Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Automating Governing Knowledge Commons and Contextual Integrity (GKC-CI) Privacy Policy Annotations with Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2311.02192 v3 pith:ELSCCAIW submitted 2023-11-03 cs.CY cs.CLcs.LG

Automating Governing Knowledge Commons and Contextual Integrity (GKC-CI) Privacy Policy Annotations with Large Language Models

classification cs.CY cs.CLcs.LG
keywords privacygkc-ciannotationpoliciesmodelmodelspolicyaccuracy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Identifying contextual integrity (CI) and governing knowledge commons (GKC) parameters in privacy policy texts can facilitate normative privacy analysis. However, GKC-CI annotation has heretofore required manual or crowdsourced effort. This paper demonstrates that high-accuracy GKC-CI parameter annotation of privacy policies can be performed automatically using large language models. We fine-tune 50 open-source and proprietary models on 21,588 ground truth GKC-CI annotations from 16 privacy policies. Our best performing model has an accuracy of 90.65%, which is comparable to the accuracy of experts on the same task. We apply our best performing model to 456 privacy policies from a variety of online services, demonstrating the effectiveness of scaling GKC-CI annotation for privacy policy exploration and analysis. We publicly release our model training code, training and testing data, an annotation visualizer, and all annotated policies for future GKC-CI research.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. A Systematic Evaluation of Traditional Privacy Policy Analysis Tools Against LLMs

    cs.CR 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0

    Prompt-only LLMs match or outperform six specialized privacy-policy tools on most tasks, according to a 10-policy benchmark with several validity caveats.