pith. sign in

arxiv: 2603.07469 · v3 · pith:FHXHGYI4new · submitted 2026-03-08 · 🌀 gr-qc

Can Oscillatory and Persistent Nonlinearities Be Bridged in Black Hole Ringdown?

Jun-Xi Shi , Zhen-Tao He , Jiageng Jiao , Jing-Qi Lai , Caiying Shao , Yu Tian , Hongbao Zhang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 11:17 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc
keywords quadratic quasinormal modesChristodoulou memory effectblack hole ringdowngravitational wavesnonlinear general relativityremnant black hole parametersnonlinear phenomena
0
0 comments X

The pith

Quadratic quasinormal modes and the Christodoulou memory effect are related by bridge coefficients that depend primarily on remnant black hole parameters during ringdown.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper asks whether the oscillatory nonlinear response of a perturbed black hole, seen in quadratic quasinormal modes, can be connected to the persistent nonlinear remnant known as the Christodoulou memory effect. It establishes that these phenomena link through coefficients set mainly by the final black hole's mass, spin, and similar parameters in the ringdown stage. A reader would care because this connection unifies near-zone black hole dynamics with far-field gravitational wave imprints, opening a path to test general relativity with future space-based detectors. The work treats the bridge as a direct consequence of the remnant properties rather than additional modeling choices.

Core claim

Quadratic quasinormal modes characterize the near-zone nonlinear response of a perturbed black hole, while the memory effect leaves a nonlinear imprint at null infinity from outgoing radiation. These are related through bridge coefficients which depend primarily on remnant black hole parameters during ringdown.

What carries the argument

Bridge coefficients that relate quadratic quasinormal modes to the Christodoulou memory effect and depend primarily on remnant black hole parameters.

If this is right

  • Future space-based gravitational wave detectors can probe the relation directly.
  • The bridge supplies a new avenue for testing gravity in the nonlinear regime.
  • It yields a fresh perspective on how near-zone and far-zone nonlinearities connect in general relativity.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The relation could improve parameter estimation from ringdown signals by linking oscillatory and persistent features.
  • It may guide waveform models for detectors like LISA by incorporating this specific unification.
  • Similar bridges might appear in other nonlinear gravitational wave phenomena beyond black hole ringdowns.

Load-bearing premise

The connection between quadratic quasinormal modes and the memory effect is fully captured by coefficients depending only on remnant black hole parameters, with no significant extra nonlinear contributions or modeling choices during ringdown.

What would settle it

A numerical simulation or gravitational wave observation in which the extracted relation between quadratic modes and memory deviates strongly from the predicted dependence on remnant parameters alone.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2603.07469 by Caiying Shao, Hongbao Zhang, Jiageng Jiao, Jing-Qi Lai, Jun-Xi Shi, Yu Tian, Zhen-Tao He.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Dimensionless spin dependence of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Dimensionless spin dependence of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Verification of the bridge coefficient Λ for the (2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Ratios of the memory strain sourced by an off [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Quadratic quasinormal modes (QQNMs) and Christodoulou memory effect are key nonlinear phenomena in gravitational wave physics. QQNMs characterize the near zone nonlinear response of a perturbed black hole, whereas the memory effect is a nonlinear remnant imprinted at null infinity by outgoing radiation. This naturally raises the question of whether and in what sense the two can be bridged. We show that they are related through bridge coefficients which depend primarily on remnant black hole parameters during ringdown. Future space-based gravitational wave detectors can probe this relation. These results provide a new avenue for testing gravity and a fresh perspective on the nonlinear regime of general relativity.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript investigates whether quadratic quasinormal modes (QQNMs), which describe the near-zone nonlinear response of a perturbed black hole, can be related to the Christodoulou memory effect, a persistent nonlinear imprint at null infinity. The central claim is that these two phenomena are connected via bridge coefficients that depend primarily on the remnant black hole mass and spin during ringdown, with potential observability by future space-based detectors such as LISA. This is positioned as providing a new test of general relativity in the nonlinear regime.

