Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 2 cited by

NUT charges force a gauge-invariant soft factor whose memory tensor carries both electric and magnetic pieces and diverges in two sky directions.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-13 18:53 UTC pith:F64J33BD

load-bearing objection Clean first calculation of NUT-charged gravitational memory, but the soft-factor fix that makes it gauge-invariant is still an ansatz and leaves a directional singularity. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2603.24365 v2 pith:F64J33BD submitted 2026-03-25 hep-th gr-qc

Memory effect from the scattering of Taub-NUT black holes

George Doran , Ricardo Monteiro , Nathan Moynihan This is my paper
classification hep-th gr-qc
keywords Taub-NUTgravitational memorysoft theoremsKerr-Taub-NUTNUT chargeKMOC formalismself-dual gravitycelestial holography
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper computes the permanent gravitational-wave displacement (the memory) left by the scattering of two Kerr-Taub-NUT black holes. It starts from the soft limit of the five-point amplitude that encodes the waveform and shows that the usual Weinberg soft factor is not gauge-invariant once NUT charges are present. The authors supply a minimal completion that restores gauge invariance by coupling the soft graviton also to the exchanged graviton, with NUT phases. From that factor they extract an explicit memory tensor on the celestial sphere. Unlike pure electromagnetism, the gravitational memory now contains a magnetic (curl) piece controlled by the NUT charges, and the tensor diverges along two antipodal observer directions. The same soft machinery is used to argue that self-dual Taub-NUT black holes do not scatter at leading order. The result is a concrete, amplitude-based prediction for an observable that future detectors might one day constrain.

Core claim

The gauge-invariant leading soft factor for gravity with NUT charges is the Weinberg factor plus an extra term that couples the soft graviton to the exchanged graviton with NUT phases. The resulting memory tensor on the celestial sphere is proportional to a duality-rotated combination of the usual electric projector and a magnetic projector acting on potentials that contain both a logarithm of the impact-parameter projection and an arctangent of an angle; the tensor diverges where that projection vanishes.

What carries the argument

The gauge-invariant soft factor S^(η)_grav that includes the extra −q_i^μ q_i^ν/(q_i·k) term carrying the NUT phase e^{iηθ_i}; it is the object that converts the known impulse into the memory tensor E_AB via a Fourier integral over the celestial sphere.

Load-bearing premise

That the extra soft-graviton–exchanged-graviton coupling with NUT phases is the correct and unique way to restore gauge invariance, even though non-linear gravity generically breaks the duality that would justify those phases and even though the same term produces a pole whose contribution cannot be fixed without the unknown analytic part of the two-to-two amplitude.

What would settle it

An independent calculation of the leading soft graviton theorem (or of the memory displacement) for two spinning Taub-NUT particles, either from the geodesic deviation equation on a Kerr-Taub-NUT background or from a fully non-linear asymptotic-symmetry analysis, that either reproduces or rules out the extra −q q/(q·k) term and the associated arctan piece in the potentials.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • The memory tensor for any scattering of NUT-charged bodies acquires a magnetic component controlled by sin θ_i, so a future measurement of magnetic memory would be a direct signature of NUT charge.
  • The same soft factor immediately supplies the late-time (subleading soft) waveform once higher-order classical soft theorems are included.
  • Self-dual Taub-NUT centres do not scatter at leading order, suggesting that multi-centre solutions with relative velocities may exist in complexified self-dual gravity.
  • The divergence of the memory tensor at two antipodal sky points marks the breakdown of the soft/perturbative approximation and must be resolved before the formula can be used for template construction.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the extra soft term survives non-linear checks, it supplies a new asymptotic charge whose flux is precisely the magnetic memory, linking NUT charge to dual supertranslations.
  • The same construction can be repeated for the bound two-body problem, converting the soft factor into a low-frequency template for inspiralling NUT-charged binaries.
  • The pole at q·k=0 that cannot be fixed by the non-analytic amplitude alone may be regularised by the finite-size structure of real black holes, turning the sky divergence into a smooth peak whose height is set by the horizon scale.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper computes the gravitational memory effect arising from the classical scattering of two Kerr-Taub-NUT black holes by extracting the soft limit of the five-point waveform amplitude in the KMOC formalism. After reviewing the dyonic impulse and the electromagnetic soft theorem, the authors propose a gauge-invariant completion of the leading soft graviton factor that includes NUT phases on both external legs and an exchanged-graviton pole (eq. 3.8). From this factor they obtain an explicit memory tensor E_AB on the celestial sphere (eqs. 4.37–4.39) containing both “electric” and “magnetic” pieces built from the impulses, together with logarithmic and arctangent potentials. A short final section argues that the scattering of self-dual Taub-NUT centres is trivial at leading order.

