Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Transient Non-Stationarity and Generalisation in Deep Reinforcement Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2006.05826 v4 pith:FWGOEETR submitted 2020-06-10 cs.LG cs.AIstat.ML

Transient Non-Stationarity and Generalisation in Deep Reinforcement Learning

classification cs.LG cs.AIstat.ML
keywords generalisationnon-stationaritydeepitertraininglearningnetworkneural
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Non-stationarity can arise in Reinforcement Learning (RL) even in stationary environments. For example, most RL algorithms collect new data throughout training, using a non-stationary behaviour policy. Due to the transience of this non-stationarity, it is often not explicitly addressed in deep RL and a single neural network is continually updated. However, we find evidence that neural networks exhibit a memory effect where these transient non-stationarities can permanently impact the latent representation and adversely affect generalisation performance. Consequently, to improve generalisation of deep RL agents, we propose Iterated Relearning (ITER). ITER augments standard RL training by repeated knowledge transfer of the current policy into a freshly initialised network, which thereby experiences less non-stationarity during training. Experimentally, we show that ITER improves performance on the challenging generalisation benchmarks ProcGen and Multiroom.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Scalable Reinforcement Learning via Adaptive Batch Scaling

    stat.ML 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    ABS uses Behavioral Divergence to adaptively scale batch sizes in RL according to policy volatility, enabling effective large-batch large-network training on ALE benchmarks.

  2. Calibrated Partial Resets: Preventing Policy Collapse in Continual Reinforcement Learning

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.5

    Utility-scaled partial neuron resets prevent policy collapse in long-horizon continual RL while matching or beating binary-reset and uniform-decay baselines on several benchmarks.

  3. Scalable Reinforcement Learning via Adaptive Batch Scaling

    stat.ML 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Adaptive Batch Scaling dynamically increases batch size in on-policy RL as policy volatility drops, measured by a new Behavioral Divergence metric, and shows larger networks plus larger batches outperform on ALE with PQN.