Significance. If the claimed relation holds with the stated parameter dependence, the work would offer a concrete link between near-zone quadratic perturbations and far-zone memory, potentially simplifying nonlinear modeling in gravitational wave physics and enabling new observational tests. The emphasis on remnant-parameter dependence, if rigorously isolated from other quadratic sources, would constitute a falsifiable prediction useful for data analysis with next-generation detectors.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4] §4, around the definition of the bridge coefficients: the claim that these coefficients depend 'primarily' on remnant parameters is load-bearing for the central result, yet the matching between the near-zone quadratic response and the null-infinity memory integral is not shown to eliminate residual dependence on the driving perturbation through cross terms between distinct angular modes. An explicit demonstration that such cross terms are subdominant or cancel (e.g., via a mode-by-mode decomposition) is required to support the qualifier.
  2. [§3.2] The weakest assumption identified in the analysis—that additional nonlinear contributions from initial data or mode couplings remain negligible during ringdown—is not accompanied by a quantitative bound or numerical check. Without this, the isolation of the bridge from other quadratic sources at the same perturbative order remains unverified.
minor comments (2)
  1. [§2] Notation for the memory integral and QQNMs should be unified across sections to avoid ambiguity in the angular indices.
  2. A brief comparison table of the bridge coefficients for different remnant spins would improve readability and allow immediate assessment of the parameter dependence.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful and constructive review. The comments identify key points where additional rigor can strengthen the central claims about the bridge coefficients and the isolation of nonlinear contributions. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§4] §4, around the definition of the bridge coefficients: the claim that these coefficients depend 'primarily' on remnant parameters is load-bearing for the central result, yet the matching between the near-zone quadratic response and the null-infinity memory integral is not shown to eliminate residual dependence on the driving perturbation through cross terms between distinct angular modes. An explicit demonstration that such cross terms are subdominant or cancel (e.g., via a mode-by-mode decomposition) is required to support the qualifier.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit demonstration is required to justify the qualifier 'primarily.' In the revised manuscript we have added a mode-by-mode decomposition of the matching integral in Section 4. The decomposition exploits the orthogonality of spherical harmonics: cross terms between distinct angular modes integrate to zero over the sphere. For the subset of modes that are co-excited by a given initial perturbation, the residual contributions are suppressed by the relative amplitudes of the driving modes, which are small in the ringdown regime. This analysis confirms that the leading dependence is carried by the remnant mass and spin, with only subdominant corrections from the driving perturbation. We have updated the relevant text, figures, and the abstract to reflect this more precise statement. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§3.2] The weakest assumption identified in the analysis—that additional nonlinear contributions from initial data or mode couplings remain negligible during ringdown—is not accompanied by a quantitative bound or numerical check. Without this, the isolation of the bridge from other quadratic sources at the same perturbative order remains unverified.

    Authors: The referee correctly notes that a quantitative bound would make the assumption more robust. We have added to the revised Section 3.2 an order-of-magnitude estimate showing that extra quadratic sources from initial data or higher-order mode couplings enter at O(ε³), where ε denotes the strain amplitude at the start of ringdown; this is parametrically smaller than the retained quadratic terms during the late-time phase. We also reference existing numerical-relativity results on binary mergers that are consistent with this scaling. While a dedicated high-resolution simulation to extract a precise numerical bound lies outside the scope of the present analytic study, the added perturbative argument and literature support allow us to present the assumption as controlled rather than unverified. The text has been revised to state the limitation explicitly. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation appears self-contained from perturbative GR

full rationale

The abstract and summary describe relating QQNMs and the memory effect via bridge coefficients that depend primarily on remnant black hole parameters. No equations or derivation steps are provided in the query that would allow identification of self-definitional reductions, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations. The central claim is presented as following from the nonlinear structure of GR during ringdown, with the relation isolated to remnant parameters under stated assumptions. This is consistent with an independent perturbative analysis rather than a construction that reduces to its own inputs by definition. Absent specific quoted equations showing otherwise, the derivation chain does not exhibit the enumerated circularity patterns.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review yields no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; the claim rests on standard assumptions of general relativity and perturbative black-hole physics that are not detailed here.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5652 in / 1033 out tokens · 39623 ms · 2026-05-21T11:17:36.421695+00:00 · methodology

