Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Finding a sparse vector in a subspace: Linear sparsity using alternating directions

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1412.4659 v3 pith:GTERYJGR submitted 2014-12-15 cs.IT cs.CVcs.LGmath.ITmath.OCstat.ML

classification cs.ITcs.CVcs.LGmath.ITmath.OCstat.ML
keywords sparsesubspacevectorlearningplantedproblemalgorithmalternating
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Is it possible to find the sparsest vector (direction) in a generic subspace $\mathcal{S} \subseteq \mathbb{R}^p$ with $\mathrm{dim}(\mathcal{S})= n < p$? This problem can be considered a homogeneous variant of the sparse recovery problem, and finds connections to sparse dictionary learning, sparse PCA, and many other problems in signal processing and machine learning. In this paper, we focus on a **planted sparse model** for the subspace: the target sparse vector is embedded in an otherwise random subspace. Simple convex heuristics for this planted recovery problem provably break down when the fraction of nonzero entries in the target sparse vector substantially exceeds $O(1/\sqrt{n})$. In contrast, we exhibit a relatively simple nonconvex approach based on alternating directions, which provably succeeds even when the fraction of nonzero entries is $\Omega(1)$. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first practical algorithm to achieve linear scaling under the planted sparse model. Empirically, our proposed algorithm also succeeds in more challenging data models, e.g., sparse dictionary learning.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools