Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 127 references

Localized quantum corrections to the inflaton potential can switch inflaton self-resonance on or off during reheating, leaving a characteristic gravitational-wave spectrum at ultra-high frequencies that would reveal the sign and size of tho

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 15:35 UTC pith:GYIDEYIX

load-bearing objection Solid lattice study of a concrete UV-motivated potential; the kappa~1 peaked spectrum is interesting, but the claimed kappa>1 'smooth and enhanced' spectra are likely inflated by an epsilon_f=1 redshift mapping that does not hold in the broken phase. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2607.18381 v1 pith:GYIDEYIX submitted 2026-07-20 hep-ph astro-ph.COgr-qchep-th

Gravitational waves from self-resonance during reheating with a quantum-corrected inflaton potential

Tomoya Inada , Noel Jonathan Jobu , Kenji Nishiwaki , Toshifumi Noumi , Naoki Yamatsu This is my paper
classification hep-ph astro-ph.COgr-qchep-th
keywords preheatingself-resonancegravitational wavesalpha-attractor T-modelquantum correctionsColeman-Weinberg correctionultra-high-frequency gravitational wavesreheating
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper argues that quantum corrections concentrated near the minimum of the inflaton potential can change the shape of the potential as the inflaton oscillates after inflation, and that this in turn controls whether the inflaton's own fluctuations undergo parametric resonance. When the correction nearly cancels the quadratic term, the potential becomes effectively quartic, triggering self-resonance and producing a multi-peaked stochastic gravitational-wave background with present-day energy density around 1e-10 in the 1e8-1e10 Hz band. When the quadratic coefficient becomes negative, the spectrum smooths out and broadens. These predictions give a concrete way for future ultra-high-frequency gravitational-wave detectors to probe quantum corrections to the inflaton potential and, indirectly, the heavy physics that generates them.

Core claim

In the alpha-attractor T-model with a heavy scalar coupled to the inflaton, the one-loop correction is localized near the potential minimum. Setting the deformation parameter kappa so that the quadratic coefficient nearly vanishes makes the oscillating inflaton behave as a quartic oscillator, which parametrically excites inflaton fluctuations at a characteristic dimensionless momentum of about 1.27. The resulting gravitational-wave spectrum exhibits multiple peaks with h^2 Omega_GW,0 around 1e-10 at frequencies of 1e8-1e10 Hz. For kappa greater than 1, where the origin becomes a local maximum, the resonance broadens and the spectrum becomes smooth. The peaked signal survives only in a narrow

What carries the argument

The controlling object is the quadratic-to-quartic transition of the potential near the origin, governed by the dimensionless parameter kappa, which measures the size of the one-loop correction relative to the tree-level potential. When the quadratic coefficient nearly vanishes, the fluctuation equation becomes a Lame equation with a known resonance band centered at k_p ~ 1.27 in dimensionless units; this resonance structure, through the anisotropic stress sourced by amplified inflaton fluctuations, determines whether the gravitational-wave spectrum is multi-peaked or smooth.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the inflaton does not couple significantly to any daughter fields during reheating; if such couplings dominate, the self-resonance and the resulting gravitational-wave spectra computed here would not be the observable outcome.

What would settle it

Construct a two-field reheating model with a representative inflaton-daughter coupling and compute the gravitational-wave spectrum; if the peaked feature at kappa=1 is quenched or shifted by orders of magnitude for couplings required in realistic reheating, the single-field prediction is not robust. Alternatively, a future ultra-high-frequency detector sensitive near 1e9 Hz that observes a smooth spectrum with no peak at the predicted kappa=1 frequency would disfavor the exact-cancellation scenario.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • If the peaked spectrum is realized, ultra-high-frequency gravitational-wave detectors operating above the kHz range could observe a stochastic background whose peak frequency and amplitude match the predicted values, distinguishing the kappa=1 quartic-resonance case from the smooth kappa>1 case.
  • Gravitational-wave observations would then provide an indirect probe of the quantum corrections to the inflaton potential and of the heavy degrees of freedom that induce them.
  • The narrowness of the parameter window means that the absence of a peaked signal would constrain the quadratic coefficient to be either large enough to suppress resonance or small enough that the tree-level quadratic term dominates.
  • At smaller pole scales, the parameter window in which the peaked signal survives widens, so the predicted observability depends sensitively on the pole scale M of the T-model.
  • If the peaked signal is not found, the combined constraints on kappa and M would indirectly restrict the underlying ultraviolet theory that generates the localized quantum correction.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because realistic reheating almost certainly requires the inflaton to couple to Standard-Model degrees of freedom, the single-field self-resonance calculation may not be the final observable; coupling to daughter fields could quench or alter the resonance, so a natural next step is to repeat the lattice calculation with representative inflaton-daughter couplings.
  • The artificial-initial-condition result at small M hints that dissipative effects, such as an effective friction term from warm inflation, could extend the resonance regime; this suggests a testable extension where a damping coefficient is added to the inflaton equation of motion to see whether the multi-peak structure persists.
  • A direct analytic estimate of the gravitational-wave peak frequency in terms of the effective quartic coupling and the oscillation amplitude, compared against the lattice spectra, would provide a useful cross-check and might predict how the peak scales with model parameters beyond the benchmark cases studied.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies gravitational-wave production from inflaton self-resonance during reheating in an α-attractor T-model with a localized one-loop Coleman--Weinberg correction generated by a heavy scalar. The deformation parameter κ controls the sign and size of the quadratic term near the origin: κ<1 is quadratic-dominated, κ=1 is quartic-like, and κ>1 has a negative quadratic coefficient and a broken phase. Using CosmoLattice simulations, the authors compute GW spectra for pole scales M=M_Pl, 0.1M_Pl and 0.01M_Pl. They find a multi-peaked spectrum with present-day amplitude h²Ω_GW,0 ~ 10^-10 at frequencies ~10^8--10^10 Hz, but only in a narrow window around κ=1; for κ>1 away from unity the spectrum becomes smooth. They connect the κ=1 peak to the Lamé resonance scale k̃ ≃ 1.27 and provide convergence checks in lattice size, IR cutoff, and late-time stability.

Significance. If the central results survive the redshift-normalization issue raised below, this is a valuable contribution. It gives a concrete, falsifiable example of how UV-scale quantum corrections localized near the inflaton minimum can imprint themselves on the preheating GW spectrum, and it uses a public lattice code with careful numerical controls: Fig. 13 (resolution), Fig. 14 (IR cutoff), and Fig. 15 (late-time stability), together with a table of simulation parameters. The analytic anchoring of the resonance peak to the Lamé prediction in Sec. 2.1 is a genuine strength. The κ=1 multi-peaked signal at h²Ω_GW,0 ~ 10^-10 in the UHF band provides a concrete target for proposed high-frequency detectors. The κ>1 smooth and enhanced part of the claim is the portion that needs substantial quantitative revision.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. 4, Eqs. (4.1)--(4.3), Figs. 4, 6, 9, footnote 7] The present-day normalization sets ϵ_f = 1 for all simulations. This is justified only for the quartic-like regime around κ≃1, as footnote 7 states. For κ>1 the potential minimum is shifted and locally quadratic, so after the tachyonic/resonant stage the background oscillates in a quadratic well with average equation of state w̄ ≈ 0. Then ϵ_f = (a_f/a_RD)^{1-3w̄} ≈ a_f/a_RD. In a matter-like expansion between t_f and radiation domination, a_f/a_RD = (H_RD/H_f)^{2/3}. With H_f ~ 10^12 GeV and H_RD ~ 10^8--10^10 GeV, this gives ϵ_f ~ 10^-3 to 10^-2. The plotted amplitudes in Figs. 4, 6 and the right panel of Fig. 9 would therefore be suppressed by one to three orders of magnitude. The claim in the abstract that a negative quadratic coefficient yields a smooth and enhanced signal, and the statement in Sec. 4.2 that this region is a realistic detection target, are quantitatively unsupported
  2. [Sec. 1 and Sec. 5] The manuscript assumes that the universe reaches radiation domination efficiently (Sec. 5) while neglecting couplings to daughter fields (Sec. 1). For κ≈1 this is self-consistent because a quartic oscillating condensate has w̄=1/3 and the reheating stage itself is radiation-like. For κ>1, however, the inflaton oscillates in a quadratic minimum and the model contains no decay or reheating mechanism within the single-field setup; the natural background evolution is matter-like. The κ>1 spectra therefore lack not only the correct ϵ_f normalization but also a defined completion to radiation domination. This limitation should be stated explicitly whenever the smooth κ>1 signal is discussed, and ideally the authors should estimate the effect of a minimal coupling to radiation so that the present-day amplitude claim has a well-defined meaning.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 4.1, Eq. (4.6), Fig. 2] The analytic estimate states that the quartic-dominance condition breaks down at 1−κ ~ 10^-4, while Fig. 2 and the summary in Sec. 4.4 show strong suppression already at 1−κ ~ 10^-5 and order-of-magnitude drop at 2×10^-5. Please reconcile this apparent order-of-magnitude discrepancy, or clearly label the estimate as only a crude order-of-magnitude guide.
  2. [Eq. (2.4)] Scalar metric perturbations are neglected in the fluctuation equation. This is standard for many lattice preheating studies, but a sentence quantifying when this is a good approximation for the large-amplitude, backreaction-dominated stages shown in Fig. 3 would strengthen the paper.
  3. [Fig. 14] The blue curve with the largest IR cutoff is useful as a diagnostic, but its radical suppression could be misread as a physical prediction. The caption or text could state more prominently that the red/green curves are the fiducial resolved runs.
  4. [Sec. 4.3, Fig. 8] The artificial-initial-condition run is clearly labeled, which is good. Consider moving this case to an appendix or marking it distinctly in the summary plot, since Fig. 9's red points could otherwise be confused with standard reheating histories.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: GW spectra are un-fitted lattice outputs from a specified potential; the κ=1 quadratic cancellation is a parameterization choice, not a fitted prediction.

full rationale

The paper's load-bearing claims — a multi-peaked GW spectrum with h²Ω_GW,0 ~ 10⁻¹⁰ at κ=1, a smooth spectrum for 1+10⁻⁴≲κ≲1+10⁻², and abrupt suppression of the peak when 1−κ ≳ 10⁻⁵ at M=M_Pl — are direct outputs of CosmoLattice simulations of the fully specified effective potential (3.10), with Λ fixed by the external CMB normalization A_s≈2.1×10⁻⁹ (App. A, Eq. A.5) and with no parameter adjusted to reproduce the GW output; the κ-window (numerical 10⁻⁵ vs. the analytic 10⁻⁴ from condition (4.6)) shows the numerics carry content beyond the analytic input. The interpretation tools — the Lamé scale k̃_p≃1.27 (Eq. 2.13), the quartic-dominance condition (4.6), and tachyonic preheating [5, 71] — are external standard results that the paper verifies against its own spectra (Figs. 3, 13–15). The one definitional item is the location of the cancellation point: κ is defined (3.11) so that the quadratic coefficient in (3.12) is (1−κ), hence "quartic regime at κ=1" is a parameterization statement (footnote 5); but the GW amplitude, multi-peak structure, and κ-window are simulated outputs, not entailments of that definition, so no prediction reduces to its input. There are no self-citations (none of the five authors appears in the bibliography), no imported uniqueness theorem, and the potential ingredients (one-loop CW formula (3.8) [68]; T-model pole structure [32]) are standard rather than ansatz smuggled via self-citation. The disclosed limitations — daughter-field neglect (Sec. 1, Sec. 5) and ϵ_f=1 in (4.1)–(4.3) with footnote 7 restricting it to the quartic-like regime — are correctness risks rather than circularity: for κ>1 the field oscillates about a shifted quadratic minimum (w̄≈0), so ϵ_f=(a_f/a_RD)^{1−3w̄}=a_f/a_RD could suppress the plotted smooth spectra by orders of magnitude, but this assumption is openly stated, externally evaluable, and not fitted to produce the claimed signal. The derivation is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks, and no circular step is identified.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

4 free parameters · 6 axioms · 1 invented entities

Central ledger: the model has two genuinely free continuous parameters (kappa and M, with benchmark coupling a^2 = -m0^2/M^2) plus the assumed unity redshift factor epsilon_f; Lambda is fixed by the CMB scalar amplitude (Eq. A.5), and N_e=60 is an illustrative choice. The peaked GW signal — the paper's headline — lives in a fine-tuned window around kappa=1, so the ledger honestly reflects that the contribution is a mechanism demonstration plus parameter map, not a parameter-free prediction. Key domain axioms: single-field self-resonance (no daughter fields), neglect of scalar metric perturbations, validity of the one-loop effective potential despite m^2(psi) -> 0 in the plateau limit, and prompt radiation domination after the simulation ends.

free parameters (4)
  • kappa (deformation parameter) = scanned: 1, 1±1e-5, 1±1e-4, 1±1e-3, 1±1e-2, ...; peaked signal needs kappa within ~1e-5 of 1 at M=M_Pl
    Defined in Eq. (3.11) as m0^4/(32 pi^2 Lambda^4); controls the sign and size of the quadratic coefficient (1-kappa) in (3.12). Scanned, not fitted, but the headline peaked-spectrum result lives in a hand-picked, fine-tuned window.
  • M (T-model pole scale) = M_Pl, 0.1 M_Pl, 0.01 M_Pl (three benchmark values)
    Pole scale of the alpha-attractor geometry (Eqs. 3.1-3.3); sets the peak GW frequency (smaller M -> higher frequency) and the width of the kappa-window for the peaked spectrum.
  • a^2 (inflaton-sigma coupling) = a^2 = -m0^2/M^2 (benchmark, Eq. 3.9)
    Coupling of the heavy scalar to the inflaton in m^2(psi); the benchmark makes the quantum correction vanish on the plateau. The authors note the quadratic-term cancellation also works for any -m0^2/M^2 <= a^2 < 0 after choosing m0/Lambda, so the choice is representative but free.
  • epsilon_f (post-simulation redshift factor) = 1 (assumed across all runs)
    Redshift factor in Eqs. (4.2)-(4.3) relating the simulation-end spectrum to today. Set to unity for all runs; directly rescales every reported h^2 Omega_GW,0 value and is exact only when the post-simulation EoS is radiation-like, i.e., in the quartic regime, not in the broken phase.
axioms (6)
  • standard math The fluctuation resonance for a quartic potential is governed by the Lamé equation with q=3, dominant band at k~1.27.
    Sec. 2.1, Eqs. (2.10)-(2.13), citing the standard results [37,38]; the simulations verify this scale (Sec. 4.1, Fig. 3).
  • standard math During quartic-dominated oscillation the background expansion is radiation-like (a''=0), giving the cn(z,1/2) background solution.
    Sec. 2.1, Eqs. (2.10)-(2.12).
  • domain assumption The one-loop Coleman-Weinberg effective potential (3.8) is the correct input; sigma can be integrated out because m(psi) >> H_inf, omega_reh over the probed field range, and the loop is exact since sigma has no self-interaction.
    Sec. 3.2, Eqs. (3.7)-(3.8). The authors flag in footnote 6 that m^2(psi) -> 0 at the plateau limit, making the large-field validity 'subtle'; they argue the probed range is finite and under control.
  • domain assumption No daughter fields: reheating involves only the inflaton and its self-resonance; the Z2-symmetric single-field sector is complete.
    Sec. 1 (p. 2-3): 'we neglect such fields and their production'; repeated as a limitation in Sec. 5.
  • domain assumption Scalar metric perturbations are negligible in the fluctuation equation (2.4).
    Sec. 2.1, before Eq. (2.4): 'we have neglected scalar metric perturbations'.
  • domain assumption Radiation domination sets in promptly at the end of the simulation, so epsilon_f = 1 in the redshift conversion.
    Sec. 4, Eq. (4.3) and footnote 7; well-motivated only in the quartic-like regime, not in the broken phase.
invented entities (1)
  • Heavy scalar sigma coupled to the inflaton with m^2(psi) = m0^2 + a^2 psi^2 independent evidence
    purpose: Sources the one-loop Coleman-Weinberg correction (3.8) localized near the inflaton potential minimum; the localization changes the reheating resonance and the GW spectrum.
    sigma itself is an input with no direct detection channel, but the model yields specific falsifiable GW predictions (peaked vs smooth spectra at 10^8-10^10 Hz with h^2 Omega ~ 10^-10 near kappa=1). These are in-principle testable, though the paper notes current and proposed detectors cannot reach this band (Sec. 5, refs. [76-91]). Motivated heuristically by the distance conjecture (Sec. 1).