Significance. If the proposed soft factor is correct, the work supplies the first concrete expression for gravitational memory sourced by NUT charge, exposing a qualitative difference from the electromagnetic dyon case that originates in the non-linear breaking of U(1) duality. The calculation is fully explicit, re-uses only previously published three-point amplitudes and standard KMOC integrals, and cleanly isolates the new features (magnetic memory component, directional singularities). The self-dual remarks also give a simple, falsifiable statement relevant to recent celestial-holography constructions. These results therefore constitute a useful benchmark for any future derivation of the nutty Compton amplitude or of dual asymptotic charges.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3.2, eq. (3.8)] Section 3.2, eq. (3.8): the gauge-invariant soft factor is introduced as an ansatz motivated by diagram counting and the requirement that Σ_i e^{iηθ_i}(p'_i-p_i-q_i)=0. Because non-linear gravity generically breaks the U(1) duality that would protect the NUT phases (as the authors themselves note via ref. [93] and §2.2), the coefficient of the exchanged-graviton term -q_i^μ q_i^ν/(q_i·k) is not fixed by any known amplitude or asymptotic-charge calculation. A derivation (or an independent check) of this coefficient is load-bearing for the claimed memory tensor.
  2. [§4.2, eqs. (4.32), (4.38–4.39)] Section 4.2, eqs. (4.32) and (4.38–4.39): after the Fourier integral the same 1/(q·k) term produces both an undetermined distributional piece on the locus ε_⊥(b,k)=0 and a non-analytic divergence of the potentials Φ_i (hence of E_AB) at the two antipodal points |ℓ_⊥|=0. The authors correctly flag the breakdown of the soft/perturbative approximation, yet the physical status of these singularities remains open; either a regularisation or an argument that they lie outside the domain of validity of the memory observable is required before the expression can be regarded as complete.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§3.2] The iε prescription for the new poles in (3.8) is mentioned only after the integral (4.32); stating it already in §3.2 would clarify which principal-value versus delta-function contributions are retained.
  2. [§5] In the self-dual discussion (§5) the limit M_i→0 is taken after the impulse formula; a short remark on how the three-point amplitudes themselves scale (footnote 13) would make the argument self-contained.
  3. [throughout] Typographical: “27→2” appears several times for the four-point amplitude; standard notation is 2→2.
  4. [Appendix B] Appendix B evaluates a useful integral but is never cited in the main text; a parenthetical reference after (4.32) would help the reader.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the soft-factor completion is an independent gauge-invariance ansatz, not a fit or self-definition of the memory result.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained against external benchmarks. Leading-order impulse and 3-point dyonic amplitudes are taken from prior literature (including some author-overlapping papers) but are independently checkable against the geodesic equation on a Taub-NUT background; they are not defined in terms of the memory tensor. The novel soft factor (3.8) is introduced as a gauge-invariant completion of the naïve factor (3.6) that fails (3.7); it is motivated by the KMOC diagrams (2.8) and by preservation of U(1) phases in the soft limit, not by fitting to a target memory or by renaming a known empirical pattern. The memory tensor (4.37)–(4.39) is then obtained by the standard soft-limit Fourier integral of that factor. Self-citations are therefore not load-bearing for the central claim, and no uniqueness theorem is imported to forbid alternatives. The open issues (unprotected coefficient of the 1/(q·k) term once non-linear gravity breaks duality, and the unfixed singularity at |ℓ_⊥|=0) are correctness/assumption risks, not circularity. Score 1 for ordinary self-citation of the impulse results that does not force the memory prediction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 4 axioms · 1 invented entities

The calculation rests on the standard KMOC map from amplitudes to classical observables, on the known 3-point dyonic amplitudes, on the assumption that only non-analytic pieces of the 4-point amplitude contribute at non-zero impact parameter, and on the new soft-factor completion fixed by gauge invariance. No free parameters are fitted; the only new entity is the proposed soft factor itself.

