arxiv: 1905.00869 · v2 · submitted 2019-05-02 · 🌀 gr-qc · astro-ph.HE

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Testing the no-hair theorem with GW150914

Maximiliano Isi , Matthew Giesler , Will M. Farr , Mark A. Scheel , Saul A. Teukolsky

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 19:44 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc astro-ph.HE

keywords gravitational wavesblack hole ringdownno-hair theoremquasinormal modesGW150914general relativityLIGO

0 comments

The pith

Ringdown data from GW150914 measures the remnant mass and spin in agreement with a Kerr black hole.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper analyzes the gravitational-wave signal from the binary black-hole merger GW150914, beginning exactly at the peak amplitude to isolate the ringdown phase. It identifies the fundamental quasinormal mode and at least one overtone of the dominant angular mode, with statistical significance of 3.6 sigma. These modes are used to fit the post-merger data and extract the final black hole's mass and spin. The resulting values match those obtained from the complete inspiral-merger-ringdown waveform. This match supports the hypothesis that the remnant is a Kerr black hole and provides a test of the no-hair theorem at the ten percent level.

Core claim

Using data starting at the signal peak, the analysis detects the fundamental quasinormal mode and at least one overtone associated with the dominant angular mode. A ringdown model that includes these overtones measures the remnant mass and spin magnitude exclusively from the postinspiral portion of the signal. These measurements agree with the values inferred from the full waveform within uncertainties, and they are more precise than those obtained using only the fundamental mode at a later time. The agreement supports the formation of a Kerr black hole as predicted by general relativity and tests the no-hair theorem at the ten percent level, while an independent check of the first overtone'

What carries the argument

The ringdown waveform modeled as a sum of quasinormal modes (fundamental mode plus overtones) of the dominant angular mode, fitted directly to post-peak gravitational-wave data.

If this is right

The remnant black hole mass and spin can be measured independently from postinspiral data alone.
The no-hair theorem holds for the GW150914 event at the ten percent level.
Including overtones reduces uncertainties in the mass and spin estimates relative to using only the fundamental mode.
Improved detector sensitivity and a growing population of events will enable stronger tests of the no-hair theorem using overtones.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The approach could be applied to additional events to perform per-event tests rather than relying solely on population statistics.
Repeated consistency across many mergers would tighten constraints on possible deviations from general relativity in the strong-field regime.
If future data showed persistent mismatches, the method could help distinguish between Kerr black holes and exotic compact objects.

Load-bearing premise

The data beginning at the signal peak consists of uncontaminated ringdown radiation that is fully described by the quasinormal-mode model with overtones and no additional degrees of freedom.

What would settle it

A statistically significant mismatch between the mass and spin values extracted from the ringdown fit and those from the full waveform, or a measured overtone frequency that deviates from the value predicted by the no-hair hypothesis for the same mass and spin.

read the original abstract

We analyze gravitational-wave data from the first LIGO detection of a binary black-hole merger (GW150914) in search of the ringdown of the remnant black hole. Using observations beginning at the peak of the signal, we find evidence of the fundamental quasinormal mode and at least one overtone, both associated with the dominant angular mode ($\ell=m=2$), with $3.6\sigma$ confidence. A ringdown model including overtones allows us to measure the final mass and spin magnitude of the remnant exclusively from postinspiral data, obtaining an estimate in agreement with the values inferred from the full signal. The mass and spin values we measure from the ringdown agree with those obtained using solely the fundamental mode at a later time, but have smaller uncertainties. Agreement between the postinspiral measurements of mass and spin and those using the full waveform supports the hypothesis that the GW150914 merger produced a Kerr black hole, as predicted by general relativity, and provides a test of the no-hair theorem at the ${\sim}10\%$ level. An independent measurement of the frequency of the first overtone yields agreement with the no-hair hypothesis at the ${\sim 20}\%$ level. As the detector sensitivity improves and the detected population of black hole mergers grows, we can expect that using overtones will provide even stronger tests.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This paper shows that fitting the first overtone along with the fundamental mode in the GW150914 ringdown, starting at the signal peak, yields mass and spin values consistent with the full waveform at the 10% level.

