Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 64 references

Monocular Vision-Based Swarm Robot Localization Using Equilateral Triangular Formations

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Four robots arranged in equilateral triangles can localize from lateral pixel distances alone, with error per step rather than per minute, beating dead-reckoning on long missions.

desk verdict A sound geometric trick and a clean one-step experiment, but the head-to-head with dead-reckoning leans on an uncalibrated 16% wheel-scale bias that would normally be removed. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.19100 v1 pith:GYN4LPVZ submitted 2025-07-25 cs.RO cs.SYeess.SY

Taewon Kang , Ji-Wook Kwon , Il Bae , Jin Hyo Kim This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.ROcs.SYeess.SY
keywords swarmrobotlocalizationmonocularvisionequilateraltriangleformationlateraldistancemeasurementvisualmarkerdead-reckoningcomparisoncooperativeopen-spacenavigation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that a swarm of low-cost robots can localize accurately in wide, open, featureless spaces without GPS, maps, ranging sensors, or positioning infrastructure. The proposed system keeps three robots stationary as beacons at the vertices of an equilateral triangle while a fourth robot, equipped with ordinary single-lens (monocular) cameras and visual markers, moves to the vertex of the next triangle. The moving robot's controller uses only lateral pixel distances between the beacon markers in its rear camera image, never depth, to find the correct two-dimensional vertex position. Because the equilateral geometry encodes the position, placement error is committed once per triangle rather than continuously over time, so halving the robots' speed does not inflate the final error the way it does for dead-reckoning. Experiments with four robots and simulations built on those measured errors show the proposed method beating a modeled dead-reckoning system on long trajectories.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the four-robot equilateral triangular formation with an anchor beacon. The beacon at the opposite vertex of the triangle serves as the anchor in the moving robot's rear-view image; the robot only needs to equalize the two lateral pixel gaps $d_{m1}$ and $d_{m2}$ between that anchor and the two base beacons, and to match those gaps to the target value $d_t$. In an equilateral triangle, satisfying $d_{m1}=d_{m2}=d_t$ in the image places the camera at the correct planar vertex, so the geometry itself performs the two-dimensional localization. This reduces the problem to reliable one-dimensional pixel counting and avoids the costly, noisy depth estimation that normally makes monocular localization hard.

What would settle it

Run a field experiment with ground truth over at least 20 consecutive triangle formations at two wheel speeds, one double the other, and compare final vertex errors: if the slower run shows a clearly larger error, if per-step errors grow as the formation advances, or if repeated steps show correlated drift, the central claim fails; the paper predicts the two speeds give nearly equal endpoint error.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the central claim is that a one-dimensional measurement—the lateral pixel distance between beacon robots in a monocular image—is enough to determine a two-dimensional robot position when the formation is an equilateral triangle. Three robots hold the triangle while a fourth, the moving robot, enters through it and then uses a rear-view camera to measure $d_{m1}$ and $d_{m2}$, the lateral distances from the opposite-vertex beacon to the two near beacons. By steering so that $d_{m1}=d_{m2}=d_t$, where $d_t$ is a pre-set target disparity tied to the triangle side length, the moving robot arrives at the exact vertex of the next equilateral triangle; the paper deliberately avoids depth estimation. The paper reports single-step placement errors with means of 36 mm lateral and 13 mm longitudinal, with standard deviations of 21 mm and 9 mm, from 60 trials, and simulations based on those errors show total error scaling with the number of triangles rather than elapsed time. In the many-turn trajectory with wheel speed halved, the proposed method ends at 0.51 m error while the modeled dead-reckoning system ends at 1.43 m.

Load-bearing premise

The method assumes the initial formation is accurately set up and that the per-step placement error measured in 60 controlled single-triangle trials stays independent, uncorrelated, and unchanged over many real-world steps; if initial alignment is off or errors compound with distance, direction, or speed, the claimed edge over dead-reckoning does not transfer.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In open, featureless environments, a robot swarm can maintain a position estimate using only cameras and visual markers; no GPS, maps, lidar, or ranging infrastructure is needed.
  • Localization error is tied to the number of triangle-formation steps, not elapsed time; a robot that slows down to save power or avoid obstacles does not pay a position-accuracy penalty.
  • The four-robot scheme extends to N robots with roughly unchanged endpoint error, because the number of triangles required to reach a distant goal stays nearly the same as the swarm grows.
  • Image processing stays cheap enough for a single-board computer, and robots only share path-planning information, never images, so communication bandwidth remains low.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Inference: If the per-step errors are independent, endpoint error should grow roughly with the square root of the number of triangles, not linearly with time; this predicts that a long fast run and a short slow run covering the same number of steps should end with similar error, which can be tested directly.
  • Inference: The same lateral-only trick would generalize to other regular polygons, but the equilateral triangle is the minimal shape where equalizing two projected side gaps at an anchor fixes the next vertex; testing other polygons would show how far the geometric principle extends.
  • Inference: The method's practical ceiling is marker visibility and line of sight; in cluttered or occluded environments the formation would break down, so the paper's open-space advantage is also its operating boundary, and fusing with short-range obstacle sensors is a natural companion layer.
  • Inference: The simulation results stand or fall on whether the 60-trial lab error model transfers to field conditions; a long outdoor run with independent ground truth would be the decisive check.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a cooperative localization method for a four-robot swarm operating in open, infrastructure-free environments. Three beacon robots form an equilateral triangle while a fourth 'moving' robot advances to the next vertex using only lateral pixel distances between visual markers observed with monocular cameras (Algorithm I, Section 2). The method deliberately avoids depth estimation and odometry, so the authors claim that positioning errors accumulate per formation step rather than per unit time. A 60-trial laboratory experiment with Vicon ground truth yields lateral and longitudinal per-step error statistics (means 36 mm and 13 mm; standard deviations 21 mm and 9 mm, Section 4.2), and these statistics are used in simulations of longer trajectories with many turns and a patrol path (Section 5). The proposed method is compared with a conventional dead-reckoning model based on a Gauss-Markov heading error and a wheel-speed sensor model (Eq. 3); Table 1 reports endpoint errors showing the proposed method outperforming dead-reckoning, with the advantage growing when the intended wheel speed is reduced.

