Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

An infalling detector can locate a quantum black hole horizon and measure its temperature locally, without meeting a firewall.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-12 03:08 UTC pith:H5X3QTCE

load-bearing objection Solid JT calculation of an infalling detector that feels a temperature-dependent horizon peak from Schwarzian dressing, without a firewall; the result stands or falls with their two-sided analytic continuation. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2607.03344 v1 pith:H5X3QTCE submitted 2026-07-03 hep-th gr-qc

Falling through the horizon of a quantum black hole

Victor Franken , Thomas G. Mertens , Bruno de S. L. Torres This is my paper
classification hep-th gr-qc
keywords JT gravitySchwarzian theorygravitational dressingUnruh-DeWitt detectorblack hole horizonequivalence principlefirewallthermofield double
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

In classical general relativity the equivalence principle says that crossing a large black hole horizon is locally uneventful: no measurement made only near the trajectory can tell you that a horizon is there. This paper asks whether quantum gravity changes that conclusion. Working in two-dimensional Jackiw–Teitelboim gravity, the authors define both the detector’s path and the field it couples to by gravitational dressing to the dynamical Schwarzian mode of the boundary. They extend that dressing into the black-hole interior by analytic continuation in the thermofield-double state. The resulting dressed correlators produce a clear peak in the detector’s excitation probability exactly at the horizon, and the height of the peak depends on the black-hole temperature. Thus a local observer can in principle detect both the horizon’s location and its temperature. The same calculation shows that the excitation probability still falls exponentially with the detector’s energy gap, so the horizon does not act as a firewall that destroys the probe.

Core claim

Once local observables and the infalling trajectory are gravitationally dressed to the Schwarzian mode (including the two-sided extension needed behind the horizon), an Unruh–DeWitt detector registers a smooth, finite peak in excitation probability at the horizon whose magnitude depends on the black-hole temperature; the peak allows local determination of both horizon location and temperature, yet the high-energy fall-off remains exponential, so the detector does not encounter a firewall.

What carries the argument

The two-sided gravitational dressing of bulk points: exterior points are anchored by null rays to one Schwarzian boundary curve, while interior points are obtained by the analytic continuation f_R(u) = −f(−u + iβ/2) + iβ/2 that dresses them to both boundaries of the thermofield double; this turns both the affine parameter and the scalar two-point function into operators of the Schwarzian theory whose near-horizon expectation values produce the detector response.

Load-bearing premise

The claim rests on accepting that the chosen analytic continuation of a single Schwarzian mode correctly defines diffeomorphism-invariant observables once a point has crossed the horizon; if that continuation is wrong, the peak and the temperature signal disappear.

What would settle it

Compute or measure the vacuum excitation probability of a smoothly switched Unruh–DeWitt detector on an infalling null geodesic that straddles the horizon; if the probability remains flat (independent of the affine-time center of the switch) and independent of black-hole temperature even after gravitational dressing is included, the central claim is false.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper computes the vacuum excitation probability of an infalling Unruh-DeWitt detector coupled to a massless scalar in quantum JT gravity, with both the detector trajectory and the bulk field gravitationally dressed to the Schwarzian mode. After reviewing the semiclassical AdS2 baseline, it extends the one-sided exterior dressing U=F(u), V=F(v) to the black-hole interior via the analytic continuation f_R(u)=−f(−u+iβ/2)+iβ/2 of a single thermal reparametrization in the thermofield-double state, yielding continuous two-point functions W_LF and W_FF. In the near-horizon regime the affine-time operator and the dressed correlator reduce to power-law expressions controlled by the IR Schwarzian bilocal; numerical evaluation of the resulting double-contour integral for a Gaussian switching function then produces a smooth peak in P_exc at the horizon whose height grows with β, allowing local extraction of horizon location and temperature, while the high-ω asymptotics remain exponentially suppressed, so that the detector does not meet the authors’ operational firewall criterion.

