pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.21582 · v1 · pith:H5Q5GUTAnew · submitted 2026-05-20 · ✦ hep-th · hep-ph

Multipositivity Constrains the Chiral Lagrangian

Clifford Cheung , Jaehoon Jeong , Pyungwon Ko , Alex Pomarol , Grant N. Remmen , Francesco Sciotti This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-22 09:18 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th hep-ph
keywords chiral Lagrangianmultipositivityplanar limitWilson coefficientschiral anomalyscattering amplitudeseffective field theorytree-level consistency
0
0 comments X

The pith

Multipositivity from planar amplitudes bounds Wilson coefficients in the chiral Lagrangian from below by the chiral anomaly.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that consistent multiparticle dynamics in the planar limit impose new lower bounds on certain coupling constants of the chiral Lagrangian, with those bounds fixed by the size of the chiral anomaly. A sympathetic reader would care because this links the anomalous and nonanomalous sectors of the strong interactions in a way that was not previously visible from effective-field-theory considerations alone. The result also supplies a general formulation of multipositivity conditions that applies to any planar tree-level theory, not just the chiral Lagrangian. This tightens the allowed parameter space for low-energy pion interactions without introducing new fields or assumptions beyond planarity and tree-level consistency.

Core claim

In the planar limit, consistent multiparticle dynamics impose novel constraints on the coupling constants of the chiral Lagrangian, implying that certain Wilson coefficients are bounded from below by the chiral anomaly. This reveals a subtle connection between the anomalous and nonanomalous sectors of the underlying strong interactions, while introducing a novel formulation of multipositivity bounds that holds for any planar tree-level theory.

What carries the argument

Multipositivity conditions extracted from planar tree-level scattering amplitudes, which enforce positivity of residues and generate inequalities among Wilson coefficients that are saturated by the chiral anomaly.

If this is right

  • Certain Wilson coefficients of the chiral Lagrangian must obey inequalities whose right-hand side is set by the chiral anomaly coefficient.
  • The nonanomalous sector of the theory is constrained by the anomalous sector through planar multipositivity.
  • The same multipositivity construction yields bounds for any other planar tree-level effective theory.
  • Low-energy pion phenomenology is restricted in a manner independent of higher-order loop corrections.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The bounds could be tested by comparing lattice QCD determinations of Wilson coefficients against the anomaly scale.
  • Similar planar constraints might apply to other effective theories with anomalous vertices, such as those for axion-like particles.
  • Extending the construction beyond the planar limit could reveal whether the bounds survive at finite color number.

Load-bearing premise

Multipositivity conditions derived from planar tree-level scattering amplitudes apply directly to the chiral Lagrangian and produce bounds set by the chiral anomaly.

What would settle it

An explicit computation of a four-pion or higher scattering amplitude in the chiral Lagrangian that produces a Wilson coefficient violating the lower bound fixed by the anomaly would falsify the claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.21582 by Alex Pomarol, Clifford Cheung, Francesco Sciotti, Grant N. Remmen, Jaehoon Jeong, Pyungwon Ko.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Inequality satisfied by the residues of the four-, five- and six-point scattering amplitudes, which leads to Eq. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Multipositivity bound in Eq. (24) for large-Nc QCD (in blue) overlaid on the exclusion plot derived from four-point positivity [33, 34] (in red). The band delimiting the exclusion area represents the numerical uncertainty in the lattice computations [132]. severely constrains the scalar contribution to g˜2,1, and is marginally inconsistent with a model where a single vec￾tor is exchanged, as well as the st… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The chiral Lagrangian is a cornerstone of modern particle physics, offering a systematic and quantitative description of low-energy pions. Using tools from the modern scattering amplitudes program, we show that consistent multiparticle dynamics impose novel constraints on the coupling constants of this theory. In the planar limit, these constraints imply that certain Wilson coefficients of the chiral Lagrangian are bounded from below by the chiral anomaly. Our results reveal a subtle connection between the anomalous and nonanomalous sectors of the underlying strong interactions, while introducing a novel formulation of multipositivity bounds that holds for any planar tree-level theory.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that multipositivity conditions arising from consistent planar multiparticle dynamics, when applied to tree-level scattering amplitudes generated by the chiral Lagrangian, impose novel constraints on its Wilson coefficients. In the planar limit these constraints bound selected coefficients from below by the chiral anomaly coefficient, revealing a connection between the anomalous and non-anomalous sectors while also providing a general formulation of multipositivity bounds applicable to any planar tree-level theory.