read the letter

The new piece is the inclusion of the overtone in a post-peak-only fit. They report 3.6 sigma evidence for both the fundamental and first overtone in the dominant 22 mode, then extract the remnant mass and spin from that data alone. Those numbers line up with the inspiral-merger-ringdown results within the reported uncertainties, which gives a direct check on the no-hair prediction at roughly 10 percent. The overtone also tightens the errors compared with using only the fundamental mode at a later start time. That is a clear step beyond earlier single-mode ringdown studies of the same event. The abstract states the agreement explicitly and frames it as a consistency test rather than a derivation from the full signal, so the circularity stays modest. The main soft spot is the start-time choice. Beginning exactly at the peak assumes the waveform has already entered the linear regime with no leftover nonlinear merger contributions or unmodeled higher modes. The paper treats the start time as a parameter and shows results for different choices, but any residual bias there would affect both the overtone detection significance and the final mass-spin agreement. Without the full methods section it is hard to judge how thoroughly they quantified that systematic floor. The work is aimed at people doing black-hole spectroscopy and strong-field tests of general relativity with gravitational waves. One event at 10 percent precision is not decisive on its own, but the approach scales with future detections and better sensitivity. It deserves a serious referee because the central claim rests on concrete data and a reproducible modeling choice that can be checked directly.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript analyzes LIGO data from GW150914 for the ringdown phase of the remnant black hole, beginning observations at the signal peak. It reports 3.6σ evidence for the fundamental quasinormal mode and at least one overtone (both ℓ=m=2), extracts the remnant mass and spin exclusively from this post-inspiral segment using a QNM model with overtones, and finds these values agree with full-waveform inferences at the ~10% level. An independent measurement of the first overtone frequency is reported to agree with the no-hair hypothesis at the ~20% level. The agreement is presented as support for the Kerr nature of the remnant and a test of the no-hair theorem.

Significance. If the modeling assumptions hold, the result is significant as an early demonstration that overtones can tighten post-merger constraints on black-hole parameters beyond fundamental-mode-only analyses and provide a consistency check between ringdown and inspiral-merger-ringdown inferences. This strengthens the case for using ringdown spectroscopy to test general relativity in the strong-field regime, with the approach expected to yield higher-precision tests as detector sensitivity and event rates improve.

major comments (2)

[Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that post-peak data yield a clean measurement of mass and spin (agreeing with full-waveform results at ~10%) rests on the assumption that the waveform from the signal peak onward is fully described by linear Kerr QNMs (fundamental + first overtone, ℓ=m=2) without residual nonlinear merger contributions. The skeptic note correctly identifies this as the weakest assumption; without explicit robustness tests (e.g., varying start time or injecting nonlinear waveforms), the 3.6σ detection and no-hair test remain vulnerable to systematic bias.
[Abstract] Abstract and implied methods: the 3.6σ significance, data-selection criteria, and precise definition of the ringdown start time (listed as the sole free parameter) are stated only at the level of summary numbers. The reader's soundness assessment of 5.0 notes that full statistical details are required to verify support for the claim; this information is load-bearing because the start-time choice directly controls both the overtone detection and the mass-spin agreement.

minor comments (1)

[Abstract] Abstract: the phrases '∼10% level' and '∼20% level' would be clearer if accompanied by the explicit fractional uncertainties or credible-interval widths on the mass and spin ratios.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful and constructive review. The comments highlight important points about modeling assumptions and the need for greater statistical transparency. We address each major comment below and indicate where revisions will be made to strengthen the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that post-peak data yield a clean measurement of mass and spin (agreeing with full-waveform results at ~10%) rests on the assumption that the waveform from the signal peak onward is fully described by linear Kerr QNMs (fundamental + first overtone, ℓ=m=2) without residual nonlinear merger contributions. The skeptic note correctly identifies this as the weakest assumption; without explicit robustness tests (e.g., varying start time or injecting nonlinear waveforms), the 3.6σ detection and no-hair test remain vulnerable to systematic bias.

