Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 3 minor 1 cited by

The quark-gluon plasma: diagnosis with thermal hadron production from the early history until detailed characterization at high energy colliders

T0 review · 4 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A single temperature at the QCD phase boundary describes the yields of all hadron species in heavy-ion collisions, from pions to J/psi mesons.

desk verdict Solid review of the SHM/SHMc framework by its authors; light-flavor story is strong and honest, but the charm-sector universality claim overreaches and the manuscript contains an alien inserted fragment that must be cut. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.04733 v1 pith:G6XXUZ2Y submitted 2025-06-05 nucl-th hep-exhep-phnucl-ex

Peter Braun-Munzinger , Krzysztof Redlich , Johanna Stachel This is my paper · ORCID
classification nucl-thhep-exhep-phnucl-ex
keywords quark-gluonplasmastatisticalhadronizationhadronresonancegaschemicalfreeze-outcharmquarksJ/psiproductionQCDphasediagramheavy-ioncollisions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This review assembles the case that hadrons emerging from high-energy nuclear collisions are produced by a universal statistical mechanism at the boundary between the quark-gluon plasma—the state in which quarks and gluons are deconfined—and ordinary matter. The paper's central claim is that hadronization from an equilibrated fireball depends only on the temperature and baryon chemical potential at the QCD phase boundary, not on the particle species. Measured yields of light-quark hadrons, light nuclei, hypernuclei, and J/psi mesons are reproduced by the statistical hadronization model with a single freeze-out temperature T = 156.5 MeV, across about nine orders of magnitude in yield. The extension to charm treats charm quarks as conserved impurities that thermalize in the plasma and hadronize at the phase boundary, with a fugacity fixed by the measured charm cross section rather than by a fit. If the picture is right, low-transverse-momentum particle yields are a direct thermometer for the QCD phase transition, and even 'special' states like charmonium follow the same statistical law as pions.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the statistical hadronization model (SHM): a partition function built from all known hadrons and resonances treated as an ideal gas in thermal and chemical equilibrium, with chemical potentials enforcing conservation of baryon number, strangeness, and electric charge. Particle yields are computed from this partition function as thermal abundances plus resonance decay contributions. The charm extension SHMc adds a charm fugacity g_c, fixed not by a fit but by the measured total charm cross section through a balance equation that conserves the number of charm-anticharm pairs. The model is anchored to hadron resonance gas thermodynamics and to S-matrix phase-shift corrections, which improve the treatment of interactions such as pion-nucleon scattering and resolve a reported proton-yield anomaly. The paper connects the extracted freeze-out temperature to the lattice QCD chiral crossover temperature T_pc = 156.5 MeV, identifying chemical freeze-out with hadronization at the phase boundary.

What would settle it

Measure the yields of multiply charmed hadrons such as $\Xi_{cc}$ and $\Omega_{ccc}$ in central heavy-ion collisions at the highest collider energies. SHMc predicts specific enhancements relative to single-charm yields, anchored to the measured charm cross section and the balance equation; a measured yield significantly below those predictions, or a D0/J/psi centrality dependence that deviates from the model, would falsify the claim that charm quarks hadronize statistically at the phase boundary.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that hadronization is species-blind: at chemical freeze-out, the abundance of every hadron is fixed by the pair (T, mu_B) at the phase boundary, independent of whether the hadron contains light quarks, is a loosely bound nucleus, or carries charm. At the highest collider energies mu_B is consistent with zero, so a single temperature T = 156.5 MeV reproduces the measured yields of all hadron species, spanning about nine orders of magnitude in yield. The statistical hadronization model (SHM) computes these yields as thermal averages over all known hadrons and resonances plus decay feed-down; its charm extension, SHMc, treats charmonium as just another charmed hadron, formed at the phase boundary from deconfined charm quarks whose total number is conserved. The measured J/psi yield and the centrality dependence of the D0-to-J/psi ratio match SHMc predictions with the charm fugacity fixed by the measured charm cross section. The paper interprets the match as evidence that even the 'special' charmonium state obeys the same statistical hadronization as pions and protons.

Load-bearing premise

The central claim collapses if charm quarks do not fully thermalize in the quark-gluon plasma or if their total number is not conserved during the fireball's evolution; the predictions for J/psi and multi-charm hadrons depend on both.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Multi-charm hadrons (two or three charm quarks), which cannot be produced in a single nucleon-nucleon collision, are predicted to be produced at measurable rates through the same statistical hadronization; their observation would confirm the mechanism.
  • Because the fireball freezes out chemically within a few MeV of hadronization, the chemical freeze-out curve extracted from hadron yields is a direct experimental map of the QCD phase boundary down to collision energies near 12 GeV.
  • The success of SHMc implies that open and hidden charm hadrons form at the same phase boundary and from the same deconfined charm quarks, so charmonium enhancement relative to proton-proton collisions is expected, not anomalous.
  • At the highest collider energies, where the baryon chemical potential is consistent with zero, one number—the freeze-out temperature—governs all hadron abundances; precise yield measurements therefore act as a thermometer for the QCD crossover.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Inference: the same balance-equation logic should extend to beauty quarks, whose initial production is also hard and whose annihilation is negligible; a beauty fugacity fixed by the measured b-quark cross section would give parameter-free predictions for Upsilon and B_c production at collider energies.
  • Inference: species-blind hadronization could be stress-tested by comparing freeze-out temperatures extracted from different collision systems at equal energy; if the extracted temperature varies with system size or shape beyond the canonical-suppression corrections, the 'only T and mu_B matter' statement would need qualification.
  • Inference: the charm-conservation premise is checkable by measuring the centrality scaling of total charm yield; a deficit at large centrality would signal that the assumption of negligible charm annihilation is violated.
  • Inference: the paper's early-universe comparison hints at an undeveloped cross-check: cosmological QCD transition and laboratory freeze-out both occur near 156 MeV, but the environments differ in expansion and re-equilibration, so a joint analysis could sharpen both pictures.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 3 minor

Summary. This manuscript is a review of thermal hadron production in relativistic nuclear collisions, tracing the development from early statistical models through the hadron resonance gas and S-matrix thermodynamics to the contemporary statistical hadronization model (SHM). It argues that chemical freeze-out occurs at the QCD phase boundary, with T ≈ 156.5 MeV and μ_B ≈ 0 at LHC energies, and that measured light-flavor hadron yields, including light nuclei, are described across nine orders of magnitude. It further presents the extension to charm (SHMc), where a charm fugacity fixed by the measured total charm cross section leads to predictions for J/ψ and multi-charm hadrons. The paper is a synthesis of previously published results and does not introduce new derivations.

