REVIEW 6 cited by
Towards Mitigating Hallucination in Large Language Models via Self-Reflection
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Towards Mitigating Hallucination in Large Language Models via Self-Reflection
read the original abstract
Large language models (LLMs) have shown promise for generative and knowledge-intensive tasks including question-answering (QA) tasks. However, the practical deployment still faces challenges, notably the issue of "hallucination", where models generate plausible-sounding but unfaithful or nonsensical information. This issue becomes particularly critical in the medical domain due to the uncommon professional concepts and potential social risks involved. This paper analyses the phenomenon of hallucination in medical generative QA systems using widely adopted LLMs and datasets. Our investigation centers on the identification and comprehension of common problematic answers, with a specific emphasis on hallucination. To tackle this challenge, we present an interactive self-reflection methodology that incorporates knowledge acquisition and answer generation. Through this feedback process, our approach steadily enhances the factuality, consistency, and entailment of the generated answers. Consequently, we harness the interactivity and multitasking ability of LLMs and produce progressively more precise and accurate answers. Experimental results on both automatic and human evaluation demonstrate the superiority of our approach in hallucination reduction compared to baselines.
Forward citations
Cited by 6 Pith papers
-
Boosting Self-Consistency with Ranking
RISC reformulates self-consistency answer selection as a ranking task solved by a lightweight LambdaRank model with five hand-designed features, yielding better accuracy-efficiency trade-offs than majority voting on Q...
-
Beyond Control-Flow: Integrating the Resource Perspective into Multi-Collaborative Process Modeling from Text
A resource-aware pipeline generates BPMN collaboration diagrams with pools and lanes from natural language descriptions using LLMs and a compact intermediate language.
-
Chain-of-Models: Cross-Model Auditing for Bias-Robust LLM Judges
Per-bias selection of a cross-family LLM auditor lifts biased-judgment accuracy from 0.805/0.824 baselines to 0.884.
-
Knowledge Injection Exists in MoE? Exploring Expert-Aware Contrast Decoding in MoE for Mitigating LLMs'Hallucinations
EAACD reduces hallucination in MoE LLMs by contrasting predictions of high-reliability expert groups against hallucination-amplified low-reliability expert groups.
-
AGAPI-Agents: An Open-Access Agentic AI Platform for Accelerated Materials Design on AtomGPT.org
An open-source agentic materials-design platform shows tool access can help or hurt accuracy depending on the property, but its headline memorization-resistant test results are not presented.
-
A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Models: Principles, Taxonomy, Challenges, and Open Questions
The paper surveys hallucination in LLMs with an innovative taxonomy, factors, detection methods, benchmarks, mitigation strategies, and open research directions.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.