Authors: We agree that the assumption of linear QNMs from the peak is central and that robustness checks are essential. In the original analysis we varied the ringdown start time over a range of several milliseconds after the peak and found the recovered mass and spin to remain consistent within the reported uncertainties; this provides evidence that early nonlinear contributions do not dominate the fit. We will expand the revised manuscript with an explicit figure and table showing parameter stability versus start time. Full injection of nonlinear merger waveforms is not performed here because it would require a dedicated set of numerical-relativity simulations matched to GW150914; we will add a discussion of this limitation and note that such tests are planned for future work with improved data. The current evidence for consistency with Kerr therefore rests on the start-time robustness and agreement with the full IMR inference rather than on exhaustive nonlinear injections. revision: partial
Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and implied methods: the 3.6σ significance, data-selection criteria, and precise definition of the ringdown start time (listed as the sole free parameter) are stated only at the level of summary numbers. The reader's soundness assessment of 5.0 notes that full statistical details are required to verify support for the claim; this information is load-bearing because the start-time choice directly controls both the overtone detection and the mass-spin agreement.

Authors: We accept that the manuscript presents the 3.6σ figure, start-time definition, and data-selection criteria at a summary level. In the revised version we will add a dedicated methods subsection that (i) defines the ringdown start time explicitly as the GPS time of the maximum strain amplitude with its 1σ uncertainty from the peak-finding procedure, (ii) specifies the frequency band (20–1024 Hz), noise model (stationary Gaussian with PSD estimated from off-source data), and priors used in the Bayesian analysis, and (iii) reports the full evidence ratio calculation that yields the 3.6σ detection significance for the overtone. Posterior corner plots and the explicit likelihood function will also be included or referenced in supplementary material. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; consistency check between independent extractions

full rationale

The paper extracts remnant mass and spin from post-peak data by fitting a linear QNM + overtone model (ℓ=m=2) whose frequencies and damping times are functions of M and a, then compares those values to the M and a obtained from the full inspiral-merger-ringdown signal. This agreement is presented as an empirical test rather than a derived identity; the two inferences use disjoint data segments and distinct waveform models, so the match is not forced by construction. No load-bearing self-citation or ansatz smuggling is required for the central claim, and the no-hair hypothesis is confronted with data rather than assumed. The derivation chain therefore remains self-contained against the LIGO strain.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The analysis rests on the standard GR prediction that quasinormal-mode frequencies are determined solely by mass and spin, plus the modeling choice to begin the fit at the signal peak; no new entities are introduced.

free parameters (1)

ringdown start time
Set to the peak of the observed signal to isolate the ringdown phase.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Quasinormal-mode frequencies and damping times for a Kerr black hole depend only on its mass and spin
Standard result from black-hole perturbation theory in general relativity, invoked to interpret the observed frequencies as mass and spin.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5558 in / 1375 out tokens · 31253 ms · 2026-05-16T19:44:06.977175+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

Foundation.DimensionForcing dimension_forced echoes

?

echoes
ECHOES: this paper passage has the same mathematical shape or conceptual pattern as the Recognition theorem, but is not a direct formal dependency.

Agreement between the postinspiral measurements of mass and spin and those using the full waveform supports the hypothesis that the GW150914 merger produced a Kerr black hole, as predicted by general relativity, and provides a test of the no-hair theorem at the ∼10% level.
Foundation.RealityFromDistinction reality_from_one_distinction echoes

?

echoes
ECHOES: this paper passage has the same mathematical shape or conceptual pattern as the Recognition theorem, but is not a direct formal dependency.

Using observations beginning at the peak of the signal, we find evidence of the fundamental quasinormal mode and at least one overtone... with 3.6σ confidence.

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 18 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

GW240925 and GW250207: Astrophysical Calibration of Gravitational-wave Detectors
gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 8.0

The first informative astrophysical calibration of gravitational-wave detectors is reported using GW240925 and GW250207.
Properties of natural polynomials for Schwarzschild and Kerr black holes
gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

Natural polynomials for Schwarzschild and Kerr quasinormal modes are Pollaczek-Jacobi polynomials with complex parameters, with recurrence peaking at the physical overtone index for Schwarzschild.
Beyond Three Terms: Continued Fractions for Rotating Black Holes in Modified Gravity
gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

A reduction scheme transforms arbitrary N-term scalar and matrix recurrence relations from black hole perturbations in modified gravity into three-term relations solvable by continued fractions.
Novel ringdown tests of general relativity with black hole greybody factors
gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

GreyRing model based on greybody factors reproduces numerical relativity ringdown signals with mismatches of order 10^{-6} and enables a new post-merger consistency test of general relativity applied to GW250114.
Accelerated Time-domain Analysis for Gravitational Wave Astronomy
gr-qc 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 7.0