Significance. If the claims hold, the review makes a strong case that hadronization in high-energy nuclear collisions is a statistical process governed by the QCD phase boundary, connecting the SHM freeze-out temperature to lattice QCD results. The SHMc extension is significant because it turns the J/ψ yield and the multi-charm hierarchy into testable predictions that bear on deconfinement and charm thermalization. Strengths include the comprehensive literature coverage, the careful comparison of HRG with lattice QCD thermodynamics, and the use of machine-checkable external data from ALICE and lattice QCD. The multi-charm predictions are falsifiable and provide a concrete experimental target. However, the central universality claim is more limited than stated, because the charm-sector predictions depend on the measured charm cross section and on assumptions about charm thermalization and number conservation.

major comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 5.2 (concluding paragraph)] The concluding claim that 'hadronization from an equilibrated fireball is independent of particle species and only dependent on the values of T and μ_B at the phase boundary' is not literally supported for the charm sector. As the text itself states, the charm fugacity g_c is not fixed by T and μ_B but is 'experimentally determined by measurement of the total charm cross section' (Sec. 5.2, with g_c ≈ 30). The J/ψ yield scales as g_c^2 and the multi-charm predictions in Fig. 4 are derived from the same balance equation, so these predictions are conditional on an external input and on the assumptions that charm quarks thermalize and that their number is conserved. The universality statement should be qualified to the light-flavor sector, or rephrased so that the charm fugacity is acknowledged as an additional species-dependent input.
  2. [After Fig. 1 (pp. 11-12)] A large passage from a different manuscript appears after Fig. 1, beginning 'of charm quarks leads to a fugacity in the SHM for charmed hadrons...' and containing a balance equation labeled (1), references to X(3872), FONLL, shadowing, and charmonium at sqrt(s_NN) = 5 TeV. This passage uses undefined notation (nth_X, V, g_c), cites references [5]-[27] that do not correspond to the main reference list, and interrupts the review's argument. This is a clear accidental insertion and must be removed or fully integrated; no other presentation issue is as serious.
  3. [Sec. 5.1, Fig. 1] The text describes Fig. 1 as demonstrating the 'predictive power' of the SHM for yields varying over nine orders of magnitude. This should be stated more carefully: while T_chem = 156.5 MeV and μ_B = 0 are taken from lattice QCD and chemical-potential measurements, the volume V (per unit rapidity) is fitted to the same yield data, and the proton yield includes an S-matrix correction. The agreement in Fig. 1 is therefore a consistency check of T and μ_B against the data conditional on V, not a parameter-free prediction. The Introduction's promise of 'predictive power' should be moderated accordingly.
  4. [Sec. 5.2, Fig. 3] The D0/Jψ ratio in Fig. 3 is presented as evidence that 'open and hidden charm states are both produced by statistical hadronization at the phase boundary.' Since both D0 and Jψ are computed from the same balance equation with the same charm fugacity, the ratio mainly tests the relative statistical weights of open and hidden charm states, not the absolute assumptions of charm thermalization and number conservation. The text should acknowledge this limitation when drawing conclusions from Fig. 3.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract and throughout] The manuscript contains numerous typographical and OCR-induced errors, e.g., '15𝜇𝑠' should be typeset as '15 μs', 'occuring' in Sec. 1, 'on has to augment' in footnote 3, and '𝜇![MeV]' in the Fig. 2 caption; a thorough proofreading pass is needed.
  2. [Fig. 2] The axis labels and tick values of Fig. 2 are garbled ('20 1000' on the horizontal axis, '𝜇![MeV]' on the axis label); the figure should be regenerated from the original source.
  3. [Sec. 4.4] The statement that canonical-ensemble strangeness suppression 'was indeed observed by the ALICE collaboration [89]' would benefit from a brief explanation of which observable is being compared, since the connection to the earlier WA97/NA57 and STAR measurements is otherwise left implicit.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the charm fugacity is an externally constrained input, the multi-charm and D0/J/psi predictions are independent tests, and T_chem is anchored to independent lQCD results.

full rationale

The paper's core comparisons do not reduce to their inputs by construction. The SHMc charm fugacity g_c is not fitted to the J/psi yield or to the D0/J_psi ratio; it is fixed by the measured total charm cross section via the balance equation, and the J/psi yield and other charmed-hadron yields are then predicted. This is an externally constrained input, not a hidden fit to the displayed observable. The D0/J_psi ratio in Fig. 3 and the multi-charm hierarchy in Fig. 4 are parameter-free consequences of the model and are compared to ALICE data, so they are externally falsifiable. For the light-quark sector, Fig. 1 uses T_chem = 156.5 MeV, which is taken from lQCD rather than fitted to the plotted yields, and the freeze-out points at lower energies are compared with the independent lQCD crossover band. The self-citations [15, 104, 118, 122] develop the SHMc framework, but the framework's output is tested against external measurements, so the citations are not load-bearing in a circular way. The statement that hadronization depends only on T and mu_B is an overgeneralization for the charm sector, since g_c enters as an additional input, but this is an accuracy/scope caveat, not a circular derivation. No step in the claimed chain equates a prediction with an input by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The SHM/SHMc framework is a phenomenological model with a small number of parameters (T, mu_B, V) previously fitted to data, plus g_c fixed by an external charm cross-section measurement. The review does not introduce new entities; its predictions depend on the completeness of the PDG hadron list and on the conservation/thermalization assumptions for charm quarks.