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 26142 in / 31498 out tokens · 252613 ms · 2026-08-01T15:35:49.663077+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We investigate how localized quantum corrections to the inflaton potential affect preheating dynamics and the resulting stochastic gravitational wave (GW) spectrum. When these corrections sufficiently suppress the quadratic term of the potential near its minimum, inflaton self-resonance can produce a peaked GW spectrum. On the other hand, we find that a smooth and enhanced spectrum can appear if the quadratic term acquires a negative coefficient. As a concrete realization, we analyze the $\alpha$-attractor T-model with a one-loop Coleman--Weinberg correction induced by a heavy scalar and compute the resulting GW spectra using lattice simulations. The GW signals lie in the ultra-high-frequency regime at frequencies above the kHz range. These results suggest that GW signals from preheating may probe quantum corrections to the inflaton potential, thereby providing indirect information about the underlying UV physics.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

127 extracted references · 95 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    ON PARTICLE CREATION BY A TIME DEPENDENT SCALAR FIELD,

    A. D. Dolgov and D. P. Kirilova, “ON PARTICLE CREATION BY A TIME DEPENDENT SCALAR FIELD,”Sov. J. Nucl. Phys.51(1990) 172–177

    1990

  2. [2]

    Particle Production During Out-of-equilibrium Phase Transitions,

    J. H. Traschen and R. H. Brandenberger, “Particle Production During Out-of-equilibrium Phase Transitions,”Phys. Rev. D42(1990) 2491–2504

    1990

  3. [3]

    Universe reheating after inflation,

    Y. Shtanov, J. H. Traschen, and R. H. Brandenberger, “Universe reheating after inflation,” Phys. Rev. D51(1995) 5438–5455,arXiv:hep-ph/9407247

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  4. [4]

    Reheating after inflation,

    L. Kofman, A. D. Linde, and A. A. Starobinsky, “Reheating after inflation,”Phys. Rev. Lett.73(1994) 3195–3198,arXiv:hep-th/9405187

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  5. [5]

    Towards the theory of reheating after inflation,

    L. Kofman, A. D. Linde, and A. A. Starobinsky, “Towards the theory of reheating after inflation,”Phys. Rev. D56(1997) 3258–3295,arXiv:hep-ph/9704452

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  6. [6]

    Theory and Numerics of Gravitational Waves from Preheating after Inflation,

    J. F. Dufaux, A. Bergman, G. N. Felder, L. Kofman, and J.-P. Uzan, “Theory and Numerics of Gravitational Waves from Preheating after Inflation,”Phys. Rev. D76(2007) 123517, arXiv:0707.0875 [astro-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  7. [7]

    Reheating in Inflationary Cosmology: Theory and Applications,

    R. Allahverdi, R. Brandenberger, F.-Y. Cyr-Racine, and A. Mazumdar, “Reheating in Inflationary Cosmology: Theory and Applications,”Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.60(2010) 27–51,arXiv:1001.2600 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  8. [8]

    Nonperturbative Dynamics Of Reheating After Inflation: A Review,

    M. A. Amin, M. P. Hertzberg, D. I. Kaiser, and J. Karouby, “Nonperturbative Dynamics Of Reheating After Inflation: A Review,”Int. J. Mod. Phys. D24(2014) 1530003, arXiv:1410.3808 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  9. [9]

    Lectures on Reheating after Inflation,

    K. D. Lozanov, “Lectures on Reheating after Inflation,”arXiv:1907.04402 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1907

  10. [10]