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

61 extracted references · 61 canonical work pages · 11 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    M. Isi, M. Giesler, W. M. Farr, M. A. Scheel, and S. A. Teukolsky, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 111102 (2019), arXiv:1905.00869 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  2. [2]

    Tests of General Relativity with GWTC-3

    R. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration and KAGRA Collaboration), (2021), arXiv:2112.06861 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  3. [3]

    Cardoso, M

    V. Cardoso, M. Kimura, A. Maselli, and E. Berti, Phys. Rev. D99, 104077 (2019)

    work page 2019

  4. [4]

    Black hole spectroscopy: from theory to experiment

    E. Berti, V. Cardoso, G. Carullo,et al., (2025), arXiv:2505.23895 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  5. [5]

    A. K.-W. Chung and N. Yunes, (2025), arXiv:2506.14695 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  6. [6]

    Ota and C

    I. Ota and C. Chirenti, Phys. Rev. D101, 104005 (2020)

    work page 2020

  7. [7]

    Second Order Quasi-Normal Mode of the Schwarzschild Black Hole

    H. Nakano and K. Ioka, Phys. Rev. D76, 084007 (2007), arXiv:0708.0450 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  8. [8]

    Ioka and H

    K. Ioka and H. Nakano, Phys. Rev. D76, 061503 (2007)

    work page 2007

  9. [9]

    Mitman et al., Phys

    K. Mitmanet al., Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 081402 (2023), arXiv:2208.07380 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  10. [10]

    M. H.-Y. Cheunget al., Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 081401 (2023), arXiv:2208.07374 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  11. [11]

    Christodoulou, Physical Review Letters67, 1486 (1991)

    D. Christodoulou, Physical Review Letters67, 1486 (1991). 9

    work page 1991

  12. [12]

    A. G. Wiseman and C. M. Will, Physical Review D44, R2945 (1991)

    work page 1991

  13. [13]

    The gravitational-wave memory effect

    M. Favata, Classical and Quantum Gravity27, 084036 (2010), arXiv:1003.3486 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  14. [14]

    Cardoso, G

    V. Cardoso, G. Carullo, M. De Amicis, F. Duque, T. Katagiri, D. Pereniguez, J. Redondo-Yuste, T. F. M. Spieksma, and Z. Zhong, Phys. Rev. D109, L121502 (2024), arXiv:2405.12290 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  15. [15]

    S. Ma, M. A. Scheel, J. Moxon, K. C. Nelli, N. Deppe, L. E. Kidder, W. Throwe, and N. L. Vu, Phys. Rev. D 112, 024003 (2025), arXiv:2412.06906 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  16. [16]

    S. Ling, S. Shah, and S. S. C. Wong, Phys. Rev. D112, 024008 (2025), arXiv:2503.19967 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  17. [17]

    Kehagias and A

    A. Kehagias and A. Riotto, Phys. Rev. D112, 024023 (2025), arXiv:2504.06224 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  18. [18]

    Z.-T. He, J. Du, J. Jiao, C. Shao, J. Shi, Y. Tian, and H. Zhang, Phys. Rev. D112, 104008 (2025), arXiv:2508.20499 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  19. [19]

    Nonlinear tails of massive scalar fields around a black hole

    C. Shao, Z.-T. He, J. Jiao, J. Lai, J.-X. Shi, Y. Tian, D. Yuan, and H. Zhang, (2026), arXiv:2601.16016 [gr- qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  20. [20]

    Redondo-Yuste, G

    J. Redondo-Yuste, G. Carullo, J. L. Ripley, E. Berti, and V. Cardoso, Phys. Rev. D109, L101503 (2024)

    work page 2024

  21. [21]

    M. H.-Y. Cheung, E. Berti, V. Baibhav, and R. Cotesta, Phys. Rev. D109, 044069 (2024)

    work page 2024

  22. [22]

    Ma and H

    S. Ma and H. Yang, Phys. Rev. D109, 104070 (2024)

    work page 2024

  23. [23]

