Pith. sign in

REVIEW 24 cited by

Visual Sketchpad: Sketching as a Visual Chain of Thought for Multimodal Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.09403 v3 pith:FPKQ4GTM submitted 2024-06-13 cs.CV cs.CL

classification cs.CVcs.CL
keywords reasoningsketchpaddrawmodelsvisualtaskssketchingmultimodal
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Humans draw to facilitate reasoning: we draw auxiliary lines when solving geometry problems; we mark and circle when reasoning on maps; we use sketches to amplify our ideas and relieve our limited-capacity working memory. However, such actions are missing in current multimodal language models (LMs). Current chain-of-thought and tool-use paradigms only use text as intermediate reasoning steps. In this work, we introduce Sketchpad, a framework that gives multimodal LMs a visual sketchpad and tools to draw on the sketchpad. The LM conducts planning and reasoning according to the visual artifacts it has drawn. Different from prior work, which uses text-to-image models to enable LMs to draw, Sketchpad enables LMs to draw with lines, boxes, marks, etc., which is closer to human sketching and better facilitates reasoning. Sketchpad can also use specialist vision models during the sketching process (e.g., draw bounding boxes with object detection models, draw masks with segmentation models), to further enhance visual perception and reasoning. We experiment with a wide range of math tasks (including geometry, functions, graphs, and chess) and complex visual reasoning tasks. Sketchpad substantially improves performance on all tasks over strong base models with no sketching, yielding an average gain of 12.7% on math tasks, and 8.6% on vision tasks. GPT-4o with Sketchpad sets a new state of the art on all tasks, including V*Bench (80.3%), BLINK spatial reasoning (83.9%), and visual correspondence (80.8%). All codes and data are in https://visualsketchpad.github.io/.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 24 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Point-RFT: Improving Multimodal Reasoning with Visually Grounded Reinforcement Finetuning

    cs.CV 2025-05 reject novelty 7.0 of 10

    Point-RFT uses point-grounded chain-of-thought with GRPO reinforcement to improve chart reasoning, reporting 90.04% on ChartQA, though internal tables and the OOD setup weaken the claim.

  2. VISCO: Benchmarking Fine-Grained Critique and Correction Towards Self-Improvement in Visual Reasoning

    cs.CV 2024-12 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A new benchmark with human-annotated step-level critiques shows vision-language models can correct errors when given human feedback, but their self-generated critiques are weak and sometimes harmful; reverifying image...

  3. SketchAgent: Language-Driven Sequential Sketch Generation

    cs.CV 2024-11 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    SketchAgent uses a multimodal LLM prompted with a numbered-grid sketching language to generate, edit, and collaboratively draw sequential vector sketches without any training.

  4. Thinking With Tools, Not With Pixels: Tool Calls as Text Scaffolds for Visual Reasoning

    cs.CV 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Replacing returned images with a fixed text placeholder in tool-augmented visual reasoning preserves benchmark accuracy, suggesting the tool-call text, not the returned pixels, carries the gain.

  5. See2Think: Do Multimodal Models Really Use Intermediate Visual States?

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Multimodal models usually pick relevant visual actions, but faithful rendering is the bottleneck, and corrupted visual feedback drops accuracy over 10 points in 3D tasks.

  6. SVR-R1: Bootstrapping Multi-modal Reasoning with Self-verification in Reinforcement Learning

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Integrating binary self-verification into multi-turn GRPO rollouts raises VLM multimodal reasoning accuracy over matched GRPO baselines while the model learns to need fewer rethinks.

  7. Beyond the Textual: Generating Coherent Visual Options for MCQs

    cs.CV 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A four-stage framework (convertibility check, question/reason generation, optimal pair selection, and template-based image generation) produces MCQs with image options from ScienceQA content.

  8. SyncLoop: A Multimodal Dual-Loop Framework for Self-Improving Mathematical Reasoning

    cs.CV 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    SyncLoop jointly evolves multimodal training data and model capability through alternating SFT and RL, selecting error-prone samples to improve geometry reasoning.

  9. MATP-BENCH: Can MLLM Be a Good Automated Theorem Prover for Multimodal Problems?

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    MATP-BENCH pairs 1,056 multimodal math problems with formal theorem statements in Lean 4, Coq, and Isabelle; the strongest tested model solves only 5.68% of Lean 4 end-to-end proving tasks at pass@10.

