Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Effective action for relativistic hydrodynamics from Crooks fluctuation theorem

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A new effective field theory framework claims to build relativistic fluctuating hydrodynamics that are causal, stable, and well-posed in the full nonlinear regime, with fluctuation-dissipation relations enforced by a covariant Crooks…

desk verdict Genuinely new path-integral construction with a solid diffusion model, but the flagship causality claim outruns the proof: it only holds for derivative-free dissipative potentials, which the paper never restricts. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.04637 v1 pith:EZFSS2J3 submitted 2025-01-08 nucl-th hep-phhep-th

Nicki Mullins , Mauricio Hippert , Jorge Noronha This is my paper · ORCID
classification nucl-thhep-phhep-th
keywords relativistichydrodynamicsstochasticeffectivefieldtheoryCrooksfluctuationtheoremfluctuation-dissipationrelationcausalitywell-posednessSchwinger-Keldysh
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper presents a new effective field theory framework for relativistic fluctuating hydrodynamics built from a single generating current and a dissipative potential. Its central claim is that causality, stability, and local well-posedness can be imposed from the outset through conditions on the generating current alone, valid in the full nonlinear regime and independent of spacetime foliation. The framework further shows that a covariant version of the Crooks fluctuation theorem enforces a Z2 (KMS) symmetry on the effective action, which reproduces the standard fluctuation-dissipation relations for n-point correlation functions. The authors argue this resolves a known pathology of Schwinger-Keldysh approaches, where stochastic first-order hydrodynamic actions become ill-defined in the causal regime.

What carries the argument

The central object is the generating current $X^\mu(\Phi)$, a vector built from the equation of state and out-of-equilibrium fields, together with the dissipative potential $\Xi$. The action is $L = -\bar{\Phi}_a \nabla_\mu (\partial X^\mu/\partial \Phi^a) + i\Xi$, and the characteristic matrix $\partial^2 X^\mu/\partial \Phi^a \partial \Phi^b$ carries all causality information: the equations of motion are symmetric hyperbolic when this matrix is positive-definite in a frame, and causal when its contraction with any nonzero $Z^a$ is timelike future-directed. The dissipative potential generates both dissipation and noise, and the entropy current $s^\mu = X^\mu - \Phi^a \partial X^\mu/\partial \Phi^a$ gives the second law. The covariant Crooks fluctuation theorem acts as a symmetry principle: requiring the path integral to satisfy $P[\Phi|\lambda] = P_\Theta[\Theta\Phi|\Theta\lambda] e^{\omega}$ forces a transformation that yields the KMS Z2 symmetry on the effective action, which is what produces the fluctuation-dissipation relations.

What would settle it

Construct a dissipative potential with a derivative term, such as $\Xi = f(\Phi) \nabla_\mu \Phi^a \nabla^\mu \Phi^a$, in the proposed action, and check whether the equations of motion are still symmetric hyperbolic and causal for all field configurations; finding a configuration where the characteristic matrix ceases to be timelike future-directed would falsify the claim that causality can be imposed solely through $X^\mu$.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The authors claim that every causal, stable, well-posed relativistic fluctuating hydrodynamic theory can be constructed from a generating current $X^\mu(\Phi)$ and a dissipative potential $\Xi$, with the action $L = -\bar{\Phi}_a \nabla_\mu (\partial X^\mu/\partial \Phi^a) + i\Xi$. The principal part of the equations of motion is governed by the characteristic matrix $\partial^2 X^\mu/\partial \Phi^a \partial \Phi^b$, so demanding that this matrix contracted with arbitrary vectors is timelike future-directed enforces causality and symmetric hyperbolicity in the nonlinear regime. Stability follows from the entropy current $s^\mu = X^\mu - \Phi^a \partial X^\mu/\partial \Phi^a$ and a two-point vector $K^\mu$ that connects concavity of the free-energy current to causality. Imposing the covariant Crooks fluctuation theorem yields a Z2 symmetry identical in form to the classical KMS symmetry of Schwinger-Keldysh theory, which in turn forces the correlation functions to satisfy the fluctuation-dissipation theorem $G_S = (2T/\omega) \operatorname{Im} G_R$. As a demonstration, the paper constructs a stochastic diffusion theory that reduces to a flux-conservative Israel-Stewart-like relaxation equation and whose correlation functions obey the standard FDT.

