Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

On Reward-Free Reinforcement Learning with Linear Function Approximation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2006.11274 v1 pith:EDQMQJT7 submitted 2020-06-19 cs.LG cs.AImath.OCstat.ML

On Reward-Free Reinforcement Learning with Linear Function Approximation

classification cs.LG cs.AImath.OCstat.ML
keywords reward-freefunctionlinearnumbersettingrewardactionsagent
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Reward-free reinforcement learning (RL) is a framework which is suitable for both the batch RL setting and the setting where there are many reward functions of interest. During the exploration phase, an agent collects samples without using a pre-specified reward function. After the exploration phase, a reward function is given, and the agent uses samples collected during the exploration phase to compute a near-optimal policy. Jin et al. [2020] showed that in the tabular setting, the agent only needs to collect polynomial number of samples (in terms of the number states, the number of actions, and the planning horizon) for reward-free RL. However, in practice, the number of states and actions can be large, and thus function approximation schemes are required for generalization. In this work, we give both positive and negative results for reward-free RL with linear function approximation. We give an algorithm for reward-free RL in the linear Markov decision process setting where both the transition and the reward admit linear representations. The sample complexity of our algorithm is polynomial in the feature dimension and the planning horizon, and is completely independent of the number of states and actions. We further give an exponential lower bound for reward-free RL in the setting where only the optimal $Q$-function admits a linear representation. Our results imply several interesting exponential separations on the sample complexity of reward-free RL.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Multi-agent imitation learning with function approximation: Linear Markov games and beyond

    cs.LG 2026-02 conditional novelty 7.0

    In linear Markov games, behavior cloning's sample complexity hinges on a feature-level concentrability coefficient, and the interactive algorithm LSVI-UCB-ZERO-BC removes concentrability dependence entirely, scaling o...

  2. Breaking the Computational Barrier: Provably Efficient Actor-Critic for Low-Rank MDPs

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    An actor-critic RL algorithm for low-rank MDPs achieves improved sample efficiency using solely a policy evaluation oracle.