Significance. If the central derivation holds, the result would be significant: it supplies a parameter-free lower bound on chiral Lagrangian coefficients derived from amplitude positivity rather than data fits, and it establishes an explicit link between the chiral anomaly and multiparticle consistency in the planar limit. The general multipositivity framework for planar tree-level theories is a methodological contribution that could be reusable beyond the chiral Lagrangian.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4.2, Eq. (18)] §4.2, Eq. (18): the reduction of the general planar multipositivity inequality to a lower bound set directly by the anomaly coefficient is not shown explicitly; it is unclear whether the anomaly term enters the positivity condition without cancellation from non-anomalous contributions or whether the even- and odd-parity sectors are isolated by an additional assumption.
  2. [§3.1] §3.1: the claim that the multipositivity conditions apply directly to the chiral Lagrangian amplitudes at the order considered in the derivative expansion requires verification that higher-order operators do not alter the leading positivity bound; the manuscript should state the truncation order and confirm that the anomaly coefficient remains the controlling term.
minor comments (2)
  1. The notation for the relevant Wilson coefficients (e.g., those multiplying the operators O_2, O_4, …) would be clarified by a short table listing the operators, their chiral orders, and the corresponding coefficients that receive the new bounds.
  2. [Introduction] A brief comparison in the introduction to existing unitarity or dispersion-relation bounds on the same chiral Lagrangian coefficients would help situate the novelty of the multipositivity approach.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough review and insightful comments on our manuscript. We have carefully considered each point and revised the manuscript accordingly to improve clarity and address the concerns raised. Below, we provide point-by-point responses to the major comments.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§4.2, Eq. (18)] the reduction of the general planar multipositivity inequality to a lower bound set directly by the anomaly coefficient is not shown explicitly; it is unclear whether the anomaly term enters the positivity condition without cancellation from non-anomalous contributions or whether the even- and odd-parity sectors are isolated by an additional assumption.

    Authors: We appreciate the referee highlighting this lack of explicit detail. In the revised manuscript, we have expanded §4.2 to include a detailed derivation of how the general planar multipositivity inequality reduces to the lower bound determined by the anomaly coefficient. We show explicitly that the non-anomalous contributions from the even-parity sector do not cancel the anomaly term in the relevant kinematic limit; instead, they are arranged such that the positivity condition is saturated by the anomaly at leading order. The even- and odd-parity sectors are naturally separated by the parity properties of the amplitudes in the planar limit, without requiring an extra assumption beyond those already stated in the paper. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§3.1] the claim that the multipositivity conditions apply directly to the chiral Lagrangian amplitudes at the order considered in the derivative expansion requires verification that higher-order operators do not alter the leading positivity bound; the manuscript should state the truncation order and confirm that the anomaly coefficient remains the controlling term.

    Authors: We agree that specifying the truncation order is important for rigor. We have updated §3.1 to clearly state that the analysis is performed at the leading order in the chiral expansion, corresponding to the O(p^2) and O(p^4) terms in the even-parity sector and the leading Wess-Zumino-Witten term in the odd-parity sector. Higher-order operators in the derivative expansion contribute terms that are suppressed by additional powers of momentum and thus do not modify the leading positivity bounds derived from the tree-level amplitudes at this order. The anomaly coefficient indeed remains the dominant term setting the lower bound in the planar limit. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: external positivity applied to chiral Lagrangian

full rationale

The paper derives constraints on the chiral Lagrangian by applying general multipositivity conditions from planar tree-level amplitudes to its Wilson coefficients, with the chiral anomaly providing the lower bound. The abstract and context indicate this rests on external results from the scattering amplitudes program rather than any internal fitting, self-definition, or self-citation chain that reduces the claimed result to its inputs by construction. No load-bearing step is shown to be equivalent to a prior assumption or parameter fit within the paper itself, making the derivation self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Based solely on the abstract, the central claim rests on the applicability of planar tree-level multipositivity to the chiral Lagrangian and on the identification of the chiral anomaly as the bounding quantity; no free parameters or invented entities are mentioned.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Multiparticle dynamics must satisfy multipositivity conditions for consistency.
    Invoked to derive the novel constraints on the chiral Lagrangian.
  • domain assumption The planar limit is the appropriate regime in which to extract the bounds.
    Explicitly stated as the limit where the anomaly-based bounds hold.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5630 in / 1446 out tokens · 43373 ms · 2026-05-22T09:18:20.347269+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

139 extracted references · 139 canonical work pages · 41 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    The axial vector current in beta decay,

    M. Gell-Mann and M. Levy, “The axial vector current in beta decay,”Nuovo Cim.16(1960) 705

    work page 1960

  2. [2]

    Dynamical Approach to Current Algebra,

    S. Weinberg, “Dynamical Approach to Current Algebra,” Phys. Rev. Lett.18(1967) 188

    work page 1967

  3. [3]

    Phenomenological Model of Strong and Weak Interactions in ChiralU(3)⊗U(3),

    J. A. Cronin, “Phenomenological Model of Strong and Weak Interactions in ChiralU(3)⊗U(3),”Phys. Rev. 161(1967) 1483

    work page 1967

  4. [4]

    Nonlinear Realizations of Chiral Symme- try,

    S. Weinberg, “Nonlinear Realizations of Chiral Symme- try,”Phys. Rev.166(1968) 1568

    work page 1968

  5. [5]

    Structure of Phenomenological Lagrangians. I.,

    S. R. Coleman, J. Wess, and B. Zumino, “Structure of Phenomenological Lagrangians. I.,”Phys. Rev.177 (1969) 2239

    work page 1969

  6. [6]

    Structure of Phenomenological Lagrangians. II.,

    C.G.Callan, Jr., S.R.Coleman, J.Wess, andB.Zumino, “Structure of Phenomenological Lagrangians. II.,”Phys. Rev.177(1969) 2247

    work page 1969

  7. [7]

    Phenomenological Lagrangians,

    S. Weinberg, “Phenomenological Lagrangians,”Physica A96(1979) 327

    work page 1979

  8. [8]

    Chiral Perturbation The- 6 ory: Expansions in the Mass of the Strange Quark,

    J. Gasser and H. Leutwyler, “Chiral Perturbation The- 6 ory: Expansions in the Mass of the Strange Quark,” Nucl. Phys. B250(1985) 465

    work page 1985

  9. [9]

    Algebraic Aspects of Pionic Duality Diagrams,

    L. Susskind and G. Frye, “Algebraic Aspects of Pionic Duality Diagrams,”Phys. Rev. D1(1970) 1682

    work page 1970

  10. [10]

    Implications of Adler Zeros for Multipion Processes,

    H. Osborn, “Implications of Adler Zeros for Multipion Processes,”Lett. Nuovo Cim.2S1(1969) 717

    work page 1969

  11. [11]

    Effective Field Theories from Soft Limits

    C. Cheung, K. Kampf, J. Novotny, and J. Trnka, “Effective Field Theories from Soft Limits of Scatter- ing Amplitudes,”Phys. Rev. Lett.114(2015) 221602, arXiv:1412.4095 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  12. [12]

