:physics], April, 2024

    2024

  39. [45]

    Odd elasticity,

    C. Scheibner, A. Souslov, D. Banerjee, P. Sur´ owka, W. T. M. Irvine, and V. Vitelli, “Odd elasticity,”Nature Physics16(April, 2020) 475–480

    2020

  40. [46]

    When Soft Crystals Defy Newton’s Third Law: Nonreciprocal Mechanics and Dislocation Motility,

    A. Poncet and D. Bartolo, “When Soft Crystals Defy Newton’s Third Law: Nonreciprocal Mechanics and Dislocation Motility,”Physical Review Letters128 (January, 2022) 048002

    2022

  41. [47]

    Dynamics and topology of non-Hermitian elastic lattices with non-local feedback control interactions,

    M. I. N. Rosa and M. Ruzzene, “Dynamics and topology of non-Hermitian elastic lattices with non-local feedback control interactions,”New Journal of Physics22 (May, 2020) 053004

    2020

  42. [48]

    Non-Hermitian Band Topology and Skin Modes in Active Elastic Media,

    C. Scheibner, W. T. Irvine, and V. Vitelli, “Non-Hermitian Band Topology and Skin Modes in Active Elastic Media,”Physical Review Letters125(September,

  43. [49]

    Topology and broken Hermiticity,

    C. Coulais, R. Fleury, and J. van Wezel, “Topology and broken Hermiticity,”Nature Physics17(January, 2021) 9–13

    2021

  44. [50]

    Tailleur, “Non-reciprocity across scales in active mixtures,

    A. Dinelli, J. O’Byrne, A. Curatolo, Y. Zhao, P. Sollich, and J, “Tailleur, “Non-reciprocity across scales in active mixtures,” Nature Communications14 (November, 2023) 7035

    2023

  45. [51]

    Melting of nonreciprocal solids: How dislocations propel and fission in flowing crystals,

    S. Guillet, A. Poncet, M. L. Blay, W. T. M. Irvine, V. Vitelli, and D. Bartolo, “Melting of nonreciprocal solids: How dislocations propel and fission in flowing crystals,”Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences122(2025), no. 15, e2412993122,https://www.pnas.org/doi/pdf...

    2025 doi

  46. [52]

    Van Saarloos, V

    W. Van Saarloos, V. Vitelli, and Z. Zeravcic,Soft Matter: Concepts, Phenomena, and Applications. Princeton University Press, 2024

    2024

  47. [53]

    Nonreciprocal Photon Transmission and Amplification via Reservoir Engineering,

    A. Metelmann and A. Clerk, “Nonreciprocal Photon Transmission and Amplification via Reservoir Engineering,”Physical Review X5(June, 2015) 021025

    2015

  48. [54]

    Exponentially-enhanced quantum sensing with non-Hermitian lattice dynamics,

    A. McDonald and A. A. Clerk, “Exponentially-enhanced quantum sensing with non-Hermitian lattice dynamics,”Nature Communications11(October, 2020) 5382. 48

    2020

  49. [55]

    Introduction to quantum non-reciprocal interactions: from non-Hermitian Hamiltonians to quantum master equations and quantum feedforward schemes,

    A. Clerk, “Introduction to quantum non-reciprocal interactions: from non-Hermitian Hamiltonians to quantum master equations and quantum feedforward schemes,”044(2022)

    2022

  50. [56]

    Nonreciprocal Dicke Model,

    E. I. R. Chiacchio, A. Nunnenkamp, and M. Brunelli, “Nonreciprocal Dicke Model,” Physical Review Letters131(September, 2023) 113602

    2023

  51. [57]

    Exceptional topology of non-Hermitian systems,

    E. J. Bergholtz, J. C. Budich, and F. K. Kunst, “Exceptional topology of non-Hermitian systems,”Reviews of Modern Physics93(February, 2021) 015005

    2021

  52. [58]

    Quantum Criticality in Open Quantum Spin Chains with Nonreciprocity,

    S. E. Begg and R. Hanai, “Quantum Criticality in Open Quantum Spin Chains with Nonreciprocity,”Physical Review Letters132(March, 2024) 120401

    2024

  53. [59]

    Phase Transitions in Nonreciprocal Driven-Dissipative Condensates,

    R. Belyansky, C. Weis, R. Hanai, P. B. Littlewood, and A. A. Clerk, “Phase Transitions in Nonreciprocal Driven-Dissipative Condensates,” 2025

    2025

  54. [60]

    Spin-only dynamics of the multi-species nonreciprocal Dicke model,

    J. Jachinowski and P. B. Littlewood, “Spin-only dynamics of the multi-species nonreciprocal Dicke model,” 2025

    2025

  55. [61]

    Nonreciprocal many-body physics,

    M. Fruchart and V. Vitelli, “Nonreciprocal many-body physics,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.11111(2026)

    2026

  56. [62]