axioms (4)
  • domain assumption KMOC formulae relating the impulse and the waveform to on-shell amplitudes (eqs. 2.2, 2.5–2.6) remain valid for NUT-charged particles once only single-species sub-amplitudes are used.
    Invoked throughout sections 2–4; supported by matching to geodesics for pure-mass probes but not proven for mutual NUT–NUT scattering.
  • ad hoc to paper The leading soft factor for gravity with NUT charges is completed by the term −q_i^μ q_i^ν/(q_i·k) carrying the same NUT phases that appear on the external legs (eq. 3.8).
    Introduced in section 3.2 solely to restore gauge invariance; not derived from a known Compton amplitude or from asymptotic symmetries.
  • domain assumption Only the non-analytic part of the 2→2 amplitude contributes to the Fourier integrals that define the memory at non-zero impact parameter.
    Standard KMOC lore (section 2.1); used to replace A_4 by the product of 3-point amplitudes.
  • domain assumption Linearised gravitational U(1) duality continues to act on the soft factor even though non-linear interactions generically break it.
    Stated in the introduction and section 3; used to motivate the NUT phases e^{i η θ_i}.
invented entities (1)
  • Gauge-invariant nutty soft factor containing the exchanged-graviton pole with NUT phases no independent evidence
    purpose: Restore gauge invariance of the soft theorem when NUT charges are present and thereby define a unique memory tensor.
    The term is postulated rather than derived from a first-principles Compton amplitude; its only justification is gauge invariance and diagram counting.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 30547 in / 2972 out tokens · 42608 ms · 2026-07-13T18:53:07.746953+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Taub-NUT black holes are somewhat exotic solutions to the vacuum Einstein equations, which have received limited attention in gravitational phenomenology. We use the soft behaviour of scattering amplitudes to compute the memory effect of the waveform resulting from the scattering of Kerr-Taub-NUT black holes. Due to the non-linear nature of gravity, NUT charges introduce intriguing features in the soft dynamics, which have no counterpart in the closely related setting of monopole charges in electromagnetism. In addition to this potentially realistic problem, we also comment on the purely academic problem in complexified gravity of the scattering of self-dual Taub-NUT black holes, which have been discussed recently in the context of celestial holography.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Schwarzschild black holes from twistor space

    hep-th 2026-07 conditional novelty 8.0

    The Schwarzschild metric is derived as a Kähler metric on a holomorphic 'coincidence locus' within the twistor space of self-dual Taub-NUT, solving the googly problem for this specific spacetime.

  2. Mass/electric versus NUT/magnetic charges: duality from scattering amplitudes in $D\geq4$ and for all bosonic spins

    hep-th 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0

    Kerr-NUT mass/electric and equal-NUT/magnetic charges are dual in D≥4, realized as J_σ ↔ J_−σ in 3-point amplitudes generated by a spin-raising operator for all bosonic spins.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

153 extracted references · 116 linked inside Pith · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Y. B. Zel’dovich and A. G. Polnarev,Radiation of gravitational waves by a cluster of superdense stars, Sov. Astron.18(1974) 17

    1974

  2. [2]

    V. B. Braginsky and L. P. Grishchuk,Kinematic Resonance and Memory Effect in Free Mass Gravitational Antennas,Sov. Phys. JETP62(1985) 427–430

    1985

  3. [3]

    V. B. Braginsky and K. S. Thorne,Gravitational-wave bursts with memory and experimental prospects, Nature327(1987) 123–125

    1987

  4. [4]

    Christodoulou,Nonlinear nature of gravitation and gravitational wave experiments,Phys

    D. Christodoulou,Nonlinear nature of gravitation and gravitational wave experiments,Phys. Rev. Lett. 67(1991) 1486–1489

    1991

  5. [5]

    A. G. Wiseman and C. M. Will,Christodoulou’s nonlinear gravitational wave memory: Evaluation in the quadrupole approximation,Phys. Rev. D44(1991) R2945–R2949

    1991

  6. [6]

    K. S. Thorne,Gravitational-wave bursts with memory: The Christodoulou effect,Phys. Rev. D45 (1992) 520–524

    1992

  7. [7]

    A. M. Grant and D. A. Nichols,Outlook for detecting the gravitational-wave displacement and spin memory effects with current and future gravitational-wave detectors,Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 064056, [2210.16266]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  8. [8]

    Ghosh, A

    S. Ghosh, A. Weaver, J. Sanjuan, P. Fulda and G. Mueller,Detection of the gravitational memory effect in LISA using triggers from ground-based detectors,Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 084051, [2302.04396]. – 19 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  9. [9]