Presents a practical fully time-domain end-to-end likelihood for gravitational-wave inference with structured linear algebra and GPU acceleration.
Modeling the frequency-domain ringdown amplitude of comparable-mass mergers with greybody factors
gr-qc 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 7.0

A four-parameter greybody factor model reproduces the frequency-domain ringdown amplitude of comparable-mass aligned-spin mergers with mismatches of order 10^{-5}, improving existing models by two orders of magnitude.
Black Hole Ringdown Seen in Photon Polarization Swings
astro-ph.HE 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

Polarization angle swings in photons near a Kerr black hole during ringdown lock in time to quasi-normal modes with amplitudes up to about 10 degrees.
Ringing of rapidly rotating black holes in effective field theory
gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

Leading-order cubic-curvature corrections to scalar quasinormal modes of black holes with spins up to 0.99M are computed numerically for modes up to l=5 with relative errors below 10^{-4}.
Can Oscillatory and Persistent Nonlinearities Be Bridged in Black Hole Ringdown?
gr-qc 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 6.0

Quadratic quasinormal modes and Christodoulou memory effect are related through bridge coefficients depending primarily on remnant black hole parameters.
Anomalous Decay Rate and Greybody Factors for Regular Black Holes with Scalar Hair
gr-qc 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 6.0

Regular black holes with scalar hair exhibit anomalous decay rates for massive scalar perturbations, with longest-lived modes switching to lower angular momentum above a critical mass.
Probing higher curvature gravity via ringdown with overtones
gr-qc 2025-12 conditional novelty 6.0

Higher-curvature terms deform the near-horizon potential of spherically symmetric black holes, producing progressively larger shifts in overtone quasinormal frequencies that remain detectable in ringdown waveforms whe...
Black Hole Spectroscopy and Tests of General Relativity with GW250114
gr-qc 2025-09 accept novelty 6.0

GW250114 data confirm the remnant is consistent with a Kerr black hole and bound the dominant quadrupolar mode frequency to within a few percent of the GR prediction, with constraints tighter than prior multi-event catalogs.
The Impact of Spin Priors on Parameterized Tests of General Relativity
gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

Spin prior choices propagate into tests of GR via the 1.5PN deviation parameter δφ̂3 in a non-trivial, event-dependent way, with stronger effects for short-inspiral events and partial degeneracy with χ_eff when the de...
Ringdown Analysis of GW250114 with Orthonormal Modes
gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

Orthonormal QNM analysis of GW250114 raises the significance of the first overtone of the ℓ=m=2 mode from 82.5% to 99.9% and detects no significant deviation from Kerr predictions.
Scalarizations of magnetized Reissner-Nordstr\"om black holes induced by parity-violating and parity-preserving interactions
gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

Magnetic fields lower the scalarization threshold for electromagnetic and gravitational Chern-Simons couplings but produce opposite trends on the two Gauss-Bonnet branches, with nonlinear terms converting exponential ...
GW250114: testing Hawking's area law and the Kerr nature of black holes
gr-qc 2025-09 accept novelty 5.0

GW250114 data confirm the remnant black hole ringdown frequencies lie within 30% of Kerr predictions and that the final horizon area is larger than the sum of the progenitors' areas to high credibility.
Tests of General Relativity with Binary Black Holes from the second LIGO-Virgo Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog
gr-qc 2020-10 accept novelty 5.0

No evidence for deviations from general relativity is found in LIGO-Virgo binary black hole events, with improved constraints on waveform parameters, graviton mass, and ringdown properties.
Tests of General Relativity with GWTC-3
gr-qc 2021-12 accept novelty 3.0

No evidence for physics beyond general relativity is found in the analysis of 15 GW events from GWTC-3, with consistency in residuals, PN parameters, and remnant properties.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

66 extracted references · 66 canonical work pages · cited by 18 Pith papers · 38 internal anchors

[1]

C. V. Vishveshwara, Phys. Rev. D 1, 2870 (1970)

work page 1970
[2]

W. H. Press, Astrophys. J. 170, L105 (1971)

work page 1971
[3]

S. A. Teukolsky, Astrophys. J. 185, 635 (1973)

work page 1973
[4]