Significance. If the quantitative claims hold, the paper offers an attractive low-cost, infrastructure-free localization alternative for swarm robots in open spaces, with potential applications in search and rescue. The core geometric idea--reconstructing the two-dimensional vertex of an equilateral triangle from one-dimensional lateral disparity measurements--is elegant and potentially generalizable to other multi-robot formations. The paper includes a clean single-step experimental evaluation with motion-capture ground truth, an external comparison against a dead-reckoning model, a scalability analysis for N-robot systems, and a collision-avoidance path planner. The main risk is not circularity but rather the fairness of the dead-reckoning baseline and the transferability of the fitted per-step error model to long trajectories; both issues directly affect the strength of the central claim in the abstract.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 4.2, Eq. (3), and Table 1] The dead-reckoning baseline uses a wheel-speed scale factor of SF_WSS=0.16, described as experimentally estimated for the authors' Stella platform. A 16% constant scale error is a large systematic error that is normally compensated during wheel-radius calibration even in low-cost systems; a typical residual after calibration is on the order of 1-2%. Because the scale factor integrates linearly with distance traveled, it contributes a dominant, distance-proportional error to the dead-reckoning trajectories in Fig. 12 and Fig. 13 (e.g., 0.81 m at Ω=5.8 in Table 1). The paper does not show that 0.16 is a representative residual for a conventional low-cost dead-reckoning system. The central claim that the proposed method's error becomes 'significantly smaller' as travel time increases is therefore not yet established against a fair baseline. Please re-run the comparison with a calibrated scale factor (e.g., 0.01-0.02) and report a sensitivity analysis over SF_WSS.
  2. [Section 4.2 and Section 5] The long-trajectory simulation of the proposed method samples per-step lateral and longitudinal errors from the same Gaussian statistics fitted from 60 single-step trials in a Vicon-instrumented lab. This is a legitimate modeling loop, but the transfer to 'wide open spaces' assumes the per-step errors are independent and identically distributed across steps, directions, approach angles, distances, and camera conditions. The paper itself acknowledges in Section 4.3 that camera distortion can affect marker detection, and the experiments used a controlled initial formation. No experimental evidence or sensitivity analysis is given for correlated, distance-dependent, or direction-dependent errors. Without such evidence, the quantitative advantage in Table 1 may not hold in real long-duration deployments. Please add a sensitivity analysis (e.g., over error magnitude and correlation) or a long-path experimental validation.
  3. [Section 5 and Table 1] The simulation currently provides no explicit accumulation model for the proposed method. If the per-step errors are independent, the endpoint error should scale approximately as the square root of the number of steps times the per-step standard deviation (with means including any bias), and N, the number of triangular steps, should be reported for each trajectory. The reported values (0.56 m, 0.51 m, 0.15 m, 0.12 m) are averages over 100 runs without error bars or confidence intervals. Please provide the step count, the predicted accumulation law, and standard deviations over the 100 runs so the reader can verify that the error is indeed per-triangle rather than per-time.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Equation (2)] The square-root symbol in Eq. (2) is rendered with a malformed typesetting artifact; please double-check the formula.
  2. [Fig. 11] Add axis labels with units (mm) and specify the number of trials (N=60) directly on the figure.
  3. [Table 1] Report standard deviations or 95% confidence intervals for the 100 simulation runs, and state the number of triangular steps N for each trajectory.
  4. [Section 4.2] Clarify how SF_WSS=0.16 was estimated and whether this value represents a residual after calibration or an uncompensated factory-scale value; the sentence 'The parameters of this model for our mobile robot platform... were experimentally estimated' is vague.
  5. [Section 5] The phrase 'Once a new triangle is formulated' should be 'Once a new triangle is formed'.
  6. [Figures 12 and 13] Consider using line styles or markers in addition to color to distinguish the three trajectories for accessibility.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the geometric localization derivation is self-contained, simulations use fitted per-step errors in a standard extrapolation loop, and the dead-reckoning baseline is external.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation is self-contained. Algorithm I and Fig. 3 convert 1D lateral pixel distances (dm1, dm2, dt) into a 2D vertex placement using the equilateral-triangle geometric constraint; this is a constructive geometric argument, not a quantity fitted to the outcome it predicts. The per-step error statistics (means 36/13 mm, standard deviations 21/9 mm along lateral/longitudinal axes) are measured in 60 Vicon trials, and Section 5's simulation accumulates those same per-step errors along planned triangle sequences. This is a normal model-based extrapolation, not a circular reduction: the simulated endpoint error is a function of the fitted per-step model and the trajectory geometry, and the paper does not fit a parameter to the long-trajectory endpoint and then present that endpoint as an independent prediction. The proposed-method result that error depends on the number of triangles rather than on travel time is a structural consequence of the event-triggered control (Algorithm I is speed-independent), and even if one questioned the fitted model's transfer to long trajectories, that would be an external-validity concern, not circularity. The dead-reckoning comparison is based on literature models [63,64] with parameters estimated from the authors' platform; this is an external benchmark, and any objection to the 16% wheel scale factor is a fairness/calibration concern, not a self-referential reduction. Self-citations [54,61,65] are historical or related-work credit and do not carry the proof. Overall, no claim reduces by definition or by self-citation to its own inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The method introduces no new physical entities. It rests on standard geometry, an experimental error model that is fitted and then reused in simulation, several domain assumptions about robot behavior and sensor visibility, and design parameters (dt, side length, dead-reckoning baseline parameters) that are either hand-chosen or fitted to the hardware.