    Inchausp´ e, S

    H. Inchausp´ e, S. Gasparotto, D. Blas, L. Heisenberg, J. Zosso and S. Tiwari,Measuring gravitational wave memory with LISA,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 044044, [2406.09228]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  10. [10]

    A. H. Taub,Empty space-times admitting a three parameter group of motions,Annals Math.53(1951) 472–490

    1951

  11. [11]

    Newman, L

    E. Newman, L. Tamburino and T. Unti,Empty space generalization of the Schwarzschild metric,J. Math. Phys.4(1963) 915

    1963

  12. [12]

    Demianski and E

    M. Demianski and E. T. Newman,A combined Kerr-NUT solution of the Einstein field equation., Bulletin de l’Academie Polonaise des Sciences Series des Sciences Mathematiques Astronomiques et Physiques14(Dec., 1966) 653–657

    1966

  13. [13]

    J. B. Griffiths and J. Podolsky,Exact Space-Times in Einstein’s General Relativity. Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2009, 10.1017/CBO9780511635397

    doi:10.1017/cbo9780511635397 2009

  14. [14]

    J. S. Dowker,The nut solution as a gravitational dyon,Gen. Rel. Grav.5(1974) 603–613

    1974

  15. [15]

    A. Luna, R. Monteiro, D. O’Connell and C. D. White,The classical double copy for Taub–NUT spacetime,Phys. Lett. B750(2015) 272–277, [1507.01869]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  16. [16]

    Alfonsi, C

    L. Alfonsi, C. D. White and S. Wikeley,Topology and Wilson lines: global aspects of the double copy, JHEP07(2020) 091, [2004.07181]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  17. [17]

    C. W. Misner,The Flatter regions of Newman, Unti and Tamburino’s generalized Schwarzschild space, J. Math. Phys.4(1963) 924–938

    1963

  18. [18]

    W. B. Bonnor,A new interpretation of the NUT metric in general relativity,Math. Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc.66(1969) 145–151

    1969

  19. [19]

    V. S. Manko and E. Ruiz,Physical interpretation of NUT solution,Class. Quant. Grav.22(2005) 3555–3560, [gr-qc/0505001]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  20. [20]

    Cl´ ement, D

    G. Cl´ ement, D. Gal’tsov and M. Guenouche,Rehabilitating space-times with NUTs,Phys. Lett. B750 (2015) 591–594, [1508.07622]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  21. [21]

    R. A. Hennigar, D. Kubizˇ n´ ak and R. B. Mann,Thermodynamics of Lorentzian Taub-NUT spacetimes, Phys. Rev. D100(2019) 064055, [1903.08668]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  22. [22]

    Durka,The first law of black hole thermodynamics for Taub–NUT spacetime,Int

    R. Durka,The first law of black hole thermodynamics for Taub–NUT spacetime,Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 31(2022) 2250021, [1908.04238]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  23. [23]

    A. B. Bordo, F. Gray, R. A. Hennigar and D. Kubizˇ n´ ak,Misner Gravitational Charges and Variable String Strengths,Class. Quant. Grav.36(2019) 194001, [1905.03785]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  24. [24]

    Ballon Bordo, F

    A. Ballon Bordo, F. Gray, R. A. Hennigar and D. Kubizˇ n´ ak,The First Law for Rotating NUTs,Phys. Lett. B798(2019) 134972, [1905.06350]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  25. [25]

    Lynden-Bell and M

    D. Lynden-Bell and M. Nouri-Zonoz,Classical monopoles: Newton, NUT space, gravimagnetic lensing and atomic spectra,Rev. Mod. Phys.70(1998) 427–446, [gr-qc/9612049]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  26. [26]

    Nouri-Zonoz and D

    M. Nouri-Zonoz and D. Lynden-Bell,Gravomagnetic lensing by NUT space,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.292(1997) 714–722, [gr-qc/9812094]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  27. [27]

    Wei, Y.-X

    S.-W. Wei, Y.-X. Liu, C.-E. Fu and K. Yang,Strong field limit analysis of gravitational lensing in Kerr-Taub-NUT spacetime,JCAP10(2012) 053, [1104.0776]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  28. [28]

    Rahvar and M

    S. Rahvar and M. Nouri-Zonoz,Gravitational microlensing in NUT space,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 338(2003) 926, [astro-ph/0204282]. – 20 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  29. [29]

