Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 4 minor 2 cited by

Matrix-product state skeletons in Onsager-integrable quantum chains

T0 review · 1 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-03 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper proves that interacting N-state chiral clock chains have a dense family of Hamiltonians with exact matrix-product ground states, extending the free-fermion MPS skeleton to non-free models.

desk verdict A serious, worthwhile generalization of the MPS-skeleton program to interacting N>2 clock chains, but the proof of the key representation-lifting step is not fully closed and needs either an argument or a small numerical check. read the letter →

arxiv 2511.07212 v2 pith:GCHDUKHO submitted 2025-11-10 quant-ph cond-mat.stat-mechcond-mat.str-elmath-phmath.MP

Imogen Camp , Nick G. Jones This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-phcond-mat.stat-mechcond-mat.str-elmath-phmath.MP
keywords MPSskeletonOnsageralgebrachiralclockmodelsexactmatrix-productgroundstatesintegrablequantumchainsdisorderparameterSchur-Cohncoefficientsdense
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper asks whether the 'MPS skeleton'—a dense network of Hamiltonians whose ground states are exactly matrix-product states—exists beyond free-fermion models. It answers yes for N-state Onsager-integrable chiral clock chains: whenever the Hamiltonian's Laurent polynomial f(z) factors as ±z^p g(z)^2, the model has an exact eigenstate of the form exp(−β_d A_{p+d})…exp(−β_1 A_{p+1})|ψ±_p⟩, which is an MPS. In the gapped regions surrounding the fixed-point generators A_k, this state is the ground state, and the skeleton is dense there, giving an analytic MPS approximation to any gapped ground state. The paper also constructs exact MPS excited states for even p and, as an application, computes the disorder parameter ⟨µ_k⟩ = √(1−a²) for the family A_0 + 2a A_1 + a² A_2 for all even N. Much of the argument uses only the Onsager algebra and is representation-independent, going beyond the chiral-clock setting.

What carries the argument

The Onsager algebra with generators {A_m, G_m} and the pivot relation e^{β A_m} A_l e^{-β A_m} = cosh²(β/2) A_l + sinh(β) G_{m-l} − sinh²(β/2) A_{2m-l}. Conjugating the skeleton Hamiltonian by a product of such exponentials reduces it (in the free-fermion representation and via an argument that the form is representation-independent) to a combination Σ r_α (A_α + G_α) that leaves the fixed-point ground state |ψ_0⟩ invariant. The coefficients b_k from the Schur-Cohn algorithm control the parameters β_k; the resulting state is an MPS because each exponential is a local MPO acting on a product state.

What would settle it

Numerically diagonalize a small chiral-clock chain with N=3 (or N=4) for a skeleton Hamiltonian with degree d=2 polynomial g (e.g., g(z)=1+a z + c z^2 with all |b_k|≠1) and check whether the explicitly constructed MPS |φ⟩ satisfies H_A|φ⟩ = E|φ⟩ up to machine precision. If it fails for a generic such case, the representation-lifting assumption breaks.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

For Hamiltonians H_A = Σ t_m A_m built from the Onsager algebra generators A_m in the N-state chiral clock representation, if the Laurent polynomial f(z) = Σ t_m z^m has the factorized form f(z) = ±z^p g(z)^2 with g a polynomial, then H_A has an exact eigenstate |φ⟩ = exp(−β_d A_{p+d})...exp(−β_1 A_{p+1})|ψ±_p⟩, where β_k = 2 arctanh(b_k) and the b_k are Schur-Cohn coefficients of g. This state is an exact MPS. When H_A lies in a gapped region around a fixed-point generator A_k, |φ⟩ is the ground state. The skeleton is dense in those gapped regions, so any gapped ground state can be approached by such MPS. For even p, analogous MPS eigenstates give low-lying excited states. As an application

