REVIEW 9 cited by
LaMini-LM: A Diverse Herd of Distilled Models from Large-Scale Instructions
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
LaMini-LM: A Diverse Herd of Distilled Models from Large-Scale Instructions
read the original abstract
Large language models (LLMs) with instruction fine-tuning demonstrate superior generative capabilities. However, these models are resource-intensive. To alleviate this issue, we explore distilling knowledge from instruction-tuned LLMs into much smaller ones. To this end, we carefully develop a large set of 2.58M instructions based on both existing and newly-generated instructions. In addition to being sizable, we design our instructions to cover a broad set of topics to ensure diversity. Extensive analysis of our instruction dataset confirms its diversity, and we generate responses for these instructions using gpt-3.5-turbo. Leveraging these instructions, we fine-tune a diverse herd of models, collectively referred to as LaMini-LM, which includes models from both the encoder-decoder and decoder-only families, with varying sizes. We evaluate the performance of our models using automatic metrics on 15 different natural language processing (NLP) benchmarks, as well as through human assessment. The results demonstrate that our proposed LaMini-LM models are comparable to competitive baselines, while being much smaller in size.
Forward citations
Cited by 9 Pith papers
-
LLM-as-a-Coach: Experiential Learning for Non-Verifiable Tasks
Training a language model by distilling a coach's written experiential knowledge beats training on a scalar rubric score for open-ended tasks, with better out-of-distribution transfer.
-
Logit-KL Flow Matching: Non-Autoregressive Text Generation via Sampling-Hybrid Inference
Logit-KL Flow Matching recovers the flow-matching velocity field from conditional likelihood maximization and uses iterative denoise-re-noise sampling to improve perplexity and downstream metrics over prior NAR baseli...
-
MiniLLM: On-Policy Distillation of Large Language Models
MiniLLM distills large language models into smaller ones via reverse KL divergence and on-policy optimization, yielding higher-quality responses with lower exposure bias than standard KD baselines.
-
Activation- and Influence-Aware Ranks (AIR): Function-Preserving SVD Compression for LLMs
AIR augments activation-aware SVD compression of LLMs with an influence metric and a closed-form ALS update, claiming >18% perplexity improvement at 60% parameter retention and 90% less calibration data than SVD-LLM(W).
-
Margin-Adaptive Confidence Ranking for Reliable LLM Judgement
Introduces a margin-adaptive confidence ranking method that learns an estimator from simulated diversity and derives margin-dependent generalization bounds for use in fixed-sequence testing of LLM-human agreement.
-
Margin-Adaptive Confidence Ranking for Reliable LLM Judgement
Learning a margin-based confidence ranker for LLM judges improves agreement-target success in cascaded selective evaluation compared to heuristic confidence scores.
-
Margin-Adaptive Confidence Ranking for Reliable LLM Judgement
Develops a margin-adaptive learned confidence estimator for LLMs with generalization guarantees to improve agreement rates with human judgments over heuristic baselines.
-
A Survey on Efficient Inference for Large Language Models
The paper surveys techniques to speed up and reduce the resource needs of LLM inference, organized by data-level, model-level, and system-level changes, with comparative experiments on representative methods.
-
Will LLMs Scaling Hit the Wall? Breaking Barriers via Distributed Resources on Massive Edge Devices
Position paper claiming that distributed training across massive edge devices can overcome data depletion and centralized compute monopolies in LLM scaling.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.