    H. Zhu, J. L. Ripley, F. Pretorius, S. Ma, K. Mitman, R. Owen, M. Boyle, Y. Chen, N. Deppe, L. E. Kid- der, J. Moxon, K. C. Nelli, H. P. Pfeiffer, M. A. Scheel, W. Throwe, and N. L. Vu, Phys. Rev. D109, 104050 (2024)

    work page 2024

  24. [24]

    Bucciotti, L

    B. Bucciotti, L. Juliano, A. Kuntz, and E. Trincherini, Phys. Rev. D110, 104048 (2024)

    work page 2024

  25. [25]

    Bourg, R

    P. Bourg, R. P. Macedo, A. Spiers, B. Leather, B. Bonga, and A. Pound, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 061401 (2025)

    work page 2025

  26. [26]

    Khera, S

    N. Khera, S. Ma, and H. Yang, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 211404 (2025)

    work page 2025

  27. [27]

    Y. Yang, C. Shi, and Y.-M. Hu, Contribution from nonlinear quasi-normal modes in gw250114 (2025), arXiv:2510.16903 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  28. [28]

    Y.-F. Wang, S. Ma, N. Khera, and H. Yang, (2026), arXiv:2601.05734 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2026

  29. [29]

    Gravitational Memory, BMS Supertranslations and Soft Theorems

    A. Strominger and A. Zhiboedov, Journal of High Energy Physics01, 086 (2016), arXiv:1411.5745 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  30. [30]

    Lectures on the Infrared Structure of Gravity and Gauge Theory

    A. Strominger, arXiv preprint (2017), arXiv:1703.05448 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  31. [31]

    S. Y. Cheung, P. D. Lasky, and E. Thrane, Class. Quant. Grav.41, 115010 (2024), arXiv:2404.11919 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  32. [32]

    H¨ ubner, C

    M. H¨ ubner, C. Talbot, P. D. Lasky, and E. Thrane, Phys. Rev. D101, 023011 (2020)

    work page 2020

  33. [33]

    P. D. Lasky, E. Thrane, Y. Levin, J. Blackman, and Y. Chen, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 061102 (2016)

    work page 2016

  34. [34]

    Z.-C. Zhao, X. Liu, Z. Cao, and X. He, Phys. Rev. D 104, 064056 (2021)

    work page 2021

  35. [35]

    Ebersold and S

    M. Ebersold and S. Tiwari, Phys. Rev. D101, 104041 (2020), arXiv:2005.03306 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2020

  36. [36]

    Babak, M

    S. Babak, M. Falxa, G. Franciolini, and M. Pieroni, Phys. Rev. D110, 063022 (2024), arXiv:2404.02864 [astro- ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2024

  37. [37]

    Inchausp´ e, S

    H. Inchausp´ e, S. Gasparotto, D. Blas, L. Heisenberg, J. Zosso, and S. Tiwari, Phys. Rev. D111, 044044 (2025), arXiv:2406.09228 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  38. [38]

    Ghosh, A

    S. Ghosh, A. Weaver, J. Sanjuan, P. Fulda, and G. Mueller, Phys. Rev. D107, 084051 (2023), arXiv:2302.04396 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  39. [39]

    Lagos and L

    M. Lagos and L. Hui, Phys. Rev. D107, 044040 (2023)

    work page 2023

  40. [40]

    Pazos, D

    E. Pazos, D. Brizuela, J. M. Mart´ ın-Garc´ ıa, and M. Tiglio, Phys. Rev. D82, 104028 (2010)

    work page 2010

  41. [41]

    London, D

    L. London, D. Shoemaker, and J. Healy, Phys. Rev. D 90, 124032 (2014)

    work page 2014

  42. [42]

    Modeling Ringdown: Beyond the Fundamental Quasi-Normal Modes

    L. London, D. Shoemaker, and J. Healy, Phys. Rev. D 90, 124032 (2014), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 94, 069902 (2016)], arXiv:1404.3197 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  43. [43]

    Nonlinear gravitational-wave memory from binary black hole mergers

    M. Favata, Astrophysical Journal Letters696, L159 (2009), arXiv:0902.3660 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  44. [44]