Load-bearing premise

The claim that the transformed Hamiltonian's coefficient form, computed in the N=2 Majorana representation, survives in every other representation of the Onsager algebra—that is, the short-range operators {A_l, G_m} have no additional linear relations in the chiral-clock representations.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For every N, the chiral-clock Hamiltonians whose Laurent polynomial is a perfect square (up to a monomial and sign) have exact MPS eigenstates, so these interacting integrable chains share an analytic structure previously known only for the N=2 free-fermion class.
  • The MPS skeleton is dense in the gapped regions around the Onsager generators: any gapped ground state in those regions can be approximated arbitrarily closely in energy density by an explicit MPS state, providing an analytic complement to numerical tensor-network methods.
  • In the d=1 family H_A = A_0 + 2a A_1 + a^2 A_2, the disorder parameter equals √(1−a²) for every even N, extending the known N=2 result to interacting chains.
  • For even p, the lowest excited states at zero and finite momentum are also exact MPS eigenstates, a feature that goes beyond the ground-state-only analysis of the free-fermion skeleton.
  • Because the core steps rely on the Onsager algebra, the same construction applies in principle to any finite-dimensional representation with appropriate properties, not only the chiral clock models.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • We infer that the skeleton may give a new route to correlation functions beyond the superintegrable line: taking limits along skeleton paths (as the paper suggests for determinantal formulas) could yield closed expressions for order/disorder parameters in more general Onsager-integrable chains.
  • We infer that the exact excited-state MPS can serve as a diagnostic for phase boundaries: the gap in a gapped region must close when one of these excited states becomes degenerate with the ground state, giving concrete variational bounds on the boundary location.
  • We infer that, by analogy with the N=2 case where the |b_k|≠1 restriction was removed in later work, the corresponding singular cases for N>2 might also admit MPS ground states through limiting arguments, extending the skeleton to the full measure-zero set.
  • We infer that the MPS forms constructed here could be used as high-quality initial states for numerical algorithms and as a testbed for exploring frustration-free properties in interacting chains.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies N-state chiral clock chains whose Hamiltonians are linear combinations of Onsager algebra generators A_m. For Laurent polynomials f(z)=±z^p g(z)^2, it constructs states |φ⟩=M^(d)⋯M^(1)|ψ±_p⟩ with M^(k)=exp(∓2 arctanh(b_k)A_{p+k}) and claims they are exact eigenstates (Result 1), exact ground states when H_A lies in the gapped set S (Result 2), that such 'skeleton' Hamiltonians are dense in S (Result 3), and that analogous exact MPS eigenstates exist for low-lying excitations (Result 4). It also derives ⟨µ_k⟩=√(1−a²) for the disorder parameter in the d=1 family. The proof strategy is to conjugate H_A using the Onsager algebra, compute the coefficients in the N=2 free-fermion representation, and lift the resulting operator identity to all N.

Significance. If valid, these results are a substantial advance: they carry the MPS-skeleton program beyond free-fermion systems into genuinely interacting chiral clock chains, provide exact MPS eigenstates (not only ground states), give a density statement with an explicit approximation scheme, and produce a closed-form disorder parameter. The paper includes reproducible algorithmic definitions (Schur-Cohn coefficients and the r_α routine) and clearly separates what is representation-independent from what is clock-model-specific. The main caveat is the unproved representation-lift of the central operator identity.

major comments (1)
  1. [§5.1, Eq. (61)] The representation-lift is the load-bearing step: r_α are computed in the N=2 Majorana representation, and the paper argues they remain valid for all N by ruling out representation-specific cancellations with a range argument. That argument only excludes relations involving order-L generators; it does not rule out L-independent relations among the short-range set {A_l,G_m: |l|,|m|≤d}. Finite-dimensional Onsager representations do satisfy linear relations (see §4), and the d=1 case is not a test because Eq. (24) follows algebraically. Please prove the needed linear independence (e.g., via the sl(2) decomposition) or verify Eq. (61) numerically for d=2, N=3. Without this, Results 1–3 remain conditional.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§5.1, after Eq. (60)] The parenthetical 'G_k = G_{−k}' is a sign typo. Eq. (51) gives G_{−k} = −G_k, and the d=1 derivation of Eq. (24) uses this antisymmetry.
  2. [§2.1, Eq. (16)] The notation |φ^(P)_{E_0+1/N, p=0}⟩ is defined only in Eq. (17); consider defining it before Eq. (16) to avoid forward-reference confusion.
  3. [Appendix B] The displayed circulant matrices T and B are difficult to read because of the ellipses and missing entries. A symbolic definition with F_1,F_2 is available and is clearer; the matrix display can be simplified or removed.
  4. [§5.2.2] When |b_k|>1, the path connecting H_A(s) to the fixed-point Hamiltonian A_l is asserted but not spelled out. A short explicit description of the path and why it stays in S would strengthen Result 2.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No circular reduction found; the main weakness is an unproved representation-lift in Sec. 5.1, which is a correctness gap rather than a circular step.