Significance. If the proposed two-sided dressing is accepted, the work supplies a fully calculable, diffeomorphism-invariant example in which quantum-gravitational fluctuations of the Schwarzian produce a local, operationally measurable violation of the equivalence principle at a black-hole horizon without generating a firewall. The exact thermal bilocal of the Schwarzian theory, the closed-form near-horizon asymptotics, and the high-frequency analysis of Appendix E constitute concrete, reproducible technical strengths that go beyond qualitative arguments. The results therefore offer a sharp, falsifiable prediction for detector response near near-extremal horizons and a useful benchmark for other bulk-reconstruction proposals (modular translations, EOW-brane microstates, etc.).

major comments (2)
  1. [§1.1, §4.2–4.4, Eqs. (1.5),(4.13)–(4.14)] The entire interior analysis (W_LF/W_FF in Eqs. (4.15),(4.18), the affine-time map (5.8), the near-horizon correlator (5.22), and the numerical peaks of Figs. 8–9) rests on the specific analytic continuation f_R(u)=−f(−u+iβ/2)+iβ/2 introduced in Eqs. (1.5) and (4.13)–(4.14). Hermiticity (§4.4) and integral convergence fix the iϵ signs but do not independently establish that the resulting operators are the correct diffeomorphism-invariant observables behind the horizon. A different interior reconstruction (independent left/right Schwarzians, half-sided modular translations, or an EOW-brane state) could alter the late-time bilocal and eliminate both the peak and its β-dependence while leaving the exterior calculation intact. The manuscript should either supply an independent derivation of this continuation (e.g., from the modular crossed product or from a bulk diffeomorphism that matches t
  2. [§1.3, §5.3.5, App. E] The operational firewall criterion of §1.3 (power-law versus faster-than-polynomial decay of P_exc(ω)) is used to conclude that the detector is “safe.” While the high-ω asymptotics of Appendix E indeed show exponential decay for the Gaussian switch, the criterion itself is introduced ad hoc; a smooth but non-Gaussian switch, or a detector coupled to higher derivatives of the field, can convert an exponential into a power law (as the authors themselves note around Eq. (5.37)). The claim that “the detector does not meet a firewall” therefore depends on both the specific switching function and the precise definition. The paper should either justify why the Gaussian case is representative of all physically allowed smooth couplings or rephrase the conclusion as “no firewall under the stated criterion and switching.”
minor comments (4)
  1. [§5.3.3–5.3.4] Figures 8–10 report results only for C=1 and selected β; a short discussion of how the peak height scales with C (or with the semiclassical parameter C/β) would help the reader assess the size of the effect in the regime where JT gravity is a controlled approximation to higher-dimensional near-extremal black holes.
  2. [§5.3, App. C] The ordering ambiguities between quenched and annealed averages of the exponential of the affine-time operator are acknowledged in §5.3 and Appendix C, yet the main text proceeds with the near-horizon approximation (5.21) without quantifying the residual difference at the values of λ0 used in the plots. A one-sentence estimate of that difference would strengthen the claim that the peak is robust.
  3. [Fig. 3, §4.2–4.3] Typographical inconsistencies appear in the contour labels of Figure 3a (γ versus γ′) and in the sign conventions for the analytic continuation of u versus u′; a uniform convention throughout §§4–5 would improve readability.
  4. [§1.1] Reference [42] is cited for the modular-flow motivation of the exterior dressing, but the connection is only sketched; a brief paragraph recalling how geometric modular flow selects the null-ray dressing would make the paper more self-contained.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Minor self-citation for exterior dressing uniqueness; central peak and temperature extraction are independent computations from the known Schwarzian bilocal IR, not forced by definition or fit.

specific steps
  1. uniqueness imported from authors [§1.1 (around Eq. 1.3) and citation [42]]
    "It was argued in [42] that the dressing (1.3) is the only viable gravitational dressing in JT gravity that is consistent with the construction of diffeomorphism-invariant observables in quantum gravity via the modular crossed product [43]. This provides a strong motivation for this choice of dressing..."

    The preferred exterior dressing that seeds the entire construction is justified by uniqueness claimed in a paper with overlapping authors (Mertens, Torres), imported as an external fact without re-derivation here. This is a mild uniqueness-from-authors step; it does not force the interior peak or temperature extraction, which follow from subsequent independent computation with the bilocal.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained: exterior dressing (1.3) is taken from prior literature (including overlapping-author [42] for modular uniqueness), the two-sided extension (1.5)/(4.13–4.14) is proposed and checked for hermiticity/convergence (§4.4), and P_exc is then obtained by inserting the exact thermal bilocal (standard result (4.7), not self-derived) into the standard UDW formula, taking the near-horizon power-law limit (5.6)/(5.22), and evaluating the resulting double integral numerically/asymptotically. The peak at λ_0=0 and β-dependence emerge from that IR decay and the Gaussian switching; they are not inserted by hand, fitted to data, or definitionally equivalent to the inputs. No fitted-input-as-prediction, no renaming of known empirical patterns, and no self-definitional loop. The single self-citation of uniqueness is not load-bearing for the new interior results (the calculation would stand under any choice of this dressing family). Score 2 reflects only that minor, non-central self-citation.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 4 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on the standard JT/Schwarzian setup plus one non-standard but explicitly stated extension of the dressing across the horizon. Free parameters are the usual JT couplings and detector parameters; no data fitting occurs. The invented entity is the two-sided analytic continuation of the dressing itself.