Load-bearing premise

Causality and symmetric hyperbolicity are derived under the assumption that the dissipative potential $\Xi$ contains no derivatives of the dynamical fields, so the principal part of the equations of motion is entirely set by the generating current $X^\mu$; if gradient terms enter $\Xi$, the characteristic matrix and the resulting causality conditions would change.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the central claim is correct, this provides the first construction of stochastic relativistic hydrodynamic EFTs whose average evolution is manifestly causal and symmetric hyperbolic in the nonlinear regime, making them usable for Monte Carlo simulations of fluctuating fluids.
  • The framework extends to arbitrary out-of-equilibrium steady states, not just near-global-equilibrium perturbations, so it can describe fluctuations around general non-equilibrium backgrounds.
  • The Z2/KMS symmetry ensures that all higher-point correlation functions satisfy the standard Schwinger-Keldysh constraints, so the theory automatically encodes nonlinear fluctuation-dissipation relations.
  • The diffusion example shows the formalism reproduces Israel-Stewart-type relaxation and Ohm's law in an external electric field, giving concrete Lagrangians for well-posed stochastic relativistic diffusion.
  • It outlines a systematic recipe (steps S.I-S.IV with constraints C.I-C.II) for building such theories, potentially replacing case-by-case causality checks with construction-time conditions.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The requirement that $\Xi$ contain no derivatives of the dynamical fields is restrictive; if gradient terms are needed to describe certain microscopic physics, the advertised causality-from-the-generating-current property would require modification or extension.
  • The stability-causality connection through $K^\mu$ suggests a general variational principle for constructing causal dissipative relativistic theories, which could be tested against existing first-order relativistic hydrodynamic theories.
  • Because the formalism is presented as a general EFT recipe, it may be adaptable to other relativistic stochastic systems beyond hydrodynamics, such as fluctuating fields in curved spacetime.
  • The explicit diffusion model provides a testable prediction: the symmetrized correlation functions are positive-definite whenever the second law holds, which could be checked in numerical simulations of relativistic diffusion.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a new effective-field-theory construction for relativistic fluctuating hydrodynamics. It starts from a generating current X^mu(Phi) and a dissipative potential Xi(Phi,bar Phi), writes a path integral, imposes a relativistically covariant Crooks fluctuation theorem to fix the transformation of the auxiliary fields, and derives a Z2/KMS symmetry that is claimed to enforce fluctuation-dissipation relations. The Letter further claims that causality, symmetric hyperbolicity, stability, and local well-posedness can be imposed from the outset through conditions on X^mu, independently of spacetime foliation and in the fully nonlinear regime. A diffusion model in the supplemental material is worked out explicitly, including entropy production, two-point correlation functions, and hyperbolicity/stability/causality conditions.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the framework would be a useful advance: it would provide a systematic route to stochastic relativistic hydrodynamic effective theories with built-in causality and fluctuation-dissipation constraints, and it would avoid the ill-defined path integrals encountered in some Schwinger-Keldysh truncations. The diffusion example is a genuine strength: it is explicit, internally consistent in its correlation functions, and it reproduces the standard Israel-Stewart relaxation form with positive entropy production sigma=j^2/kappa and the expected FDT relation at tree level. The manuscript also states its construction recipe and conditions (S.I-S.IV, C.I-C.II) clearly. However, the general claims are substantially broader than what is proven: the causality analysis is conditioned on a derivative-free Xi, the stability-causality connection via K^mu is asserted without derivation, and the entropy-production sign dictionary contains inconsistencies. These gaps are load-bearing for the abstract's central claim, so a major revision is needed.

