Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Mark Your LLM: Detecting the Misuse of Open-Source Large Language Models via Watermarking

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2503.04636 v2 pith:GI4J6NAK submitted 2025-03-06 cs.CL cs.AIcs.CRcs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.CRcs.LG
keywords llmswatermarkingopen-sourcemisusewatermarksbackdoordetectmethods
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

As open-source large language models (LLMs) like Llama3 become more capable, it is crucial to develop watermarking techniques to detect their potential misuse. Existing watermarking methods either add watermarks during LLM inference, which is unsuitable for open-source LLMs, or primarily target classification LLMs rather than recent generative LLMs. Adapting these watermarks to open-source LLMs for misuse detection remains an open challenge. This work defines two misuse scenarios for open-source LLMs: intellectual property (IP) violation and LLM Usage Violation. Then, we explore the application of inference-time watermark distillation and backdoor watermarking in these contexts. We propose comprehensive evaluation methods to assess the impact of various real-world further fine-tuning scenarios on watermarks and the effect of these watermarks on LLM performance. Our experiments reveal that backdoor watermarking could effectively detect IP Violation, while inference-time watermark distillation is applicable in both scenarios but less robust to further fine-tuning and has a more significant impact on LLM performance compared to backdoor watermarking. Exploring more advanced watermarking methods for open-source LLMs to detect their misuse should be an important future direction.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. PathMark: Protecting Intellectual Property of Mixture-of-Expert LLMs via Path Watermarks

    cs.CR 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    PathMark embeds multi-bit MoE ownership watermarks by steering triggered tokens onto predetermined expert subsets, verified by routing inspection or trigger-only outputs.

  2. Towards Provable (In)Secure Model Weight Release Schemes

    cs.CR 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Defines game-based security for weight release schemes and breaks TaylorMLP with a near-complete, low-cost parameter extraction attack.

  3. SECNEURON: Reliable and Flexible Abuse Control in Local LLMs via Hybrid Neuron Encryption

    cs.CR 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    SECNEURON uses per-neuron AES encryption plus attribute-based key management so a locally deployed LLM can be selectively decrypted to allow only authorized tasks and prune unauthorized capabilities.

Pith tools