free parameters (4)
  • T_chem (chemical freeze-out temperature) = 156.5 MeV
    Used as the hadronization temperature in the SHM comparison (Fig. 1); value previously determined by fits to LHC hadron yields by the same authors.
  • mu_B (baryon chemical potential) = 0
    Set to zero at LHC energies; consistency with data is used to fix the overall yield scale and is consistent with measured chemical potentials.
  • V (fireball volume per unit rapidity)
    Overall normalization of hadron yields; fitted to the data in the SHM, though not tabulated in this review.
  • g_c (charm fugacity) = ~30
    Determined from the measured total charm cross section in Pb-Pb collisions, not a fit parameter, but an external input required by the SHMc.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The hadron resonance gas built from the PDG hadron list and Breit-Wigner resonances reproduces the QCD equation of state in the confined phase.
    Invoked in Sec. 4.2; the review relies on this equality when using HRG partition functions to describe yields at the phase boundary.
  • domain assumption The fireball reaches full hadrochemical equilibrium before hadronization.
    Sec. 5.1: 'at hadronization ... the fireball ... is very close to a thermodynamic state in full (hadro-)chemical equilibrium.' This is the basis for applying the SHM.
  • domain assumption Charm quark number is conserved during QGP evolution; thermal production and annihilation of charm are negligible.
    Sec. 5.2: 'the total number of charm quarks is conserved during the evolution of the fireball since charm quark annihilation is very small.' This underlies the charm balance equation.
  • domain assumption The chemical freeze-out temperature equals the lQCD pseudo-critical temperature Tpc.
    The comparison in Fig. 2 and the discussion in Sec. 5.1 rely on this equality to interpret freeze-out as occurring at the phase boundary.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The quark-gluon plasma: diagnosis with thermal hadron production from the early history until detailed characterization at high energy colliders." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/G6XXUZ2Y

@misc{pith2026250604733,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The quark-gluon plasma: diagnosis with thermal hadron production from the early history until detailed characterization at high energy colliders},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/G6XXUZ2Y}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.04733}
}
read the original abstract

In nuclear collisions at relativistic energies, matter is created which resembles closely the matter that filled all space until about 15 microseconds after the big bang. Here we summarize selected aspects of the research that led to the establishment of this new sub-field of physics and briefly describe its current `state of the art' with emphasis on matter creation through thermal particle production. In particular, we will focus on particle production at low transverse momentum and explain how its analysis sheds light on one of the key open questions, i.e. what is the mechanism of hadronization of colored objects such as quarks and gluons.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.04733 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Primordial and total (anti)particle yields, normalized to spin degeneracyas a function of mass calculated with the SHMC to primordial and total (anti-)particle yields as calculated within the SHM [15]. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Predictions of yields for singly- and multiply-charmed hadrons by the Statistical Hadroniza￾tion Model with charm SHMc. Figure from [104] and adapted to include also selected light nuclei and hyper-nuclei. Future measurement campaigns at the LHC in Run 3 and Run 4 and with ALICE 3 [125] will yield detailed information on the production cross sections of hadrons 3 For Λ𝑐 baryons on has to augment the currently measur… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Hadronic and partonic composition of QCD matter across the crossover

    nucl-th 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A three-parameter hadron–quark crossover equation of state fitted to lattice QCD data yields a switching temperature T₀ ≃ 216 MeV, implying hadronic degrees of freedom persist well above the chiral pseudocritical temperature.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

134 extracted references · 77 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [5]

    Hagedorn

    R. Hagedorn. Statistical thermodynamics of strong interactions at high energies. 3. Heavy-pair (quark) production rates.Nuovo Cim. Suppl., 6:311–354, 1968

    1968

  2. [27]

    Kogut, M

    John B. Kogut, M. Stone, H. W. Wyld, W. R. Gibbs, J. Shigemitsu, Stephen H. Shenker, and D. K. Sinclair. Deconfinement and Chiral Symmetry Restoration at Finite Temperatures in SU(2) and SU(3) Gauge Theories.Phys. Rev. Lett., 50:393, 1983

    1983

  3. [1]

    I. Ya. Pomeranchuk. On the theory of multiple particle production in a single collision.Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 78(5):889–891, 1951

    1951

  4. [2]

    E. Fermi. Multiple Production of Pions in Nucleon-Nucleon Collisions at Cosmotron Ener- gies.Phys. Rev., 92:452–453, 1953

    1953

  5. [3]

    L. D. Landau. On the multiparticle production in high-energy collisions.Izv. Akad. Nauk Ser. Fiz., 17:51–64, 1953

    1953

  6. [4]

    Hagedorn

    R. Hagedorn. Statistical thermodynamics of strong interactions at high-energies.Nuovo Cim. Suppl., 3:147, 1965

    1965

  7. [6]

    Hagedorn

    R. Hagedorn. Hadronic matter near the boiling point.Nuovo Cim. A, 56:1027–1057, 1968

    1968

  8. [7]

    J. D. Bjorken and Stanley J. Brodsky. Statistical Model for electron-Positron Annihilation Into Hadrons.Phys. Rev. D, 1:1416–1420, 1970

    1970

Show all 134 references
  1. [8]

    Edward V. Shuryak. Quark-Gluon Plasma and Hadronic Production of Leptons, Photons and Psions.Phys. Lett. B, 78:150, 1978

    1978

  2. [9]

    50 Years of Quantum Chromodynamics.Eur

    Franz Gross et al. 50 Years of Quantum Chromodynamics.Eur. Phys. J. C, 83:1125, 2023

    2023

  3. [10]

    Collins and M

    John C. Collins and M. J. Perry. Superdense Matter: Neutrons Or Asymptotically Free Quarks?Phys. Rev. Lett., 34:1353, 1975

    1975

  4. [11]

    Cabibbo and G

    N. Cabibbo and G. Parisi. Exponential Hadronic Spectrum and Quark Liberation.Phys. Lett. B, 59:67–69, 1975

    1975

  5. [12]

    Edward V. Shuryak. Theory of Hadronic Plasma.Sov. Phys. JETP, 47:212–219, 1978

    1978

  6. [13]

    Claudia Ratti and Rene Bellwied.The Deconfinement Transition of QCD: Theory Meets Experiment, volume 981 ofLecture Notes in Physics. 6 2021

    2021

  7. [14]

    Particle production in heavy ion collisions

    Peter Braun-Munzinger, Krzysztof Redlich, and Johanna Stachel. Particle production in heavy ion collisions. InQuark Gluon Plasma 3, eds. R. C. Hwa and Xin-Nian Wang, World Scientific Publishing, 491–599. 2003

    2003

  8. [15]

    Decoding the phase structure of QCD via particle production at high energy.Nature, 561(7723):321– 330, 2018

    Anton Andronic, Peter Braun-Munzinger, Krzysztof Redlich, and Johanna Stachel. Decoding the phase structure of QCD via particle production at high energy.Nature, 561(7723):321– 330, 2018

    2018

  9. [16]

    Comment on the Single Particle Distribution in the Hydro- dynamic and Statistical Thermodynamic Models of Multiparticle Production.Phys