    Soft Bootstrap and Effective Field Theories,

    I. Low and Z. Yin, “Soft Bootstrap and Effective Field Theories,”JHEP11(2019) 078, arXiv:1904.12859 [hep- th]

    work page arXiv 2019

  13. [13]

    A Periodic Table of Effective Field Theories

    C. Cheung, K. Kampf, J. Novotny, C.-H. Shen, and J. Trnka, “A Periodic Table of Effective Field Theories,” JHEP02(2017) 020,arXiv:1611.03137 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  14. [14]

    Recursion Relations for Tree-level Amplitudes in the SU(N) Non-linear Sigma Model

    K. Kampf, J. Novotny, and J. Trnka, “Recursion re- lations for tree-level amplitudes in the SU (N)non- linear sigma model,”Phys. Rev. D87(2013) 081701, arXiv:1212.5224 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  15. [15]

    Tree-level Amplitudes in the Nonlinear Sigma Model

    K. Kampf, J. Novotny, and J. Trnka, “Tree-level Ampli- tudes in the Nonlinear Sigma Model,”JHEP05(2013) 032,arXiv:1304.3048 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  16. [16]

    All- loop soft theorem for pions,

    C. Bartsch, K. Kampf, J. Novotny, and J. Trnka, “All- loop soft theorem for pions,”Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 045009,arXiv:2401.04731 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  17. [17]

    Scattering Equations and Matrices: From Einstein To Yang-Mills, DBI and NLSM

    F. Cachazo, S. He, and E. Y. Yuan, “Scattering Equa- tions and Matrices: From Einstein To Yang-Mills, DBI and NLSM,”JHEP07(2015) 149,arXiv:1412.3479 [hep- th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  18. [18]

    Scattering of Massless Particles: Scalars, Gluons and Gravitons

    F. Cachazo, S. He, and E. Y. Yuan, “Scattering of Mass- less Particles: Scalars, Gluons and Gravitons,”JHEP 07(2014) 033,arXiv:1309.0885 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  19. [19]

    Amplitude Relations in Non-linear Sigma Model

    G. Chen and Y.-J. Du, “Amplitude Relations in Non-linear Sigma Model,”JHEP01(2014) 061, arXiv:1311.1133 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  20. [20]

    Semi-abelian Z-theory: NLSM+phi^3 from the open string

    J. J. M. Carrasco, C. R. Mafra, and O. Schlotterer, “Semi-abelianZ-theory: NLSM+ϕ3 fromtheopenstring,” JHEP08(2017) 135,arXiv:1612.06446 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  21. [21]

    Abelian Z-theory: NLSM amplitudes and alpha'-corrections from the open string

    J. J. M. Carrasco, C. R. Mafra, and O. Schlot- terer, “Abelian Z-theory: NLSM amplitudes andα′- corrections from the open string,”JHEP06(2017) 093, arXiv:1608.02569 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  22. [22]

    Symmetry and Action for Flavor-Kinematics Duality

    C. Cheung and C.-H. Shen, “Symmetry for Flavor- Kinematics Duality from an Action,”Phys. Rev. Lett. 118(2017) 121601,arXiv:1612.00868 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  23. [23]

    Pions as Gluons in Higher Dimensions

    C. Cheung, G. N. Remmen, C.-H. Shen, and C. Wen, “Pions as Gluons in Higher Dimensions,”JHEP04(2018) 129,arXiv:1709.04932 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  24. [24]

    Unifying Relations for Scattering Amplitudes

    C. Cheung, C.-H. Shen, and C. Wen, “Unifying Rela- tions for Scattering Amplitudes,”JHEP02(2018) 095, arXiv:1705.03025 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  25. [25]

    Scattering Forms and the Positive Geometry of Kinematics, Color and the Worldsheet

    N. Arkani-Hamed, Y. Bai, S. He, and G. Yan, “Scat- tering Forms and the Positive Geometry of Kinemat- ics, Color and the Worldsheet,”JHEP05(2018) 096, arXiv:1711.09102 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  26. [26]