    Rahvar and F

    S. Rahvar and F. Habibi,Possibility of magnetic mass detection by the next generation of microlensing experiments,Astrophys. J.610(2004) 673, [astro-ph/0311242]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  30. [30]

    D. Bini, C. Cherubini, R. T. Jantzen and B. Mashhoon,Gravitomagnetism in the Kerr-Newman-Taub-NUT space-time,Class. Quant. Grav.20(2003) 457–468, [gr-qc/0301055]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  31. [31]

    J. Q. Shen,Gravitational analogues, geometric effects and gravitomagnetic charge,Gen. Rel. Grav.34 (2002) 1423–1435, [gr-qc/0301067]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  32. [32]

    C. Liu, S. Chen, C. Ding and J. Jing,Particle Acceleration on the Background of the Kerr-Taub-NUT Spacetime,Phys. Lett. B701(2011) 285–290, [1012.5126]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  33. [33]

    Pradhan,Circular geodesics in the Kerr–Newman–Taub–NUT spacetime,Class

    P. Pradhan,Circular geodesics in the Kerr–Newman–Taub–NUT spacetime,Class. Quant. Grav.32 (2015) 165001, [1402.0089]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  34. [34]

    F. Long, S. Chen, J. Wang and J. Jing,Electromagnetic emissions from near-horizon region of an extreme Kerr-Taub-Nut black hole,Eur. Phys. J. C79(2019) 466, [1812.11463]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  35. [35]

    Kagramanova, J

    V. Kagramanova, J. Kunz, E. Hackmann and C. Lammerzahl,Analytic treatment of complete and incomplete geodesics in Taub-NUT space-times,Phys. Rev. D81(2010) 124044, [1002.4342]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  36. [36]

    Chakraborty and S

    C. Chakraborty and S. Bhattacharyya,Does the gravitomagnetic monopole exist? A clue from a black hole x-ray binary,Phys. Rev. D98(2018) 043021, [1712.01156]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  37. [37]

    S.-J. Yang, J. Chen, J.-J. Wan, S.-W. Wei and Y.-X. Liu,Weak cosmic censorship conjecture for a Kerr-Taub-NUT black hole with a test scalar field and particle,Phys. Rev. D101(2020) 064048, [2001.03106]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  38. [38]

    Damour,High-energy gravitational scattering and the general relativistic two-body problem,Phys

    T. Damour,High-energy gravitational scattering and the general relativistic two-body problem,Phys. Rev. D97(2018) 044038, [1710.10599]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  39. [39]

    N. E. J. Bjerrum-Bohr, P. H. Damgaard, G. Festuccia, L. Plant´ e and P. Vanhove,General Relativity from Scattering Amplitudes,Phys. Rev. Lett.121(2018) 171601, [1806.04920]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  40. [40]

    Cheung, I

    C. Cheung, I. Z. Rothstein and M. P. Solon,From Scattering Amplitudes to Classical Potentials in the Post-Minkowskian Expansion,Phys. Rev. Lett.121(2018) 251101, [1808.02489]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  41. [41]

    D. A. Kosower, B. Maybee and D. O’Connell,Amplitudes, Observables, and Classical Scattering, JHEP02(2019) 137, [1811.10950]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  42. [42]

    Z. Bern, C. Cheung, R. Roiban, C.-H. Shen, M. P. Solon and M. Zeng,Scattering Amplitudes and the Conservative Hamiltonian for Binary Systems at Third Post-Minkowskian Order,Phys. Rev. Lett.122 (2019) 201603, [1901.04424]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  43. [43]

    K¨ alin and R

    G. K¨ alin and R. A. Porto,From boundary data to bound states. Part I. The correspondence from scattering angles to dynamical invariants,JHEP01(2020) 072, [1910.03008]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  44. [44]

    Di Vecchia, C

    P. Di Vecchia, C. Heissenberg, R. Russo and G. Veneziano,Radiation Reaction from Soft Theorems, Phys. Lett. B818(2021) 136379, [2101.05772]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  45. [45]

    Herrmann, J

    E. Herrmann, J. Parra-Martinez, M. S. Ruf and M. Zeng,Radiative classical gravitational observables atO(G 3) from scattering amplitudes,JHEP10(2021) 148, [2104.03957]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  46. [46]