    Fred Cooper and Graham Frye. Comment on the Single Particle Distribution in the Hydro- dynamic and Statistical Thermodynamic Models of Multiparticle Production.Phys. Rev. D, 10:186, 1974

    1974

  10. [17]

    Properties of the QCD matter: review of selected results from the relativistic heavy ion collider beam energy scan (RHIC BES) program.Nucl

    Jinhui Chen et al. Properties of the QCD matter: review of selected results from the relativistic heavy ion collider beam energy scan (RHIC BES) program.Nucl. Sci. Tech., 35(12):214, 2024

    2024

  11. [18]

    Stephanov, K

    Misha A. Stephanov, K. Rajagopal, and Edward V. Shuryak. Event-by-event fluctuations in heavy ion collisions and the QCD critical point.Phys. Rev. D, 60:114028, 1999

    1999

  12. [19]

    Properties of hot and dense matter from relativistic heavy ion collisions.Phys

    Peter Braun-Munzinger, Volker Koch, Thomas Sch ¨afer, and Johanna Stachel. Properties of hot and dense matter from relativistic heavy ion collisions.Phys. Rept., 621:76–126, 2016

    2016

  13. [20]

    Hydrodynamic Modeling of Heavy-Ion Collisions.Int

    Charles Gale, Sangyong Jeon, and Bjoern Schenke. Hydrodynamic Modeling of Heavy-Ion Collisions.Int. J. Mod. Phys. A, 28:1340011, 2013

    2013

  14. [21]

    Elliptic Flow: A Brief Review.New J

    Raimond Snellings. Elliptic Flow: A Brief Review.New J. Phys., 13:055008, 2011

    2011

  15. [22]

    Poskanzer, and Sergei A

    Jean-Yves Ollitrault, Arthur M. Poskanzer, and Sergei A. Voloshin. Effect of flow fluctuations and nonflow on elliptic flow methods.Phys. Rev. C, 80:014904, 2009

    2009

  16. [23]

    Baier, Yuri L

    R. Baier, Yuri L. Dokshitzer, Alfred H. Mueller, S. Peigne, and D. Schiff. Radiative energy loss and p(T) broadening of high-energy partons in nuclei.Nucl. Phys. B, 484:265–282, 1997. The quark-gluon plasma: diagnosis with thermal hadron production.... 19

    1997

  17. [24]

    Dilepton Spectroscopy of QCD Matter at Collider Energies.Adv

    Ralf Rapp. Dilepton Spectroscopy of QCD Matter at Collider Energies.Adv. High Energy Phys., 2013:148253, 2013

    2013

  18. [25]

    R. Rapp, J. Wambach, and H. van Hees. The Chiral Restoration Transition of QCD and Low Mass Dileptons.Landolt-Bornstein, 23:134, 2010

    2010

  19. [26]

    Engels, F

    J. Engels, F. Karsch, H. Satz, and I. Montvay. High Temperature SU(2) Gluon Matter on the Lattice.Phys. Lett. B, 101:89, 1981

    1981

  20. [28]

    H. T. Ding et al. Chiral Phase Transition Temperature in (2+1)-Flavor QCD.Phys. Rev. Lett., 123(6):062002, 2019

    2019

  21. [29]

    Bazavov et al

    A. Bazavov et al. Chiral crossover in QCD at zero and non-zero chemical potentials.Phys. Lett. B, 795:15–21, 2019

    2019

  22. [30]

    Guenther, Ruben Kara, Sandor D

    Szabolcs Borsanyi, Zoltan Fodor, Jana N. Guenther, Ruben Kara, Sandor D. Katz, Paolo Parotto, Attila Pasztor, Claudia Ratti, and Kalman K. Szabo. QCD Crossover at Finite Chemical Potential from Lattice Simulations.Phys. Rev. Lett., 125(5):052001, 2020

    2020

  23. [31]

    Phase Transitions in Particle Physics: Results and Perspectives from Lattice Quantum Chromo-Dynamics.Prog

    Gert Aarts et al. Phase Transitions in Particle Physics: Results and Perspectives from Lattice Quantum Chromo-Dynamics.Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys., 133:104070, 2023

    2023

  24. [32]

    Approaches to the sign problem in lattice field theory

    Christof Gattringer and Kurt Langfeld. Approaches to the sign problem in lattice field theory. Int. J. Mod. Phys. A, 31(22):1643007, 2016

    2016

  25. [33]

    Braun-Munzinger, B

    P. Braun-Munzinger, B. Friman, K. Redlich, A. Rustamov, and J. Stachel. Relativistic nuclear collisions: Establishing a non-critical baseline for fluctuation measurements.Nucl. Phys. A, 1008:122141, 2021

    2021

  26. [34]

    Abe et al

    K. Abe et al. Leading Particle Distributions in 200-GeV/c𝑃+ a Interactions.Phys. Lett. B, 200:266–271, 1988

    1988

  27. [35]

    Benecke, T

    J. Benecke, T. T. Chou, Chen-Ning Yang, and E. Yen. Hypothesis of Limiting Fragmentation in High-Energy Collisions.Phys. Rev., 188:2159–2169, 1969

    1969

  28. [36]

    J. D. Bjorken. Highly Relativistic Nucleus-Nucleus Collisions: The Central Rapidity Region. Phys. Rev. D, 27:140–151, 1983

    1983

  29. [37]

    Measurement of the pseudorapidity and centrality dependence of the transverse energy density in PbPb collisions at √𝑠𝑁𝑁 =2.76 TeV.Phys

    Serguei Chatrchyan et al. Measurement of the pseudorapidity and centrality dependence of the transverse energy density in PbPb collisions at √𝑠𝑁𝑁 =2.76 TeV.Phys. Rev. Lett., 109:152303, 2012

    2012

  30. [38]

    Barrette et al

    J. Barrette et al. Measurement of transverse energy production with Si and Au beams at relativistic energy: Towards hot and dense hadronic matter.Phys. Rev. Lett., 70:2996–2999, 1993

    1993

  31. [39]

    M. M. Aggarwal et al. Scaling of particle and transverse energy production in Pb-208 + Pb-208 collisions at 158-A-GeV.Eur. Phys. J. C, 18:651–663, 2001

    2001

  32. [40]

    Adare et al

    A. Adare et al. Transverse energy production and charged-particle multiplicity at midrapidity in various systems from√𝑠𝑁𝑁 =7.7 to 200 GeV.Phys. Rev. C, 93(2):024901, 2016

    2016

  33. [41]

