Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

FCoReBench: Can Large Language Models Solve Challenging First-Order Combinatorial Reasoning Problems?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.02611 v3 pith:DZ44BZ4W submitted 2024-02-04 cs.AI cs.CLcs.LG

classification cs.AIcs.CLcs.LG
keywords problemproblemschallengingfirst-orderreasoningllmsalongapproach
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Can the large language models (LLMs) solve challenging first-order combinatorial reasoning problems such as graph coloring, knapsack, and cryptarithmetic? By first-order, we mean these problems can be instantiated with potentially an infinite number of problem instances of varying sizes. They are also challenging being NP-hard and requiring several reasoning steps to reach a solution. While existing work has focused on coming up with datasets with hard benchmarks, there is limited work which exploits the first-order nature of the problem structure. To address this challenge, we present FCoReBench, a dataset of 40 such challenging problems, along with scripts to generate problem instances of varying sizes and automatically verify and generate their solutions. We first observe that LLMs, even when aided by symbolic solvers, perform rather poorly on our dataset, being unable to leverage the underlying structure of these problems. We specifically observe a drop in performance with increasing problem size. In response, we propose a new approach, SymPro-LM, which combines LLMs with both symbolic solvers and program interpreters, along with feedback from a few solved examples, to achieve huge performance gains. Our proposed approach is robust to changes in the problem size, and has the unique characteristic of not requiring any LLM call during inference time, unlike earlier approaches. As an additional experiment, we also demonstrate SymPro-LM's effectiveness on other logical reasoning benchmarks.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. PuzzleClone: A DSL-Powered Framework for Synthesizing Verifiable Data

    cs.AI 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A DSL plus SMT solver generates and validates 83,657 logic puzzles, and fine-tuning on them improves a 7B model's scores on several reasoning benchmarks.

  2. InternBootcamp Technical Report: Boosting LLM Reasoning with Verifiable Task Scaling

    cs.CL 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    InternBootcamp supplies 1000+ verifiable, auto-generated task environments across domains that enable task scaling to improve LLM reasoning, producing a 32B model with state-of-the-art results on the new Bootcamp-EVAL...

Pith tools