free parameters (3)
  • Schwarzian coupling C
    Sets the strength of quantum fluctuations; results are plotted for C=1 but the peak location scales as A/C^{2} with A ∝ C/Z₀(β).
  • inverse temperature β
    Controls both the classical horizon and the size of quantum corrections; P_exc grows with β.
  • detector switching width σ and energy gap ω
    Chosen by hand to satisfy the near-horizon and near-gapless regimes; results are shown for representative values (σ=0.1, σω≪1 or large).
axioms (4)
  • domain assumption JT gravity on the disk with Schwarzian boundary dynamics correctly captures the leading quantum gravity effects of near-extremal black holes.
    Standard in the literature; invoked throughout §§1–2.
  • domain assumption The preferred exterior dressing U=F(u), V=F(v) is the unique one compatible with the modular crossed product.
    Motivated by prior work (Mertens–Tappeiner–Torres); used as starting point for the interior extension.
  • ad hoc to paper Interior points are obtained by the analytic continuation u → −u ± iβ/2 of the single Schwarzian mode, with the sign fixed by hermiticity and convergence.
    Proposed in §1.1 and §4.2–4.4; load-bearing for all interior correlators.
  • ad hoc to paper A detector encounters a firewall if and only if its excitation probability decays at most as a power law in the energy gap ω.
    Operational definition introduced in §1.3; used to conclude absence of a firewall.
invented entities (1)
  • two-sided Schwarzian dressing of interior bulk points via f_L and f_R related by analytic continuation no independent evidence
    purpose: to define diffeomorphism-invariant local observables and affine time behind the horizon
    Extends the one-sided dressing of earlier papers; no independent experimental handle outside the model.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 44754 in / 2888 out tokens · 26366 ms · 2026-07-12T03:08:14.854034+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We study quantum-gravitational effects on the response of an infalling detector as it crosses the horizon of a near-extremal black hole in the framework of quantum JT gravity. These effects are incorporated via the gravitational dressing needed to define both the infalling trajectory and the local observables probed by the detector in a diffeomorphism-invariant way. In the black hole exterior, a preferred choice of dressing to the Schwarzian mode of JT gravity can be motivated in connection to geometric modular flow. We show how to extend this dressing to the black hole interior, defining local observables that are gravitationally dressed to both boundaries in the thermofield double state. The gravitational dressing connects the near-horizon region to the IR sector of the Schwarzian theory, leading to measurable effects as the horizon is approached. We find that the infalling detector is able to locally determine the location of the horizon and its temperature, violating the equivalence principle, but without encountering a firewall.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. JT gravity on the worldline

    hep-th 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0

    Coupling a worldline observer to JT gravity replaces its evolution operator by an exactly computed average over fluctuating Euclidean times; the fluctuations are small in the disk but large on the double trumpet.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

99 extracted references · 81 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Rovelli,What Is Observable in Classical and Quantum Gravity?,Class

    C. Rovelli,What Is Observable in Classical and Quantum Gravity?,Class. Quant. Grav.8 (1991) 297

    1991

  2. [2]

    Giddings, D

    S.B. Giddings, D. Marolf and J.B. Hartle,Observables in effective gravity,Phys. Rev. D74 (2006) 064018 [hep-th/0512200]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  3. [3]

    Donnelly and S.B

    W. Donnelly and S.B. Giddings,Diffeomorphism-invariant observables and their nonlocal algebra,Phys. Rev. D93(2016) 024030 [1507.07921]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  4. [4]

    Donnelly and S.B

    W. Donnelly and S.B. Giddings,Observables, gravitational dressing, and obstructions to locality and subsystems,Phys. Rev. D94(2016) 104038 [1607.01025]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  5. [5]