    Navas et al

    S. Navas et al. Review of particle physics.Phys. Rev. D, 110(3):030001, 2024

    2024

  34. [42]

    Bastian, David B

    Andreas Bauswein, Niels-Uwe F. Bastian, David B. Blaschke, Katerina Chatziioannou, James A. Clark, Tobias Fischer, and Micaela Oertel. Identifying a first-order phase tran- sition in neutron star mergers through gravitational waves.Phys. Rev. Lett., 122(6):061102, 2019

    2019

  35. [43]

    New Neutron Star Equation of State with Quark-Hadron Crossover.Astrophys

    Gordon Baym, Shun Furusawa, Tetsuo Hatsuda, Toru Kojo, and Hajime Togashi. New Neutron Star Equation of State with Quark-Hadron Crossover.Astrophys. J., 885:42, 2019

    2019

  36. [44]

    Ab-initio QCD Calculations Impact the Inference of the Neutron-star-matter Equation of State.Astrophys

    Tyler Gorda, Oleg Komoltsev, and Aleksi Kurkela. Ab-initio QCD Calculations Impact the Inference of the Neutron-star-matter Equation of State.Astrophys. J., 950(2):107, 2023

    2023

  37. [45]

    A Short Survey of Matter-Antimatter Evolution in the Primordial Universe.Universe, 9(7):309, 2023

    Johann Rafelski, Jeremiah Birrell, Andrew Steinmetz, and Cheng Tao Yang. A Short Survey of Matter-Antimatter Evolution in the Primordial Universe.Universe, 9(7):309, 2023

    2023

  38. [46]

    Bernstein

    Roger Dashen, Shang-Keng Ma, and Herbert J. Bernstein. S Matrix formulation of statistical mechanics.Phys. Rev., 187:345–370, 1969

    1969

  39. [47]

    Venugopalan and M

    R. Venugopalan and M. Prakash. Thermal properties of interacting hadrons.Nucl. Phys. A, 546:718–760, 1992. 20 Peter Braun-Munzinger, Krzysztof Redlich, and Johanna Stachel

    1992

  40. [48]

    Weinhold, B

    W. Weinhold, B. Friman, and W. Norenberg. Thermodynamics of Delta resonances.Phys. Lett. B, 433:236–242, 1998

    1998

  41. [49]

    S-matrix analysis of the baryon electric charge correlation.Phys

    Pok Man Lo, Bengt Friman, Krzysztof Redlich, and Chihiro Sasaki. S-matrix analysis of the baryon electric charge correlation.Phys. Lett. B, 778:454–458, 2018

    2018

  42. [50]

    Density of states of a coupled-channel system.Phys

    Pok Man Lo. Density of states of a coupled-channel system.Phys. Rev. D, 102(3):034038, 2020

    2020

  43. [51]

    Hagedorn

    R. Hagedorn. Thermodynamics of strong interactions. 5 1971

    1971

  44. [52]

    Johann Rafelski.Melting Hadrons, Boiling Quarks, pages 417–439. 2016

    2016

  45. [53]

    Ultimate temperature and the early universe.Phys

    Kerson Huang and Steven Weinberg. Ultimate temperature and the early universe.Phys. Rev. Lett., 25:895–897, 1970

    1970

  46. [54]

    Fubini and G

    S. Fubini and G. Veneziano. Level structure of dual-resonance models.Nuovo Cim. A, 64:811–840, 1969

    1969

  47. [55]

    H. Satz. Critical Behavior of Hadronic Matter. 1. Critical Point Exponents.Phys. Rev. D, 19:1912, 1979

    1912

  48. [56]

    Hagedorn and Johann Rafelski

    R. Hagedorn and Johann Rafelski. Hot Hadronic Matter and Nuclear Collisions.Phys. Lett. B, 97:136, 1980

    1980

  49. [57]

    Matching the Hagedorn mass spectrum with Lattice QCD results.Phys

    Pok Man Lo, Micha l Marczenko, Krzysztof Redlich, and Chihiro Sasaki. Matching the Hagedorn mass spectrum with Lattice QCD results.Phys. Rev. C, 92(5):055206, 2015

    2015

  50. [58]

    Missing baryonic resonances in the Hagedorn spectrum.Eur

    Pok Man Lo, Micha l Marczenko, Krzysztof Redlich, and Chihiro Sasaki. Missing baryonic resonances in the Hagedorn spectrum.Eur. Phys. J. A, 52(8):235, 2016

    2016

  51. [59]

    Different Hagedorn temperatures for mesons and baryons from experimental mass spectra, compound hadrons, and combinatorial satura- tion.Phys

    Wojciech Broniowski and Wojciech Florkowski. Different Hagedorn temperatures for mesons and baryons from experimental mass spectra, compound hadrons, and combinatorial satura- tion.Phys. Lett. B, 490:223–227, 2000

    2000

  52. [60]

    Karsch, K

    F. Karsch, K. Redlich, and A. Tawfik. Hadron resonance mass spectrum and lattice QCD thermodynamics.Eur. Phys. J. C, 29:549–556, 2003

    2003

  53. [61]

    Karsch, K

    F. Karsch, K. Redlich, and A. Tawfik. Thermodynamics at nonzero baryon number density: A Comparison of lattice and hadron resonance gas model calculations.Phys. Lett. B, 571:67–74, 2003

    2003

  54. [62]

    Ejiri, F

    S. Ejiri, F. Karsch, and K. Redlich. Hadronic fluctuations at the QCD phase transition.Phys. Lett. B, 633:275–282, 2006

    2006

  55. [63]

    C. R. Allton, M. Doring, S. Ejiri, S. J. Hands, O. Kaczmarek, F. Karsch, E. Laermann, and K. Redlich. Thermodynamics of two flavor QCD to sixth order in quark chemical potential. Phys. Rev. D, 71:054508, 2005

    2005

  56. [64]

    Bazavov et al

    A. Bazavov et al. Fluctuations and Correlations of net baryon number, electric charge, and strangeness: A comparison of lattice QCD results with the hadron resonance gas model.Phys. Rev. D, 86:034509, 2012

    2012

  57. [65]

    Thermodynamics of strong interaction matter from lattice QCD and the hadron resonance gas model.Acta Phys

    Frithjof Karsch. Thermodynamics of strong interaction matter from lattice QCD and the hadron resonance gas model.Acta Phys. Polon. Supp., 7:117, 2014

    2014

  58. [66]

    Bazavov et al

    A. Bazavov et al. The QCD Equation of State toO(𝜇 6 𝐵)from Lattice QCD.Phys. Rev. D, 95(5):054504, 2017

    2017

  59. [67]

    Guenther, Sandor D

    Rene Bellwied, Szabolcs Borsanyi, Zoltan Fodor, Jana N. Guenther, Sandor D. Katz, Paolo Parotto, Attila Pasztor, David Pesznyak, Claudia Ratti, and Kalman K. Szabo. Corrections to the hadron resonance gas from lattice QCD and their effect on fluctuation-ratios at finite densit...

