Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Drawing Pandas: A Benchmark for LLMs in Generating Plotting Code

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2412.02764 v2 pith:DMTQKLKY submitted 2024-12-03 cs.SE cs.AIcs.LG

Drawing Pandas: A Benchmark for LLMs in Generating Plotting Code

classification cs.SE cs.AIcs.LG
keywords benchmarkcodedatasetgeneratinglanguagellmspandasplotbenchcurrent
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper introduces the human-curated PandasPlotBench dataset, designed to evaluate language models' effectiveness as assistants in visual data exploration. Our benchmark focuses on generating code for visualizing tabular data - such as a Pandas DataFrame - based on natural language instructions, complementing current evaluation tools and expanding their scope. The dataset includes 175 unique tasks. Our experiments assess several leading Large Language Models (LLMs) across three visualization libraries: Matplotlib, Seaborn, and Plotly. We show that the shortening of tasks has a minimal effect on plotting capabilities, allowing for the user interface that accommodates concise user input without sacrificing functionality or accuracy. Another of our findings reveals that while LLMs perform well with popular libraries like Matplotlib and Seaborn, challenges persist with Plotly, highlighting areas for improvement. We hope that the modular design of our benchmark will broaden the current studies on generating visualizations. Our dataset and benchmark code are available online: https://huggingface.co/datasets/JetBrains-Research/PandasPlotBench; https://github.com/JetBrains-Research/PandasPlotBench.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. SciVisAgentBench: A Benchmark for Evaluating Scientific Data Analysis and Visualization Agents

    cs.AI 2026-03 accept novelty 7.0

    A taxonomy-grounded 108-case SciVis agent benchmark with multimodal LLM-plus-deterministic evaluation finds general-purpose coding agents currently beat most specialized SciVis agents on outcome quality.

  2. SciVisAgentBench: A Benchmark for Evaluating Scientific Data Analysis and Visualization Agents

    cs.AI 2026-03 conditional novelty 7.0

    SciVisAgentBench provides 108 expert-crafted tasks and a mixed LLM-plus-deterministic evaluation pipeline for benchmarking AI agents that perform scientific visualization workflows.

  3. VisPhyWorld: Probing Physical Reasoning via Code-Driven Video Reconstruction

    cs.CV 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    VisPhyWorld evaluates MLLMs' physical reasoning via executable code generation for video reconstruction, with VisPhyBench showing strong semantics but weak parameter inference and dynamics simulation.

  4. PairCoder++: Pair Programming as a Universal Paradigm for Verified Code-Driven Multimodal and Structured-Artifact Generation

    cs.CL 2026-07 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    PairCoder is a two-agent pair-programming method that leverages toolchain verification oracles to improve LLM generation of verifiable structured artifacts on 17 benchmarks across seven models.