    Goeller, P.A

    C. Goeller, P.A. Hoehn and J. Kirklin,Diffeomorphism-invariant observables and dynamical frames in gravity: reconciling bulk locality with general covariance,2206.01193

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  6. [6]

    Hamilton, D.N

    A. Hamilton, D.N. Kabat, G. Lifschytz and D.A. Lowe,Local bulk operators in AdS/CFT: A Boundary view of horizons and locality,Phys. Rev. D73(2006) 086003 [hep-th/0506118]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  7. [7]

    Hamilton, D.N

    A. Hamilton, D.N. Kabat, G. Lifschytz and D.A. Lowe,Holographic representation of local bulk operators,Phys. Rev. D74(2006) 066009 [hep-th/0606141]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  8. [8]

    Kraus, H

    P. Kraus, H. Ooguri and S. Shenker,Inside the horizon with AdS / CFT,Phys. Rev. D67 (2003) 124022 [hep-th/0212277]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  9. [9]

    Almheiri, D

    A. Almheiri, D. Marolf, J. Polchinski, D. Stanford and J. Sully,An Apologia for Firewalls, JHEP09(2013) 018 [1304.6483]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  10. [10]

    Marolf and J

    D. Marolf and J. Polchinski,Gauge/Gravity Duality and the Black Hole Interior,Phys. Rev. Lett.111(2013) 171301 [1307.4706]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  11. [11]

    Papadodimas and S

    K. Papadodimas and S. Raju,An Infalling Observer in AdS/CFT,JHEP10(2013) 212 [1211.6767]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  12. [12]

    Papadodimas and S

    K. Papadodimas and S. Raju,Black Hole Interior in the Holographic Correspondence and the Information Paradox,Phys. Rev. Lett.112(2014) 051301 [1310.6334]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  13. [13]

    Papadodimas and S

    K. Papadodimas and S. Raju,State-Dependent Bulk-Boundary Maps and Black Hole Complementarity,Phys. Rev. D89(2014) 086010 [1310.6335]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  14. [14]

    Grinberg and J

    M. Grinberg and J. Maldacena,Proper time to the black hole singularity from thermal one-point functions,JHEP03(2021) 131 [2011.01004]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  15. [15]

    Leutheusser and H

    S.A.W. Leutheusser and H. Liu,Emergent Times in Holographic Duality,Phys. Rev. D108 (2023) 086020 [2112.12156]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  16. [16]

    Maldacena,Eternal black holes in anti-de Sitter,JHEP04(2003) 021 [hep-th/0106112]

    J.M. Maldacena,Eternal black holes in anti-de Sitter,JHEP04(2003) 021 [hep-th/0106112]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  17. [17]

    Hamilton, D.N

    A. Hamilton, D.N. Kabat, G. Lifschytz and D.A. Lowe,Local bulk operators in AdS/CFT: A Holographic description of the black hole interior,Phys. Rev. D75(2007) 106001 [hep-th/0612053]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  18. [18]

    Lewkowycz, G.J

    A. Lewkowycz, G.J. Turiaci and H. Verlinde,A CFT Perspective on Gravitational Dressing and Bulk Locality,JHEP01(2017) 004 [1608.08977]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  19. [19]

    Almheiri, T

    A. Almheiri, T. Anous and A. Lewkowycz,Inside out: meet the operators inside the horizon. On bulk reconstruction behind causal horizons,JHEP01(2018) 028 [1707.06622]. – 48 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  20. [20]

    Jafferis and L

    D.L. Jafferis and L. Lamprou,Inside the hologram: reconstructing the bulk observer’s experience,JHEP03(2022) 084 [2009.04476]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  21. [21]

    Gao and L

    P. Gao and L. Lamprou,Seeing behind black hole horizons in SYK,JHEP06(2022) 143 [2111.14010]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  22. [22]

    de Boer, D.L

    J. de Boer, D.L. Jafferis and L. Lamprou,On black hole interior reconstruction, singularities and the emergence of time,2211.16512

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  23. [23]

    Leutheusser and H

    S. Leutheusser and H. Liu,Subregion-subalgebra duality: Emergence of space and time in holography,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 066021 [2212.13266]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  24. [24]