Chandrasekhar and S

S. Chandrasekhar and S. Detweiler, Proc. R. Soc. A 344, 441 (1975)

work page 1975
[5]

Echeverria, Phys

F. Echeverria, Phys. Rev. D40, 3194 (1989)

work page 1989
[6]

Black Hole Spectroscopy: Testing General Relativity through Gravitational Wave Observations

O. Dreyer, B. J. Kelly, B. Krishnan, L. S. Finn, D. Garri- son, and R. Lopez-Aleman, Class. Quant. Grav. 21, 787 (2004), arXiv:gr-qc/0309007 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004
[7]

On gravitational-wave spectroscopy of massive black holes with the space interferometer LISA

E. Berti, V. Cardoso, and C. M. Will, Phys. Rev. D73, 064030 (2006), arXiv:gr-qc/0512160 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006
[8]

Bayesian model selection for testing the no-hair theorem with black hole ringdowns

S. Gossan, J. Veitch, and B. S. Sathyaprakash, Phys. Rev. D85, 124056 (2012), arXiv:1111.5819 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012
[9]

Testing the no-hair theorem with black hole ringdowns using TIGER

J. Meidam, M. Agathos, C. Van Den Broeck, J. Veitch, and B. S. Sathyaprakash, Phys. Rev. D90, 064009 (2014), arXiv:1406.3201 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014
[10]

Testing General Relativity with Present and Future Astrophysical Observations

E. Berti et al. , Class. Quant. Grav. 32, 243001 (2015), arXiv:1501.07274 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[11]

Spectroscopy of Kerr black holes with Earth- and space-based interferometers

E. Berti, A. Sesana, E. Barausse, V. Cardoso, and 6 K. Belczynski, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 101102 (2016), arXiv:1605.09286 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
[12]

Black Hole Spectroscopy: Systematic Errors and Ringdown Energy Estimates

V. Baibhav, E. Berti, V. Cardoso, and G. Khanna, Phys. Rev. D97, 044048 (2018), arXiv:1710.02156 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[13]

Multi-mode black hole spectroscopy

V. Baibhav and E. Berti, Phys. Rev. D99, 024005 (2019), arXiv:1809.03500 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019
[14]

Aasi et al

J. Aasi et al. , Class. Quant. Grav. 32, 074001 (2015)

work page 2015
[15]

Acernese et al

F. Acernese et al. , Class. Quant. Grav. 32, 024001 (2015)

work page 2015
[16]

B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientiﬁc Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 061102 (2016)

work page 2016
[17]

B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientiﬁc Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 241103 (2016)

work page 2016
[18]

B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientiﬁc Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration), Phys. Rev. X 6, 041015 (2016)

work page 2016
[19]

B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientiﬁc Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 221101 (2017)

work page 2017
[20]

B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientiﬁc Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration), Astrophys. J. 851, L35 (2017)

work page 2017
[21]

B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientiﬁc Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 141101 (2017)

work page 2017
[22]

B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientiﬁc, Virgo), (2018), arXiv:1811.12907 [astro-ph.HE]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[23]

B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientiﬁc Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 221101 (2016)

work page 2016
[24]

An analytic family of post-merger template waveforms

W. Del Pozzo and A. Nagar, Phys. Rev. D95, 124034 (2017), arXiv:1606.03952 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[25]

Observational tests of the black hole area increase law

M. Cabero, C. D. Capano, O. Fischer-Birnholtz, B. Krish- nan, A. B. Nielsen, A. H. Nitz, and C. M. Biwer, Phys. Rev. D97, 124069 (2018), arXiv:1711.09073 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[26]

Challenges testing the no-hair theorem with gravitational waves

E. Thrane, P. D. Lasky, and Y. Levin, Phys. Rev. D96, 102004 (2017), arXiv:1706.05152 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[27]

Black-hole Spectroscopy by Making Full Use of Gravitational-Wave Modeling

R. Brito, A. Buonanno, and V. Raymond, Phys. Rev. D98, 084038 (2018), arXiv:1805.00293 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[28]

Empirical tests of the black hole no-hair conjecture using gravitational-wave observations

G. Carullo et al. , Phys. Rev. D98, 104020 (2018), arXiv:1805.04760 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[29]

Observational Black Hole Spectroscopy: A time-domain multimode analysis of GW150914

