Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

WorldCuisines: A Massive-Scale Benchmark for Multilingual and Multicultural Visual Question Answering on Global Cuisines

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.12705 v5 pith:ENJEXFD4 submitted 2024-10-16 cs.CL cs.AIcs.CV

WorldCuisines: A Massive-Scale Benchmark for Multilingual and Multicultural Visual Question Answering on Global Cuisines

classification cs.CL cs.AIcs.CV
keywords benchmarkknowledgelanguagelanguagesmulticulturalansweringcontextscuisines
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Vision Language Models (VLMs) often struggle with culture-specific knowledge, particularly in languages other than English and in underrepresented cultural contexts. To evaluate their understanding of such knowledge, we introduce WorldCuisines, a massive-scale benchmark for multilingual and multicultural, visually grounded language understanding. This benchmark includes a visual question answering (VQA) dataset with text-image pairs across 30 languages and dialects, spanning 9 language families and featuring over 1 million data points, making it the largest multicultural VQA benchmark to date. It includes tasks for identifying dish names and their origins. We provide evaluation datasets in two sizes (12k and 60k instances) alongside a training dataset (1 million instances). Our findings show that while VLMs perform better with correct location context, they struggle with adversarial contexts and predicting specific regional cuisines and languages. To support future research, we release a knowledge base with annotated food entries and images along with the VQA data.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Evaluating AI-Generated Images of Cultural Artifacts with Community-Informed Rubrics

    cs.CY 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Community members from the UK blind community, Kerala, and Tamil Nadu helped define what counts as culturally appropriate depictions of artifacts, and the authors tested whether those definitions can be turned into re...

  2. Camellia: Benchmarking Cultural Biases in LLMs for Asian Languages

    cs.CL 2025-10 conditional novelty 6.0

    Across nine Asian languages, multilingual LLMs favor Western cultural entities in 30-40% of culturally grounded contexts, with model-specific sentiment biases and extraction accuracy gaps.

  3. Evaluating AI-Generated Images of Cultural Artifacts with Community-Informed Rubrics

    cs.CY 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Case studies with blind UK residents and people from Kerala and Tamil Nadu demonstrate that community input at the systematization stage produces culturally grounded definitions of appropriateness for text-to-image mo...