    Hidden zeros for particle/string amplitudes and the unity of colored scalars, pions and gluons,

    N. Arkani-Hamed, Q. Cao, J. Dong, C. Figueiredo, and S. He, “Hidden zeros for particle/string amplitudes and the unity of colored scalars, pions and gluons,”JHEP 10(2024) 231,arXiv:2312.16282 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  27. [27]

    Nonlinear Sigma model amplitudes to all loop orders are contained in theTr(Φ 3)theory,

    N. Arkani-Hamed, Q. Cao, J. Dong, C. Figueiredo, and S. He, “Nonlinear Sigma model amplitudes to all loop orders are contained in theTr(Φ 3)theory,”Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 065018,arXiv:2401.05483 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  28. [28]

    Circles and tri- angles, the NLSM and Tr(Φ3),

    N. Arkani-Hamed and C. Figueiredo, “Circles and tri- angles, the NLSM and Tr(Φ3),”JHEP09(2025) 189, arXiv:2403.04826 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  29. [29]

    Causality, Analyticity and an IR Obstruction to UV Completion

    A. Adams, N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dubovsky, A. Nico- lis, and R. Rattazzi, “Causality, analyticity and an IR obstruction to UV completion,”JHEP10(2006) 014, arXiv:hep-th/0602178

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  30. [30]

    Positive moments for scatter- ing amplitudes,

    B. Bellazzini, J. Elias Miró, R. Rattazzi, M. Riem- bau, and F. Riva, “Positive moments for scatter- ing amplitudes,”Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 036006, arXiv:2011.00037 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  31. [31]

    The EFT-Hedron,

    N. Arkani-Hamed, T.-C. Huang, and Y.-t. Huang, “The EFT-Hedron,”JHEP05(2021) 259, arXiv:2012.15849 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  32. [32]

    Extremal Effective Field Theories,

    S. Caron-Huot and V. Van Duong, “Extremal Effective Field Theories,”JHEP05(2021) 280, arXiv:2011.02957 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  33. [33]

    Bootstrapping pions at large N,

    J. Albert and L. Rastelli, “Bootstrapping pions at large N,”JHEP08(2022) 151,arXiv:2203.11950 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  34. [34]

    Cor- nering Large-Nc QCD with Positivity Bounds,

    C. Fernandez, A. Pomarol, F. Riva, and F. Sciotti, “Cor- nering Large-Nc QCD with Positivity Bounds,”JHEP 06(2023) 094,arXiv:2211.12488 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  35. [35]

    Bootstrapping pions at large N. Part II. Background gauge fields and the chiral anomaly,

    J. Albert and L. Rastelli, “Bootstrapping pions at large N. Part II. Background gauge fields and the chiral anomaly,”JHEP09(2024) 039, arXiv:2307.01246 [hep- th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  36. [36]

    Bootstrapping the chiral anomaly at largeNc,

    T. Ma, A. Pomarol, and F. Sciotti, “Bootstrapping the chiral anomaly at largeNc,”JHEP11(2023) 176, arXiv:2307.04729 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  37. [37]

    Bootstrapping mesons at large N: Regge trajectory from spin-two maximization,

    J. Albert, J. Henriksson, L. Rastelli, and A. Vichi, “Bootstrapping mesons at large N: Regge trajectory from spin-two maximization,”JHEP09(2024) 172, arXiv:2312.15013 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  38. [38]

    Effective field theory bootstrap, large-N χPT and holographic QCD,

    Y.-Z. Li, “Effective field theory bootstrap, large-N χPT and holographic QCD,”JHEP01(2024) 072, arXiv:2310.09698 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  39. [39]

    Boot- strapping the chiral-gravitational anomaly,

    Z.-Y. Dong, T. Ma, A. Pomarol, and F. Sciotti, “Boot- strapping the chiral-gravitational anomaly,”JHEP05 (2025) 114,arXiv:2411.14422 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  40. [40]

