Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Meta4XNLI: A Crosslingual Parallel Corpus for Metaphor Detection and Interpretation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2404.07053 v3 pith:DNFI4LHE submitted 2024-04-10 cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.LG
keywords metaphorlanguageinterpretationmeta4xnlimodelsdetectionacrossannotated
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Metaphors are a ubiquitous but often overlooked part of everyday language. As a complex cognitive-linguistic phenomenon, they provide a valuable means to evaluate whether language models can capture deeper aspects of meaning, including semantic, pragmatic, and cultural context. In this work, we present Meta4XNLI, the first parallel dataset for Natural Language Inference (NLI) newly annotated for metaphor detection and interpretation in both English and Spanish. Meta4XNLI facilitates the comparison of encoder- and decoder-based models in detecting and understanding metaphorical language in multilingual and cross-lingual settings. Our results show that fine-tuned encoders outperform decoders-only LLMs in metaphor detection. Metaphor interpretation is evaluated via the NLI framework with comparable performance of masked and autoregressive models, which notably decreases when the inference is affected by metaphorical language. Our study also finds that translation plays an important role in the preservation or loss of metaphors across languages, introducing shifts that might impact metaphor occurrence and model performance. These findings underscore the importance of resources like Meta4XNLI for advancing the analysis of the capabilities of language models and improving our understanding of metaphor processing across languages. Furthermore, the dataset offers previously unavailable opportunities to investigate metaphor interpretation, cross-lingual metaphor transferability, and the impact of translation on the development of multilingual annotated resources.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Metaphor and Large Language Models: When Surface Features Matter More than Deep Understanding

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A multi-dataset evaluation finds LLM performance on metaphor inference is driven more by lexical overlap and sentence length than by metaphor understanding.

  2. Lost in Variation? Evaluating NLI Performance in Basque and Spanish Geographical Variants

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Language models are significantly worse at natural language inference when sentences are written in Basque or Spanish regional dialects, especially for Basque.

Pith tools