    Leutheusser and H

    S. Leutheusser and H. Liu,Causal connectability between quantum systems and the black hole interior in holographic duality,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 086019 [2110.05497]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  25. [25]

    Van Raamsdonk,Building up spacetime with quantum entanglement,Gen

    M. Van Raamsdonk,Building up spacetime with quantum entanglement,Gen. Rel. Grav.42 (2010) 2323 [1005.3035]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  26. [26]

    Jackiw,Lower Dimensional Gravity,Nucl

    R. Jackiw,Lower Dimensional Gravity,Nucl. Phys.B252(1985) 343

    1985

  27. [27]

    Teitelboim,Gravitation and Hamiltonian Structure in Two Space-Time Dimensions, Phys

    C. Teitelboim,Gravitation and Hamiltonian Structure in Two Space-Time Dimensions, Phys. Lett.126B(1983) 41

    1983

  28. [28]

    Almheiri and J

    A. Almheiri and J. Polchinski,Models of AdS 2 backreaction and holography,JHEP11(2015) 014 [1402.6334]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  29. [29]

    Mertens and G.J

    T.G. Mertens and G.J. Turiaci,Solvable models of quantum black holes: a review on Jackiw–Teitelboim gravity,Living Rev. Rel.26(2023) 4 [2210.10846]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  30. [30]

    Fabbri and J

    A. Fabbri and J. Navarro-Salas,Modeling black hole evaporation, World Scientific, Singapore (2005), 10.1142/p378

    doi:10.1142/p378 2005

  31. [31]

    Nayak, A

    P. Nayak, A. Shukla, R.M. Soni, S.P. Trivedi and V. Vishal,On the Dynamics of Near-Extremal Black Holes,JHEP09(2018) 048 [1802.09547]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  32. [32]

    Iliesiu and G.J

    L.V. Iliesiu and G.J. Turiaci,The statistical mechanics of near-extremal black holes,JHEP 05(2021) 145 [2003.02860]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  33. [33]

    Turiaci,Les Houches lectures on two-dimensional gravity and holography,SciPost Phys

    G.J. Turiaci,Les Houches lectures on two-dimensional gravity and holography,SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes113(2026) 1 [2412.09537]

    arXiv 2026

  34. [34]

    Jensen,Chaos in AdS 2 Holography,Phys

    K. Jensen,Chaos in AdS 2 Holography,Phys. Rev. Lett.117(2016) 111601 [1605.06098]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  35. [35]

    Maldacena, D

    J. Maldacena, D. Stanford and Z. Yang,Conformal symmetry and its breaking in two dimensional Nearly Anti-de-Sitter space,PTEP2016(2016) 12C104 [1606.01857]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  36. [36]

    Engels¨ oy, T.G

    J. Engels¨ oy, T.G. Mertens and H. Verlinde,An investigation of AdS 2 backreaction and holography,JHEP07(2016) 139 [1606.03438]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  37. [37]

    Franken, T.G

    V. Franken, T.G. Mertens, and B. de S. L. Torres,To appear,

  38. [38]

    Blommaert, T.G

    A. Blommaert, T.G. Mertens and H. Verschelde,Clocks and Rods in Jackiw-Teitelboim Quantum Gravity,JHEP09(2019) 060 [1902.11194]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  39. [39]

    Mertens,Towards Black Hole Evaporation in Jackiw-Teitelboim Gravity,JHEP07 (2019) 097 [1903.10485]

    T.G. Mertens,Towards Black Hole Evaporation in Jackiw-Teitelboim Gravity,JHEP07 (2019) 097 [1903.10485]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  40. [40]

    Blommaert, T.G

    A. Blommaert, T.G. Mertens and H. Verschelde,Unruh detectors and quantum chaos in JT gravity,JHEP03(2021) 086 [2005.13058]. – 49 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  41. [41]

    De Vuyst and T.G

    J. De Vuyst and T.G. Mertens,Operational islands and black hole dissipation in JT gravity, JHEP01(2023) 027 [2207.03351]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  42. [42]

    Mertens, T

    T.G. Mertens, T. Tappeiner and B. de S. L. Torres,Fiducial observers and the thermal atmosphere in the black hole quantum throat,JHEP04(2026) 145 [2507.20983]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  43. [43]

    Witten,Gravity and the crossed product,JHEP10(2022) 008 [2112.12828]

