Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Local vs Global continual learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2407.16611 v1 pith:FGOZ2KNY submitted 2024-07-23 cs.LG cs.AI

Local vs Global continual learning

classification cs.LG cs.AI
keywords continuallearningalgorithmsexistinglocalapproximationapproximationsglobal
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Continual learning is the problem of integrating new information in a model while retaining the knowledge acquired in the past. Despite the tangible improvements achieved in recent years, the problem of continual learning is still an open one. A better understanding of the mechanisms behind the successes and failures of existing continual learning algorithms can unlock the development of new successful strategies. In this work, we view continual learning from the perspective of the multi-task loss approximation, and we compare two alternative strategies, namely local and global approximations. We classify existing continual learning algorithms based on the approximation used, and we assess the practical effects of this distinction in common continual learning settings.Additionally, we study optimal continual learning objectives in the case of local polynomial approximations and we provide examples of existing algorithms implementing the optimal objectives

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. To Retain or to Adapt? Generalizing Continual Learning

    stat.ML 2026-07 accept novelty 7.5

    When retention induces positive stationary bias, historical knowledge becomes an optimization liability beyond a closed-form Critical Task Duration; Predictive CL with finite windows can beat both full Joint-Task and ...