full rationale

The derivation of Results 1-4 does not reduce to its inputs by construction. The MPS eigenstate construction is anchored in the Onsager algebra via the pivot relation Eq. (11), the N=2 free-fermion representation from Ref. [19], and a representation-independence argument in Sec. 5.1. The paper's principal unproved step is the lift of Eq. (61) from the N=2 Majorana computation to all N: the range-counting argument ("we would need the transformation Eq. (54) to produce generators Al, Gm with l,m of order L") rules out only relations involving order-L generators and does not exclude fixed short-range relations in finite-dimensional Onsager representations. This is a missing proof / potential falsifiability concern, not a circular reduction: the N>2 claims do not follow by definition from the N=2 computation, and a counterexample with N=3, d>=2 would invalidate them. The use of Ref. [19] is self-citation, but it is used as a known special case and computational anchor rather than as a premise that already contains the N>2 result; the paper candidly states in the Outlook: "it is not fully independent, since we utilise features of the frustration-free form of the Hamiltonian derived in this work." The disorder-parameter result is derived by a transfer-matrix calculation (Appendix B), not imported from the N=2 formula. No equation in the paper fits a parameter and then renames it a prediction, and no uniqueness theorem is invoked to force the choice. Hence the circularity burden is low; score 2 reflects the admitted dependence on prior self-authored machinery, not a circular derivation.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No fitted or ad-hoc numerical parameters: the couplings t_m/s_k parametrize the Hamiltonian family, and b_k, β_k = 2 arctanh(b_k), r_α are derived deterministically (Algorithms 1-2, §5.1) from those couplings. No new entities are postulated; the MPS states are assembled from the existing Onsager algebra, its fixed-point ground states, and the pivot unitaries. The axioms above are the load-bearing external inputs, dominated by the §5.1 lifting assumption and the S-structure inherited from prior (partly numerical) work.

assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption The chiral clock operators A_m (Eq. 9 plus pivots) form a representation of the Onsager algebra (Eq. 4) on chains with L ≡ 0 mod N.
    Invoked throughout (Section 2.1). L ≡ 0 mod N is needed for the odd-p and −A_p ground-state bases (Appendix D).
  • ad hoc to paper The transformed Hamiltonian's coefficients computed in the N=2 Majorana representation (Eq. 61) transfer to all representations without representation-specific cancellations.
    Section 5.1 ('provided we do not have any representation-specific cancellations'); justified by an operator-range argument for L ≫ d, p, not by a faithfulness proof. This is the step that makes the N>2 interacting results follow from the N=2 computation.
  • domain assumption The single-particle excitations |ϕ^(P)_{E0+1/N}⟩ (Eq. 17) simultaneously diagonalize (A_n + G_n) for all n.
    Appendix A; used to prove Result 4. Requires the clock-model single-particle spectrum (energy E_0 + 1/N) and translation eigenstates; relies on Ref [31] for the spectrum.
  • domain assumption The gapped regions S around each fixed point A_k, and the ground-state energy inside S, are as determined by Refs [26,28-30] and the numerical phase diagrams of Ref [31].
    Defines the domain of Result 2 and fixes ε_0 (Eq. 47); for N>2 the phase boundaries in Fig. 1 are numerically determined (Ref [31]), not proven here.
  • standard math While the gap remains open, the ground-state projector is analytic in the Hamiltonian parameters (Kato perturbation theory).
    Section 5.2, Ref [82]; the backbone of Result 2's ground-state certification.
  • standard math Properties of the Schur transform: a zero of g(z) on the unit circle forces some |b_k| = 1 (Appendix E).
    Used to relate the |b_k|=1 breakdown set to gaplessness and to exclude those points from the construction.
  • domain assumption The pivot unitaries U_m = e^{−iπA_m} (Eq. 12) relate all A_k to A_0/A_1 and keep each A_m local with range ≤ |m|.
    Section 2.1; locality is required for the MPS/MPO representation and the density proof; established for the clock models in Ref [31].

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Matrix-product state skeletons in Onsager-integrable quantum chains." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/GCHDUKHO

@misc{pith2026251107212,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Matrix-product state skeletons in Onsager-integrable quantum chains},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/GCHDUKHO}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2511.07212}
}
abstract