free parameters (6)
  • Per-step lateral error statistics (mean, SD) = mean 36 mm, SD 21 mm
    Fitted from 60 lab trials (Section 4.2); every simulated triangle step samples from this empirical CDF, so the final error in the simulation is directly determined by these fitted values.
  • Per-step longitudinal error statistics (mean, SD) = mean 13 mm, SD 9 mm
    Fitted from the same 60 trials; used to generate errors along the longitudinal axis in the Section 5 simulations.
  • Dead-reckoning wheel speed scale factor SF_WSS = 0.16
    Experimentally estimated for the Stella platform (Section 4.2); this 16% scale factor error strongly affects the dead-reckoning baseline trajectory in Figs. 12-14.
  • Dead-reckoning WSS noise standard deviation = 0.045 m/s
    Experimentally estimated; contributes to dead-reckoning position error growth in the comparison.
  • Equilateral triangle side length L = 1.5 m
    Chosen for simulation (Section 5); determines number of triangle steps and hence the number of error accumulations.
  • Desired lateral pixel disparity dt = 280 pixels
    Set based on camera FOV (Section 2); maps to the triangle side length in the vision servo loop.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math Euclidean geometry of equilateral triangles: in an equilateral triangle, matching lateral pixel distances at the target vertex yields the correct 2D vertex position without depth information.
    Core geometric fact underlying Algorithm I (Section 2, Figs. 1-3).
  • domain assumption The per-step localization error distribution measured in 60 controlled lab trials (Vicon, stationary beacons) is representative of every step of long open-space trajectories in the simulation.
    Section 4.2 error model is applied identically at each simulated triangle step in Section 5; if errors grow with distance, lighting, or triangle deformation, the simulated advantage over dead-reckoning would shrink.
  • domain assumption Initial positions of all robots are known.
    Stated in Section 1: 'Assuming that the initial positions of the robots are known'; the method localizes relative to a known starting formation.
  • domain assumption The three beacon robots remain stationary while the moving robot executes the approach and building steps.
    Algorithm I assumes a fixed reference triangle; beacon motion during the maneuver would corrupt the pixel-distance equalization. Though the paper describes role rotation, it does not model beacon drift during a step.
  • domain assumption All three beacon robots remain inside the camera FOV during the maneuver, so pixel distances can be measured. The 280-pixel dt is chosen to satisfy this.
    Section 2 and 4.3 state dt is selected based on FOV constraints; if the formation is large relative to the camera FOV, Algorithm I fails.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Monocular Vision-Based Swarm Robot Localization Using Equilateral Triangular Formations." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/GYN4LPVZ

@misc{pith2026250719100,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Monocular Vision-Based Swarm Robot Localization Using Equilateral Triangular Formations},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/GYN4LPVZ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.19100}
}
read the original abstract