major comments (3)
  1. [Causality] The principal-symbol argument in the Causality section is explicitly conditioned on Xi containing no derivatives of the dynamical fields ('as long as Xi does not contain any derivatives'). This restriction is not part of the construction recipe (S.IV), which instructs one to build the most general Xi invariant under (9) up to a maximum power of bar-phi^a and phi^a, with no derivative power counting. If Xi contains gradient couplings, such as bar-phi^a grad_mu phi^b, the term i dXi/dbar-Phi^a in Eq. (3) contributes to the principal part and the characteristic matrix is no longer d^2X^mu/dPhi^a dPhi^b. Consequently, the abstract's claim that causality and well-posedness can be imposed 'from the outset' through X^mu alone, and the corresponding statement in the Conclusions, are established only for a subclass of theories that the Letter does not delineate. Please either prove that the Z2 symmetry in (9) forbids all derivative terms in Xi, or restrict the central claim and add a derivative-free (or derivative-power-counted) condition to step (S.IV).
  2. [Covariant stability] The claimed connection between stability and causality through K^mu in Eq. (6) is asserted without proof. Using Omega^mu = (Phi^a-Phi^a_*) dX^mu/dPhi^a - X^mu, one finds d^2Omega^mu/dPhi^a dPhi^b = d^2X^mu/dPhi^a dPhi^b + (Phi-Phi_*)^c d^3X^mu/dPhi^a dPhi^b dPhi^c, so timelikeness of K^mu does not by itself imply timelikeness of the characteristic contraction (d^2X^mu/dPhi^a dPhi^b)Phi^a Phi'^b. This implication is load-bearing because condition (C.I) uses K^mu to enforce causality, symmetric hyperbolicity, and stability simultaneously. A derivation of this implication, or a separation of the causality condition from the stability condition, is needed before (C.I) can be used as stated.
  3. [Crooks fluctuation theorem] Equations (10)-(11) contain a sign inconsistency that propagates into the entropy-production constraint (C.II). Equation (10) gives grad_mu s^mu = (dX^mu/dlambda^h) grad_mu lambda^h - Phi^a grad_mu(dX^mu/dPhi^a); with sigma = -Phi^a grad_mu(dX^mu/dPhi^a) this yields sigma = grad_mu s^mu - sigma_ext if sigma_ext = (dX^mu/dlambda^h) grad_mu lambda^h, not sigma = grad_mu s^mu + sigma_ext as written in Eq. (11). In the supplemental example, the on-shell equation (22b) has the opposite sign to the one obtained by varying Eq. (21), and the stated result sigma = j^2/kappa depends on this sign convention. The sign conventions for sigma_ext, the gauge-field coupling, and Ohm's law therefore need to be fixed before the positivity constraints can be checked.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract and Introduction] The phrases 'for the first time' and 'uniquely' are stronger than what a single Letter can establish, especially in a field with competing Schwinger-Keldysh constructions; I recommend softening or removing them.
  2. [Supplemental material] Footnotes 9 and 10 refer to an upcoming companion paper for 'detailed applications'; the nonlinear claims in the main text would be much easier to evaluate if at least one fully nonlinear example were included in this manuscript.
  3. [Eq. (7) and Eq. (9)] The action of the discrete transformation Theta on spacetime arguments, on derivatives, and on the integration measure is not spelled out; please define the transformation of x^mu, grad_mu, and the path-integral measure explicitly.
  4. [Supplemental material, Eq. (30)] The retarded/advanced/symmetrized correlators are written in a form where contact terms are suppressed; it would be helpful to state the contact-term prescription explicitly so that the Ward identities mentioned in the main text can be checked.
  5. [Supplemental material, Eq. (35)] The statement that hyperbolicity and stability together force P1 to be independent of alpha is an interesting and restrictive result; it should appear as an explicit limitation of the leading-order inverse-Reynolds truncation in the main text, not only in the supplemental derivation.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the KMS and fluctuation-dissipation relations are derived from an explicitly imposed covariant Crooks condition, and the causality/stability conditions are stated constraints on the generating current rather than fitted predictions.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is an explicit construction rather than a hidden identification. It posits Crooks' fluctuation theorem in covariant form (Eq. 7), converts it into the Lagrangian condition (Eq. 8), and then shows that the transformation (9) satisfies this condition. The KMS symmetry (16) and the fluctuation-dissipation relation (19) are derived from this imposed symmetry in the effective action; they are not inserted as inputs. The diffusion example verifies the FDR by direct Gaussian integration, with all coefficients (kappa, tau, chi) left as free parameters, so G_S = (iT/omega)(G_R - G_A) is a consequence of the action's structure, not a fit. The causality/stability conditions (C.I) and (C.II) are presented as constraints to be imposed on the generating current and dissipative potential, not as empirical predictions. The statement in the Causality section that the principal-part analysis holds 'as long as Xi does not contain any derivatives' is an explicit restriction of the proof; although the construction recipe (S.IV) does not separately restrict Xi to be derivative-free, this is a completeness gap rather than a circular reduction. Finally, the shift L_Theta(Phi,Phi-bar) = L(Phi,Phi-bar - i Phi) is attributed to the authors' prior work [50], but the paper states this choice explicitly and verifies that it is sufficient for Eq. (8), so the argument does not reduce to an unverified self-citation. The self-citations to [50] for the BDNK imaginary-action issue and for comparison correlation functions are motivational or corroborative, not load-bearing for the derivation itself.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The framework rests on standard thermodynamics plus the introduced generating-current/dissipative-potential structure. No new physical entities are postulated. The Crooks theorem is an external physical principle, not a free parameter. The main burden is the unproven generality of the causality/stability criteria and the no-derivative restriction on Xi.

