REVIEW 4 cited by
MLLMGuard: A Multi-dimensional Safety Evaluation Suite for Multimodal Large Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
MLLMGuard: A Multi-dimensional Safety Evaluation Suite for Multimodal Large Language Models
read the original abstract
Powered by remarkable advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs), Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) demonstrate impressive capabilities in manifold tasks. However, the practical application scenarios of MLLMs are intricate, exposing them to potential malicious instructions and thereby posing safety risks. While current benchmarks do incorporate certain safety considerations, they often lack comprehensive coverage and fail to exhibit the necessary rigor and robustness. For instance, the common practice of employing GPT-4V as both the evaluator and a model to be evaluated lacks credibility, as it tends to exhibit a bias toward its own responses. In this paper, we present MLLMGuard, a multidimensional safety evaluation suite for MLLMs, including a bilingual image-text evaluation dataset, inference utilities, and a lightweight evaluator. MLLMGuard's assessment comprehensively covers two languages (English and Chinese) and five important safety dimensions (Privacy, Bias, Toxicity, Truthfulness, and Legality), each with corresponding rich subtasks. Focusing on these dimensions, our evaluation dataset is primarily sourced from platforms such as social media, and it integrates text-based and image-based red teaming techniques with meticulous annotation by human experts. This can prevent inaccurate evaluation caused by data leakage when using open-source datasets and ensures the quality and challenging nature of our benchmark. Additionally, a fully automated lightweight evaluator termed GuardRank is developed, which achieves significantly higher evaluation accuracy than GPT-4. Our evaluation results across 13 advanced models indicate that MLLMs still have a substantial journey ahead before they can be considered safe and responsible.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
Catching the Infection Before It Spreads: Foresight-Guided Defense in Multi-Agent Systems
A foresight-based local purification method using multi-persona simulations and recursive diagnosis reduces infectious jailbreak spread in multi-agent systems from over 95% to below 5.47% while matching benign perform...
-
Multimodal Reward Hacking in Reinforcement Learning
Imperfect multimodal RL rewards systematically create new failures (NRFR > RHR); scaling and answer-aware rewards help but do not eliminate hacking, and unreliable visual verifiers actively increase it.
-
Catching the Infection Before It Spreads: Foresight-Guided Defense in Multi-Agent Systems
A foresight-based local purification method simulates future agent interactions, detects infections via response diversity across personas, and applies targeted rollback or recursive diagnosis to cut maximum infection...
-
Catching the Infection Before It Spreads: Foresight-Guided Defense in Multi-Agent Systems
FLP uses multi-persona foresight simulation to detect infections via response diversity and applies local purification to reduce maximum cumulative infection rates in multi-agent systems from over 95% to below 5.47%.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.