Matrix-product state (MPS) skeletons are connected networks of Hamiltonians with exact MPS ground states that underlie a phase diagram. Such skeletons have previously been found in classes of free-fermion models. For the translation-invariant BDI and AIII free-fermion classes, it has been shown that the underlying skeleton is dense, giving an analytic approach to MPS approximation of ground states anywhere in the class. In this paper, we partially expose the skeleton in certain interacting spin chains: the $N$-state Onsager-integrable chiral clock families. We construct MPS that form a dense MPS skeleton in the gapped regions surrounding a sequence of fixed-point Hamiltonians (the generators of the Onsager algebra). Outside these gapped regions, these MPS remain eigenstates, but no longer give the many-body ground state. Rather, they are ground states in particular sectors of the spectrum. Our methods also allow us to find further MPS eigenstates; these correspond to low-lying excited states within the aforementioned gapped regions. This set of MPS excited states goes beyond the previous analysis of ground states on the $N=2$ free-fermion MPS skeleton. As an application of our results, we find a closed form for the disorder parameter in a family of interacting models. Finally, we remark that many of our results use only the Onsager algebra and are not specific to the chiral clock model representation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2511.07212 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Schematic phase diagrams for the Hamiltonian H = αA0 +βA1 +γA2 with normalisation α + β + γ = 1. The winding number of f(z) is denoted by ω. The coloured regions are gapped and connected to fixed point Ak, therefore corresponding to the intersection of the set S with the phase diagram. The white regions are gapless and outside S. For N = 2, the phase diagram is well-understood [17, 18]. Diagrams for N = 3, 4 were fo… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. (a) The circuit diagram for the d = 1 ground state. This can be interpreted as an MPO acting on a product state, giving an MPS. The blue boxes represent each unitary gate Uj,j+1, and the |vj ⟩ are the single-site states. (b) The MPS tensor from Eq. (33). (A1 + G1)|ψ0⟩ ∝ |ψ0⟩ (A1 + G1)|ϕ (P) E0+1/N, p=0⟩ ∝ |ϕ (P) E0+1/N, p=0⟩ . (26) The states |ψ0⟩ and |ϕ (P) E0+1/N, p=0⟩ are therefore eigenstates of H˜A. In fact, we… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Entanglement Pattern Transition of Quantum States from Directed Percolation

    quant-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    Mapping the Domany-Kinzel automaton to isoTNS yields a 2D quantum state with algebraic correlations whose continuous parent Hamiltonian exhibits a degenerate manifold containing an entanglement-pattern transition at t...

  2. Spectral signatures of nonstabilizerness and criticality in infinite matrix product states

    quant-ph 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The stabilizer Rényi entropy of an infinite matrix product state decomposes into bulk, boundary, and exponentially decaying parts, and the associated 'magic correlation length' diverges at criticality with a different...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

89 extracted references · 7 linked inside Pith · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [19]

    Jones, J

    N.G. Jones, J. Bibo, B. Jobst, F. Pollmann, A. Smith and R. Verresen,Skeleton of matrix-product-state-solvable models connecting topological phases of matter,Physical Review Research3(2021)

    2021

  2. [1]

    Korepin, N

    V.E. Korepin, N. Bogoliubov and A. Izergin,Quantum inverse scattering method and correlation functions, vol. 3, Cambridge University Press (1997)

    1997

  3. [2]

    Baxter,Exactly solved models in statistical mechanics, Elsevier (2016)

    R.J. Baxter,Exactly solved models in statistical mechanics, Elsevier (2016)

    2016

  4. [3]

    White,Density matrix formulation for quantum renormalization groups,Phys

    S.R. White,Density matrix formulation for quantum renormalization groups,Phys. Rev. Lett.69(1992) 2863

    1992

  5. [4]

    Schollwöck,The density-matrix renormalization group in the age of matrix product states,Annals of Physics 326(2011) 96–192

    U. Schollwöck,The density-matrix renormalization group in the age of matrix product states,Annals of Physics 326(2011) 96–192

    2011

  6. [5]

    Hastings,An area law for one-dimensional quantum systems,Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment2007(2007) P08024–P08024

    M.B. Hastings,An area law for one-dimensional quantum systems,Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment2007(2007) P08024–P08024

    2007

  7. [6]

    Cirac, D

    J.I. Cirac, D. Pérez-García, N. Schuch and F. Verstraete,Matrix product states and projected entangled pair states: Concepts, symmetries, theorems,Rev. Mod. Phys.93(2021) 045003

    2021

  8. [7]

    Affleck, T

    I. Affleck, T. Kennedy, E.H. Lieb and H. Tasaki,Rigorous results on valence-bond ground states in antiferromagnets,Phys. Rev. Lett.59(1987) 799

    1987

Show all 89 references
  1. [8]

    Pollmann, A.M

    F. Pollmann, A.M. Turner, E. Berg and M. Oshikawa,Entanglement spectrum of a topological phase in one dimension,Phys. Rev. B81(2010) 064439

    2010

  2. [9]

    Chen, Z.-C

    X. Chen, Z.-C. Gu and X.-G. Wen,Classification of gapped symmetric phases in one-dimensional spin systems, Phys. Rev. B83(2011) 035107

    2011

  3. [10]

    Schuch, D

    N. Schuch, D. Pérez-García and I. Cirac,Classifying quantum phases using matrix product states and projected entangled pair states,Phys. Rev. B84(2011) 165139

    2011

  4. [11]

    Turner, F

    A.M. Turner, F. Pollmann and E. Berg,Topological phases of one-dimensional fermions: An entanglement point of view,Phys. Rev. B83(2011) 075102