free parameters (2)
  • kappa(x) (diffusivity/transport coefficient) = unspecified
    Enters the dissipative potential and entropy production sigma=j^2/kappa; must be positive definite, but no value is derived or fit.
  • P(alpha, j^2) (generating pressure function) = unspecified
    Defines the equation of state and out-of-equilibrium corrections; constrained by convexity conditions (35) and (43), but otherwise arbitrary and not fit to data.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The transition probability P[A->B] is represented by the MSR-type path integral (Eq 1) over fields Phi and auxiliary fields Phibar.
    This is the starting point for the whole construction; it assumes a stochastic path-integral description of the macroscopic fluid exists.
  • domain assumption The fluid's energy-momentum tensor and conserved current are derived from a generating current X^mu via T^{mu nu}=dX^mu/d beta_nu and J^mu=dX^mu/d alpha.
    This extends divergence-type theories to the stochastic setting; it restricts the form of the constitutive relations.
  • domain assumption A covariant version of the Crooks fluctuation theorem (Eq 7) is imposed on the path-integral probabilities.
    The theorem is a physical input from non-equilibrium statistical mechanics, not derived here; it is used to constrain the dissipative potential and derive KMS symmetry.
  • ad hoc to paper The dissipative potential Xi contains no derivatives of the fields.
    Explicitly stated in the Causality section; needed so that the principal part is controlled by X^mu alone. If violated, the causality analysis fails.
  • ad hoc to paper The reversal transformation (Eq 9) leaves Xi invariant.
    Required to satisfy the Crooks condition; it is a construction rule rather than a derived symmetry.
  • domain assumption Global equilibrium exists with constant alpha_* and timelike Killing beta_*^mu.
    Used for the stability analysis and the Lyapunov functional; assumes a stationary background metric with timelike Killing vector.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Effective action for relativistic hydrodynamics from Crooks fluctuation theorem." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/EZFSS2J3

@misc{pith2026250104637,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Effective action for relativistic hydrodynamics from Crooks fluctuation theorem},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/EZFSS2J3}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.04637}
}
abstract

A new effective theory framework for fluctuating hydrodynamics in the relativistic regime is derived using standard thermodynamical principles and general properties of non-equilibrium stochastic dynamics. For the first time, we establish clear and concise conditions for ensuring that the resulting effective theories are causal, stable, and well-posed within general relativity. These properties are independent of spacetime foliation and are valid in the full nonlinear regime. Out-of-equilibrium fluctuations are constrained by a relativistically covariant version of Crooks fluctuation theorem, which determines how the entropy production is distributed even when the system is driven by an external force. This leads to an emerging $\mathbb{Z}_2$ symmetry responsible for imposing fluctuation-dissipation relations for n-point correlation functions, which matches the standard constraints for the Schwinger-Keldysh effective action.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Comparison between Causal and Acausal Diffusion: a Schwinger-Keldysh Effective Field Theory Perspective

    hep-th 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    One-loop real-time density correlations in causal diffusion reduce to known acausal results in the overdamped limit and yield a new universal scaling function in the underdamped limit.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

68 extracted references · 23 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Heinz and R

    U. Heinz and R. Snellings, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 63, 123 (2013) , arXiv:1301.2826 [nucl-th]

    arXiv 2013

  2. [2]

    trajectory

    Finally, we remark that since the path integral is obtained by integrating over solutions of the equations of motion, this construction is only possible if local well-posedness holds. Dissipative hydrodynamics —Dissipative theories in- clude nonconserved quantities that can be described in this formalism by adding out-of-equilibrium variables ϕ a to the s...

