Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

MultiModal Bias: Introducing a Framework for Stereotypical Bias Assessment beyond Gender and Race in Vision Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2303.12734 v1 pith:H5WAAV6I submitted 2023-03-16 cs.CV cs.CLcs.LG

MultiModal Bias: Introducing a Framework for Stereotypical Bias Assessment beyond Gender and Race in Vision Language Models

classification cs.CV cs.CLcs.LG
keywords biasmodelsgroupsmultimodalgenderlanguageselfsupervised
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recent breakthroughs in self supervised training have led to a new class of pretrained vision language models. While there have been investigations of bias in multimodal models, they have mostly focused on gender and racial bias, giving much less attention to other relevant groups, such as minorities with regard to religion, nationality, sexual orientation, or disabilities. This is mainly due to lack of suitable benchmarks for such groups. We seek to address this gap by providing a visual and textual bias benchmark called MMBias, consisting of around 3,800 images and phrases covering 14 population subgroups. We utilize this dataset to assess bias in several prominent self supervised multimodal models, including CLIP, ALBEF, and ViLT. Our results show that these models demonstrate meaningful bias favoring certain groups. Finally, we introduce a debiasing method designed specifically for such large pre-trained models that can be applied as a post-processing step to mitigate bias, while preserving the remaining accuracy of the model.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Prototypicality Bias Reveals Blindspots in Multimodal Evaluation Metrics

    cs.CV 2026-01 conditional novelty 6.0

    Prototypicality bias: common text-to-image metrics systematically prefer plausible-but-wrong images over correct non-prototypical ones; PROTOSCORE mitigates but does not eliminate the failure.

  2. VLBiasBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Evaluating Bias in Large Vision-Language Model

    cs.CV 2024-06 conditional novelty 6.0

    VLBiasBench is a new large-scale benchmark with 128,342 samples covering nine social bias categories plus two intersectional ones to evaluate biases in LVLMs.