Localization of mobile robots is crucial for deploying robots in real-world applications such as search and rescue missions. This work aims to develop an accurate localization system applicable to swarm robots equipped only with low-cost monocular vision sensors and visual markers. The system is designed to operate in fully open spaces, without landmarks or support from positioning infrastructures. To achieve this, we propose a localization method based on equilateral triangular formations. By leveraging the geometric properties of equilateral triangles, the accurate two-dimensional position of each participating robot is estimated using one-dimensional lateral distance information between robots, which can be reliably and accurately obtained with a low-cost monocular vision sensor. Experimental and simulation results demonstrate that, as travel time increases, the positioning error of the proposed method becomes significantly smaller than that of a conventional dead-reckoning system, another low-cost localization approach applicable to open environments.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.19100 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Triangular formation for localization with three robots vs. four robots. (a) View from the moving robot’s perspective corresponding to the three-robot formation shown in (c). (b) View from the moving robot’s perspective corresponding to the four-robot formation shown in (d). (c) Arbitrary triangular formation based on three robots. (d) Equilateral triangular formation based on four robots. cannot compensate for this… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Movement of a robot to the target vertex to form the next equilateral triangular formation. The movement consists of three steps: the approaching step, the inner triangle step, and the building triangle step. vertex position. Once the moving robot reaches the target vertex, its role changes to that of a beacon robot, one of the previous beacon robots becomes the new moving robot, and the formation continues marching… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Algorithm used to create the next equilateral triangle in the desired moving direction. (a) The moving robot selects the target vertex and begins its maneuver. (b) Front-view image during the approaching step. (c) The orange line indicates the path of the moving robot. The purple arrow represents the extended height of the triangle. After passing point 2, the moving robot is controlled to maintain equal lateral dist… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (12 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Movement patterns of the triangular formation. (a) A single leftward movement step. (b) A single rightward movement step. (c) A single upward movement step. (d) A single downward movement step. (e) Straight-line movement through multiple rightward steps. (f) Turning mo…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Path for collision avoidance with an obstacle in a candidate path. Both paths P1={point 1, point 3, point c} and P2={point 1, point 2, point b} can avoid inner collisions, but only path P1 avoids outer collisions. robots within the formation, and outer collisions, whic…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Example path of the robot formation to the destination. The yellow region around the obstacle represents the safety zone, and the formation detours around this zone to avoid potential collisions [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Movement of an N-robot system. This configuration is a direct extension of the proposed four-robot system. and choose the next closest vertex, other than points b and c, as the new target. While the current implementation effectively handles simple obstacle avoidance b…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Mobile robot platform used for the experiments. (a) System components. Two cameras are mounted to view the front and back, and a single board computer (SBC) controls the entire system. Retro-reflective markers are attached to enable ground truth motion capture using a …
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Four-robot system in a controlled laboratory environment with a commercial motion capture system. Ten motion capture cameras provided ground truth data for the movement of each robot during the experiment. in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Example trajectory of a moving robot passing through the previous triangular formation of three beacon robots to create a new triangular formation. The robot moved from the blue circle to the red asterisk, which represents a vertex of the new equilateral triangle. Thi…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Empirical cumulative distribution functions (CDFs) of the distance errors for the proposed system along the lateral axis (blue) and the longitudinal axis (red) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Comparison of the movement paths generated by the dead-reckoning method (red) and the formations of the proposed method (blue), following the given trajectory (green) with many turns. The Ωwheel in Eq. (3) was set to (a) 5.8 rad/s and (b) 2.9 rad/s. The localization e…
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Comparison of the movement paths generated by the dead-reckoning method (red) and the formations of the proposed method (blue), following the given trajectory (green) representing a robot patrol case. The Ωwheel in Eq. (3) was set to (a) 5.8 rad/s and (b) 2.9 rad/s. T…
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Comparison of localization errors with the dead-reckoning system (red curve) and the proposed system (blue circles) under the trajectory given in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_14.png]
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Localization error corresponding to the trajectory in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_15.png]

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

64 extracted references · 38 canonical work pages

  1. [54]

    Simulation study on a method to localize four mobile robots based on triangular formation

    Kim, J.; Kwon, J.W.; Seo, J. Simulation study on a method to localize four mobile robots based on triangular formation. In Proceedings of the ION Pacific PNT, 2017, pp. 348–361. https://doi.org/10.33012/2017.15034

    work page arXiv 2017

  2. [1]

    Localization challenges for the emergence of the smart world

    Pahlavan, K.; Krishnamurthy, P .; Geng, Y. Localization challenges for the emergence of the smart world. IEEE Access 2015, 3, 3058–3067. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2015.2508648

    work page arXiv 2015

  3. [2]

    Robust control of mobility and communications in autonomous robot teams.IEEE Access 2013, 1, 290–309

    Fink, J.; Ribeiro, A.; Kumar, V . Robust control of mobility and communications in autonomous robot teams.IEEE Access 2013, 1, 290–309. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2013.2262013

    work page arXiv 2013

  4. [3]

    Global Positioning System: Signals, Measurements, and Performance ; Ganga-Jamuna Press, 2011

    Misra, P .; Enge, P . Global Positioning System: Signals, Measurements, and Performance ; Ganga-Jamuna Press, 2011

    work page 2011

  5. [4]

    Robust fine acquisition algorithm for GPS receiver with limited resources

    Tamazin, M.; Noureldin, A.; Korenberg, M.; Massoud, A. Robust fine acquisition algorithm for GPS receiver with limited resources. GPS Solut. 2016, 20, 77–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-015-0463-3

    work page doi:10.1007/s10291-015-0463-3 2016

  6. [5]

    Single-antenna-based GPS antijamming method exploiting polarization diversity

    Park, K.; Seo, J. Single-antenna-based GPS antijamming method exploiting polarization diversity. IEEE T rans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst. 2021, 57, 919–934. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAES.2020.3034025

    arXiv 2021

  7. [6]