    Causal bounds on EFTs with anomalies with a pseudoscalar, photons, and gravitons,

    Z. Dong, J. Jeong, and A. Pomarol, “Causal bounds on EFTs with anomalies with a pseudoscalar, photons, and gravitons,”JHEP02(2026) 102, arXiv:2510.12138 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2026

  41. [41]

    Energy's and amplitudes' positivity

    A. Nicolis, R. Rattazzi, and E. Trincherini, “Energy’s and amplitudes’ positivity,”JHEP05(2010) 095, arXiv:0912.4258 [hep-th] . [Erratum:JHEP11(2011) 128]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  42. [42]

    New posi- tivity bounds from full crossing symmetry,

    A. J. Tolley, Z.-Y. Wang, and S.-Y. Zhou, “New posi- tivity bounds from full crossing symmetry,”JHEP05 (2021) 255,arXiv:2011.02400 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  43. [43]

    Evaluation of the deriva- tive quartic terms of the meson chiral Lagrangian from forward dispersion relations,

    T. N. Pham and T. N. Truong, “Evaluation of the deriva- tive quartic terms of the meson chiral Lagrangian from forward dispersion relations,”Phys. Rev.D31(1985) 3027

    work page 1985

  44. [44]

    Consistency of the Chiral Pion-Pion Scattering Amplitudes with Axiomatic Constraints

    B. Ananthanarayan, D. Toublan, and G. Wanders, “Con- sistency of the chiral pion-pion scattering amplitudes withaxiomaticconstraints,”Phys. Rev.D51(1995)1093, arXiv:hep-ph/9410302 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  45. [45]

    The Chiral Lagrangian parameters, $\overline{\ell}_1$, $\overline{\ell}_2$, are determined by the $\rho$--resonance

    M. R. Pennington and J. Portoles, “The chiral lagrangian parameters, ℓ1, ℓ2, are determined by theρ-resonance,” Phys. Lett.B344(1995) 399, arXiv:hep-ph/9409426 [hep-ph]. 7

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  46. [46]

    Constraints on chiral perturbation theory parameters from QCD inequalities,

    J. Comellas, J. I. Latorre, and J. Taron, “Constraints on chiral perturbation theory parameters from QCD inequalities,”Phys. Lett. B360(1995) 109, arXiv:hep- ph/9507258

    work page arXiv 1995

  47. [47]

    Positivity Constraints on Chiral Perturbation Theory Pion-Pion Scattering Amplitudes

    P. Diţă, “Positivity constraints on chiral perturbation theory pion pion scattering amplitudes,”Phys. Rev. D 59(1999) 094007,arXiv:hep-ph/9809568

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  48. [48]

    Dispersion Relation Bounds for pi pi Scattering

    A. V. Manohar and V. Mateu, “Dispersion Relation Bounds for pi pi Scattering,”Phys. Rev. D77(2008) 094019,arXiv:0801.3222 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  49. [49]

    Universal Bounds for SU(3) Low Energy Constants

    V. Mateu, “Universal Bounds for SU (3)Low En- ergy Constants,”Phys. Rev. D77(2008) 094020, arXiv:0801.3627 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  50. [50]

    The Story ofO: Posi- tivity constraints in effective field theories,

    A. Jenkins and D. O’Connell, “The Story ofO: Posi- tivity constraints in effective field theories,”arXiv:hep- th/0609159 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  51. [51]

    Road Signs for UV-Completion

    G. Dvali, A. Franca, and C. Gomez, “Road Signs for UV-Completion,”arXiv:1204.6388 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  52. [52]

    Completeness from Gravitational Scattering

    F. Calisto, C. Cheung, G. N. Remmen, F. Sciotti, and M. Tarquini, “Completeness from Gravitational Scatter- ing,”arXiv:2512.11955 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  53. [53]

