Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2305.16366 v1 pith:ESD6E7UP submitted 2023-05-25 cs.CL cs.AIcs.LGcs.LO

Decomposing the Enigma: Subgoal-based Demonstration Learning for Formal Theorem Proving

classification cs.CL cs.AIcs.LGcs.LO
keywords demonstrationlearningmodelsorganizationsubgoal-basedaccuracydiffusiondomain
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large language models~(LLMs) present an intriguing avenue of exploration in the domain of formal theorem proving. Nonetheless, the full utilization of these models, particularly in terms of demonstration formatting and organization, remains an underexplored area. In an endeavor to enhance the efficacy of LLMs, we introduce a subgoal-based demonstration learning framework, consisting of two primary elements: Firstly, drawing upon the insights of subgoal learning from the domains of reinforcement learning and robotics, we propose the construction of distinct subgoals for each demonstration example and refine these subgoals in accordance with the pertinent theories of subgoal learning. Secondly, we build upon recent advances in diffusion models to predict the optimal organization, simultaneously addressing two intricate issues that persist within the domain of demonstration organization: subset selection and order determination. Through the integration of subgoal-based learning methodologies, we have successfully increased the prevailing proof accuracy from 38.9\% to 44.3\% on the miniF2F benchmark. Furthermore, the adoption of diffusion models for demonstration organization can lead to an additional enhancement in accuracy to 45.5\%, or a $5\times$ improvement in sampling efficiency compared with the long-standing state-of-the-art method. Our code is available at \url{https://github.com/HKUNLP/subgoal-theorem-prover}.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Less Effort, Shorter Proofs: Reinforcement Learning for Security Protocol Analysis in Tamarin

    cs.CR 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    An RL-guided MCTS proof search for Tamarin finds more and shorter proofs than standard search across 16 protocol models.

  2. Knowledge Distillation from Large Reasoning Models to Compact Student Models: A Case Study on the John O Bryan Mathematics Competition

    cs.LG 2026-06 conditional novelty 4.0

    Distilling CoT from DeepSeek-R1 to Qwen2.5-7B on competition problems yields 4.76 pp accuracy gain to 69.43% and 73.1% on MATH-500, with accuracy falling as response length decreases.