    Z. Bern, A. Luna, R. Roiban, C.-H. Shen and M. Zeng,Spinning black hole binary dynamics, scattering amplitudes, and effective field theory,Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 065014, [2005.03071]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  47. [47]

    Z. Bern, J. Parra-Martinez, R. Roiban, M. S. Ruf, C.-H. Shen, M. P. Solon et al.,Scattering Amplitudes and Conservative Binary Dynamics atO(G 4),Phys. Rev. Lett.126(2021) 171601, [2101.07254]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  48. [48]

    N. E. J. Bjerrum-Bohr, P. H. Damgaard, L. Plant´ e and P. Vanhove,The amplitude for classical gravitational scattering at third Post-Minkowskian order,JHEP08(2021) 172, [2105.05218]. – 21 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  49. [49]

    Brandhuber, G

    A. Brandhuber, G. Chen, G. Travaglini and C. Wen,Classical gravitational scattering from a gauge-invariant double copy,JHEP10(2021) 118, [2108.04216]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  50. [50]

    Dlapa, G

    C. Dlapa, G. K¨ alin, Z. Liu and R. A. Porto,Dynamics of Binary Systems to Fourth Post-Minkowskian Order from the Effective Field Theory Approach,Phys. Rev. Lett.128(2022) 161104, [2106.08276]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  51. [51]

    Dlapa, G

    C. Dlapa, G. K¨ alin, Z. Liu and R. A. Porto,Conservative Dynamics of Binary Systems at Fourth Post-Minkowskian Order in the Effective Field Theory Approach,Phys. Lett. B831(2022) 137203, [2112.11296]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  52. [52]

    Dlapa, G

    C. Dlapa, G. K¨ alin, Z. Liu, I. Neill and R. A. Porto,Radiative Dynamics and Thermodynamics to Fourth Post-Minkowskian Order,Phys. Rev. Lett.130(2023) 101401, [2210.05541]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  53. [53]

    G. U. Jakobsen, G. Mogull, J. Plefka, B. Sauer and J. Steinhoff,All-order-in-spin conservative binary dynamics at third post-Minkowskian order,JHEP09(2023) 103, [2306.01714]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  54. [54]

    P. H. Damgaard, E. R. Hansen, L. Plant´ e and P. Vanhove,Classical observables from the exponential representation of the gravitational S-matrix,JHEP09(2023) 183, [2307.04746]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  55. [55]

    Cristofoli, R

    A. Cristofoli, R. Gonzo, D. A. Kosower and D. O’Connell,Waveforms from amplitudes,Phys. Rev. D 106(2022) 056007, [2107.10193]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  56. [56]

    G. U. Jakobsen, G. Mogull, J. Plefka and J. Steinhoff,Classical Gravitational Bremsstrahlung from a Worldline Quantum Field Theory,Phys. Rev. Lett.126(2021) 201103, [2101.12688]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  57. [57]

    Brandhuber, G

    A. Brandhuber, G. R. Brown, G. Chen, S. De Angelis, J. Gowdy and G. Travaglini,One-loop gravitational bremsstrahlung and waveforms from a heavy-mass effective field theory,JHEP06(2023) 048, [2303.06111]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  58. [58]

    Herderschee, R

    A. Herderschee, R. Roiban and F. Teng,The sub-leading scattering waveform from amplitudes,JHEP 06(2023) 004, [2303.06112]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  59. [59]

    Georgoudis, C

    A. Georgoudis, C. Heissenberg and I. Vazquez-Holm,Inelastic exponentiation and gravitational waveforms at orderG 3,JHEP06(2023) 126, [2303.07006]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  60. [60]

    Caron-Huot, M

    S. Caron-Huot, M. Giroux, H. S. Hannesdottir and S. Mizera,What can be measured asymptotically?, JHEP01(2024) 139, [2308.02125]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  61. [61]

    D. Bini, T. Damour, S. De Angelis, A. Geralico, A. Herderschee, R. Roiban et al.,Gravitational waveforms: A tale of two formalisms,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 125008, [2402.06604]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  62. [62]

    Bohnenblust, H

    L. Bohnenblust, H. Ita, M. Kraus and J. Schlenk,Gravitational Bremsstrahlung in black-hole scattering atO(G 3): quadratic-in-spin effects,JHEP12(2025) 100, [2505.15724]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  63. [63]