    2011

  5. [12]

    Barouch and B.M

    E. Barouch and B.M. McCoy,Statistical Mechanics of theXYModel. II. Spin-Correlation Functions,Phys. Rev. A3(1971) 786

    1971

  6. [13]

    Kurmann, H

    J. Kurmann, H. Thomas and G. Müller,Antiferromagnetic long-range order in the anisotropic quantum spin chain,Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications112(1982) 235

    1982

  7. [14]

    Müller and R.E

    G. Müller and R.E. Shrock,Implications of direct-product ground states in the one-dimensional quantum XYZ and XY spin chains,Phys. Rev. B32(1985) 5845

    1985

  8. [15]

    Chung and I

    M.-C. Chung and I. Peschel,Density-matrix spectra of solvable fermionic systems,Phys. Rev. B64(2001) 064412

    2001

  9. [16]

    Franchini, A.R

    F. Franchini, A.R. Its and V.E. Korepin,Renyi entropy of the XY spin chain,Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical41(2007) 025302. MPS SKELETONS IN ONSAGER-INTEGRABLE CHAINS 21

    2007

  10. [17]

    M.M. Wolf, G. Ortiz, F. Verstraete and J.I. Cirac,Quantum Phase Transitions in Matrix Product Systems,Phys. Rev. Lett.97(2006) 110403

    2006

  11. [18]

    Smith, B

    A. Smith, B. Jobst, A.G. Green and F. Pollmann,Crossing a topological phase transition with a quantum computer,Phys. Rev. Res.4(2022) L022020

    2022

  12. [20]

    Jones and R

    N.G. Jones and R. Verresen,Exact correlations in topological quantum chains,Symmetry, Integrability and Geometry: Methods and Applications(2023)

    2023

  13. [21]

    Altland and M.R

    A. Altland and M.R. Zirnbauer,Nonstandard symmetry classes in mesoscopic normal-superconducting hybrid structures,Phys. Rev. B55(1997) 1142

    1997

  14. [22]

    E. Lieb, T. Schultz and D. Mattis,Two soluble models of an antiferromagnetic chain,Annals of Physics16(1961) 407

    1961

  15. [23]

    Franchini, A

    F. Franchini, A. Its, V.E. Korepin and L.A. Takhtajan,Spectrum of the density matrix of a large block of spins of the XY model in one dimension,Quantum Information Processing10(2011) 325

    2011

  16. [24]

    Onsager,Crystal statistics

    L. Onsager,Crystal statistics. 1. A Two-dimensional model with an order disorder transition,Phys. Rev.65(1944) 117

    1944

  17. [25]

    Dolan and M

    L. Dolan and M. Grady,Conserved charges from self-duality,Phys. Rev. D25(1982) 1587

    1982

  18. [26]

    Ahn and K

    C. Ahn and K. Shigemoto,Onsager algebra and integrable lattice models,Mod. Phys. Lett. A6(1991) 3509

    1991

  19. [27]

    von Gehlen and V

    G. von Gehlen and V. Rittenberg,Zn-symmetric quantum chains with an infinite set of conserved charges andZn zero modes,Nuclear Physics B257(1985) 351

    1985

  20. [28]

    Baxter,The superintegrable chiral Potts model,Phys

    R.J. Baxter,The superintegrable chiral Potts model,Phys. Lett. A133(1988) 185

    1988

  21. [29]

    Baxter,Superintegrable chiral Potts model: Thermodynamic properties, an inverse model and a simple associated Hamiltonian,J

    R.J. Baxter,Superintegrable chiral Potts model: Thermodynamic properties, an inverse model and a simple associated Hamiltonian,J. Statist. Phys.57(1989) 1

    1989

  22. [30]

    Davies,Onsager’s algebra and superintegrability,Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General23(1990) 2245

    B. Davies,Onsager’s algebra and superintegrability,Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General23(1990) 2245

    1990

  23. [31]

    Jones, A

    N.G. Jones, A. Prakash and P. Fendley,Pivoting through the chiral-clock family,SciPost Physics18(2025)

    2025

  24. [32]

    Jones, R

    N.G. Jones, R. Thorngren, R. Verresen and A. Prakash,Charge pumps, pivot Hamiltonians, and symmetry-protected topological phases,Phys. Rev. B112(2025) 165123

    2025

  25. [33]

    Vernier, E

    E. Vernier, E. O’Brien and P. Fendley,Onsager symmetries inU(1)-invariant clock models,Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment2019(2019) 043107

    2019

  26. [34]

    Gioia and R

    L. Gioia and R. Thorngren,Exact Chiral Symmetries of 3+1D Hamiltonian Lattice Fermions,2503.07708

    arXiv

  27. [35]