    2021

  60. [68]

    Karsch et al.QCD Phase Structure at Finite Baryon Density

    F. Karsch et al.QCD Phase Structure at Finite Baryon Density. 2022

    2022

  61. [69]

    Constraining the hadronic spectrum through QCD thermodynamics on the lattice.Phys

    Paolo Alba et al. Constraining the hadronic spectrum through QCD thermodynamics on the lattice.Phys. Rev. D, 96(3):034517, 2017

    2017

  62. [70]

    Bollweg, D

    D. Bollweg, D. A. Clarke, J. Goswami, O. Kaczmarek, F. Karsch, S. Mukherjee, P. Petreczky, C. Schmidt, and S. Sharma. Equation of state and speed of sound of (2+1)-flavor QCD in strangeness-neutral matter at nonvanishing net baryon-number density.Phys. Rev. D, 108(1):014510, 2023

    2023

  63. [71]

    Sharma, F

    S. Sharma, F. Karsch, and P. Petreczky. Thermodynamics of charmed hadrons across chiral crossover from lattice QCD.J. Subatomic Part. Cosmol., 3:100044, 2025

    2025

  64. [72]

    Braun-Munzinger, I

    P. Braun-Munzinger, I. Heppe, and J. Stachel. Chemical equilibration in Pb + Pb collisions at the SPS.Phys. Lett. B, 465:15–20, 1999. The quark-gluon plasma: diagnosis with thermal hadron production.... 21

    1999

  65. [73]

    The thermal proton yield anomaly in Pb-Pb collisions at the LHC and its resolution.Phys

    Anton Andronic, Peter Braun-Munzinger, Bengt Friman, Pok Man Lo, Krzysztof Redlich, and Johanna Stachel. The thermal proton yield anomaly in Pb-Pb collisions at the LHC and its resolution.Phys. Lett. B, 792:304–309, 2019

    2019

  66. [74]

    Thermodynamics of the strange baryon system from a coupled-channels analysis and missing states.Phys

    C ´esar Fern ´andez-Ram´ırez, Pok Man Lo, and Peter Petreczky. Thermodynamics of the strange baryon system from a coupled-channels analysis and missing states.Phys. Rev. C, 98(4):044910, 2018

    2018

  67. [75]

    Strangeness fluctuations from𝐾−𝜋interactions.Phys

    Bengt Friman, Pok Man Lo, Micha l Marczenko, Krzysztof Redlich, and Chihiro Sasaki. Strangeness fluctuations from𝐾−𝜋interactions.Phys. Rev. D, 92(7):074003, 2015

    2015

  68. [76]

    Redlich and L

    K. Redlich and L. Turko. Phase Transitions in the Statistical Bootstrap Model with an Internal Symmetry.Z. Phys. C, 5:201, 1980

    1980

  69. [77]

    Hagedorn and K

    R. Hagedorn and K. Redlich. Statistical Thermodynamics in Relativistic Particle and Ion Physics: Canonical or Grand Canonical?Z. Phys. C, 27:541, 1985

    1985

  70. [78]

    Cleymans, K

    J. Cleymans, K. Redlich, and E. Suhonen. Canonical description of strangeness conservation and particle production.Z. Phys. C, 51:137–141, 1991

    1991

  71. [79]

    Influence of impact parameter on thermal description of relativistic heavy ion collisions at (1-2) A-GeV.Phys

    Jean Cleymans, Helmut Oeschler, and Krzysztof Redlich. Influence of impact parameter on thermal description of relativistic heavy ion collisions at (1-2) A-GeV.Phys. Rev. C, 59:1663, 1999

    1999

  72. [80]

    Canonical description of strangeness enhancement from p-A to Pb Pb collisions.Phys

    Salah Hamieh, Krzysztof Redlich, and Ahmed Tounsi. Canonical description of strangeness enhancement from p-A to Pb Pb collisions.Phys. Lett. B, 486:61–66, 2000

    2000

  73. [81]

    C. M. Ko, V. Koch, Zi-wei Lin, K. Redlich, Misha A. Stephanov, and Xin-Nian Wang. Kinetic equation with exact charge conservation.Phys. Rev. Lett., 86:5438–5441, 2001

    2001

  74. [82]

    Nuclear matter under extreme conditions.Lect

    Johann Rafelski and Michael Danos. Nuclear matter under extreme conditions.Lect. Notes Phys., 231:361–455, 1985

    1985

  75. [83]

    Redlich and A

    K. Redlich and A. Tounsi. Strangeness enhancement and energy dependence in heavy ion collisions.Eur. Phys. J. C, 24:589–594, 2002

    2002

  76. [84]

    Kraus, J

    I. Kraus, J. Cleymans, H. Oeschler, and K. Redlich. Particle production in p-p collisions and prediction for LHC energy.Phys. Rev. C, 79:014901, 2009

    2009

  77. [85]

    Becattini and Ulrich W

    F. Becattini and Ulrich W. Heinz. Thermal hadron production in p p and p anti-p collisions. Z. Phys. C, 76:269–286, 1997. [Erratum: Z.Phys.C 76, 578 (1997)]

    1997

  78. [86]

    Thermal model description of p–Pb collisions at√𝑠𝑁𝑁 =5.02 TeV.Eur

    Natasha Sharma, Jean Cleymans, and Lokesh Kumar. Thermal model description of p–Pb collisions at√𝑠𝑁𝑁 =5.02 TeV.Eur. Phys. J. C, 78(4):288, 2018

    2018

  79. [87]

    Andronic, F

    A. Andronic, F. Beutler, P. Braun-Munzinger, K. Redlich, and J. Stachel. Thermal description of hadron production in e+e- collisions revisited.Phys. Lett. B, 675:312–318, 2009

    2009

  80. [88]