    Bohnenblust, H

    L. Bohnenblust, H. Ita, M. Kraus and J. Schlenk,Gravitational Bremsstrahlung in black-hole scattering atO G3 : linear-in-spin effects,JHEP11(2024) 109, [2312.14859]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  64. [64]

    Z. Bern, E. Herrmann, R. Roiban, M. S. Ruf, A. V. Smirnov, S. Smith et al.,Scattering Amplitudes and Conservative Binary Dynamics atO(G 5)without Self-Force Truncation,2512.23654

    arXiv

  65. [65]

    Driesse, G

    M. Driesse, G. U. Jakobsen, G. Mogull, C. Nega, J. Plefka, B. Sauer et al.,Conservative Black Hole Scattering at Fifth Post-Minkowskian and Second Self-Force Order,2601.16256

    arXiv

  66. [66]

    Z. Bern, J. J. Carrasco, M. Chiodaroli, H. Johansson and R. Roiban,The SAGEX review on scattering amplitudes Chapter 2: An invitation to color-kinematics duality and the double copy,J. Phys. A55 (2022) 443003, [2203.13013]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  67. [67]

    D. A. Kosower, R. Monteiro and D. O’Connell,The SAGEX review on scattering amplitudes Chapter 14: Classical gravity from scattering amplitudes,J. Phys. A55(2022) 443015, [2203.13025]. – 22 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  68. [68]

    N. E. J. Bjerrum-Bohr, P. H. Damgaard, L. Plante and P. Vanhove,The SAGEX review on scattering amplitudes Chapter 13: Post-Minkowskian expansion from scattering amplitudes,J. Phys. A55(2022) 443014, [2203.13024]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  69. [69]

    Buonanno, M

    A. Buonanno, M. Khalil, D. O’Connell, R. Roiban, M. P. Solon and M. Zeng,Snowmass White Paper: Gravitational Waves and Scattering Amplitudes, inSnowmass 2021, 4, 2022.2204.05194

    arXiv 2021

  70. [70]

    Di Vecchia, C

    P. Di Vecchia, C. Heissenberg, R. Russo and G. Veneziano,The gravitational eikonal: From particle, string and brane collisions to black-hole encounters,Phys. Rept.1083(2024) 1–169, [2306.16488]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  71. [71]

    Huang, U

    Y.-T. Huang, U. Kol and D. O’Connell,Double copy of electric-magnetic duality,Phys. Rev. D102 (2020) 046005, [1911.06318]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  72. [72]

    W. T. Emond, Y.-T. Huang, U. Kol, N. Moynihan and D. O’Connell,Amplitudes from Coulomb to Kerr-Taub-NUT,JHEP05(2022) 055, [2010.07861]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  73. [73]

    Moynihan and J

    N. Moynihan and J. Murugan,On-shell electric-magnetic duality and the dual graviton,Phys. Rev. D 105(2022) 066025, [2002.11085]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  74. [74]

    Csaki, S

    C. Csaki, S. Hong, Y. Shirman, O. Telem, J. Terning and M. Waterbury,Scattering amplitudes for monopoles: pairwise little group and pairwise helicity,JHEP08(2021) 029, [2009.14213]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  75. [75]

    Kim and M

    J.-W. Kim and M. Shim,Gravitational Dyonic Amplitude at One-Loop and its Inconsistency with the Classical Impulse,JHEP02(2021) 217, [2010.14347]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  76. [76]

    Monteiro, D

    R. Monteiro, D. O’Connell, D. Peinador Veiga and M. Sergola,Classical solutions and their double copy in split signature,JHEP05(2021) 268, [2012.11190]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  77. [77]

    Crawley, A

    E. Crawley, A. Guevara, N. Miller and A. Strominger,Black holes in Klein space,JHEP10(2022) 135, [2112.03954]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  78. [78]

    Monteiro, S

    R. Monteiro, S. Nagy, D. O’Connell, D. Peinador Veiga and M. Sergola,NS-NS spacetimes from amplitudes,JHEP06(2022) 021, [2112.08336]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  79. [79]

    Caron-Huot and Z

    S. Caron-Huot and Z. Zahraee,Integrability of Black Hole Orbits in Maximal Supergravity,JHEP07 (2019) 179, [1810.04694]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  80. [80]

    Y. M. Shnir,Magnetic Monopoles. Text and Monographs in Physics. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, 2005, 10.1007/3-540-29082-6

    doi:10.1007/3-540-29082-6 2005

Showing first 80 references.