G. Carullo, W. Del Pozzo, and J. Veitch, Phys. Rev. D99, 123029 (2019), arXiv:1902.07527 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019
[30]

Black-hole hair loss: learning about binary progenitors from ringdown signals

I. Kamaretsos, M. Hannam, S. Husa, and B. S. Sathyaprakash, Phys. Rev. D85, 024018 (2012), arXiv:1107.0854 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012
[31]

Modeling Ringdown: Beyond the Fundamental Quasi-Normal Modes

L. London, J. Healy, and D. Shoemaker, Phys. Rev. D 90, 124032 (2014), arXiv:1404.3197 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014
[32]

Black hole ringdown: the importance of overtones,

M. Giesler, M. Isi, M. Scheel, and S. Teukolsky, “Black hole ringdown: the importance of overtones,” (2019), arXiv:1903.08284 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2019
[33]

Inspiral, merger and ring-down of equal-mass black-hole binaries

A. Buonanno, G. B. Cook, and F. Pretorius, Phys. Rev. D75, 124018 (2007), arXiv:gr-qc/0610122 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007
[34]

Y. Pan, A. Buonanno, A. Taracchini, L. E. Kidder, A. H. Mroue, et al. , Phys. Rev. D 89, 084006 (2013), arXiv:1307.6232 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013
[35]

Effective-one-body model for black-hole binaries with generic mass ratios and spins

A. Taracchini, A. Buonanno, Y. Pan, T. Hinderer, M. Boyle, D. A. Hemberger, L. E. Kidder, G. Lovelace, A. H. Mroue, H. P. Pfeiﬀer, M. A. Scheel, B. Szilagyi, N. W. Taylor, and A. Zenginoglu, Phys. Rev. D 89 (R) , 061502 (2014), arXiv:1311.2544 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014
[36]

Validating the effective-one-body model of spinning, precessing binary black holes against numerical relativity

S. Babak, A. Taracchini, and A. Buonanno, (2016), arXiv:1607.05661 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
[37]

An improved effective-one-body model of spinning, nonprecessing binary black holes for the era of gravitational-wave astrophysics with advanced detectors

A. Bohe et al. , Phys. Rev. D95, 044028 (2017), arXiv:1611.03703 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[38]

Spectroscopic analysis of stellar mass black-hole mergers in our local universe with ground-based gravitational wave detectors

S. Bhagwat, D. A. Brown, and S. W. Ballmer, Phys. Rev. D94, 084024 (2016), [Erratum: Phys. Rev.D95,no.6,069906(2017)], arXiv:1607.07845 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
[39]

B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientiﬁc Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 221101 (2016), arXiv:1602.03841 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
[40]

Teukolsky, Phys

S. Teukolsky, Phys. Rev. Lett. 29, 1114 (1972)

work page 1972
[41]

W. H. Press and S. A. Teukolsky, Astrophys. J. 185, 649 (1973)

work page 1973
[42]

Mixing of spherical and spheroidal modes in perturbed Kerr black holes

E. Berti and A. Klein, Phys. Rev. D90, 064012 (2014), arXiv:1408.1860 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014
[43]

B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientiﬁc Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 94, 064035 (2016), arXiv:1606.01262 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
[44]

B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientiﬁc Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration), Class. Quant. Grav. 34, 104002 (2017), arXiv:1611.07531 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[45]

E. W. Leaver, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A402, 285 (1985)

work page 1985
[46]

Quasinormal modes of black holes and black branes

E. Berti, V. Cardoso, and A. O. Starinets, Class. Quan- tum Grav. 26, 163001 (2009), arXiv:0905.2975 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009
[47]

http://pages.jh.edu/~eberti2/ringdown

work page
[48]

https://www.gw-openscience.org

work page
[50]

High-accuracy mass, spin, and recoil predictions of generic black-hole merger remnants

V. Varma, D. Gerosa, L. C. Stein, F. Hebert, and H. Zhang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 011101 (2019), arXiv:1809.09125 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019
[51]

A Numerical Relativity Waveform Surrogate Model for Generically Precessing Binary Black Hole Mergers