    Gravitational-wave memory revisited: memory from the merger and recoil of binary black holes

    M. Favata, inJournal of Physics: Conference Series, Vol. 154 (2009) p. 012043, arXiv:0811.3451 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  45. [45]

    Boyle et al

    M. Boyleet al., Class. Quant. Grav.36, 195006 (2019), arXiv:1904.04831 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2019

  46. [46]

    M. A. Scheelet al., Class. Quant. Grav.42, 195017 (2025), arXiv:2505.13378 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  47. [47]

    SXS Collaboration, SpEC: Spectral Einstein Code, https://www.black-holes.org/code/SpEC.html(), ac- cessed: 2025-12-20

    work page 2025

  48. [48]

    SXS Collaboration, SXS Gravitational Waveform Database,https://www.black-holes.org/waveforms (), accessed: 2025-12-20

    work page 2025

  49. [49]

    Moxon, M

    J. Moxon, M. A. Scheel, and S. A. Teukolsky, Phys. Rev. D102, 044052 (2020)

    work page 2020

  50. [50]

    SpECTRE Cauchy-characteristic evolution system for rapid, precise waveform extraction,

    J. Moxon, M. A. Scheel, S. A. Teukolsky, N. Deppe, N. Fischer, F. H´ ebert, L. E. Kidder, and W. Throwe, Phys. Rev. D107, 064013 (2023), arXiv:2110.08635 [gr- qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  51. [51]

    Mitman, N

    K. Mitman, N. Khera, D. A. B. Iozzo, L. C. Stein, M. Boyle, N. Deppe, L. E. Kidder, J. Moxon, H. P. Pfeif- fer, M. A. Scheel, S. A. Teukolsky, and W. Throwe, Phys. Rev. D104, 024051 (2021)

    work page 2021

  52. [52]

    Mitman, L

    K. Mitman, L. C. Stein, M. Boyle, N. Deppe, F. m. c. H´ ebert, L. E. Kidder, J. Moxon, M. A. Scheel, S. A. Teukolsky, W. Throwe, and N. L. Vu, Phys. Rev. D106, 084029 (2022)

    work page 2022

  53. [53]

    Boyle, D

    M. Boyle, D. Iozzo, and L. C. Stein, scri (moble/scri): v1.2,https://github.com/moble/scri(2020), version v1.2; Accessed: 2025-12-20

    work page 2020

  54. [54]

    Talbot, E

    C. Talbot, E. Thrane, P. D. Lasky, and F. Lin, Phys. Rev. D98, 064031 (2018)

    work page 2018

  55. [55]

    Giesler, M

    M. Giesler, M. Isi, M. A. Scheel, and S. A. Teukolsky, Phys. Rev. X9, 041060 (2019)

    work page 2019

  56. [56]

    Giesler, S

    M. Giesler, S. Ma, K. Mitman, N. Oshita, S. A. Teukol- sky, M. Boyle, N. Deppe, L. E. Kidder, J. Moxon, K. C. Nelli, H. P. Pfeiffer, M. A. Scheel, W. Throwe, and N. L. Vu, Phys. Rev. D111, 084041 (2025)

    work page 2025

  57. [57]

    L. C. Stein, J. Open Source Softw.4, 1683 (2019), arXiv:1908.10377 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2019

  58. [58]

    Oshita, Phys

    N. Oshita, Phys. Rev. D104, 124032 (2021)

    work page 2021

  59. [59]

    S. Yi, A. Kuntz, E. Barausse, E. Berti, M. H.-Y. Cheung, K. Kritos, and A. Maselli, Phys. Rev. D109, 124029 (2024)

    work page 2024

  60. [60]

    Lagos, T

    M. Lagos, T. Andrade, J. Rafecas-Ventosa, and L. Hui, Phys. Rev. D111, 024018 (2025), arXiv:2411.02264 [gr- qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  61. [61]

    C. Shi, Q. Zhang, and J. Mei, Phys. Rev. D110, 124007 (2024), arXiv:2407.13110 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024