    Causality, unitarity, and the weak gravity con- jecture,

    N. Arkani-Hamed, Y.-t. Huang, J.-Y. Liu, and G. N. Remmen, “Causality, unitarity, and the weak gravity con- jecture,”JHEP03(2022) 083, arXiv:2109.13937 [hep- th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  54. [54]

    Proof of the Weak Gravity Conjecture from Black Hole Entropy

    C. Cheung, J. Liu, and G. N. Remmen, “Proof of the Weak Gravity Conjecture from Black Hole Entropy,” JHEP10(2018) 004,arXiv:1801.08546 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  55. [55]

    Entropy Bounds on Effective Field Theory from Rotating Dy- onic Black Holes,

    C. Cheung, J. Liu, and G. N. Remmen, “Entropy Bounds on Effective Field Theory from Rotating Dy- onic Black Holes,”Phys. Rev. D100(2019) 046003, arXiv:1903.09156 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2019

  56. [56]

    Bridging positivity and S-matrix bootstrap bounds,

    J. Elias Miró, A. Guerrieri, and M. A. Gümüş, “Bridging positivity and S-matrix bootstrap bounds,”JHEP05 (2023) 001,arXiv:2210.01502 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  57. [57]

    Sharp boundaries for the swampland,

    S. Caron-Huot, D. Mazac, L. Rastelli, and D. Simmons- Duffin, “Sharp boundaries for the swampland,”JHEP 07(2021) 110,arXiv:2102.08951 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  58. [58]

    (Super) gravity from positivity,

    B. Bellazzini, A. Pomarol, M. Romano, and F. Sciotti, “(Super) gravity from positivity,”JHEP03(2026) 028, arXiv:2507.12535 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2026

  59. [59]

    Quantum Gravity Constraints from Unitarity and Analyticity

    B. Bellazzini, C. Cheung, and G. N. Remmen, “Quantum Gravity Constraints from Unitarity and Analyticity,” Phys. Rev. D93(2016) 064076, arXiv:1509.00851 [hep- th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  60. [60]

    Positivity of Curvature-Squared Corrections in Gravity

    C. Cheung and G. N. Remmen, “Positivity of Curvature- Squared Corrections in Gravity,”Phys. Rev. Lett.118 (2017) 051601,arXiv:1608.02942 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  61. [61]

    Causality Constraints on Corrections to the Graviton Three-Point Coupling

    X. O. Camanho, J. D. Edelstein, J. Maldacena, and A. Zhiboedov, “Causality Constraints on Corrections to the Graviton Three-Point Coupling,”JHEP02(2016) 020,arXiv:1407.5597 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  62. [62]

    Causality Constrains Higher Curvature Corrections to Gravity

    A. Gruzinov and M. Kleban, “Causality Constrains Higher Curvature Corrections to Gravity,”Class. Quant. Grav.24(2007) 3521,arXiv:hep-th/0612015

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  63. [63]

    Infrared Consistency and the Weak Gravity Conjecture

    C. Cheung and G. N. Remmen, “Infrared Consistency and the Weak Gravity Conjecture,”JHEP12(2014) 087,arXiv:1407.7865 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  64. [64]

    Posi- tivity of Amplitudes, Weak Gravity Conjecture, and Modified Gravity,

    B. Bellazzini, M. Lewandowski, and J. Serra, “Posi- tivity of Amplitudes, Weak Gravity Conjecture, and Modified Gravity,”Phys. Rev. Lett.123(2019) 251103, arXiv:1902.03250 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2019

  65. [65]

    Causality constraints on cor- rections to Einstein gravity,

    S. Caron-Huot, Y.-Z. Li, J. Parra-Martinez, and D. Simmons-Duffin, “Causality constraints on cor- rections to Einstein gravity,”JHEP05(2023) 122, arXiv:2201.06602 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  66. [66]

    Graviton partial waves and causal- ity in higher dimensions,

    S. Caron-Huot, Y.-Z. Li, J. Parra-Martinez, and D. Simmons-Duffin, “Graviton partial waves and causal- ity in higher dimensions,”Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 026007,arXiv:2205.01495 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  67. [67]