    work page

  3. [3]

    G. S. Rocha, D. Wagner, G. S. Denicol, J. Noronha, and D. H. Rischke, Entropy 26, 189 (2024) , arXiv:2311.15063 [nucl-th]

    arXiv 2024

  4. [4]

    Noronha, B

    J. Noronha, B. Schenke, C. Shen, and W. Zhao (2024) arXiv:2401.09208 [nucl-th]

    arXiv 2024

  5. [5]

    Romatschke and U

    P. Romatschke and U. Romatschke, Relativistic Fluid Dynamics In and Out of Equilibrium , Cambridge Mono- graphs on Mathematical Physics (Cambridge University Press, 2019) arXiv:1712.05815 [nucl-th]

    arXiv 2019

  6. [6]

    Bzdak, S

    A. Bzdak, S. Esumi, V. Koch, J. Liao, M. Stephanov, and N. Xu, Phys. Rept. 853, 1 (2020) , arXiv:1906.00936 [nucl-th]

    arXiv 2020

  7. [7]

    X. An, G. Ba¸ sar, M. Stephanov, and H.-U. Yee, Phys. Rev. C 102, 034901 (2020) , arXiv:1912.13456 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2020

  8. [8]

    and (13), we find that the effective action is symmetric under the usual KMS symmetry expected 5 from effective actions on the Schwinger-Keldysh closed- time path contour in the classical limit [ 28–31]: λ h → Θ λ h, (16a) ¯λ h → Θ ¯λ h + iΘ Lβ λ h, (16b) with the external sources λ a and ¯λ a set to Aµ and ¯Aµ , respectively. The KMS symmetry in ( 16) indic...

    work page

Show all 68 references
  1. [9]

    inverse Reynolds number

    or the symmetry in ( 16) (up to boundary terms). (S.IV) Construct the most general dissipative potential Ξ that is invariant under the symmetry in ( 9) and contains all possible terms up to a maximum power of ¯ϕ a, ϕ a that is equal to the power chosen in step (S. II). In gene...

  2. [10]

    Soares Rocha, L

    G. Soares Rocha, L. Gavassino, and N. Mullins, Phys. Rev. D 110, 016020 (2024) , arXiv:2405.10878 [nucl-th]

    2024 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Choquet-Bruhat, General Relativity and the Einstein Equations, Oxford Mathematical Monographs (Oxford University Press, United Kingdom, 2009)

    Y. Choquet-Bruhat, General Relativity and the Einstein Equations, Oxford Mathematical Monographs (Oxford University Press, United Kingdom, 2009)

    2009

  4. [12]

    Jarzynski, Physical Review Letters 78, 2690–2693 (1997)

    C. Jarzynski, Physical Review Letters 78, 2690–2693 (1997)

    1997

  5. [13]

    G. E. Crooks, Journal of Statistical Physics 90, 1481 (1998)

    1998

  6. [14]

    G. E. Crooks, Physical Review E 60, 2721–2726 (1999)

    1999

  7. [15]

    R. J. Harris and G. M. Sch¨ utz, Journal of Statistical Me- chanics: Theory and Experiment 2007, P07020–P07020 (2007)

    2007

  8. [16]

    Sevick, R

    E. Sevick, R. Prabhakar, S. R. Williams, and D. J. Sear- les, Annual Review of Physical Chemistry 59, 603–633 (2008)

    2008

  9. [17]

    C. Gale, S. Jeon, B. Schenke, P. Tribedy, and R. Venugopalan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 012302 (2013) , arXiv:1209.6330 [nucl-th]

    2013 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Noronha-Hostler, J

    J. Noronha-Hostler, J. Noronha, and M. Gyulassy, Phys. Rev. C 93, 024909 (2016) , arXiv:1508.02455 [nucl-th]

    2016 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Landau and E

    L. Landau and E. Lifshitz, Statistical Physics: Volume 5 , v. 5 (Elsevier Science, 2013)

    2013

  12. [20]