    Ground vehicle navigation integrity monitoring for multi-constellation GNSS fused with cellular signals of opportunity

    Jia, M.; Lee, H.; Khalife, J.; Kassas, Z.M.; Seo, J. Ground vehicle navigation integrity monitoring for multi-constellation GNSS fused with cellular signals of opportunity. In Proceedings of the IEEE ITSC, 2021, pp. 3978–3983. https://doi.org/10.1109/ITSC4 8978.2021.9564686

    work page arXiv 2021

  8. [7]

    Urban road safety prediction: A satellite navigation perspective

    Lee, H.; Seo, J.; Kassas, Z. Urban road safety prediction: A satellite navigation perspective. IEEE Intell. T ransp. Syst. Mag. 2022, 14, 94–106. https://doi.org/10.1109/MITS.2022.3181557

    arXiv 2022

Show all 64 references
  1. [8]

    Single antenna based GPS signal reception condition classification using machine learning approaches

    Kim, S.; Park, S.; Seo, J. Single antenna based GPS signal reception condition classification using machine learning approaches. J. Position. Navig. Timing 2023, 12, 149–155. https://doi.org/10.11003/JPNT.2023.12.2.149

    2023 doi

  2. [9]

    Seamless accurate positioning in deep urban area based on mode switching between DGNSS and multipath mitigation positioning

    Lee, Y.; Hwang, Y.; Ahn, J.Y.; Seo, J.; Park, B. Seamless accurate positioning in deep urban area based on mode switching between DGNSS and multipath mitigation positioning. IEEE T rans. Intell. T ransp. Syst.2023, 24, 5856–5870. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS. 2023.3256040

    2023

  3. [10]

    Machine-learning-based classification of GPS signal reception conditions using a dual-polarized antenna in urban areas

    Kim, S.; Seo, J. Machine-learning-based classification of GPS signal reception conditions using a dual-polarized antenna in urban areas. In Proceedings of the IEEE/ION PLANS, Apr. 2023, pp. 113–118. https://doi.org/10.1109/PLANS53410.2023.10140036

    2023

  4. [11]

    Survey of wireless indoor positioning techniques and systems

    Liu, H.; Darabi, H.; Banerjee, P .; Liu, J. Survey of wireless indoor positioning techniques and systems. IEEE T rans. Syst. Man Cybern. Pt. C. Appl. Rev. 2007, 37, 1067–1080. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMCC.2007.905750

    2007

  5. [13]

    Evaluation of RF fingerprinting-aided RSS-based target localization for emergency response

    Lee, H.; Kang, T.; Jeong, S.; Seo, J. Evaluation of RF fingerprinting-aided RSS-based target localization for emergency response. In Proceedings of the IEEE VTC, Jun. 2022, pp. 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1109/VTC2022-Spring54318.2022.9860436

    2022

  6. [14]

    Integrated WiFi/PDR/smartphone using an unscented Kalman filter algorithm for 3D indoor localization

    Chen, G.; Meng, X.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Tian, P .; Yang, H. Integrated WiFi/PDR/smartphone using an unscented Kalman filter algorithm for 3D indoor localization. Sensors 2015, 15, 24595–24614. https://doi.org/10.3390/s150924595

    2015 doi

  7. [15]

    Human collaborative localization and mapping in indoor environments with non-continuous stereo

    Guerra, E.; Munguia, R.; Bolea, Y.; Grau, A. Human collaborative localization and mapping in indoor environments with non-continuous stereo. Sensors 2016, 16, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.3390/s16030275

    2016 doi

  8. [16]

    Practical simplified indoor multiwall path-loss model

    Kang, T.; Seo, J. Practical simplified indoor multiwall path-loss model. In Proceedings of the ICCAS, 2020, pp. 774–777. https://doi.org/10.23919/ICCAS50221.2020.9268260

    2020

  9. [17]

    Low-cost GNSS simulators with wireless clock synchronization for indoor positioning

    Kim, W.; Seo, J. Low-cost GNSS simulators with wireless clock synchronization for indoor positioning. IEEE Access 2023, 11, 55861–55874. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3210932

    2023

  10. [18]

    HELPS for emergency location service: Hyper-enhanced local positioning system

    Moon, H.; Park, H.; Seo, J. HELPS for emergency location service: Hyper-enhanced local positioning system. IEEE Wirel. Commun. 2024, 31, 276–282. https://doi.org/10.1109/MWC.011.2300354

    2024 doi

  11. [19]

    Optimal parameter inflation to enhance the availability of single-frequency GBAS for intelligent air transportation

    Lee, H.; Pullen, S.; Lee, J.; Park, B.; Yoon, M.; Seo, J. Optimal parameter inflation to enhance the availability of single-frequency GBAS for intelligent air transportation. IEEE T rans. Intell. T ransp. Syst.2022, 23, 17801–17808. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2022 .3157138

    2022 doi

  12. [20]

    Monitoring and mitigation of ionospheric anomalies for GNSS-based safety critical systems

    Lee, J.; Morton, Y.; Lee, J.; Moon, H.S.; Seo, J. Monitoring and mitigation of ionospheric anomalies for GNSS-based safety critical systems. IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 2017, 34, 96–110. https://doi.org/10.1109/MSP .2017.2716406. Machines 2025, 1, 0 19 of 20

    2017

  13. [21]

    Performance benefit from dual-frequency GNSS-based aviation applications under Ionospheric Scintillation: A new approach to fading process modeling

    Sun, K.; Chang, H.; Lee, J.; Seo, J.; Jade Morton, Y.; Pullen, S. Performance benefit from dual-frequency GNSS-based aviation applications under Ionospheric Scintillation: A new approach to fading process modeling. In Proceedings of the ION ITM, 2020, pp. 889–899. https://doi....