    Non-reciprocal phase transitions,

    M. Fruchart, R. Hanai, P. B. Littlewood, and V. Vitelli, “Non-reciprocal phase transitions,”Nature (London)592(2021) 363

    2021

  57. [63]

    Introduction to quantum non-reciprocal interactions: from non-Hermitian Hamiltonians to quantum master equations and quantum feedforward schemes,

    A. A. Clerk, “Introduction to quantum non-reciprocal interactions: from non-Hermitian Hamiltonians to quantum master equations and quantum feedforward schemes,”SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes(2022) 44

    2022

  58. [64]

    Non-reciprocal photonics based on time modulation,

    D. L. Sounas and A. Al` u, “Non-reciprocal photonics based on time modulation,” Nature Photonics11(Dec., 2017) 774–783. Number: 12 Publisher: Nature Publishing Group

    2017

  59. [65]

    Tutorial on Electromagnetic Nonreciprocity and its Origins,

    V. S. Asadchy, M. S. Mirmoosa, A. Diaz-Rubio, S. Fan, and S. A. Tretyakov, “Tutorial on Electromagnetic Nonreciprocity and its Origins,”Proceedings of the IEEE108(2020), no. 10, 1684–1727

    2020

  60. [66]

    Theory of Gating in Recurrent Neural Networks,

    K. Krishnamurthy, T. Can, and D. J. Schwab, “Theory of Gating in Recurrent Neural Networks,”Phys. Rev. X12(Jan, 2022) 011011. 49

    2022

  61. [67]

    Random Magnetic Fields, Supersymmetry, and Negative Dimensions,

    G. Parisi and N. Sourlas, “Random Magnetic Fields, Supersymmetry, and Negative Dimensions,”Phys. Rev. Lett.43(Sep, 1979) 744–745

    1979

  62. [68]

    Supersymmetric field theories and stochastic differential equations,

    G. Parisi and N. Sourlas, “Supersymmetric field theories and stochastic differential equations,”Nuclear Physics B206(1982), no. 2, 321–332

    1982

  63. [69]

    Rychkov,Lectures on the random field ising model: From parisi-sourlas supersymmetry to dimensional reduction

    S. Rychkov,Lectures on the random field ising model: From parisi-sourlas supersymmetry to dimensional reduction. Springer Nature, 2023

    2023

  64. [70]

    Random Field Ising Model and Parisi-Sourlas supersymmetry. Part I. Supersymmetric CFT,

    A. Kaviraj, S. Rychkov, and E. Trevisani, “Random Field Ising Model and Parisi-Sourlas supersymmetry. Part I. Supersymmetric CFT,”Journal of High Energy Physics2020(2020), no. 4, 1–49

    2020

  65. [71]

    Random field Ising model and Parisi-Sourlas supersymmetry. Part II. Renormalization group,

    A. Kaviraj, S. Rychkov, and E. Trevisani, “Random field Ising model and Parisi-Sourlas supersymmetry. Part II. Renormalization group,”Journal of High Energy Physics2021(2021), no. 3, 1–112

    2021

  66. [72]

    Parisi-Sourlas supersymmetry in random field models,

    A. Kaviraj, S. Rychkov, and E. Trevisani, “Parisi-Sourlas supersymmetry in random field models,”Physical review letters129(2022), no. 4, 045701

    2022

  67. [73]

    UnleashQ! Cohomology, Localization, and Interpolation in Parisi-Sourlas Supersymmetry,

    B. Le Floch, G. Patashuri, and E. Trevisani, “UnleashQ! Cohomology, Localization, and Interpolation in Parisi-Sourlas Supersymmetry,”2512.15899

  68. [75]

    Kinematic dynamo, supersymmetry breaking, and chaos,

    I. V. Ovchinnikov and T. A. Ensslin, “Kinematic dynamo, supersymmetry breaking, and chaos,”Physical Review D93(2016), no. 8, 085023

    2016

  69. [76]

    Supersymmetric theory of stochastic ABC model,

    I. V. Ovchinnikov, Y. Sun, T. A. En lin, and K. L. Wang, “Supersymmetric theory of stochastic ABC model,”Journal of Physics Communications2(2018), no. 6, 065008

    2018

  70. [77]

    Dynamical field inference and supersymmetry,

    M. Westerkamp, I. Ovchinnikov, P. Frank, and T. En lin, “Dynamical field inference and supersymmetry,”Entropy23(2021), no. 12, 1652

    2021

  71. [78]

    Toward an Effective Theory of Neurodynamics: Topological Supersymmetry Breaking, Network Coarse-Graining, and Instanton Interaction,

    I. V. Ovchinnikov and S. Janusonis, “Toward an Effective Theory of Neurodynamics: Topological Supersymmetry Breaking, Network Coarse-Graining, and Instanton Interaction,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2102.03849(2021). 50