    S.D. Pace, A. Chatterjee and S.-H. Shao,Lattice T-duality from non-invertible symmetries in quantum spin chains, SciPost Phys.18(2025) 121

    2025

  28. [36]

    Su,Z 2 gauging and self-dualities of theXXmodel and its cousins,Phys

    L. Su,Z 2 gauging and self-dualities of theXXmodel and its cousins,Phys. Rev. B112(2025) 035105

    2025

  29. [37]

    Roan,Eigenvectors of an Arbitrary Onsager Sector in Superintegrableτ(2)-model and Chiral Potts Model, 1003.3621

    S.-S. Roan,Eigenvectors of an Arbitrary Onsager Sector in Superintegrableτ(2)-model and Chiral Potts Model, 1003.3621

    arXiv

  30. [38]

    McCoy,The chiral Potts model: From physics to mathematics and back, inICM-90 Satellite Conference Proceedings: Special Functions, pp

    B.M. McCoy,The chiral Potts model: From physics to mathematics and back, inICM-90 Satellite Conference Proceedings: Special Functions, pp. 245–259, Springer, 1991

    1991

  31. [39]

    Von Gehlen and S.-S

    G. Von Gehlen and S.-S. Roan,The Superintegrable Chiral Potts Quantum Chain and Generalized Chebyshev Polynomials, inIntegrable Structures of Exactly Solvable Two-Dimensional Models of Quantum Field Theory, S. Pakuliak and G. von Gehlen, eds., (Dordrecht), pp. 155–172, Springe...

    2001

  32. [40]

    Albertini, B.M

    G. Albertini, B.M. McCoy and J.H.H. Perk,Eigenvalue spectrum of the superintegrable chiral Potts model, in Advanced Studies in Pure Mathematics, vol. 19, pp. 1–55, 1989

    1989

  33. [41]

    Dasmahapatra, R

    S. Dasmahapatra, R. Kedem and B.M. McCoy,Spectrum and completeness of the three state superintegrable chiral Potts model,Nucl. Phys. B396(1993) 506 [hep-th/9204003]

    1993 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Iorgov, S

    N. Iorgov, S. Pakuliak, V. Shadura, Y. Tykhyy and G. von Gehlen,Spin operator matrix elements in the superintegrable chiral potts quantum chain,Journal of Statistical Physics139(2010) 743–768

    2010

  35. [43]

    Au-Yang and J.H

    H. Au-Yang and J.H. Perk,Eigenvectors in the superintegrable model I: generators,Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical41(2008) 275201

    2008

  36. [44]

    Au-Yang and J.H

    H. Au-Yang and J.H. Perk,Eigenvectors in the superintegrable model II: ground-state sector,Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical42(2009) 375208

    2009

  37. [45]

    Albertini, B.M

    G. Albertini, B.M. McCoy and J.H.H. Perk,Level Crossing Transitions and the Massless Phases of the Superintegrable Chiral Potts Chain,Phys. Lett. A139(1989) 204

    1989

  38. [46]

    Verresen, N.G

    R. Verresen, N.G. Jones and F. Pollmann,Topology and edge modes in quantum critical chains,Physical Review Letters120(2018)

    2018

  39. [47]

    Jones and R

    N.G. Jones and R. Verresen,Asymptotic correlations in gapped and critical topological phases of 1d quantum systems,Journal of Statistical Physics175(2019) 1164–1213

    2019

  40. [48]

    Albertini, B.M

    G. Albertini, B.M. McCoy, J.H. Perk and S. Tang,Excitation spectrum and order parameter for the integrable N-state chiral Potts model,Nuclear Physics B314(1989) 741

    1989

  41. [49]

    von Gehlen,IntegrableZ n-Chiral Potts Model: The Missing Rapidity-Momentum Relation,hep-th/9601001

    G. von Gehlen,IntegrableZ n-Chiral Potts Model: The Missing Rapidity-Momentum Relation,hep-th/9601001

    arXiv

  42. [50]

    Suzuki,Relationship among Exactly Soluble Models of Critical Phenomena

    M. Suzuki,Relationship among Exactly Soluble Models of Critical Phenomena. I*) 2D Ising Model, Dimer Problem and the Generalized XY-Model,Progress of Theoretical Physics46(1971) 1337

    1971

  43. [51]

    Keating and F

    J. Keating and F. Mezzadri,Random matrix theory and entanglement in quantum spin chains,Communications in Mathematical Physics252(2004) 543–579

    2004

  44. [52]

    Smacchia, L

    P. Smacchia, L. Amico, P. Facchi, R. Fazio, G. Florio, S. Pascazio et al.,Statistical mechanics of the cluster Ising model,Phys. Rev. A84(2011) 022304. MPS SKELETONS IN ONSAGER-INTEGRABLE CHAINS 22