    2020

  14. [22]

    Markov chain-based stochastic modeling of deep signal fading: Availability assessment of dual-frequency GNSS-based aviation under ionospheric scintillation

    Sun, A.K.; Chang, H.; Pullen, S.; Kil, H.; Seo, J.; Morton, Y.J.; Lee, J. Markov chain-based stochastic modeling of deep signal fading: Availability assessment of dual-frequency GNSS-based aviation under ionospheric scintillation. Space Weather 2021, 19, 1–19. https://doi.org/...

    2021 doi

  15. [23]

    Statistical evaluation of the multi-frequency GPS ionospheric scintillation observation data

    Ahmed, N.; Seo, J. Statistical evaluation of the multi-frequency GPS ionospheric scintillation observation data. In Proceedings of the ICCAS, 2017, pp. 1792–1797. https://doi.org/10.23919/ICCAS.2017.8204261

    2017

  16. [24]

    GPS jamming and the impact on maritime navigation.J

    Grant, A.; Williams, P .; Ward, N.; Basker, S. GPS jamming and the impact on maritime navigation.J. Navig. 2009, 62, 173–187. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0373463308005213

    2009 doi

  17. [25]

    Dual-polarized GPS antenna array algorithm to adaptively mitigate a large number of interference signals

    Park, K.; Lee, D.; Seo, J. Dual-polarized GPS antenna array algorithm to adaptively mitigate a large number of interference signals. Aerosp. Sci. T echnol. 2018, 78, 387–396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2018.04.029

    2018 doi

  18. [26]

    Design and implementation of real-time software radio for anti-interference GPS/WAAS sensors

    Chen, Y.H.; Juang, J.C.; Seo, J.; Lo, S.; Akos, D.; De Lorenzo, D.; Enge, P . Design and implementation of real-time software radio for anti-interference GPS/WAAS sensors. Sensors 2012, 12, 13417–13440. https://doi.org/10.3390/s121013417

    2012 doi

  19. [27]

    SFOL DME pulse shaping through digital predistortion for high-accuracy DME

    Lee, S.; Kim, E.; Seo, J. SFOL DME pulse shaping through digital predistortion for high-accuracy DME. IEEE T rans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst. 2022, 58, 2616–2620. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAES.2021.3123934

    2022

  20. [28]

    Mitigation of GPS chirp jammer using a transversal FIR filter and LMS algorithm

    Kim, S.; Park, K.; Seo, J. Mitigation of GPS chirp jammer using a transversal FIR filter and LMS algorithm. In Proceedings of the ITC-CSCC, 2019, pp. 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/ITC-CSCC.2019.8793441

    2019

  21. [29]

    Real-time software receiver for GPS controlled reception pattern antenna array processing

    Chen, Y.H.; Juang, J.C.; De Lorenzo, D.; Seo, J.; Lo, S.; Enge, P .; Akos, D. Real-time software receiver for GPS controlled reception pattern antenna array processing. In Proceedings of the ION GNSS, 2010, pp. 1932–1941

    2010

  22. [30]

    Left-handed metamaterial bandpass filter for GPS, Earth exploration-satellite and WiMAX frequency sensing applications

    Jubaer Alam, M.; Ahamed, E.; Faruque, M.; Islam, M.; Tamim, A. Left-handed metamaterial bandpass filter for GPS, Earth exploration-satellite and WiMAX frequency sensing applications. PLOS ONE 2019, 14, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. pone.0224478

    2019 doi

  23. [31]

    First demonstration of the Korean eLoran accuracy in a narrow waterway using improved ASF maps

    Kim, W.; Son, P .W.; Park, S.G.; Park, S.H.; Seo, J. First demonstration of the Korean eLoran accuracy in a narrow waterway using improved ASF maps. IEEE T rans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst. 2022, 58, 1492–1496. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAES.2021.3114272

    2022

  24. [32]

    A method for dead reckoning parameter correction in pedestrian navigation system

    Jirawimut, R.; Ptasinski, P .; Garaj, V .; Cecelja, F.; Balachandran, W. A method for dead reckoning parameter correction in pedestrian navigation system. IEEE T rans. Instrum. Meas. 2003, 52, 209–215. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2002.807986

    2003

  25. [33]

    A dead reckoning localization system for mobile robots using inertial sensors and wheel revolution encoding

    Cho, B.S.; Moon, W.; Seo, W.J.; Baek, K.R. A dead reckoning localization system for mobile robots using inertial sensors and wheel revolution encoding. J. Mech. Sci. T echnol. 2011, 25, 2907–2917. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-011-0805-1