    Collapse of Small-Scale Density Perturbations during Preheating in Single Field Inflation,

    K. Jedamzik, M. Lemoine, and J. Martin, “Collapse of Small-Scale Density Perturbations during Preheating in Single Field Inflation,”JCAP09(2010) 034,arXiv:1002.3039 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  11. [11]

    Preheating with Non-Minimal Kinetic Terms,

    H. L. Child, J. T. Giblin, Jr, R. H. Ribeiro, and D. Seery, “Preheating with Non-Minimal Kinetic Terms,”Phys. Rev. Lett.111(2013) 051301,arXiv:1305.0561 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  12. [12]

    Theory of self-resonance after inflation. I. Adiabatic and isocurvature Goldstone modes,

    M. P. Hertzberg, J. Karouby, W. G. Spitzer, J. C. Becerra, and L. Li, “Theory of self-resonance after inflation. I. Adiabatic and isocurvature Goldstone modes,”Phys. Rev. D 90(2014) 123528,arXiv:1408.1396 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  13. [13]

    Theory of self-resonance after inflation. II. Quantum mechanics and particle-antiparticle asymmetry,

    M. P. Hertzberg, J. Karouby, W. G. Spitzer, J. C. Becerra, and L. Li, “Theory of self-resonance after inflation. II. Quantum mechanics and particle-antiparticle asymmetry,” Phys. Rev. D90(2014) 123529,arXiv:1408.1398 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  14. [14]

    Preheating after Higgs Inflation: Self-Resonance and Gauge boson production,

    E. I. Sfakianakis and J. van de Vis, “Preheating after Higgs Inflation: Self-Resonance and Gauge boson production,”Phys. Rev. D99no. 8, (2019) 083519,arXiv:1810.01304 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  15. [15]

    Metric preheating and radiative decay in single-field inflation,

    J. Martin, T. Papanikolaou, L. Pinol, and V. Vennin, “Metric preheating and radiative decay in single-field inflation,”JCAP05(2020) 003,arXiv:2002.01820 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  16. [16]

    Gravitational dark matter from minimal preheating,

    R. Zhang and S. Zheng, “Gravitational dark matter from minimal preheating,”JHEP02 (2024) 061,arXiv:2311.14273 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  17. [17]

    Self-resonance during preheating: The case ofα-attractor models,

    D. del Corral, “Self-resonance during preheating: The case ofα-attractor models,”Annals Phys.470(2024) 169824,arXiv:2406.04017 [hep-th]. – 28 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  18. [18]

    Primordial black hole formation from self-resonant preheating?,

    G. Ballesteros, J. Iguaz Juan, P. D. Serpico, and M. Taoso, “Primordial black hole formation from self-resonant preheating?,”Phys. Rev. D111no. 8, (2025) 083521, arXiv:2406.09122 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  19. [19]

    Nonlinear dynamics of oscillons and transients during preheating after single field inflation,

    T. Jia, Y. Sang, and X. Zhang, “Nonlinear dynamics of oscillons and transients during preheating after single field inflation,”Phys. Rev. D111no. 8, (2025) 083531, arXiv:2409.04046 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  20. [20]

    The Cosmological gravitational wave background from primordial density perturbations,

    K. N. Ananda, C. Clarkson, and D. Wands, “The Cosmological gravitational wave background from primordial density perturbations,”Phys. Rev. D75(2007) 123518, arXiv:gr-qc/0612013

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  21. [21]

    Gravitational Wave Spectrum Induced by Primordial Scalar Perturbations,

    D. Baumann, P. J. Steinhardt, K. Takahashi, and K. Ichiki, “Gravitational Wave Spectrum Induced by Primordial Scalar Perturbations,”Phys. Rev. D76(2007) 084019, arXiv:hep-th/0703290

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  22. [22]

    Gravitational waves from an early matter era,

    H. Assadullahi and D. Wands, “Gravitational waves from an early matter era,”Phys. Rev. D79(2009) 083511,arXiv:0901.0989 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  23. [23]

    Gravitational waves from inflation,

    M. C. Guzzetti, N. Bartolo, M. Liguori, and S. Matarrese, “Gravitational waves from inflation,”Riv. Nuovo Cim.39no. 9, (2016) 399–495,arXiv:1605.01615 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  24. [24]

    Scalar Induced Gravitational Waves Review,

    G. Dom` enech, “Scalar Induced Gravitational Waves Review,”Universe7no. 11, (2021) 398, arXiv:2109.01398 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  25. [25]

    Semianalytic calculation of gravitational wave spectrum nonlinearly induced from primordial curvature perturbations,

    K. Kohri and T. Terada, “Semianalytic calculation of gravitational wave spectrum nonlinearly induced from primordial curvature perturbations,”Phys. Rev. D97no. 12, (2018) 123532,arXiv:1804.08577 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  26. [26]

    Franciolini,Primordial Black Holes: from Theory to Gravitational Wave Observations

    G. Franciolini,Primordial Black Holes: from Theory to Gravitational Wave Observations. PhD thesis, Geneva U., Dept. Theor. Phys., 2021.arXiv:2110.06815 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  27. [27]