    2011

  45. [53]

    DeGottardi, M

    W. DeGottardi, M. Thakurathi, S. Vishveshwara and D. Sen,Majorana fermions in superconducting wires: Effects of long-range hopping, broken time-reversal symmetry, and potential landscapes,Phys. Rev. B88(2013) 165111

    2013

  46. [54]

    T. Ohta, S. Tanaka, I. Danshita and K. Totsuka,Topological and dynamical properties of a generalized cluster model in one dimension,Phys. Rev. B93(2016) 165423

    2016

  47. [55]

    Verresen, R

    R. Verresen, R. Moessner and F. Pollmann,One-dimensional symmetry protected topological phases and their transitions,Phys. Rev. B96(2017) 165124

    2017

  48. [56]

    Haegeman, B

    J. Haegeman, B. Pirvu, D.J. Weir, J.I. Cirac, T.J. Osborne, H. Verschelde et al.,Variational matrix product ansatz for dispersion relations,Phys. Rev. B85(2012) 100408

    2012

  49. [57]

    Haegeman, S

    J. Haegeman, S. Michalakis, B. Nachtergaele, T.J. Osborne, N. Schuch and F. Verstraete,Elementary excitations in gapped quantum spin systems,Phys. Rev. Lett.111(2013) 080401

    2013

  50. [58]

    Baxter,The challenge of the chiral Potts model, inJournal of Physics: Conference Series, vol

    R. Baxter,The challenge of the chiral Potts model, inJournal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 42, p. 11, IOP Publishing, 2006

    2006

  51. [59]

    Baxter,The Order Parameter of the Chiral Potts Model,Journal of Statistical Physics120(2005) 1–36

    R.J. Baxter,The Order Parameter of the Chiral Potts Model,Journal of Statistical Physics120(2005) 1–36

    2005

  52. [60]

    Tantivasadakarn, R

    N. Tantivasadakarn, R. Thorngren, A. Vishwanath and R. Verresen,Pivot Hamiltonians as generators of symmetry and entanglement,SciPost Phys.14(2023) 012

    2023

  53. [61]

    Kramers and G.H

    H.A. Kramers and G.H. Wannier,Statistics of the Two-Dimensional Ferromagnet. Part II,Phys. Rev.60(1941) 263

    1941

  54. [62]

    Aasen, P

    D. Aasen, P. Fendley and R.S.K. Mong,Topological defects on the lattice: Dualities and degeneracies,2008.08598

    2008 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Fjelstad and T

    J. Fjelstad and T. Mansson,New symmetries of the chiral Potts model,J. Phys. A45(2012) 155208 [1109.6503]

    2012 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Minami,Onsager algebra and algebraic generalization of Jordan-Wigner transformation,Nucl

    K. Minami,Onsager algebra and algebraic generalization of Jordan-Wigner transformation,Nucl. Phys. B973 (2021) 115599 [2108.03811]

    2021 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Miao,Generalised Onsager Algebra in Quantum Lattice Models,SciPost Phys.13(2022) 070

    Y. Miao,Generalised Onsager Algebra in Quantum Lattice Models,SciPost Phys.13(2022) 070

    2022

  58. [66]

    Perk,Star-triangle equations, quantum Lax pairs, and higher genus curves,Theta Functions–Bowdoin 1987 49(1989) 341

    J.H. Perk,Star-triangle equations, quantum Lax pairs, and higher genus curves,Theta Functions–Bowdoin 1987 49(1989) 341

    1987

  59. [67]

    Davies,Onsager’s algebra and the Dolan–Grady condition in the non-self-dual case,Journal of Mathematical Physics32(1991) 2945

    B. Davies,Onsager’s algebra and the Dolan–Grady condition in the non-self-dual case,Journal of Mathematical Physics32(1991) 2945

    1991

  60. [68]

    Perk,The early history of the integrable chiral Potts model and the odd–even problem,Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical49(2016) 153001

    J.H.H. Perk,The early history of the integrable chiral Potts model and the odd–even problem,Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical49(2016) 153001

    2016

  61. [69]

    Naudts, T

    J. Naudts, T. Verhulst and B. Anthonis,Counting operator analysis of the discrete spectrum of some model Hamiltonians,Physics Letters A373(2009) 3419–3422

    2009

  62. [70]

    O’Brien, E

    E. O’Brien, E. Vernier and P. Fendley,“Not-A”, representation symmetry-protected topological, and Potts phases in anS 3-invariant chain,Phys. Rev. B101(2020) 235108

    2020

  63. [71]