    2021 arXiv

  72. [79]

    Witten-type topological field theory of self-organized criticality for stochastic neural networks,

    J. Zhai, C. Yu, and Y. Zhai, “Witten-type topological field theory of self-organized criticality for stochastic neural networks,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.10851(2021)

    2021 arXiv

  73. [80]

    Topological field theory of dynamical systems. II,

    I. V. Ovchinnikov, “Topological field theory of dynamical systems. II,”Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science23(01, 2013) 013108

    2013

  74. [81]

    On the Topological Nature of the Butterfly Effect,

    I. V. Ovchinnikov, “On the Topological Nature of the Butterfly Effect,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.18124(2025)

    2025 arXiv

  75. [83]

    Zinn-Justin,Quantum Field Theory and Critical Phenomena: Fifth Edition (5th edn)

    J. Zinn-Justin,Quantum Field Theory and Critical Phenomena: Fifth Edition (5th edn). 2021

    2021

  76. [84]

    Topological mechanics from supersymmetry,

    J. Attig, K. Roychowdhury, M. J. Lawler, and S. Trebst, “Topological mechanics from supersymmetry,”Physical Review Research1(Dec., 2019)

    2019

  77. [85]

    Nuts and bolts of supersymmetry,

    N. Upadhyaya, B. G. Chen, and V. Vitelli, “Nuts and bolts of supersymmetry,” Physical Review Research2(2020), no. 4, 043098

    2020

  78. [86]

    C. W. Gardineret al.,Handbook of stochastic methods, vol. 3. springer Berlin, 2004

    2004

  79. [87]

    Kunita and H

    H. Kunita and H. Kunita,Stochastic flows and stochastic differential equations, vol. 24. Cambridge university press, 1990

    1990

  80. [88]

    E. P. Hsu,Stochastic analysis on manifolds. No. 38. American Mathematical Soc., 2002

    2002

  81. [89]

    Geometric stochastic heat equations,

    Y. Bruned, F. Gabriel, M. Hairer, and L. Zambotti, “Geometric stochastic heat equations,”Journal of the American Mathematical Society35(2022), no. 1, 1–80

    2022

  82. [90]

    P. K. Friz and M. Hairer,Brownian motion as a rough path, pp. 39–59. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2020

    2020

  83. [91]

    Fermions without Fermions: The Nicolai Map Revisited,

    H. Ezawa and J. R. Klauder, “Fermions without Fermions: The Nicolai Map Revisited,”Progress of Theoretical Physics74(Oct., 1985) 904–915

    1985

  84. [92]

    Stochastic Quantization,

    P. H. Damgaard and H. Huffel, “Stochastic Quantization,”Phys. Rept.152(1987) 227. 51

    1987

  85. [93]

    Kamenev,Field Theory of Non-Equilibrium Systems

    A. Kamenev,Field Theory of Non-Equilibrium Systems. Cambridge University Press, 2011

    2011

  86. [94]

    Altland and B

    A. Altland and B. D. Simons,Condensed Matter Field Theory. Cambridge University Press, 2 ed., 2010

    2010

  87. [95]

    A theory of regularity structures,

    M. Hairer, “A theory of regularity structures,”Inventiones mathematicae198 (Nov., 2014) 269–504

    2014

  88. [96]

    Time-Dependent Statistics of the Ising Model,

    R. J. Glauber, “Time-Dependent Statistics of the Ising Model,”Journal of Mathematical Physics4(February, 1963) 294–307

    1963

  89. [97]

    Henkel and M

    M. Henkel and M. Pleimling,Non-Equilibrium Phase Transitions Vol. II Ageing and Dynamical Scaling Far from Equilibrium. Theoretical and Mathematical Physics. Netherlands, address = Dordrecht, publisher = Springer,. 2010

    2010

  90. [98]

    Convergence of the two-dimensional dynamic Ising-Kac model to$\Phiˆ4 2$,

    J.-C. Mourrat and H. Weber, “Convergence of the two-dimensional dynamic Ising-Kac model to$\Phiˆ4 2$,” Jan., 2015. arXiv:1410.1179 [math-ph]

    2015 arXiv

  91. [99]

    An algebraic correspondence between stochastic differential equations and the Martin-Siggia-Rose formalism,

    A. Bonicelli, C. Dappiaggi, and N. Drago, “An algebraic correspondence between stochastic differential equations and the Martin-Siggia-Rose formalism,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.10579(2023)

    2023 arXiv

  92. [100]

    On supersymmetric Lifshitz field theories,

    S. Chapman, Y. Oz, and A. Raviv-Moshe, “On supersymmetric Lifshitz field theories,”Journal of High Energy Physics2015(2015), no. 10, 1–25

    2015

  93. [101]

    Symmetry of stochastic equations,

    G. Gaeta, “Symmetry of stochastic equations,”math-ph/0401025. 52

    arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 2, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.