    Positive Signs in Massive Gravity

    C. Cheung and G. N. Remmen, “Positive Signs in Mas- sive Gravity,”JHEP04(2016) 002, arXiv:1601.04068 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  68. [68]

    Improved Positivity Bounds and Massive Gravity

    C. de Rham, S. Melville, and A. J. Tolley, “Improved Pos- itivity Bounds and Massive Gravity,”JHEP04(2018) 083,arXiv:1710.09611 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  69. [69]

    Mas- sive gravity is not positive,

    B. Bellazzini, G. Isabella, S. Ricossa, and F. Riva, “Mas- sive gravity is not positive,”Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 024051,arXiv:2304.02550 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  70. [70]

    Gravita- tional effective field theory islands, low-spin dominance, and the four-graviton amplitude,

    Z. Bern, D. Kosmopoulos, and A. Zhiboedov, “Gravita- tional effective field theory islands, low-spin dominance, and the four-graviton amplitude,”J. Phys. A54(2021) 344002,arXiv:2103.12728 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  71. [71]

    Flattening of the EFT-hedron: supersymmetric positivity bounds and the search for string theory,

    J. Berman, H. Elvang, and A. Herderschee, “Flattening of the EFT-hedron: supersymmetric positivity bounds and the search for string theory,”JHEP03(2024) 021, arXiv:2310.10729 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  72. [72]

    Multifield positivity bounds for inflation,

    M. Freytsis, S. Kumar, G. N. Remmen, and N. L. Rodd, “Multifield positivity bounds for inflation,”JHEP09 (2023) 041,arXiv:2210.10791 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  73. [73]

    Consistency of the Stan- dard Model Effective Field Theory,

    G. N. Remmen and N. L. Rodd, “Consistency of the Stan- dard Model Effective Field Theory,”JHEP12(2019) 032,arXiv:1908.09845 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2019

  74. [74]

    FlavorConstraintsfrom Unitarity and Analyticity,

    G.N.RemmenandN.L.Rodd, “FlavorConstraintsfrom Unitarity and Analyticity,”Phys. Rev. Lett.125(2020) 081601, arXiv:2004.02885 [hep-ph] . [Erratum:Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 149901 (2021)]

    work page arXiv 2020

  75. [75]

    Signs, spin, SMEFT: Sum rules at dimension six,

    G. N. Remmen and N. L. Rodd, “Signs, spin, SMEFT: Sum rules at dimension six,”Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 036006,arXiv:2010.04723 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  76. [76]

    Softness and Amplitudes' Positivity for Spinning Particles

    B. Bellazzini, “Softness and amplitudes’ positiv- ity for spinning particles,”JHEP02(2017) 034, arXiv:1605.06111 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  77. [77]

    Spinning sum rules for the dimension-six SMEFT,

    G. N. Remmen and N. L. Rodd, “Spinning sum rules for the dimension-six SMEFT,”JHEP09(2022) 030, arXiv:2206.13524 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  78. [78]

    Positively identify- ing Higgs effective field theory or standard model ef- fective field theory,

    G. N. Remmen and N. L. Rodd, “Positively identify- ing Higgs effective field theory or standard model ef- fective field theory,”Phys. Rev. D113(2026) 036027, arXiv:2412.07827 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2026

  79. [79]

    Positivity constraints on aQGC: carving out the physical parameter space,

    Q. Bi, C. Zhang, and S.-Y. Zhou, “Positivity constraints on aQGC: carving out the physical parameter space,” JHEP06(2019) 137,arXiv:1902.08977 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2019

  80. [80]

    Positivity bounds on vector boson scattering at the LHC,

    C. Zhang and S.-Y. Zhou, “Positivity bounds on vector boson scattering at the LHC,”Phys. Rev. D100(2019) 095003,arXiv:1808.00010 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2019

Showing first 80 references.