    Verresen et al, to appear

    R. Verresen et al, to appear

  64. [72]

    Schur,Über Potenzreihen, die im Innern des Einheitskreises beschränkt sind.,Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik148(1918) 122

    J. Schur,Über Potenzreihen, die im Innern des Einheitskreises beschränkt sind.,Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik148(1918) 122

    1918

  65. [73]

    Cohn,Über die anzahl der wurzeln einer algebraischen gleichung in einem kreise,Mathematische Zeitschrift14 (1922) 110

    A. Cohn,Über die anzahl der wurzeln einer algebraischen gleichung in einem kreise,Mathematische Zeitschrift14 (1922) 110

    1922

  66. [74]

    Bratteli, A

    O. Bratteli, A. Kishimoto and D.W. Robinson,Ground states of quantum spin systems,Communications in Mathematical Physics64(1978) 41

    1978

  67. [75]

    Fradkin and L.P

    E.H. Fradkin and L.P. Kadanoff,Disorder Variables and Parafermions in Two-dimensional Statistical Mechanics, Nucl. Phys. B170(1980) 1

    1980

  68. [76]

    Fendley,Parafermionic edge zero modes inZn-invariant spin chains,Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment2012(2012) P11020

    P. Fendley,Parafermionic edge zero modes inZn-invariant spin chains,Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment2012(2012) P11020

    2012

  69. [77]

    Xu and G.-M

    W.-T. Xu and G.-M. Zhang,Matrix product states for topological phases with parafermions,Phys. Rev. B95 (2017) 195122

    2017

  70. [78]

    Davis,Circulant Matrices, Wiley (1979)

    P.J. Davis,Circulant Matrices, Wiley (1979)

    1979

  71. [79]

    Roan,Onsager’s Algebra, Loop Algebra and Chiral Potts Model,MPIM Preprint Series 1991 (70).(1991)

    S.-S. Roan,Onsager’s Algebra, Loop Algebra and Chiral Potts Model,MPIM Preprint Series 1991 (70).(1991)

    1991

  72. [80]

    Nishino and T

    A. Nishino and T. Deguchi,The symmetry of the Bazhanov–Stroganov model associated with the superintegrable chiral Potts model,Physics Letters A356(2006) 366–370

    2006

  73. [81]

    Cardy,Critical exponents of the chiral potts model from conformal field theory,Nuclear Physics B389(1993) 577

    J.L. Cardy,Critical exponents of the chiral potts model from conformal field theory,Nuclear Physics B389(1993) 577

    1993

  74. [82]

    Kato,Perturbation theory in a finite-dimensional-space, inPerturbation Theory for Linear Operators, pp

    T. Kato,Perturbation theory in a finite-dimensional-space, inPerturbation Theory for Linear Operators, pp. 62–126, Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, 1966

    1966

  75. [83]

    Wouters, H

    J. Wouters, H. Katsura and D. Schuricht,Interrelations among frustration-free models via Witten’s conjugation, SciPost Phys. Core4(2021) 027

    2021

  76. [84]

    Baxter,Proof of the determinantal form of the spontaneous magnetization of the superintegrable chiral potts model,The ANZIAM Journal51(2010) 309–316

    R.J. Baxter,Proof of the determinantal form of the spontaneous magnetization of the superintegrable chiral potts model,The ANZIAM Journal51(2010) 309–316

    2010

  77. [85]

    Alcaraz and M.J

    F.C. Alcaraz and M.J. Lazo,The Bethe ansatz as a matrix product ansatz,Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General37(2003) L1

    2003

  78. [86]

    Katsura and I

    H. Katsura and I. Maruyama,Derivation of the matrix product ansatz for the Heisenberg chain from the algebraic Bethe ansatz,Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical43(2010) 175003

    2010

  79. [87]

    Murg, V.E

    V. Murg, V.E. Korepin and F. Verstraete,Algebraic bethe ansatz and tensor networks,Physical Review B86 (2012)

    2012

  80. [88]

    R. Ruiz, A. Sopena, M.H. Gordon, G. Sierra and E. López,The Bethe ansatz as a quantum circuit,Quantum8 (2024) 1356. MPS SKELETONS IN ONSAGER-INTEGRABLE CHAINS 23

    2024

  81. [89]

    Shibata, N

    N. Shibata, N. Yoshioka and H. Katsura,Onsager’s scars in disordered spin chains,Phys. Rev. Lett.124(2020) 180604. AppendixA.Properties of(A n +G n) To prove Eq. (16), we note that the Onsager algebra admits the ladder operatorsRm,l andR † m,l given by [69] Rm,l = 1 2 [Am, Al]...

    2020

Pith tools

Reviewed August 3, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.