    Potential surge preheating: enhanced resonance from potential features,

    P. Saha and Y. Urakawa, “Potential surge preheating: enhanced resonance from potential features,”JCAP04(2025) 061,arXiv:2412.17359 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  28. [28]

    Self-resonance preheating in deformed attractor models: oscillon formation and evolution,

    B.-M. Gu, Y.-P. Zhang, F.-W. Shu, and Y.-X. Liu, “Self-resonance preheating in deformed attractor models: oscillon formation and evolution,”arXiv:2602.07972 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  29. [29]

    Challenges and opportunities of gravitational-wave searches at MHz to GHz frequencies,

    N. Aggarwalet al., “Challenges and opportunities of gravitational-wave searches at MHz to GHz frequencies,”Living Rev. Rel.24no. 1, (2021) 4,arXiv:2011.12414 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  30. [30]

    Challenges and opportunities of gravitational-wave searches above 10 kHz,

    N. Aggarwalet al., “Challenges and opportunities of gravitational-wave searches above 10 kHz,”Living Rev. Rel.28no. 1, (2025) 10,arXiv:2501.11723 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2025

  31. [31]

    On the Geometry of the String Landscape and the Swampland,

    H. Ooguri and C. Vafa, “On the Geometry of the String Landscape and the Swampland,” Nucl. Phys. B766(2007) 21–33,arXiv:hep-th/0605264

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  32. [32]

    Superconformal Inflationaryα-Attractors,

    R. Kallosh, A. Linde, and D. Roest, “Superconformal Inflationaryα-Attractors,”JHEP11 (2013) 198,arXiv:1311.0472 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  33. [33]

    Cosmological Attractors and Asymptotic Freedom of the Inflaton Field,

    R. Kallosh and A. Linde, “Cosmological Attractors and Asymptotic Freedom of the Inflaton Field,”JCAP06(2016) 047,arXiv:1604.00444 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  34. [34]

    CosmoLattice: A modern code for lattice simulations of scalar and gauge field dynamics in an expanding universe,

    D. G. Figueroa, A. Florio, F. Torrenti, and W. Valkenburg, “CosmoLattice: A modern code for lattice simulations of scalar and gauge field dynamics in an expanding universe,” Comput. Phys. Commun.283(2023) 108586,arXiv:2102.01031 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  35. [35]

    The art of simulating the early – 29 – Universe – Part I: Integration techniques and canonical cases,

    D. G. Figueroa, A. Florio, F. Torrenti, and W. Valkenburg, “The art of simulating the early – 29 – Universe – Part I: Integration techniques and canonical cases,”JCAP04(2021) 035, arXiv:2006.15122 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  36. [36]

    The art of simulating the early Universe. Part II. Non-canonical cases & gravitational waves,

    J. Baeza-Ballesteros, D. G. Figueroa, A. Florio, J. Lizarraga, N. Loayza, K. Marschall, T. Opferkuch, B. A. Stefanek, F. Torrent ´ ı, and A. Urio, “The art of simulating the early Universe. Part II. Non-canonical cases & gravitational waves,”arXiv:2512.15627 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv

  37. [37]

    Structure of resonance in preheating after inflation,

    P. B. Greene, L. Kofman, A. D. Linde, and A. A. Starobinsky, “Structure of resonance in preheating after inflation,”Phys. Rev. D56(1997) 6175–6192,arXiv:hep-ph/9705347

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  38. [38]

    Parametric resonance in the early Universe—a fitting analysis,

    D. G. Figueroa and F. Torrenti, “Parametric resonance in the early Universe—a fitting analysis,”JCAP02(2017) 001,arXiv:1609.05197 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  39. [39]

    Gravitational wave production from preheating: parameter dependence,

    D. G. Figueroa and F. Torrenti, “Gravitational wave production from preheating: parameter dependence,”JCAP10(2017) 057,arXiv:1707.04533 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  40. [40]

    Universality Class in Conformal Inflation,

    R. Kallosh and A. Linde, “Universality Class in Conformal Inflation,”JCAP07(2013) 002, arXiv:1306.5220 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  41. [41]

    Universal Attractor for Inflation at Strong Coupling,

    R. Kallosh, A. Linde, and D. Roest, “Universal Attractor for Inflation at Strong Coupling,” Phys. Rev. Lett.112no. 1, (2014) 011303,arXiv:1310.3950 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  42. [42]

    Minimal Supergravity Models of Inflation,

    S. Ferrara, R. Kallosh, A. Linde, and M. Porrati, “Minimal Supergravity Models of Inflation,”Phys. Rev. D88no. 8, (2013) 085038,arXiv:1307.7696 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  43. [43]

    Starobinsky-like Inflationary Models as Avatars of No-Scale Supergravity,

    J. Ellis, D. V. Nanopoulos, and K. A. Olive, “Starobinsky-like Inflationary Models as Avatars of No-Scale Supergravity,”JCAP10(2013) 009,arXiv:1307.3537 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  44. [44]

    Large field inflation and doubleα-attractors,

    R. Kallosh, A. Linde, and D. Roest, “Large field inflation and doubleα-attractors,”JHEP 08(2014) 052,arXiv:1405.3646 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  45. [45]