    Becattini, P

    F. Becattini, P. Castorina, J. Manninen, and H. Satz. The Thermal Production of Strange and Non-Strange Hadrons in e+ e- Collisions.Eur. Phys. J. C, 56:493–510, 2008

    2008

  81. [89]

    Enhanced production of multi-strange hadrons in high-multiplicity proton-proton collisions.Nature Phys., 13:535–539, 2017

    Jaroslav Adam et al. Enhanced production of multi-strange hadrons in high-multiplicity proton-proton collisions.Nature Phys., 13:535–539, 2017

    2017

  82. [90]

    Presented by R. A. Fini et al. Strange baryon production in Pb Pb collisions at 158-A-GeV/c. J. Phys. G, 27:375–381, 2001

    2001

  83. [91]

    M. M. Aggarwal et al. Strange and Multi-strange Particle Production in Au+Au Collisions at√𝑠𝑁𝑁 = 62.4 GeV.Phys. Rev. C, 83:024901, 2011. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.C 107, 049903 (2023)]

    2023

  84. [92]

    Multiplicity depen- dence of (multi)strange baryons in the canonical ensemble with phase shift corrections.Phys

    Jean Cleymans, Pok Man Lo, Krzysztof Redlich, and Natasha Sharma. Multiplicity depen- dence of (multi)strange baryons in the canonical ensemble with phase shift corrections.Phys. Rev. C, 103(1):014904, 2021

    2021

  85. [93]

    Multiplicity dependence of light flavour hadron production at LHC energies in the strangeness canonical suppression picture

    Vytautas Vislavicius and Alexander Kalweit. Multiplicity dependence of light flavour hadron production at LHC energies in the strangeness canonical suppression picture. 10 2016

    2016

  86. [94]

    Cleymans, H

    J. Cleymans, H. Oeschler, and K. Redlich. Statistical model description of K+ and K- production between 1-GeV/A to 10-GeV/A.Phys. Lett. B, 485:27–31, 2000

    2000

  87. [95]

    Braun-Munzinger, J

    P. Braun-Munzinger, J. Stachel, and Christof Wetterich. Chemical freezeout and the QCD phase transition temperature.Phys. Lett. B, 596:61–69, 2004

    2004

  88. [96]

    Adamczyk et al

    L. Adamczyk et al. Bulk Properties of the Medium Produced in Relativistic Heavy-Ion Collisions from the Beam Energy Scan Program.Phys. Rev. C, 96(4):044904, 2017

    2017

  89. [97]

    Private Communications

    Joachim Stroth, (HADES Collaboration). Private Communications. 22 Peter Braun-Munzinger, Krzysztof Redlich, and Johanna Stachel

  90. [98]

    Braun-Munzinger and J

    P. Braun-Munzinger and J. Wambach. The Phase Diagram of Strongly-Interacting Matter. Rev. Mod. Phys., 81:1031–1050, 2009

    2009

  91. [99]

    Tanabashi et al

    M. Tanabashi et al. Review of Particle Physics.Phys. Rev. D, 98(3):030001, 2018

    2018

  92. [100]

    A Modern View of the Origin of the Universe

    Steven Weinberg.The First Three Minutes. A Modern View of the Origin of the Universe. 1977

    1977

  93. [101]

    Pawlowski, and Fabian Rennecke

    Wei-jie Fu, Jan M. Pawlowski, and Fabian Rennecke. QCD phase structure at finite tempera- ture and density.Phys. Rev. D, 101(5):054032, 2020

    2020

  94. [102]

    Mapping the Phases of Quantum Chromodynamics with Beam Energy Scan.Phys

    Adam Bzdak, Shinichi Esumi, Volker Koch, Jinfeng Liao, Mikhail Stephanov, and Nu Xu. Mapping the Phases of Quantum Chromodynamics with Beam Energy Scan.Phys. Rept., 853:1–87, 2020

    2020

  95. [103]

    The ALICE experiment: a journey through QCD.Eur

    Shreyasi Acharya et al. The ALICE experiment: a journey through QCD.Eur. Phys. J. C, 84(8):813, 2024

    2024

  96. [104]

    K ¨ohler, Aleksas Mazeliauskas, Krzysztof Redlich, Johanna Stachel, and Vytautas Vislavicius

    Anton Andronic, Peter Braun-Munzinger, Markus K. K ¨ohler, Aleksas Mazeliauskas, Krzysztof Redlich, Johanna Stachel, and Vytautas Vislavicius. The multiple-charm hier- archy in the statistical hadronization model.JHEP, 07:035, 2021

    2021

  97. [105]

    K ¨ohler, Krzysztof Redlich, and Jo- hanna Stachel

    Anton Andronic, Peter Braun-Munzinger, Markus K. K ¨ohler, Krzysztof Redlich, and Jo- hanna Stachel. Transverse momentum distributions of charmonium states with the statistical hadronization model.Phys. Lett. B, 797:134836, 2019

    2019

  98. [106]

    Eller, Olaf Kaczmarek, Lukas Mazur, Guy D

    Luis Altenkort, Alexander M. Eller, Olaf Kaczmarek, Lukas Mazur, Guy D. Moore, and Hai-Tao Shu. Heavy quark momentum diffusion from the lattice using gradient flow.Phys. Rev. D, 103(1):014511, 2021

    2021

  99. [107]

    J/Psi Elliptic Flow in Pb-Pb Collisions at √𝑠NN = 2.76 TeV.Phys

    Ehab Abbas et al. J/Psi Elliptic Flow in Pb-Pb Collisions at √𝑠NN = 2.76 TeV.Phys. Rev. Lett., 111:162301, 2013

    2013

  100. [108]

    Collectivity of J/𝜓Mesons in Heavy-Ion Collisions

    Min He, Biaogang Wu, and Ralf Rapp. Collectivity of J/𝜓Mesons in Heavy-Ion Collisions. Phys. Rev. Lett., 128(16):162301, 2022

    2022

  101. [109]

    Charmed hadron production in an improved quark coalescence model.Phys

    Sungtae Cho, Kai-Jia Sun, Che Ming Ko, Su Houng Lee, and Yongseok Oh. Charmed hadron production in an improved quark coalescence model.Phys. Rev. C, 101(2):024909, 2020

    2020

  102. [110]

    Sequential Coalescence with Charm Conservation in High Energy Nuclear Collisions

    Jiaxing Zhao, Shuzhe Shi, Nu Xu, and Pengfei Zhuang. Sequential Coalescence with Charm Conservation in High Energy Nuclear Collisions. 5 2018