    E. Witten,Gravity and the crossed product,JHEP10(2022) 008 [2112.12828]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  44. [44]

    Witten,APS Medal for Exceptional Achievement in Research: Invited article on entanglement properties of quantum field theory,Rev

    E. Witten,APS Medal for Exceptional Achievement in Research: Invited article on entanglement properties of quantum field theory,Rev. Mod. Phys.90(2018) 045003 [1803.04993]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  45. [45]

    Araki,Type of von Neumann Algebra Associated with Free Field,Prog

    H. Araki,Type of von Neumann Algebra Associated with Free Field,Prog. Theor. Phys.32 (1964) 956

    1964

  46. [46]

    Driessler,On the Type of Local Algebras in Quantum Field Theory,Commun

    W. Driessler,On the Type of Local Algebras in Quantum Field Theory,Commun. Math. Phys.53(1977) 295

    1977

  47. [47]

    Chandrasekaran, R

    V. Chandrasekaran, R. Longo, G. Penington and E. Witten,An algebra of observables for de Sitter space,JHEP02(2023) 082 [2206.10780]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  48. [48]

    Chandrasekaran, G

    V. Chandrasekaran, G. Penington and E. Witten,Large N algebras and generalized entropy, JHEP04(2023) 009 [2209.10454]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  49. [49]

    Ali Ahmad and R

    S. Ali Ahmad and R. Jefferson,Crossed product algebras and generalized entropy for subregions,SciPost Phys. Core7(2024) 020 [2306.07323]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  50. [50]

    Jensen, J

    K. Jensen, J. Sorce and A.J. Speranza,Generalized entropy for general subregions in quantum gravity,JHEP12(2023) 020 [2306.01837]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  51. [51]

    Fewster, D.W

    J.C. Fewster, D.W. Janssen, L.D. Loveridge, K. Rejzner and J. Waldron,Quantum Reference Frames, Measurement Schemes and the Type of Local Algebras in Quantum Field Theory, Commun. Math. Phys.406(2025) 19 [2403.11973]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  52. [52]

    Unruh,Notes on black-hole evaporation,Phys

    W.G. Unruh,Notes on black-hole evaporation,Phys. Rev. D14(1976) 870

    1976

  53. [53]

    DeWitt,Quantum gravity: the new synthesis, inGeneral Relativity: An Einstein Centenary Survey, pp

    B.S. DeWitt,Quantum gravity: the new synthesis, inGeneral Relativity: An Einstein Centenary Survey, pp. 680–745, Cambridge University Press, (1980)

    1980

  54. [54]

    Candelas and D.W

    P. Candelas and D.W. Sciama,Irreversible thermodynamics of black holes,Phys. Rev. Lett. 38(1977) 1372

    1977

  55. [55]

    Reznik,Entanglement from the vacuum,Found

    B. Reznik,Entanglement from the vacuum,Found. Phys.33(2003) 167

    2003

  56. [56]

    Reznik, A

    B. Reznik, A. Retzker and J. Silman,Violating Bell’s inequalities in the vacuum,Phys. Rev. A71(2005) 042104 [quant-ph/0310058]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  57. [57]

    Polo-G´ omez, L.J

    J. Polo-G´ omez, L.J. Garay and E. Mart´ ın-Mart´ ınez,A detector-based measurement theory for quantum field theory,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 065003

    2022

  58. [58]

    Pozas-Kerstjens and E

    A. Pozas-Kerstjens and E. Mart´ ın-Mart´ ınez,Harvesting correlations from the quantum vacuum,Phys. Rev. D92(2015) 064042

    2015

  59. [59]

    B. de S. L. Torres, K. Wurtz, J. Polo-G´ omez and E. Mart´ ın-Mart´ ınez,Entanglement structure of quantum fields through local probes,JHEP05(2023) 058 [2301.08775]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  60. [60]

    Mertens, G.J

    T.G. Mertens, G.J. Turiaci and H.L. Verlinde,Solving the Schwarzian via the Conformal Bootstrap,JHEP08(2017) 136 [1705.08408]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  61. [61]

    Almheiri, D

    A. Almheiri, D. Marolf, J. Polchinski and J. Sully,Black Holes: Complementarity or Firewalls?,JHEP02(2013) 062 [1207.3123]. – 50 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  62. [62]