    2011 doi

  26. [34]

    Walking-speed estimation using a single inertial measurement unit for the older adults

    Byun, S.; Lee, H.; Han, J.; Kim, J.; Choi, E.; Kim, K. Walking-speed estimation using a single inertial measurement unit for the older adults. PLOS ONE 2019, 14, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227075

    2019 doi

  27. [35]

    Balancing-prioritized anti-slip control of a two-wheeled inverted pendulum robot vehicle on low-frictional surfaces with an acceleration slip indicator

    Kim, Y.; Kwon, S. Balancing-prioritized anti-slip control of a two-wheeled inverted pendulum robot vehicle on low-frictional surfaces with an acceleration slip indicator. Machines 2023, 11, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/machines11050553

    2023 doi

  28. [36]

    Map-based navigation in mobile robots: I

    Filliat, D.; Meyer, J.A. Map-based navigation in mobile robots: I. A review of localization strategies. Cogn. Sys. Res. 2003, 4, 243–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1389-0417(03)00008-1

    2003 doi

  29. [37]

    A solution to the simultaneous localization and map building (SLAM) problem

    Gamini Dissanayake, M.; Newman, P .; Clark, S.; Durrant-Whyte, H.; Csorba, M. A solution to the simultaneous localization and map building (SLAM) problem. IEEE T rans. Rob. Autom. 2001, 17, 229–241. https://doi.org/10.1109/70.938381

    2001 doi

  30. [38]

    An adaptive map-matching algorithm based on hierarchical fuzzy system from vehicular GPS data

    Tang, J.; Zhang, S.; Zou, Y.; Liu, F. An adaptive map-matching algorithm based on hierarchical fuzzy system from vehicular GPS data. PLOS ONE 2017, 12, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0188796

    2017 doi

  31. [39]

    Probabilistic robotics

    Thrun, S. Probabilistic robotics. Commun. ACM 2002, 45, 52–57. https://doi.org/10.1145/504729.504754

    2002

  32. [40]

    Simultaneous localization and mapping: Part I

    Durrant-Whyte, H.; Bailey, T. Simultaneous localization and mapping: Part I. IEEE Rob. Autom. Mag. 2006, 13, 99–108. https://doi.org/10.1109/MRA.2006.1638022

    2006 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Real-time monocular SLAM with low memory requirements.IEEE T rans

    Bresson, G.; Feraud, T.; Aufrere, R.; Checchin, P .; Chapuis, R. Real-time monocular SLAM with low memory requirements.IEEE T rans. Intell. T ransp. Syst.2015, 16, 1827–1839. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2014.2376780

    2015

  34. [42]

    Delayed monocular SLAM approach applied to unmanned aerial vehicles

    Munguia, R.; Urzua, S.; Grau, A. Delayed monocular SLAM approach applied to unmanned aerial vehicles. PLOS ONE 2016, 11, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0167197

    2016 doi

  35. [43]

    Virtual and real occlusion processing method of monocular visual assembly scene based on ORB-SLAM3

    Xu, H.; Chen, C.; Yin, Q.; Ma, C.; Guo, F. Virtual and real occlusion processing method of monocular visual assembly scene based on ORB-SLAM3. Machines 2025, 13, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/machines13030212

    2025 doi

  36. [44]

    SVO: Semidirect visual odometry for monocular and multicamera systems

    Forster, C.; Zhang, Z.; Gassner, M.; Werlberger, M.; Scaramuzza, D. SVO: Semidirect visual odometry for monocular and multicamera systems. IEEE T rans. Rob. 2017, 33, 249–265. https://doi.org/10.1109/TRO.2016.2623335

    2017

  37. [45]

    Research on SLAM algorithm of mobile robot based on the fusion of 2D LiDAR and depth camera

    Mu, L.; Yao, P .; Zheng, Y.; Chen, K.; Wang, F.; Qi, N. Research on SLAM algorithm of mobile robot based on the fusion of 2D LiDAR and depth camera. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 157628–157642. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3019659

    2020

  38. [46]

    SLAMM: Visual monocular SLAM with continuous mapping using multiple maps

    Daoud, H.; Sabri, A.; Loo, C.; Mansoor, A. SLAMM: Visual monocular SLAM with continuous mapping using multiple maps. PLOS ONE 2018, 13, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195878. Machines 2025, 1, 0 20 of 20

    2018 doi

  39. [47]

    Learning probabilistic features for robotic navigation using laser sensors

    Aznar, F.; Pujol, F.; Pujol, M.; Rizo, R.; Pujol, M.J. Learning probabilistic features for robotic navigation using laser sensors. PLOS ONE 2014, 9, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0112507

    2014 doi

  40. [48]

    Overview of multi-robot collaborative SLAM from the perspective of data fusion

    Chen, W.; Wang, X.; Gao, S.; Shang, G.; Zhou, C.; Li, Z.; Xu, C.; Hu, K. Overview of multi-robot collaborative SLAM from the perspective of data fusion. Machines 2023, 11, 1–74. https://doi.org/10.3390/machines11060653