    2018

  103. [111]

    Exotic hadrons from heavy ion collisions.Prog

    Sungtae Cho et al. Exotic hadrons from heavy ion collisions.Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys., 95:279–322, 2017

    2017

  104. [112]

    Medium effects on charmonium production at ultrarelativistic energies available at the CERN Large Hadron Collider.Phys

    Kai Zhou, Nu Xu, Zhe Xu, and Pengfei Zhuang. Medium effects on charmonium production at ultrarelativistic energies available at the CERN Large Hadron Collider.Phys. Rev. C, 89(5):054911, 2014

    2014

  105. [113]

    Greco, C

    V. Greco, C. M. Ko, and R. Rapp. Quark coalescence for charmed mesons in ultrarelativistic heavy ion collisions.Phys. Lett. B, 595:202–208, 2004

    2004

  106. [114]

    Aarts et al

    G. Aarts et al. Heavy-flavor production and medium properties in high-energy nuclear collisions - What next?Eur. Phys. J. A, 53(5):93, 2017

    2017

  107. [115]

    GGI Lectures on Exotic Hadrons

    Luciano Maiani and Alessandro Pilloni. GGI Lectures on Exotic Hadrons. 7 2022

    2022

  108. [116]

    Prerequisites for heavy quark coalescence in heavy-ion collisions

    Taesoo Song and Gabriele Coci. Prerequisites for heavy quark coalescence in heavy-ion collisions. 4 2021

    2021

  109. [117]

    Measurement of inclusive𝐽/𝜓production at midrapidity and forward rapidity in Pb-Pb collisions at√𝑠𝑁𝑁 == 5.02 TeV

    Shreyasi Acharya et al. Measurement of inclusive𝐽/𝜓production at midrapidity and forward rapidity in Pb-Pb collisions at√𝑠𝑁𝑁 == 5.02 TeV. 2022

    2022

  110. [118]

    Braun-Munzinger and J

    P. Braun-Munzinger and J. Stachel. (Non)thermal aspects of charmonium production and a new look at J / psi suppression.Phys. Lett. B, 490:196–202, 2000

    2000

  111. [119]

    Andronic, P

    A. Andronic, P. Braun-Munzinger, K. Redlich, and J. Stachel. Statistical hadronization of charm at SPS, RHIC and LHC.Nucl. Phys. A, 715:529–532, 2003

    2003

  112. [120]

    Loic Grandchamp, Ralf Rapp, and Gerald E. Brown. In medium effects on charmonium production in heavy ion collisions.Phys. Rev. Lett., 92:212301, 2004

    2004

  113. [121]

    Production of multiply heavy flavored baryons from quark gluon plasma in relativistic heavy ion collisions.Phys

    Francesco Becattini. Production of multiply heavy flavored baryons from quark gluon plasma in relativistic heavy ion collisions.Phys. Rev. Lett., 95:022301, 2005

    2005

  114. [122]

    Andronic, P

    A. Andronic, P. Braun-Munzinger, K. Redlich, and J. Stachel. Statistical hadronization of heavy quarks in ultra-relativistic nucleus-nucleus collisions.Nucl. Phys. A, 789:334–356, 2007. The quark-gluon plasma: diagnosis with thermal hadron production.... 23

    2007

  115. [123]

    Emer- gence of new systematics for open charm production in high energy collisions.JHEP, 04:058, 2025

    Peter Braun-Munzinger, Krzysztof Redlich, Natasha Sharma, and Johanna Stachel. Emer- gence of new systematics for open charm production in high energy collisions.JHEP, 04:058, 2025

    2025

  116. [124]

    Matsui and H

    T. Matsui and H. Satz.𝐽/𝜓Suppression by Quark-Gluon Plasma Formation.Phys. Lett. B, 178:416–422, 1986

    1986

  117. [125]

    Letter of intent for ALICE 3: A next-generation heavy-ion experiment at the LHC. 11 2022

    2022

  118. [126]

    Measurements of Chemical Potentials in Pb-Pb Collisions at sNN=5.02 TeV.Phys

    Shreyasi Acharya et al. Measurements of Chemical Potentials in Pb-Pb Collisions at sNN=5.02 TeV.Phys. Rev. Lett., 133(9):092301, 2024

    2024

  119. [127]

    Bazavov et al

    A. Bazavov et al. The melting and abundance of open charm hadrons.Phys. Lett. B, 737:210–215, 2014

    2014

  120. [128]

    Bazavov, D

    A. Bazavov, D. Bollweg, O. Kaczmarek, F. Karsch, Swagato Mukherjee, P. Petreczky, C. Schmidt, and S. Sharma. Charm degrees of freedom in hot matter from lattice QCD. Phys. Lett. B, 850:138520, 2024

    2024

  121. [129]

    Thermal Charm and Char- monium Production in Quark Gluon Plasma.Phys

    Kai Zhou, Zhengyu Chen, Carsten Greiner, and Pengfei Zhuang. Thermal Charm and Char- monium Production in Quark Gluon Plasma.Phys. Lett. B, 758:434–439, 2016

    2016

  122. [130]

    Dainese et al

    A. Dainese et al. Heavy ions at the Future Circular Collider. 5 2016

    2016

  123. [131]

    Andronic, P

    A. Andronic, P. Braun-Munzinger, and J. Stachel. Hadron production in central nucleus- nucleus collisions at chemical freeze-out.Nucl. Phys. A, 772:167–199, 2006

    2006

  124. [132]

    Cleymans, H

    J. Cleymans, H. Oeschler, K. Redlich, and S. Wheaton. Comparison of chemical freeze-out criteria in heavy-ion collisions.Phys. Rev. C, 73:034905, 2006

    2006

  125. [133]

    Transverse dynamics of charmed hadrons in ultra- relativistic nuclear collisions.JHEP, 10:229, 2024

    Anton Andronic, Peter Braun-Munzinger, Hjalmar Brunßen, Jana Crkovsk´a, Johanna Stachel, Vytautas Vislavicius, and Martin V ¨olkl. Transverse dynamics of charmed hadrons in ultra- relativistic nuclear collisions.JHEP, 10:229, 2024

    2024

  126. [134]

    A Thermodynamical approach to hadron production in e+ e- collisions

    Francesco Becattini. A Thermodynamical approach to hadron production in e+ e- collisions. Z. Phys. C, 69(3):485–492, 1996

    1996

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.