    Cosmological attractors fromα-scale supergravity,

    D. Roest and M. Scalisi, “Cosmological attractors fromα-scale supergravity,”Phys. Rev. D 92(2015) 043525,arXiv:1503.07909 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  46. [46]

    Single-fieldα-attractors,

    A. Linde, “Single-fieldα-attractors,”JCAP05(2015) 003,arXiv:1504.00663 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  47. [47]

    Cosmologicalα-attractors and de Sitter landscape,

    M. Scalisi, “Cosmologicalα-attractors and de Sitter landscape,”JHEP12(2015) 134, arXiv:1506.01368 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  48. [48]

    α-Attractors: Planck, LHC and Dark Energy,

    J. J. M. Carrasco, R. Kallosh, and A. Linde, “α-Attractors: Planck, LHC and Dark Energy,”JHEP10(2015) 147,arXiv:1506.01708 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  49. [49]

    Polynomialα-attractors,

    R. Kallosh and A. Linde, “Polynomialα-attractors,”JCAP04no. 04, (2022) 017, arXiv:2202.06492 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  50. [50]

    On the problem of initial conditions for inflation,

    A. Linde, “On the problem of initial conditions for inflation,”Found. Phys.48no. 10, (2018) 1246–1260,arXiv:1710.04278 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2018

  51. [51]

    Hypernatural inflation,

    A. Linde, D.-G. Wang, Y. Welling, Y. Yamada, and A. Ach´ ucarro, “Hypernatural inflation,” JCAP07(2018) 035,arXiv:1803.09911 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  52. [52]

    Singularα-attractors,

    R. Kallosh and A. Linde, “Singularα-attractors,”JCAP04(2026) 075,arXiv:2512.02969 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2026

  53. [53]

    Cosmological Attractor Models and Higher Curvature Supergravity,

    S. Cecotti and R. Kallosh, “Cosmological Attractor Models and Higher Curvature Supergravity,”JHEP05(2014) 114,arXiv:1403.2932 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  54. [54]

    Escher in the Sky,

    R. Kallosh and A. Linde, “Escher in the Sky,”Comptes Rendus Physique16(2015) 914–927,arXiv:1503.06785 [hep-th]. – 30 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  55. [55]

    Hyperbolic geometry of cosmological attractors,

    J. J. M. Carrasco, R. Kallosh, A. Linde, and D. Roest, “Hyperbolic geometry of cosmological attractors,”Phys. Rev. D92no. 4, (2015) 041301,arXiv:1504.05557 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  56. [56]

    Streamlined supergravity,

    R. Kallosh and A. Linde, “Streamlined supergravity,”JHEP03(2026) 176, arXiv:2511.15815 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2026

  57. [57]

    Fibre Inflation: Observable Gravity Waves from IIB String Compactifications,

    M. Cicoli, C. P. Burgess, and F. Quevedo, “Fibre Inflation: Observable Gravity Waves from IIB String Compactifications,”JCAP03(2009) 013,arXiv:0808.0691 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  58. [58]

    Fibre Inflation and α-attractors,

    R. Kallosh, A. Linde, D. Roest, A. Westphal, and Y. Yamada, “Fibre Inflation and α-attractors,”JHEP02(2018) 117,arXiv:1707.05830 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  59. [59]

    Chiral global embedding of Fibre Inflation with D3 uplift,

    M. Cicoli, A. Grassi, O. Lacombe, and F. G. Pedro, “Chiral global embedding of Fibre Inflation with D3 uplift,”JHEP06(2025) 090,arXiv:2412.08723 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  60. [60]

    SL(2,Z) cosmological attractors,

    R. Kallosh and A. Linde, “SL(2,Z) cosmological attractors,”JCAP04(2025) 045, arXiv:2408.05203 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  61. [61]

    General inflaton potentials in supergravity,

    R. Kallosh, A. Linde, and T. Rube, “General inflaton potentials in supergravity,”Phys. Rev. D83(2011) 043507,arXiv:1011.5945 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  62. [62]

    D3 induced geometric inflation,

    R. Kallosh, A. Linde, D. Roest, and Y. Yamada, “ D3 induced geometric inflation,”JHEP 07(2017) 057,arXiv:1705.09247 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  63. [63]

    Universality of multi-fieldα-attractors,

    A. Ach´ ucarro, R. Kallosh, A. Linde, D.-G. Wang, and Y. Welling, “Universality of multi-fieldα-attractors,”JCAP04(2018) 028,arXiv:1711.09478 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  64. [64]

    Sequestered Inflation,

    R. Kallosh, A. Linde, T. Wrase, and Y. Yamada, “Sequestered Inflation,”Fortsch. Phys.69 no. 11-12, (2021) 2100128,arXiv:2108.08491 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  65. [65]