    2023 doi

  41. [49]

    Advancing simultaneous localization and mapping with multi-sensor fusion and point cloud de-distortion

    Shao, H.; Zhao, Q.; Chen, H.; Yang, W.; Chen, B.; Feng, Z.; Zhang, J.; Teng, H. Advancing simultaneous localization and mapping with multi-sensor fusion and point cloud de-distortion. Machines 2023, 11, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/machines11060588

    2023 doi

  42. [50]

    A comparison of loop closing techniques in monocular SLAM

    Williams, B.; Cummins, M.; Neira, J.; Newman, P .; Reid, I.; Tardós, J. A comparison of loop closing techniques in monocular SLAM. Rob. Autom. Syst. 2009, 57, 1188–1197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2009.06.010

    2009 doi

  43. [51]

    SLAM–Loop closing with visually salient features

    Newman, P .; Ho, K. SLAM–Loop closing with visually salient features. In Proceedings of the IEEE ICRA, 2005, pp. 635–642. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROBOT.2005.1570189

    2005

  44. [52]

    LIO-CSI: LiDAR inertial odometry with loop closure combined with semantic information

    Wang, G.; Gao, S.; Ding, H.; Zhang, H.; Cai, H. LIO-CSI: LiDAR inertial odometry with loop closure combined with semantic information. PLOS ONE 2021, 16, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0261053

    2021 doi

  45. [53]

    Cooperative positioning with multiple robots

    Kurazume, R.; Nagata, S.; Hirose, S. Cooperative positioning with multiple robots. In Proceedings of the IEEE ICRA, 1994, pp. 1250–1256. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROBOT.1994.351315

    1994

  46. [55]

    Simultaneous localization and map building for mobile robot navigation

    Anousaki, G.; Kyriakopoulos, K. Simultaneous localization and map building for mobile robot navigation. IEEE Rob. Autom. Mag. 1999, 6, 42–53. https://doi.org/10.1109/100.793699

    1999 doi

  47. [56]

    Optimization of the simultaneous localization and map-building algorithm for real-time implementation

    Guivant, J.; Nebot, E. Optimization of the simultaneous localization and map-building algorithm for real-time implementation. IEEE T rans. Rob. Autom. 2001, 17, 242–257. https://doi.org/10.1109/70.938382

    2001 doi

  48. [57]

    Predicting the performance of cooperative simultaneous localization and mapping (C-SLAM)

    Mourikis, A.; Roumeliotis, S. Predicting the performance of cooperative simultaneous localization and mapping (C-SLAM). Int. J. Rob. Res. 2006, 25, 1273–1286. https://doi.org/10.1177/0278364906072515

    2006 doi

  49. [58]

    Hybrid indoor localization using IMU sensors and smartphone camera

    Poulose, A.; Han, D. Hybrid indoor localization using IMU sensors and smartphone camera. Sensors 2019, 19, 1–17. https: //doi.org/10.3390/s19235084

    2019 doi

  50. [59]

    Ground reflection elimination algorithms for enhanced distance measurement to the curbs using ultrasonic sensors

    Rhee, J.; Seo, J. Ground reflection elimination algorithms for enhanced distance measurement to the curbs using ultrasonic sensors. In Proceedings of the ION ITM, 2018, pp. 224–231. https://doi.org/10.33012/2018.15552

    2018

  51. [60]

    Low-cost curb detection and localization system using multiple ultrasonic sensors

    Rhee, J.; Seo, J. Low-cost curb detection and localization system using multiple ultrasonic sensors. Sensors 2019, 19, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19061389

    2019 doi

  52. [61]

    Mapping and path planning using communication graph of unlocalized and randomly deployed robotic swarm

    Kim, J.; Kwon, J.W.; Seo, J. Mapping and path planning using communication graph of unlocalized and randomly deployed robotic swarm. In Proceedings of the ICCAS, 2016, Vol. 0, pp. 865–868. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCAS.2016.7832414

    2016

  53. [62]

    AprilTag: A robust and flexible visual fiducial system

    Olson, E. AprilTag: A robust and flexible visual fiducial system. In Proceedings of the IEEE Int. Conf. Rob. Autom., 2011, p. 3400 – 3407. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRA.2011.5979561

    2011

  54. [63]

    Design and performance analysis of a low-cost aided dead reckoning navigator

    Gebre-Egziabher, D. Design and performance analysis of a low-cost aided dead reckoning navigator. Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford Univ., Stanford, CA, USA, 2004

    2004

  55. [64]

    Study of future on-board GNSS/INS hybridization architectures

    Vezinet, J. Study of future on-board GNSS/INS hybridization architectures. Ph.D. dissertation, Univ. of Toulouse, Toulouse, France, 2014

    2014

  56. [65]

    Multiple leader candidate and competitive position allocation for robust formation against member robot faults

    Kwon, J.W.; Kim, J.; Seo, J. Multiple leader candidate and competitive position allocation for robust formation against member robot faults. Sensors 2015, 15, 10771–10790. https://doi.org/10.3390/s150510771. Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contai...

    2015 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.