Towards a Science of AI Agent Reliability
read the original abstract
AI agents are increasingly deployed to execute important tasks. While rising accuracy scores on standard benchmarks suggest rapid progress, many agents still continue to fail in practice. This discrepancy highlights a fundamental limitation of current evaluations: compressing agent behavior into a single success metric obscures critical operational flaws. Notably, it ignores whether agents behave consistently across runs, withstand perturbations, fail predictably, or have bounded error severity. Grounded in safety-critical engineering, we provide a holistic performance profile by proposing twelve concrete metrics that decompose agent reliability along four key dimensions: consistency, robustness, predictability, and safety. Evaluating 15 models across two complementary benchmarks, we find that recent capability gains have only yielded small improvements in reliability. By exposing these persistent limitations, our metrics complement traditional evaluations while offering tools for reasoning about how agents perform, degrade, and fail.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 10 Pith papers
-
Agent Meltdowns: The Road to Hell Is Paved with Helpful Agents
The paper defines accidental meltdowns as unsafe agent behavior triggered by benign errors and reports that such meltdowns occur in 64.7% of evaluated rollouts across GPT, Grok, and Gemini agents.
-
PocketAgents: A Manifest-Driven Library of Autonomous Defense Agents
PocketAgents introduces a manifest-driven library for LLM-based autonomous defense agents, evaluated in 18 closed-loop trials against a DarkSide-inspired attack where 13 trials produced validated blocking actions.
-
Open-World Evaluations for Measuring Frontier AI Capabilities
Open-world evaluations using qualitative review of real-world tasks can give earlier warnings of frontier AI capabilities than automated benchmarks, as demonstrated by an AI agent publishing a simple iOS app with one ...
-
Property-Level Reconstructability of Agent Decisions: An Anchor-Level Pilot Across Vendor SDK Adapter Regimes
Pilot study shows agent decision reconstructability varies by vendor SDK regime, with completeness scores from 42.9% to 85.7% and consistent gaps in reasoning traces.
-
Hallucinations Undermine Trust; Metacognition is a Way Forward
LLMs need metacognition to align expressed uncertainty with their actual knowledge boundaries, moving beyond knowledge expansion to reduce confident errors.
-
MarketBench: Evaluating AI Agents as Market Participants
LLMs show poor calibration in predicting task success and token use on software engineering benchmarks, causing market auctions to underperform compared to perfect information scenarios, with limited improvement from ...
-
RemoteShield: Enable Robust Multimodal Large Language Models for Earth Observation
RemoteShield improves robustness of Earth observation MLLMs by training on semantic equivalence clusters of clean and perturbed inputs via preference learning to maintain consistent reasoning under noise.
-
Nautilus: From One Prompt to Plug-and-Play Robot Learning
NAUTILUS is a prompt-driven harness that automates plug-and-play adapters, typed contracts, and validation for policies, benchmarks, and robots in learning research.
-
Consistency as a Testable Property: Statistical Methods to Evaluate AI Agent Reliability
A framework with U-statistics and kernel-based metrics quantifies AI agent consistency and robustness, showing trajectory metrics outperform pass@1 rates in diagnosing failures.
-
Security, Privacy, and Ethical Risks in OpenClaw
The paper analyzes security, privacy, and ethical risks in the OpenClaw AI agent system arising from its architecture, storage, tool use, and integrations, arguing these form major barriers to trustworthy adoption.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.