Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Towards LLM-guided Causal Explainability for Black-box Text Classifiers

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2309.13340 v2 pith:HEJEZSVL submitted 2023-09-23 cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG

Towards LLM-guided Causal Explainability for Black-box Text Classifiers

classification cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG
keywords explainabilitytextfeaturesblack-boxcausalexplanationinputllms
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

With the advent of larger and more complex deep learning models, such as in Natural Language Processing (NLP), model qualities like explainability and interpretability, albeit highly desirable, are becoming harder challenges to tackle and solve. For example, state-of-the-art models in text classification are black-box by design. Although standard explanation methods provide some degree of explainability, these are mostly correlation-based methods and do not provide much insight into the model. The alternative of causal explainability is more desirable to achieve but extremely challenging in NLP due to a variety of reasons. Inspired by recent endeavors to utilize Large Language Models (LLMs) as experts, in this work, we aim to leverage the instruction-following and textual understanding capabilities of recent state-of-the-art LLMs to facilitate causal explainability via counterfactual explanation generation for black-box text classifiers. To do this, we propose a three-step pipeline via which, we use an off-the-shelf LLM to: (1) identify the latent or unobserved features in the input text, (2) identify the input features associated with the latent features, and finally (3) use the identified input features to generate a counterfactual explanation. We experiment with our pipeline on multiple NLP text classification datasets, with several recent LLMs, and present interesting and promising findings.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Mind the Prompt: Self-adaptive Generation of Task Plan Explanations via LLMs

    cs.AI 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    COMPASS formalizes prompt engineering as a POMDP-based cognitive decision process for self-adaptive generation of task plan explanations via LLMs.

  2. Quantifying Trust: Financial Risk Management for Trustworthy AI Agents

    cs.AI 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    The paper introduces the Agentic Risk Standard (ARS) as a payment settlement framework that delivers predefined compensation for AI agent execution failures, misalignment, or unintended outcomes.