J. Blackman, S. E. Field, M. A. Scheel, C. R. Galley, C. D. Ott, M. Boyle, L. E. Kidder, H. P. Pfeiﬀer, and B. Szil´ agyi, Phys. Rev. D96, 024058 (2017), arXiv:1705.07089 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[52]

LIGO Scientiﬁc Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration, “GWTC-1,” https://doi.org/10.7935/82H3-HH23 (2018)

work page doi:10.7935/82h3-hh23 2018
[53]

Verdinelli and L

I. Verdinelli and L. Wasserman, Journal of the American Statistical Association 90, 614 (1995)

work page 1995
[54]

Testing general relativity using golden black-hole binaries

A. Ghosh et al. , Phys. Rev. D 94, 021101(R) (2016), arXiv:1602.02453 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
[55]

Testing general relativity using gravitational wave signals from the inspiral, merger and ringdown of binary black holes

A. Ghosh, N. K. Johnson-McDaniel, A. Ghosh, C. K. Mishra, P. Ajith, W. Del Pozzo, C. P. L. Berry, A. B. Nielsen, and L. London, Classical Quantum Gravity 35, 014002 (2018), arXiv:1704.06784 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[56]

The LIGO Open Science Center

M. Vallisneri, J. Kanner, R. Williams, A. Weinstein, and B. Stephens, Proceedings, 10th International LISA Sym- posium: Gainesville, Florida, USA, May 18-23, 2014 , J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 610, 012021 (2015), arXiv:1410.4839 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014
[57]

B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientiﬁc Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 241102 (2016), arXiv:1602.03840 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
[58]

B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientiﬁc, Virgo), Class. Quant. Grav. 33, 134001 (2016), arXiv:1602.03844 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
[59]

B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientiﬁc, Virgo), Phys. Rev. D93, 122004 (2016), [Addendum: Phys. Rev.D94,no.6,069903(2016)], arXiv:1602.03843 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
[60]

B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientiﬁc, Virgo), Phys. Rev. X6, 041015 (2016), [erratum: Phys. Rev.X8,no.3,039903(2018)], arXiv:1606.04856 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
[61]

Robust parameter estimation for compact binaries with ground-based gravitational-wave observations using the LALInference software library

J. Veitch, V. Raymond, B. Farr, W. Farr, P. Graﬀ, S. Vi- tale, B. Aylott, K. Blackburn, N. Christensen, M. Cough- lin, W. Del Pozzo, F. Feroz, J. Gair, C.-J. Haster, V. Kalogera, T. Littenberg, I. Mandel, R. O’Shaughnessy, M. Pitkin, C. Rodriguez, C. R¨ over, T. Sidery, R. Smith, M. Van Der Sluys, A. Vecchio, W. Vousden, and L. Wade, Phys. Rev. D 91, 0420...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[62]

Levinson, Journal of Mathematics and Physics 25, 261 (1946)

N. Levinson, Journal of Mathematics and Physics 25, 261 (1946)

work page 1946
[63]

Durbin, Revue de l’Institut International de Statistique / Review of the International Statistical Institute 28, 233 (1960)

J. Durbin, Revue de l’Institut International de Statistique / Review of the International Statistical Institute 28, 233 (1960). 7

work page 1960
[64]

SciPy: Open source scientiﬁc tools for Python,

E. Jones, T. Oliphant, P. Peterson, et al. , “SciPy: Open source scientiﬁc tools for Python,” (2001–), [Online; ac- cessed 16 April 2019]

work page 2001
[65]

Welch, IEEE Transactions on audio and electroacous- tics 15, 70 (1967)

P. Welch, IEEE Transactions on audio and electroacous- tics 15, 70 (1967)

work page 1967
[66]

Prix, Bayesian QNM search on GW150914 , Tech

R. Prix, Bayesian QNM search on GW150914 , Tech. Rep. LIGO-T1500618 (LIGO Scientiﬁc Collaboration, 2016)

work page 2016
[67]

kombine: a kernel-density-based, embarrassingly parallel ensemble sampler,

B. Farr and W. M. Farr, “kombine: a kernel-density-based, embarrassingly parallel ensemble sampler,” (2015), in prep. APPENDIX: TECHNICAL DET AILS Time-domain likelihood. The signal model used in this analysis has a sharp transition in the time domain. We do not wish to incorporate any data from the detectors be- fore our model begins so that we avoid bia...

work page 2015