  10. MME-Reasoning: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Logical Reasoning in MLLMs

    cs.AI 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new 1,188-question multimodal benchmark covering deductive, inductive, and abductive reasoning shows that leading MLLMs score around 60% and are especially weak at abductive reasoning.

  11. VisualToolAgent (VisTA): A Reinforcement Learning Framework for Visual Tool Selection

    cs.CV 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    VisTA uses GRPO reinforcement learning to train a vision-language agent to select external visual tools for a frozen reasoning model, improving accuracy on ChartQA, Geometry3K, BlindTest, and MathVerse.

  12. From EduVisBench to EduVisAgent: A Benchmark and Multi-Agent Framework for Reasoning-Driven Pedagogical Visualization

    cs.AI 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    EduVisAgent, a five-agent framework, outperforms all baseline AI models at generating pedagogically effective interactive visualizations for STEM problems, according to the new EduVisBench benchmark and its GPT-4o-bas...

  13. PointArena: Probing Multimodal Grounding Through Language-Guided Pointing

    cs.CV 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A three-stage benchmark consisting of 982 pointing tasks, a live pairwise arena with 4,500 votes, and a robot manipulation study shows that pointing-supervised open models such as Molmo-72B can match proprietary model...

  14. ReFocus: Visual Editing as a Chain of Thought for Structured Image Understanding

    cs.CV 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Visual editing of input images as a chain of thought improves multimodal LLM accuracy on structured image tasks by 3 to 12 points.

  15. MMFactory: A Universal Solution Search Engine for Vision-Language Tasks

    cs.CV 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    MMFactory automatically generates and benchmarks a pool of reusable programmatic vision-language solutions from a few examples, letting users pick one that fits their accuracy and speed constraints.

  16. Reinforced Visual Perception with Tools

    cs.CV 2025-09 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    ReVPT uses GRPO reinforcement learning with a cold-start SFT phase to make Qwen2.5-VL models call visual tools, improving perception benchmarks over SFT and text-only RL baselines.

  17. Augmented Vision-Language Models: A Systematic Review

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A structured taxonomy of inference-time augmentation techniques that connect vision-language models to external symbolic systems, tools, and knowledge sources.

  18. MINT-CoT: Enabling Interleaved Visual Tokens in Mathematical Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    MINT-CoT-7B interleaves fine-grained visual tokens into each math reasoning step and reports 73.70 on MathVista-Math, 64.72 on GeoQA, and 69.6 on MMStar-Math.

  19. Advancing Multimodal Reasoning via Reinforcement Learning with Cold Start

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Using a two-stage SFT-plus-GRPO pipeline, the authors train 3B and 7B multimodal models that beat prior open-source models on four math reasoning benchmarks, while showing that reflective 'aha moment' text is not a re...

  20. ReFineVLA: Reasoning-Aware Teacher-Guided Transfer Fine-Tuning

    cs.RO 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Fine-tuning a vision-language-action robot model on teacher-generated reasoning rationales raises average simulated manipulation success by up to 8.6 percentage points over the SpatialVLA baseline.

  21. Perception Tokens Enhance Visual Reasoning in Multimodal Language Models

    cs.CV 2024-12 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    AURORA augments LLaVA with tokenized depth maps and bounding boxes as intermediate reasoning steps, improving counting accuracy on some benchmarks, while the strongest depth numbers rest on a benchmark the authors con...

  22. Perception, Reason, Think, and Plan: A Survey on Large Multimodal Reasoning Models

    cs.CV 2025-05 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A survey organizes multimodal reasoning research into a staged roadmap and proposes native large multimodal reasoning models that unify perception, generation, and agentic planning.

  23. From Simple to Professional: A Combinatorial Controllable Image Captioning Agent

    cs.CV 2024-12 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    CapAgent converts simple captioning requests into professional multi-constraint instructions and uses a tool-using agent to generate captions, but the report provides no experiments.

  24. YingSound: Video-Guided Sound Effects Generation with Multi-modal Chain-of-Thought Controls

    cs.SD 2024-12 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    A video-guided sound effects model with a learnable audio-visual aggregator and multi-modal chain-of-thought module reports strong VGGSound benchmark scores, but its few-shot claim rests on three qualitative samples.

Pith tools