    J. I. Kapusta, B. Muller, and M. Stephanov, Phys. Rev. C 85, 054906 (2012) , arXiv:1112.6405 [nucl-th]

    2012 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Kovtun, J

    P. Kovtun, J. Phys. A 45, 473001 (2012) , arXiv:1205.5040 [hep-th]

    2012 arXiv

  14. [22]

    F. M. Haehl, R. Loganayagam, and M. Rangamani, JHEP 05, 060 (2015) , arXiv:1502.00636 [hep-th]

    2015 arXiv

  15. [23]

    F. M. Haehl, R. Loganayagam, and M. Rangamani, JHEP 04, 039 (2016) , arXiv:1511.07809 [hep-th]

    2016 arXiv

  16. [24]

    F. M. Haehl, R. Loganayagam, and M. Rangamani, JHEP 06, 069 (2017) , arXiv:1610.01940 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Akamatsu, A

    Y. Akamatsu, A. Mazeliauskas, and D. Teaney, Phys. Rev. C 95, 014909 (2017) , arXiv:1606.07742 [nucl-th]

    2017 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Akamatsu, A

    Y. Akamatsu, A. Mazeliauskas, and D. Teaney, Phys. Rev. C 97, 024902 (2018) , arXiv:1708.05657 [nucl-th]

    2018 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Mazeliauskas, Y

    A. Mazeliauskas, Y. Akamatsu, and D. Teaney, PoS CPOD2017, 038 (2018)

    2018

  20. [28]

    X. An, G. Basar, M. Stephanov, and H.-U. Yee, Phys. Rev. C 100, 024910 (2019) , arXiv:1902.09517 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Kovtun, G

    P. Kovtun, G. D. Moore, and P. Romatschke, JHEP 07, 123 (2014) , arXiv:1405.3967 [hep-ph]

    2014 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Harder, P

    M. Harder, P. Kovtun, and A. Ritz, JHEP 07, 025 (2015), arXiv:1502.03076 [hep-th]

    2015 arXiv

  23. [31]

    L. M. Sieberer, A. Chiocchetta, A. Gambassi, U. C. T¨ auber, and S. Diehl, Phys. Rev. B 92, 134307 (2015) , arXiv:1505.00912 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    2015 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Crossley, P

    M. Crossley, P. Glorioso, and H. Liu, JHEP 09, 095 (2017), arXiv:1511.03646 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Glorioso, M

    P. Glorioso, M. Crossley, and H. Liu, JHEP 09, 096 (2017), arXiv:1701.07817 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Liu and P

    H. Liu and P. Glorioso, PoS TASI2017, 008 (2018) , arXiv:1805.09331 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Kato, Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis 58, 181 (1975)

    T. Kato, Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis 58, 181 (1975)

    1975

  28. [36]

    M. M. Disconzi, Living Rev. Rel. 27, 6 (2024) , arXiv:2308.09844 [math.AP]

    2024 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Wang and U

    E. Wang and U. W. Heinz, Phys. Rev. D 66, 025008 (2002), arXiv:hep-th/9809016

    2002 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Mallick, M

    K. Mallick, M. Moshe, and H. Orland, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 44, 095002 (2011)

    2011

  31. [39]

    Torrieri, JHEP 02, 175 (2021), arXiv:2007.09224 [hep- -th]

    G. Torrieri, JHEP 02, 175 (2021), arXiv:2007.09224 [hep- -th]

    2021 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Huang, J

    X. Huang, J. H. Farrell, A. J. Friedman, I. Zane, P. Glo- rioso, and A. Lucas, (2023), arXiv:2310.12233 [cond– mat.stat-mech]. 7

    2023 arXiv

  33. [41]

    J. Guo, P. Glorioso, and A. Lucas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 150603 (2022) , arXiv:2204.06006 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    2022 arXiv

  34. [42]

    R. Kubo, J. Phys. Soc. Jap. 12, 570 (1957)

    1957

  35. [43]

    P. C. Martin and J. S. Schwinger, Phys. Rev. 115, 1342 (1959)

    1959

  36. [44]

    L. P. Kadanoff and P. C. Martin, Annals Phys. 24, 419 (1963)

    1963

  37. [45]

    R. P. Geroch and L. Lindblom, Phys. Rev. D 41, 1855 (1990)

    1990

  38. [46]