    Axion stabilization in modular cosmology,

    J. J. Carrasco, R. Kallosh, A. Linde, and D. Roest, “Axion stabilization in modular cosmology,”JCAP07(2025) 090,arXiv:2503.14904 [hep-th]. [66]PlanckCollaboration, Y. Akramiet al., “Planck 2018 results. X. Constraints on inflation,” Astron. Astrophys.641(2020) A10,arXiv:1807.06211 [astro-ph.CO]. [67]BICEP , KeckCollaboration, P. A. R. Adeet al., “Improved...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  66. [68]

    Radiative Corrections as the Origin of Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking,

    S. R. Coleman and E. J. Weinberg, “Radiative Corrections as the Origin of Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking,”Phys. Rev. D7(1973) 1888–1910

    1973

  67. [69]

    E. J. Weinberg,Radiative corrections as the origin of spontaneous symmetry breaking. PhD thesis, Harvard U., 1973.arXiv:hep-th/0507214

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1973

  68. [70]

    Gravitational wave production from preheating with trilinear interactions,

    C. Cosme, D. G. Figueroa, and N. Loayza, “Gravitational wave production from preheating with trilinear interactions,”JCAP05(2023) 023,arXiv:2206.14721 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  69. [71]

    Dynamics of symmetry breaking and tachyonic preheating,

    G. N. Felder, J. Garcia-Bellido, P. B. Greene, L. Kofman, A. D. Linde, and I. Tkachev, “Dynamics of symmetry breaking and tachyonic preheating,”Phys. Rev. Lett.87(2001) 011601,arXiv:hep-ph/0012142

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  70. [72]

    Gravitational perturbations from oscillons and transients after inflation,

    K. D. Lozanov and M. A. Amin, “Gravitational perturbations from oscillons and transients after inflation,”Phys. Rev. D99no. 12, (2019) 123504,arXiv:1902.06736 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  71. [73]

    Production of gravitational waves during preheating in α-attractor inflation,

    J. Li, H. Yu, and P. Wu, “Production of gravitational waves during preheating in α-attractor inflation,”Phys. Rev. D102no. 8, (2020) 083522. – 31 –

    2020

  72. [74]

    (P)reheating and gravitational waves inα-attractor models,

    T. Krajewski and K. Turzy´ nski, “(P)reheating and gravitational waves inα-attractor models,”JCAP10(2022) 005,arXiv:2204.12909 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  73. [75]

    Probing physics beyond the standard model: limits from BBN and the CMB independently and combined,

    T.-H. Yeh, J. Shelton, K. A. Olive, and B. D. Fields, “Probing physics beyond the standard model: limits from BBN and the CMB independently and combined,”JCAP10(2022) 046, arXiv:2207.13133 [astro-ph.CO]. [76]LIGO ScientificCollaboration, J. Aasiet al., “Advanced LIGO,”Class. Quant. Grav.32 (2015) 074001,arXiv:1411.4547 [gr-qc]. [77]VIRGOCollaboration, F. ...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  74. [80]

    Laser Interferometer Space Antenna,

    P. Amaro-Seoaneet al., “Laser Interferometer Space Antenna,”arXiv e-prints(Feb., 2017) arXiv:1702.00786,arXiv:1702.00786 [astro-ph.IM]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  75. [81]

    Possibility of direct measurement of the acceleration of the universe using 0.1-Hz band laser interferometer gravitational wave antenna in space,

    N. Seto, S. Kawamura, and T. Nakamura, “Possibility of direct measurement of the acceleration of the universe using 0.1-Hz band laser interferometer gravitational wave antenna in space,”Phys. Rev. Lett.87(2001) 221103,arXiv:astro-ph/0108011

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  76. [82]

    Laser interferometry for the big bang observer,

    G. M. Harry, P. Fritschel, D. A. Shaddock, W. Folkner, and E. S. Phinney, “Laser interferometry for the big bang observer,”Class. Quant. Grav.23(2006) 4887–4894. [Erratum: Class.Quant.Grav. 23, 7361 (2006)]

    2006

  77. [83]

    Sensitivity Studies for Third-Generation Gravitational Wave Observatories,

    S. Hildet al., “Sensitivity Studies for Third-Generation Gravitational Wave Observatories,” Class. Quant. Grav.28(2011) 094013,arXiv:1012.0908 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  78. [84]

    The Einstein Telescope: A third-generation gravitational wave observatory,

    M. Punturoet al., “The Einstein Telescope: A third-generation gravitational wave observatory,”Class. Quant. Grav.27(2010) 194002

    2010

  79. [85]

    Cosmic Explorer: The U.S. Contribution to Gravitational-Wave Astronomy beyond LIGO,

    D. Reitzeet al., “Cosmic Explorer: The U.S. Contribution to Gravitational-Wave Astronomy beyond LIGO,”Bull. Am. Astron. Soc.51no. 7, (2019) 035,arXiv:1907.04833 [astro-ph.IM]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  80. [86]

    Detecting high-frequency gravitational waves with microwave cavities,

    A. Berlin, D. Blas, R. Tito D’Agnolo, S. A. R. Ellis, R. Harnik, Y. Kahn, and J. Sch¨ utte-Engel, “Detecting high-frequency gravitational waves with microwave cavities,” Phys. Rev. D105no. 11, (2022) 116011,arXiv:2112.11465 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

Showing first 80 references.