Pith. sign in

REVIEW 7 cited by

UGPhysics: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Undergraduate Physics Reasoning with Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2502.00334 v4 pith:E57R7TF6 submitted 2025-02-01 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords physicsreasoningugphysicsllmscomprehensiveevaluationmodelsundergraduate-level
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in solving complex reasoning tasks, particularly in mathematics. However, the domain of physics reasoning presents unique challenges that have received significantly less attention. Existing benchmarks often fall short in evaluating LLMs' abilities on the breadth and depth of undergraduate-level physics, underscoring the need for a comprehensive evaluation. To fill this gap, we introduce UGPhysics, a large-scale and comprehensive benchmark specifically designed to evaluate UnderGraduate-level Physics (UGPhysics) reasoning with LLMs. UGPhysics includes 5,520 undergraduate-level physics problems in both English and Chinese, covering 13 subjects with seven different answer types and four distinct physics reasoning skills, all rigorously screened for data leakage. Additionally, we develop a Model-Assistant Rule-based Judgment (MARJ) pipeline specifically tailored for assessing answer correctness of physics problems, ensuring accurate evaluation. Our evaluation of 31 leading LLMs shows that the highest overall accuracy, 49.8% (achieved by OpenAI-o1-mini), emphasizes the necessity for models with stronger physics reasoning skills, beyond math abilities. We hope UGPhysics, along with MARJ, will drive future advancements in AI for physics reasoning. Codes and data are available at https://github.com/YangLabHKUST/UGPhysics .

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 7 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. ChronoPhyBench: Do MLLMs Truly Understand the World or Merely Exploit Language Priors?

    cs.CV 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    ChronoPhyBench is a new benchmark and dataset for chronological physical dynamics reasoning that combines video-conditioned next-state prediction with VQA to reduce language bias in MLLM evaluation.

  2. Fine-Tuning Small Reasoning Models for Quantum Field Theory

    cs.LG 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    Small 7B reasoning models were fine-tuned on synthetic and curated QFT problems using RL and SFT, yielding performance gains, error analysis, and public release of data and traces.

  3. SPM-Bench: Benchmarking Large Language Models for Scanning Probe Microscopy

    cs.AI 2026-02 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new benchmark of 2,703 automatically generated multimodal questions for scanning probe microscopy, plus a modified F1 metric that penalizes over-selection and labels model 'personalities'.

  4. DeepPHY: Benchmarking Agentic VLMs on Physical Reasoning

    cs.AI 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A unified visual benchmark of six physics environments shows current VLMs, including frontier models, mostly fail at interactive physical reasoning and cannot convert descriptive physics knowledge into reliable control.

  5. The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Entropy Minimization in LLM Reasoning

    cs.LG 2025-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Entropy minimization on self-generated outputs elicits strong reasoning in pretrained LLMs, matching or exceeding supervised RL methods on benchmarks.

  6. Hidden in Plain Sight: Visual-to-Symbolic Analytical Solution Inference from Field Visualizations

    cs.AI 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    ViSA-R2 recovers single executable SymPy expressions for linear steady-state fields from visualizations using a self-verifying chain-of-thought that recognizes patterns, hypothesizes solution families, derives paramet...

  7. Aligning Perception, Reasoning, Modeling and Interaction: A Survey on Physical AI

    cs.AI 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

    A survey of physical AI that distinguishes theoretical physics reasoning from applied understanding and synthesizes advances in symbolic reasoning, embodied systems, and generative models to advocate for physics-groun...

Pith tools