    Calzetta, Class

    E. Calzetta, Class. Quant. Grav. 15, 653 (1998) , arXiv:gr-qc/9708048

    1998 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Geroch and L

    R. Geroch and L. Lindblom, Annals of Physics 207, 394 (1991)

    1991

  40. [48]

    Gavassino, M

    L. Gavassino, M. M. Disconzi, and J. Noronha, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 222302 (2024) , arXiv:2302.03478 [nu- cl-th]

    2024 arXiv

  41. [49]

    H. B. Callen and T. A. Welton, Phys. Rev. 83, 34 (1951)

    1951

  42. [50]

    Gavassino, M

    L. Gavassino, M. Antonelli, and B. Haskell, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 010606 (2022) , arXiv:2105.14621 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Gavassino, M

    L. Gavassino, M. Antonelli, and B. Haskell, Phys. Rev. D 106, 056010 (2022) , arXiv:2207.14778 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Pitaevskii and E

    L. Pitaevskii and E. Lifshitz, Physical Kinetics: Volume 10 , v. 10 (Butterworth-Heinemann, 2012)

    2012

  45. [53]

    Mullins, M

    N. Mullins, M. Hippert, L. Gavassino, and J. Noronha, Phys. Rev. D 108, 116019 (2023) , arXiv:2309.00512 [hep- -th]

    2023 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Israel and J

    W. Israel and J. M. Stewart, Annals Phys. 118, 341 (1979)

    1979

  47. [55]

    G. S. Denicol, H. Niemi, E. Molnar, and D. H. Rischke, Phys. Rev. D 85, 114047 (2012) , [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 91, 039902 (2015)], arXiv:1202.4551 [nucl-th]

    2012 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Florio, E

    A. Florio, E. Grossi, A. Soloviev, and D. Teaney, Phys. Rev. D 105, 054512 (2022) , arXiv:2111.03640 [hep-lat]

    2022 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Schaefer and V

    T. Schaefer and V. Skokov, Phys. Rev. D 106, 014006 (2022), arXiv:2204.02433 [nucl-th]

    2022 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Florio, E

    A. Florio, E. Grossi, and D. Teaney, Phys. Rev. D 109, 054037 (2024) , arXiv:2306.06887 [hep-lat]

    2024 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Basar, J

    G. Basar, J. Bhambure, R. Singh, and D. Teaney, (2024), arXiv:2403.04185 [nucl-th]

    2024 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Chattopadhyay, J

    C. Chattopadhyay, J. Ott, T. Schaefer, and V. V. Skokov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 032301 (2024) , arXiv:2403.10608 [nucl-th]

    2024 arXiv

  53. [61]

    F. S. Bemfica, M. M. Disconzi, and J. Noronha, Phys. Rev. D 98, 104064 (2018) , arXiv:1708.06255 [gr-qc]

    2018 arXiv

  54. [62]

    F. S. Bemfica, F. S. Bemfica, M. M. Disconzi, M. M. Disconzi, J. Noronha, and J. Noronha, Phys. Rev. D 100, 104020 (2019) , [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 105, 069902 (2022)], arXiv:1907.12695 [gr-qc]

    2019 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Kovtun, JHEP 10, 034 (2019) , arXiv:1907.08191 [hep- -th]

    P. Kovtun, JHEP 10, 034 (2019) , arXiv:1907.08191 [hep- -th]

    2019 arXiv

  56. [64]

    R. E. Hoult and P. Kovtun, JHEP 06, 067 (2020) , arXiv:2004.04102 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  57. [65]

    F. S. Bemfica, M. M. Disconzi, and J. Noronha, Phys. Rev. X 12, 021044 (2022) , arXiv:2009.11388 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Jain and P

    A. Jain and P. Kovtun, JHEP 01, 162 (2024) , arXiv:2309.00511 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Gavassino, N

    L. Gavassino, N. Abboud, E. Speranza, and J. Noronha, (2024), arXiv:2401.13852 [nucl-th]

    2024 arXiv

  60. [68]

    Gavassino, N

    L. Gavassino, N. Mullins, and M. Hippert, (2024), arXiv:2402.06776 [nucl-th] . SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL A model for diffusion To illustrate how the effective theory procedure described in this wo rk can be used to construct well-posed theories of relativistic fluctuating hydrodynami...

    2024 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.