    Bousso,Complementarity Is Not Enough,Phys

    R. Bousso,Complementarity Is Not Enough,Phys. Rev. D87(2013) 124023 [1207.5192]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  63. [63]

    Nomura, J

    Y. Nomura, J. Varela and S.J. Weinberg,Complementarity Endures: No Firewall for an Infalling Observer,JHEP03(2013) 059 [1207.6626]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  64. [64]

    Harlow and P

    D. Harlow and P. Hayden,Quantum Computation vs. Firewalls,JHEP06(2013) 085 [1301.4504]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  65. [65]

    Stanford and Z

    D. Stanford and Z. Yang,Firewalls from wormholes,2208.01625

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  66. [66]

    Blommaert, C.-H

    A. Blommaert, C.-H. Chen and Y. Nomura,Firewalls at exponentially late times,JHEP10 (2024) 131 [2403.07049]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  67. [67]

    Chandrasekaran,Smooth horizons from topology change in canonical quantum gravity, 2606.06404

    V. Chandrasekaran,Smooth horizons from topology change in canonical quantum gravity, 2606.06404

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  68. [68]

    Harlow and D

    D. Harlow and D. Jafferis,The Factorization Problem in Jackiw-Teitelboim Gravity,JHEP 02(2020) 177 [1804.01081]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  69. [69]

    Danielsson, E

    U.H. Danielsson, E. Keski-Vakkuri and M. Kruczenski,Vacua, propagators, and holographic probes in AdS / CFT,JHEP01(1999) 002 [hep-th/9812007]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  70. [70]

    Spradlin and A

    M. Spradlin and A. Strominger,Vacuum states for AdS(2) black holes,JHEP11(1999) 021 [hep-th/9904143]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  71. [71]

    Fewster, B.A

    C.J. Fewster, B.A. Ju´ arez-Aubry and J. Louko,Asymptotically thermal responses for smoothly switched detectors, in14th Marcel Grossmann Meeting on Recent Developments in Theoretical and Experimental General Relativity, Astrophysics, and Relativistic Field Theories, vol. 4, pp. 3801–3806, 2017, DOI [1511.00701]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  72. [72]

    Fewster, B.A

    C.J. Fewster, B.A. Ju´ arez-Aubry and J. Louko,Waiting for Unruh,Class. Quant. Grav.33 (2016) 165003 [1605.01316]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  73. [73]

    Shallue and S.M

    C.J. Shallue and S.M. Carroll,What Hawking radiation looks like as you fall into a black hole,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 085013 [2501.06609]

    arXiv 2025

  74. [74]

    Bagrets, A

    D. Bagrets, A. Altland and A. Kamenev,Sachdev–Ye–Kitaev model as Liouville quantum mechanics,Nucl. Phys. B911(2016) 191 [1607.00694]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  75. [75]

    Yang,The Quantum Gravity Dynamics of Near Extremal Black Holes,JHEP05(2019) 205 [1809.08647]

    Z. Yang,The Quantum Gravity Dynamics of Near Extremal Black Holes,JHEP05(2019) 205 [1809.08647]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  76. [76]

    Blommaert, T.G

    A. Blommaert, T.G. Mertens and H. Verschelde,The Schwarzian Theory - A Wilson Line Perspective,JHEP12(2018) 022 [1806.07765]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  77. [77]

    Iliesiu, S.S

    L.V. Iliesiu, S.S. Pufu, H. Verlinde and Y. Wang,An exact quantization of Jackiw-Teitelboim gravity,JHEP11(2019) 091 [1905.02726]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  78. [78]

    Lam, T.G

    H.T. Lam, T.G. Mertens, G.J. Turiaci and H. Verlinde,Shockwave S-matrix from Schwarzian Quantum Mechanics,JHEP11(2018) 182 [1804.09834]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  79. [79]

    Satz,Then again, how often does the Unruh-DeWitt detector click if we switch it carefully?,Class

    A. Satz,Then again, how often does the Unruh-DeWitt detector click if we switch it carefully?,Class. Quant. Grav.24(2007) 1719 [gr-qc/0611067]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  80. [80]

    Louko,Unruh-DeWitt detector response across a Rindler firewall is finite,JHEP09 (2014) 142 [1407.6299]

    J. Louko,Unruh-DeWitt detector response across a Rindler firewall is finite,JHEP09 (2014) 142 [1407.6299]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

Showing first 80 references.